Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Mineral Tolerance of Domestic Animals (1980)
Board on Agriculture (BOA)

Page
131
bottomleft bottomright
Page
131

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 131
Calcium Calcium (Ca), a white, silvery, alkaline earth metal, was discovered in 1808 by Sir Humphrey Davey. Its name was derived from the Latin word cabs, a name by which the oxide of the element was known to early Romans. Calcium does not occur in the free state, but its com- pounds are widely distributed in nature. It is the fifth most abundant element in the earth's crust and the most abundant cation in the animal body, comprising 1 to 2 percent of the total weight. Approximately 99 percent of the calcium in the animal body is found in the bones and teeth, with the remaining I percent widely distributed in venous soft tissues. Calcium has a very close interrelationship why phosphorus and vitamin D (Hegsted, 19731. ESSENTIALITY Calcium has been recognized as an essential element in animal nutrition for et least 100 years. Quantitatively, the participation of calcium in the formation of bone is its most important function. Bone acts not only as a supporting or structural component of the body, but also as a vital physiological tissue serving to provide a readily available source of calcium for maintenance of homeostasis. The 1 percent of the body's calcium outside of the bone functions in a number of essential pro- cesses and is found in extracellular fluid, soft tissue, and as a com- ponent of various membrane structures (Bronner, 19641. Calcium is 131

OCR for page 132
132 MINERAL TOLERANCE OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS involved in blood coagulation; it is necessary for muscle contractility, myocardial function, normal neuromuscular irritability, and integrity of intracellular cement substances and various membranes. Calcium is also an activator of numerous enzymes. METABOLISM There are many factors that influence the absorption, distnbution, and excretion of calcium. Calcium is absorbed from the intestine by an active transport mechanism. Vitamin D is required for this active trans- po~t, and there is strong evidence that a vitamin D-induced, calcium- binding protein plays a role (Wasserman and Corradino, 1973~. There is evidence that the active transport of calcium is regulated to meet the calcium needs of the body and is most active when dietary calcium is restricted or when the needs are great such as during pregnancy, lac- tation, and egg production (Wilis, 1973~. Calcium is also absorbed by passive ionic diffusion, a process that may be vitamin D dependent. The active process is believed to occur mainly in the proximal duodenum and the passive process in the remainder of the small intestine (Avioli, 19721. The level of calcium in serum, maintained remarkably constant at a concentration of about 10 mg/d} in most species, is regulated by para- thyroid hormone (PrH), calcitonin, and metabolically active vitamin D. It is believed that a slight decrease in serum calcium causes an increased secretion of PTH. PrH stimulates the biosynthesis of 1,2S-dihydroxy vitamin D3, which causes an increased absorption of calcium from the intestine and an increased resorption of calcium from bone. On the other hand, a slight increase in serum calcium results in a decrease in PTH secretion and an increase in calcitonin release. These changes effect a decreased production of 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3, causing a reduction in intestinal absorption and bone resorption of calcium (Tanaka et al., 1973~. Approximately 60 percent of the serum calcium is ionized and physiologically active. The remaining calcium is non~on~zed and physi- olog~cally inert; 35 percent of the serum calcium is bound to protein and 5 percent is complexed with citrate, bicarbonate, and phosphate (White e! al., 1968~. A significant decrease in serum ionized calcium results in tetany, while an increase can cause cardiac or respiratory failure Trough an impairment of muscle function (Bronner, 1964; Goodman and Gilman, 1975~. ' Calcium metabolism is influenced by a large number of factors. .

