National Academies Press: OpenBook

Alternative Technologies for the Destruction of Chemical Agents and Munitions (1993)

Chapter: CHARACTERISTICS OF ALTERNATIVE DESTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES

« Previous: REQUIREMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS
Suggested Citation:"CHARACTERISTICS OF ALTERNATIVE DESTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES." National Research Council. 1993. Alternative Technologies for the Destruction of Chemical Agents and Munitions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2218.
×
Page 5

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 political process when determining a technology's acceptability. Precise estimates of development times are also hard to make, because these times will depend on the quality and level of development effort. The committee estimated that about 12 years are typically required for a technology to progress from concept through demonstration. Once a technology is demonstrated, time for construction and startup of a production facility would probably be similar to that for the existing program, in which design, construction, and systematization of a facility require about 5 years. • Costs must ultimately be considered. The committee decided that cost estimates were premature until the number of options is narrowed and more detail about them is known. Thus, no cost projections are made here. However, the committee believes that the selection of any alternative technology would likely incur additional program costs, largely because of technical development requirements and program delays. CHARACTERISTICS OF ALTERNATIVE DESTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES In characterizing alternative processes and technologies for chemical weapons destruction, the committee focused on the following: • Functional performance. The capability of the technology to treat or process the different agents, solid parts, explosives, propellants, dunnage, and air streams; the liquid, solid, and gas waste streams generated; and any requirements for further treatment of solid parts or waste streams. • Engineering factors. The degree and manner in which engineering factors (e.g., explosion potential or extreme conditions such as very high pressures or corrosivity) may affect a technology's effectiveness, its potential for successful development, and its safety and hazard potential during operation. • Development status. The development and demonstration stage of the technology (whether laboratory, conceptual design, pilot plant, in commercial use for similar operations, or used previously to destroy one or more chemical warfare agents). Development status is an indicator of the time required for full development. As discussed above, this time is difficult to estimate because it is determined by many factors, such as the level of development effort. Typically, to progress through the end of demonstration from the laboratory stage takes 9 to 12 years; from the conceptual design stage, 10 to 11 years; from the pilot plant stage, 7.5 to 9 years; and from the beginning of demonstration itself, 3 years (see Table 4-2).

Next: Low-Temperature, Low-Pressure, Liquid-Phase Detoxification »
Alternative Technologies for the Destruction of Chemical Agents and Munitions Get This Book
×
 Alternative Technologies for the Destruction of Chemical Agents and Munitions
Buy Paperback | $95.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The U.S. Army Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program was established with the goal of destroying the nation's stockpile of lethal unitary chemical weapons. Since 1990 the U.S. Army has been testing a baseline incineration technology on Johnston Island in the southern Pacific Ocean. Under the planned disposal program, this baseline technology will be imported in the mid to late 1990s to continental United States disposal facilities; construction will include eight stockpile storage sites.

In early 1992 the Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies was formed by the National Research Council to investigate potential alternatives to the baseline technology. This book, the result of its investigation, addresses the use of alternative destruction technologies to replace, partly or wholly, or to be used in addition to the baseline technology. The book considers principal technologies that might be applied to the disposal program, strategies that might be used to manage the stockpile, and combinations of technologies that might be employed.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!