Items in cart [0] Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK list:$42.25 Web:$38.02 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Free Resources Sign in to download PDF book and chapters PDF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles Cryptography's Role in Securing the Information Society Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future Other Related Titles Scientific Communication and National Security (1982) Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Page 171   E-mail  Facebook  Digg  Stumble  Twitter More The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Appendix J CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AND M.I.T. RESTRICTING FOREIGN VISITORS This Appendix presents two case examples of the restrictions imposed by the Department of State on foreign scientists seeking to visit U.S. universities and of the university response to such restrictions. The first case concerns Qi Yulu, a scholar from the People’s Republic of China interested in computer software technology, whose visit to the University of Minnesota was to be restricted. The second case involves a Soviet scientist, Mikhail Y.Gololobov, whose interests involved biological and nutritional research. Dr. Gololobov’s principal placement was to be at Purdue University, with shorter visits to the Universities of New Orleans, Miami, California at Santa Cruz, and M.I.T. The correspondence reprinted here pertains to his proposed visit to M.I.T. Page 171 Front Matter (R1-R16) Executive Summary (1-8) Introduction (9-12) 1 Current Knowledge About Unwanted Technology Transfer and Its Military Significance (13-21) 2 Universities and Scientific Communication (22-26) 3 The Current Control System (27-38) 4 General Conclusions: Balancing the Costs and Benefits of Controls (39-51) 5 Improving the Current System (52-64) 6 Compilation of Recommendations (65-90) Appendix A: Memorandum from the Intelligence Subpanel to the Panel on Scientific Communication and National Security (91-96) Appendix B: The Historical Context of National Security Concerns About Science and Technology (97-109) Appendix C: A Study of the Responses of Industry to a Letter of Inquiry from the NAS Panel on Scientific Communication and National Security (110-116) Appendix D: A Brief Analysis of University Research and Development Efforts Relating to National Security, 1940-1980 (117-119) Appendix E: Voluntary Restraints on Research with National Security Implications: The Case of Cryptography, 1975-1982 (120-125) Appendix F: The Role of Foreign Nationals Studying or Working in U.S. Universities and Other Sectors (126-135) Appendix G: Letter from Five University Presidients (136-139) Appendix H: Statement of Admiral B.R. Inman for the May 11, 1982, Senate Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Investigations Hearing on Technology Transfer (140-142) Appendix I: Executive Order on National Security Information (143-170) Appendix J: Correspondence Between the State Department and the University of Minnesota and M.I.T. Restricting Foreign Visitors (171-171) Working Papers of the Panel (172-188)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 171
Scientific Communication and National Security Appendix J CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AND M.I.T. RESTRICTING FOREIGN VISITORS This Appendix presents two case examples of the restrictions imposed by the Department of State on foreign scientists seeking to visit U.S. universities and of the university response to such restrictions. The first case concerns Qi Yulu, a scholar from the People’s Republic of China interested in computer software technology, whose visit to the University of Minnesota was to be restricted. The second case involves a Soviet scientist, Mikhail Y.Gololobov, whose interests involved biological and nutritional research. Dr. Gololobov’s principal placement was to be at Purdue University, with shorter visits to the Universities of New Orleans, Miami, California at Santa Cruz, and M.I.T. The correspondence reprinted here pertains to his proposed visit to M.I.T.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

involved biological