OCR for page 133
Calcium 133 Several reviews have presented detailed discussions (Nicolaysen et al., 1953; Rasmussen and DeI-uca, 1963; Bronner, 1964; Hegsted, 1973; Borie, 1973, 1974; Mueller et al., 1973; Schraer et al., 19731. SOURCES Calcium is present in variable amounts in almost all feedstuffs (National Research Council, 1971~. The calcium content of natural feeds varies widely, depending upon the species of plant, portion of plant fed, and stage of matunty. In general, grains such as barley, corn, rnilo, oats, and wheat are very low in calcium, having levels ranging from 0.02 to 0.10 percent. Noniegume roughages such as grass hay and mature range forages are intermediate in calcium content (0.31 to 0.36 percent), and legume forages such as alfalfa and clover hay contain 1.2 to 1.7 percent calcium. Several supplemental sources of calcium are used in animal diets, With the most common being ground limestone or calcium carbonate. Other common sources include oyster shell, calcium sulfate, calcium chlonde, calcium phosphates, and bone meal. These range in calcium content from 16 to 38 percent. TOXICOSIS Calcium compounds ingested obey are usually not considered toxic. The homeostatic mechanism of the animal tends to protect against the absorption of excessive quantities of the element; however, because of the interrelationship with other nutnents, especially phosphorus, the feeding of high or excessive levels of calcium for extended periods of time can have a detn mental effect on animal performance. Optimum animal performance is linked very closely with calcium and phosphorus levels in the diet. Most animals require a fairly narrow calcium-to- phosphorus ratio~suaDy no wider than 2: 1; however, ruminants can tolerate wider ratios than monogastr~c animals providing the phos- phorus level is adequate. The quantitative aspects of the dietary calcium-to-phosphorus ratios and subsequent animal performance are discussed in several recent reviews (Beeson et al., 1975; Harms et al., 1976; Pea, 19761. Partur~ent paresis (milk fever) resulting from calcium deficiency is a metabolic problem, primarily affecting high-producing dairy cows, which is probably related to endocrine function (Beeson et al., 1975~.

OCR for page 134
134 MINERAL TOLERANCE OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS Both the parathyroid gland and calciton~n-secreting cells of the thyroid may be involved. Dietary calcium intake prior to and during early lactation is important in influencing the capability of these glands to respond appropnately to the sudden change in metabolic demands for calcium imposed by lactation. Black et at. (1973) conducted a study with dairy cows in which they compared a high- and a tow-calcium diet. The high-calcium diet provided 150 g of calcium per cow daily, whereas the low-calcium diet provided 25 g. The phosphorus intake was 25 g per cow daily for each calcium level. They concluded that cows fed high- calcium `diets depend primarily upon intestinal absorption of calcium, whereas in cows receiving less calcium, the significance of the para- thyroid hormones in maintaining proper blood calcium levels is greater. They stated that the-long-term feeding of a high-calcium diet appears to suppress the chief celds of the parathyroids, so that they are less able to respond quickly to a hypocalcem~c condition. Dowe et al. (1957) studied the effect of excessive dietary calcium on growing beef calves. The animals were fed a diet that provided 12 g of phosphorus per day. Calcium-to-phosphorus ratios of 1.3:1, 4.3:1, 9.1: 1, and 13.7: 1 were compared by the addition of ground limestone. The two higher ratios depressed gain. Ammerman et al. (1963) reported that a level of 4.4 percent dietary calcium caused a significant depres- sion in protein and energy digestion by beef steers. Lewis et a]. (1951) found that excess calcium and a ration borderline in phosphorus con- tent reduced feed consumption and rate of gain of steer calves. The long-term nutritional effects of excessive dietary calcium on bulls was studied by Krook et al. (l971~. Relative intake varied from 3.5 times recommended requirements in young bulls to 5.9 times in old bulls. It was suggested that the excessive calcium intake resulted in hyper- secretion of calcitonin with the result that normal bone resorption was inhibited and bone mass increased. With adequate phosphorus, ruminant animals have been observed to perform satisfactorily with dietary calcium-to-phosphorus ratios between 1: 1 and 7 :1. Depressed performance has been observed with ratios above 7:1, but these effects were not as extreme as those below 1:1. Most investigators, however, suggest that calcium-to-phosphorus ratios for ruminants should be in the range of 1.5: I to 2: 1 (Beeson et al., 1975~. Fontenot- et al. (1964) fed calcium-to-phosphorus ratios of 1: 1, 2: 1, 4: 1, and 8: 1 (0.3 percent phosphorus) to lambs with and without sup- plemental zinc (100 ppm). When no supplemental zinc was fed, rate of gain tended to be decreased at the higher calcium levels (4: 1, S: 1~. Feed efficiency was depressed 9 percent when these high-calcium levels

