National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$33.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dual-Use Technologies and Export Control in the Post-Cold War Era (1994)
Office of International Affairs (OIA)

Citation Manager

. "Basic Trends in the Development of Mechanisms for Controlling the Export of Dual-Use Products." Dual-Use Technologies and Export Control in the Post-Cold War Era. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1994.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
146
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Dual-Use Technologies and Export Administration in the Post-Cold War Era: Documents from a Joint Program of the National Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences

In our view, it is vitally important to develop and pass a law on export control, that is generally analogous to existing American legislation on this topic. The law must clearly define the spheres and forms of strategic regulation, including in the area of weapons of mass destruction. It must also divide and assign authorities and functions to the various governmental bodies in the CIS. This will also increase the international standing of our country and make our foreign partners more willing to work with us on resolving rather delicate questions. It would be advisable to publish the export control lists so that they might be used by our manufacturers in their day-to-day export business.

In the international arena, the CIS must engage in active cooperation with the leading countries and declare its willingness to participate as an equal partner in existing multilateral export control mechanisms regarding weapons of mass destruction. This is particularly important in view of the fact that many Western specialists view our country's participation in the multilateral control system for weapons nonproliferation as one condition for easing the export regime on shipments of up-to-date types of equipment to the CIS. It appears that such an initiative on our part would be greeted with satisfaction, since Western nations interested in coordinating their nonproliferation activities with the CIS are currently discussing various ways of improving export controls on weapons of mass destruction. A possible first step might be a declaration of willingness to take part in joint activities to improve the effectiveness of existing export control regimes regarding nuclear, chemical and missile weapons.

We believe that the CIS should support the idea of creating a body under the aegis of the UN Security Council to address the nonproliferation of nuclear missiles and chemical and bacteriological weapons. This body must include an inspection mechanism, as well as an effective means of ensuring compliance. COCOM might be used as the operating arm of this Security Council organ.

Finally, we must remember that the West and particularly the United States will be closely monitoring the actions of the CIS in this area and modifying their own policies in accordance with what they observe. This being the case, an insufficiently responsible approach to the question of strategic regulation will ultimately hinder the integration of our country into the world economy. It is therefore in our interest to study carefully and utilize the experience amassed in similar export regulation efforts in the West in order to strengthen our own control services.

Page
146
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Executive Summary (1-2)
Dual-Use Technologies and Export Administration in the Post-Cold War Era: A Joint Statement of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences (3-32)
Papers Presented at the Third National Academy of Sciences-Russian Academy of Sciences Joint Meeting on Dual-Use Technologies, December 12-20, 1992 (33-34)
High-Performance Computing: Countrollability and Cooperation (35-56)
An Assessment of the Controllability of Dual-Use Technologies: Optoelectronic Devices (57-76)
American Contribution for the Joint Paper of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences Working Groups on Structural (Functional) Materials (77-86)
Russian Contribution for the Joint Paper of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences Working Groups on Structural (Functional) Materials (87-96)
High-Precision Weapons as a Phenomenon of the Twenty-first Century (97-104)
High-Precision Weapons (105-106)
Thesis of a Speech on Dual-Use Technologies and Export Control (107-110)
Conceptual Approaches to the Problem of Dual-Use Technologies (111-116)
A Binocular View of the Issues Associated With Dual-Use-Technologies: Two is Enough to Have a Fight, It Takes More to Keep the Peace (117-120)
Papers Presented at the Second National Academy of Sciences-Russian Academy of Sciences Joint Meeting on Dual-Use Technologies, May 26-29, 1992 (121-122)
A Conceptual Approach to Addressing Dual-Use Technologies: A Framework for U.S.-Russian Dialogue (123-130)
Joint Concept of U.S. and Russian Provisions for the Ensurance of Global Stability Under Conditions of the New World Order (131-138)
Basic Trends in the Development of Mechanisms for Controlling the Export of Dual-Use Products (139-146)
Control of Dual-Use Technologies: A Businessman's Recommendation for Preserving the Military and Economic Security of the United States (147-154)
The Justification for Establishing in Russia a Commission on Non-Proliferation of Potentially Strategically Dangerous Technologies (155-160)
Main Goals of the Proposed Commissions of the Cabinet of Russian Ministers on the Containment of Potentially Strategically Dangerous Technologies and Weapons (161-162)
Application of Verification to Dual-Use Technology Export Controls and Related Issues (163-176)
Critical Professions and Categories of Scientists and Engineers, Principles of the Professional and Social Motivation of Their Activities, and Rational Employment Under Conditions of Science Conversion in Russia (177-180)
Case Studies (181-188)
Economic Incentives Conversion and Dual-Use Technologies: The Case of Russia (189-198)
Appendix I: Participants and Agenda for the Third U.S. National Academy of Sciences-Russian Academy of Sciences Joint Meeting on Dual Use Technologies, Decmeber 12-20 1992 Moscow (199-204)
Appendix II: Participants, Agenda, and Initial Framework for the Second U.S. National Academy of Sciences-Russian Academy of Sciences Joint Meeting on Dual-Use Technologies, May 12-20, 1992, Washington, D.C. (205-214)
Appendix III: Participants and Protocol from the First U.S. National Academy of Sciences-Russian Academy of Sciences Exploratory Meeting on Dual Use Technologies, December 13-21, 1991, Moscow and Perm, Russia (215-220)