National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$34.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Lost Crops of Africa: Volume I: Grains (1996)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix H: Notes on Nutritional Charts." Lost Crops of Africa: Volume I: Grains. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1996.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
361
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Lost Crops of Africa: Volume I, Grains

was devised specifically for this project, but comparable approaches could be employed equally well in Africa.*

The maize and rice values against which the African grains are compared in the bar graphs are taken from U.S. Department of Agriculture tables. The actual figures (converted to a dry-weight basis) are given below.

Component

Maize

Rice

Food energy (Kc)

408

406

Protein (g)

10.5

8.1

Carbohydrate (g)

83

90

Fat (g)

5.3

0.7

Fiber (g)

3.2

0.3

Ash (g)

1.3

0.7

Thiamin (mg)

0.43

0.08

Riboflavin (mg)

0.22

0.06

Niacin (mg)

4.1

1.8

Vitamin B6 (mg)

0.58

0.02

Folate (µg)

0.0

9.1

Pantothenic acid (mg)

0.47

1.15

Calcium (mg)

8

32

Copper (mg)

0.35

0.25

Iron (mg)

3.0

0.9

Magnesium (mg)

142

130

Manganese (mg)

0.55

1.1

Phosphorus (mg)

234

130

Potassium (mg)

320

130

Sodium (mg)

39

6

Zinc (mg)

2.5

1.2

In each of the essential-amino-acid bar graphs, the figures were compared on the basis of the amounts occurring in the protein of each grain (that is, grams per 100 grams of protein). In the other bar graphs, all nutrients were compared on a dry-weight basis so as to eliminate the distortions of different (and varying) amounts of moisture. Digestibility and other metabolic factors were not factored into the calculations. For vitamin A, the values for Retinol Equivalents were derived using standard formulas to convert literature figures given for carotenoids, ß-carotene, or International Units.

*  

The bar graphs were plotted electronically, so their resolution exceeds the standard error of the data (which is at minimum 10 percent). Duplicate data were discarded, and ranges were treated as separate values.

Page
361