OCR for page 135
Calcium 135 were fed (compared to 1:1~. In the zinc-supplemented groups, calcium level had no such effect on rate and efficiency of gain. Zimmerman e' al. (1963) conducted a series of experiments to deter- m~ne optimum calcium and phosphorus levels for maximum body weight gain, feed conversion, and metatarsal calcification of swine 2 to 7 weeks of age. High calcium levels in the diets reduced rate of body weight gain. In general, calcium-to-phosphorus ratios of 1.6: 1 or wider adversely influenced gains. High calcium levels in the diet (above 0.8 percent) reduced feed efficiency. The results of this work suggested a maximum dietary calcium level of 0.S percent and a minimum phos- phorus level of 0.6 percent for optimum performance and adequate skeletal development of young swine. Combs et al. (1966) observed that when the level of calcium was increased in the diet of young pigs from 0.48 percent to 0.~8 percent and to 1.32 percent, average daily gain and feed conversion decreased significantly. The highest level of calcium decreased apparent digestibility of calcium and dry matter. The skin disease, parakeratosis, can be induced by high levels of calcium. Luecke et al. (1956) produced a 100 percent incidence of parakeratosis in pigs on a diet with 1.5 percent calcium, 0.8 percent phosphorus, and 31 ppm zinc. The addition of 20 ppm of zinc to the diet essentially eliminated the disease. Newland et al. (1958) stated that pigs fed high- calcium diets had an accelerated rate of zinc metabolism, thereby increasing the requirement for zinc. A more complete review of the effect of dietary calcium levels in swine is presented by Peo (l976~. Urbana (1960) determined that levels of calcium carbonate above 3 percent of the diet (1.2 percent calcium) had an adverse effect on the body weight gains from a 4-week chick expenment. In a large-scale broiler trial by Smith and Taylor (1961), significantly different growth rate and feed conversion values were detected between groups fed either 0.83 or 1.35 percent calcium with a phosphorus level of 0.52 percent for a 10-week feeding period, with the O.X3 percent treatment being superior. Fangauf et al. (1961) fed chicks with diets containing 1.2, 2.0, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.5 percent calcium and concluded that broiler diets should not contain over 2 percent calcium. Levels above this significantly depressed feed intake and body weight gain and increased mortality. Shane et al. (1969) reported on a growing pullet study show- ing that levels of calcium above 2.5 percent fed between ~ and 20 weeks of age would cause nephrosis, visceral gout, calcium urate deposits, and high mortality. Parathyroid size and activity were reduced, along with feed consumption and weight gains. They recommended that diets should not contain more than 1.2 percent calcium for pullets under 18

OCR for page 136
136 MINERAL TOLERANCE OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS to 20 weeks of age. There are conflicting reports on the eject of excess calcium in the diet of laying hens. Gutowska and Parkhurst (1942) repotted that a high level (3.95 percent) of calcium in the diet decreased egg production and feed efficiency. There was no significant difference In eggshell breaking strength or egg weight. MacIntyre et al. (1963) reported that levels of dietary calcium up to 6 percent did not depress egg production, feed efficiency, or egg weight. Hanns and Waldroup (1971) also found that calcium levels up to 5 percent did not significantly affect the rate of egg production, egg weight, eggshell thick ness, or feed consumption per hen per day during the 4-month feeding period. There is evidence that levels of calcium greater than 1 percent in the diet may have an adverse effect on the growth of laboratory animals (Davis, 1959~. Goto and Sawamura (1973) reported that rats fed high- calcium diets (2.83 percent added calcium) had significant weight loss and decreased absorption and retention of nitrogen when compared to the control group (0.72 percent added calcium). Increasing the calcium level in the diet (above 1 percent) can have a depressing effect upon the utilization of other nutrients in the diet, including protein, fats, vita- m~ns, the macrom~neral elements phosphorus and magnesium—and Me trace mineral elements, especially iron, iodine, zinc, and manga- nese (Davis, 19591. In those instances where the intake of these nutrients is just adequate, increasing the calcium in me diet may have a markedly adverse effect and may produce a deficiency of the other nutrients. There are many factors that influence the absorption, distribution, and excretion of calcium (Church and Pond, 19741. The level of dietary phosphorus, the ratio of calcium to phosphorus, and the level of dietary vitamin D are the most important. MAXIMUM TOLERABLE LEVELS Many sources of calcium are inexpensive, and animals have a tolerance for widely diffenng levels in the diet. This has often led to the neglect of dietary calcium levels and their balance with other nutrients, primacy mineral elements. Except for the laying hen, which has a high requirement for calcium, it is inadvisable to maintain dietary calcium levels much above 1 percent. Experiments with most species have shown that optimum animal performance is obtained when the ratio of calcium to phosphorus in the diet is in the range of approximately 1.5: 1 to 2: 1. If adequate amounts of phosphorus are included in the diet, then a wider ratio of calcium to phosphorus can be tolerated. In ruminant

OCR for page 137
Calcium 137 animals, diets with a ratio of calcium to phosphorus as wide as 7: 1 have performed satisfactorily; however, the phosphorus has been present at levels weD above that which is considered a requirement level. Assuming the presence of adequate levels of dietary phosphorus, the foBow~ng calcium levels can be tolerated; however, depending on the age and production status of the animal, even these levels may reduce performance: cattle, 2 percent; sheep, 2 percent; swine, 1 per- cent; poultry, 1.2 percent; laying hen, 4 percent; horse, 2 percent; rabbit, 2 percent. SU~AlRY Calcium does not occur in the free state, but its compounds are widely distributed and it is the most abundant cation in the animal body. It is an essential element in animal nutrition and serves a principal role in bone formation, as wed as a number of other physiological processes. Primary factors that influence the metabolism of calcium include phos- phorus, vitamin D, hormonal systems, and the age of the animal. Calcium compounds ingested orally are usually not considered toxic. The homeostatic mechanism of the animal tends to protect against the absorption of excessive quantities of the element; however, because of the interrelationship with other nutrients, especially phosphorus, the feeding of high or excessive levels of calcium for extended periods of time can have a detrimental effect on animal performance. The addition of extra calcium to an otherwise adequate diet may precipitate a deficiency of other essential elements, i.e., phosphorus, magnesium, ~on, iodine, zinc, and manganese. In every case, it appears that the injurious effect of the calcium is due to an interaction rather than to a harmful effect of the calcium itself. Additional quanti- ties of the respective elements wiB overcome the adverse effect of the calcium similar to that observed by reducing the level of calcium in the diet. A relationship also exists between high dietary calcium and the utilization of protein and fat. Because of the intricate interrelations between calcium metabolism and that of other nutnents, caution must be observed when calcium supplements are being added to the diet.

OCR for page 138
~: 8) - LU - 3 o U. Ct a c . o . - Ct - . ~: ·E ~0 . C~ Ct v o CO - .. . m _ q~ _ _ , _ ~ e E— E_ E E E O ~ E: 2 ~i; O :i .E ˘: Q ~ ~ ~ ~ cn S _ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ·— Le c. ~ c: ~ ~ ._ ~ '5 3 ~ s ce — - ._ o .~ ~ a ~ U. c o ee cn e ._ e E 2 i D— , e E li i ~ o ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E - ·o ~ ~ ~o ~ _ ~ _ .~ o ~ e _ ~ C E ·— cd u, ~ ou _ ~ {_ .- ~ ~ ft! ·_ ·_ ~ ~ 00 too S o ~4 ~ ~ .o ~ a ~ r~ - o _ ~ 3 ._ ._ ·a o ce O · a oo o _ 0- P" ~ ~ a' E ~ e 2 -—t. ° 0 ~ = ~ E O c e ~ ~ '. 5 a U Z i ~ U U `~ s 3 138 .

OCR for page 139
~ ~ - ~ sE ~ J^ § ~ ° ~ On ~ E 5 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d d I , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ it, _ 3 ~ .00 ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ." D ~ _ _. .cn ~ ~ ~ o _ v' m u, ~ ~ 4~ V (t~ — _ ._ ._ ._ ._ ._ ~ ~ ~ a a 3 3 3 3 ~ _ ° V E ~ so,. ~ c: o V ct o V to et - ct V =~ a' ~ n ~ ~ E ~ i;; ~ x ~c' - q' ° _ \e ·° ~c' '~` ~ ~ ~ ~ · ~ C~$ ~ (~ eP' ~ .~ 00 ° ~ ° I_ s 0 0 0 0 0 CC oa .= ~ 3 D - - - ~— O 7 C ~ ~ .C3 ~ .', .~ U. ~ V C) 139 os - c~ ct ._ ct o ~ | Z

OCR for page 140
140 MINERAL TOLERANCE OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS REFERENCES Ammerman, C. B., L. R. Amngton, M. C. Jayaswal, R. L. Shirley, and G. K. Davis. 1963. Effect of dietary calcium and phosphorus levels on nutrient digestibility by steers. J. Anim. Sci. 22:248. Avioli, L. V. 1972. Intestinal absorption of calcium. Arch. Int. Med. 129:345. Beeson, W. M., T. W. Perry, N. L. Jacobson, K. D. Wiggers, and G. N. Jacobson. 1975. Calcium in Beef and Dairy Nutrition. National Feed Ingredients Association, Des Moines, Iowa. Black, H. E., C. C. Capen, and C. D. Arnaud. 1973. Ultrastructure of parathyroid glands and plasma immunoreactive parathyroid hormone in pregnant cows fed normal and 0th calcium diets. Lab. Invest. 29:173. Borle, A. B. 1973. Calcium metabolism at the cellular level. Fed. Proc. 32:1944. Borle, A. B. 1974. Calcium and phosphate metabolism. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 36:361. Bronner, F. 1964. Dynamics and function of calcium, pp. 341 4$4. In C. L. Comar and F. Bronner, eds., Mineral Metabolism, vol. 2, part A. Academic Press, New York. Church, D. C., and W. G. Pond. 1974. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding. D. C. Church, Corvallis, Oreg. Combs, G. E., T. H. Be'Ty, H. D. Wallace, and R. C. Crum, Jr. 1966. Levels and sources of vitamin D for pigs fed diets containing varying quantities of calcium. J. Anim. Sci. 25:827. Davis, G. K. 1959. Effects of high calcium intakes on the absorption of other nutnents. Fed. Proc. 18:1119. Dowe, T. W., J. Matsushima, and V. H. Arthaud. 1957. The effects of adequate and excessive calcium when fed with adequate phosphorus in growing rations for beef calves. J. Anim. Sci. 16:811. Fangauf, R., H. Vogt, and W. Penner. 1961. Studies of calcium tolerance in chickens. Arch. Geflugelk. 25:82. Fontenot, J. P., R. F. Miller, and N. O. Price. 1964. Ejects of calcium level and zinc supplementation of fattening lamb rations. J. Anim. Sci. 23:874. Goodman, L. S., and A. Gilman. 1975. We Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 5th ed. The Macmillan Company, New York. Goto, S., and T. Sawamura. 1973. Effect of excess calcium intake on absorption of nitrogen, fat, phosphorus, and calcium in young rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminal. 19:355. Gutowska, M. S., and R. T. Parkhurst. 1942. Studies in mineral nutrition of laying hens. 11. Excess of calcium in the diet. Poult. Sci. 21:321. Harms, R. H., and P. W. Waldroup. 1971. The effect of 0th dietary calcium on the performance of laying hens. (Research Notes) Poult. Sci. 50:967. Harms, R. H., B. L. Damron, D. A. Roland, and L. M. Potter. 1976. Calcium in Broiler, Layer and Turkey Nutrition. National Peed Ingredients Association, Des Moines, Iowa. Hegsted, D. M. 1973. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, 5th ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia. Krook, L., L. Lutwak, K. McEntee, P. A. Hendrickson, K. Braun, and S. Roberts. 1~1. Nutritional hypercalcitonism in bulls. Cornell Vet. 61:625. Lewis, J. K., W. H. Burkitt, and F. S. Willson. 1951. The effect of excess calcium with borderline and deficient phosphorus in rations of steer calves. J. Anim. Sci. 10:1053. Luecke, R. W., J. A. Hoefer, W. S. Brammell, and F. Twerp, Jr. 1956. Mineral interre- lationships of parakeratosis of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 15:347.

OCR for page 141
Calcium 141 MacIntyre, T. M., H. W. R. Chancey, and E. E. Gardiner. 1963. Effect of dietary energy and calcium level on egg production and egg quality. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 43:337. Mueller, W. J., R. L. B~ubaker, C. V. Gay, and J. N. Boelkins. 1973. Mechanisms of bone resorption in laying hens. Fed. Proc. 32:1951. National Research Council. 1971. Atlas of Nutritional Data on United States and Canadian Feeds. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. Newland, H. W., D. E. Ullrey, J. A. Hoefer, and R. W. Luecke. 19S8. The relationship of dietary calcium to zinc metabolism in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 17:886. Nicolaysen, R., N. Eeg-~rsen, and O. J. Malm. 1953. Physiology of calcium metabm lism. Physiol. Rev. 33:424. Peo, E. R., Jr. 1976. Calcium in Swine Nutntion. National Feed Ingredients Association, Des Moines, Iowa. Rasmussen, H., and H. F. DeLuca. 1963. Calcium homeostasis. Ergeb. Physiol. 53:109. Schraer, R., J. A. Elder, and H. Schraer. 1973. Aspects of mitochondrial function in calcium movement and calcification. Fed. Proc. 32:1938. Shane, S. M., R. J. Young, and L. Krook. 1969. Renal and parathyroid changes produced by high calcium intake in growing pullets. Avian Dis. 13:S58. Smith, H., and J. H. Taylor. 1961. Effect of feeding two levels of dietary calcium on the grow~ of broiler chickens. Nature 190:12W. Tanaka, Y., H. F=nk, and H. F. DeLuca. 1973. Role of 1,25 dibydroxy-cholecalciferol in calcification of bone and maintenance of serum calcium concentration in the rat. J. Nutr. lOQ:1569. Urbanyi, L. 1960. Chicken feeding trials with diets containing sufficient phosphorus and increasing amounts of calcium carbonate. Nutr. Abstr. 30:691. Wasserman, R. H., and R. A. Co'Tadino. 1973 . Vitamin D, calcium and protein synthesis. Vitam. Horm. 31:43. White, A., P. Handler, and E. L. Smith. 1968. Principles of Biochemistry, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. Wills, M. R. 1973. Intestinal absorption of calcium. Lancet 1:820. Zimmerman, D. R., V. C. Speer, V. W. Hays, and D. V. Catron. 1963. Effect of calcium and phosphon~s levels on baby pig performance. J. Anim. Sci. 22:658.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

calcium levels