The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 39
time scales are somewhat smaller (Lean et al., 1992a and Figure
2.3) than the 0.4 to 1.5 percent needed to explain the paleoclimate
record. If the climate sensitivity is greater (one inference from
Milankovitch GCM studies; Rind et al., 1989; Phillipps and Held,
1994; discussed below) or the global temperature change smaller
than indicated, the required solar variability would be reduced.
Furthermore, although GCM climate simulations estimate a mean
global temperature reduction of 0.46° C for a solar irradiance
reduction of 0.25 percent (Rind and Overpeck, 1993), some regions
of the Earth's surface may cool and others warm by as much as
1° C as a result of advective changes caused by differential
heating of the land and oceans.
The problem of assessing direct solar radiative forcing of
climate change is additionally complicated because the extent to
which total solar irradiance variability arises from radiative
changes at ultraviolet rather than at visible wavelengths (Lean,
1989) determines the altitude of its direct impact on the global
system. If this impact shifts to altitudes mostly above the
troposphere, total solar irradiance forcing of surface temperature
would be reduced. On the other hand, the amplitude of irradiance
variations in the visible and infrared portions of the solar
spectrum that directly heat the surface, though thought to be small
(e.g., Figure 1.1), is not currently known.
While solar radiative changes are probably not the sole driving
force of the historical climate record, they nevertheless will need
to be understood and quantified in order to unravel the
contribution of solar forcing. Indeed, circumstantial evidence
points to a solar forcing contribution to the temperature changes
observed over the past century (Kelly and Wigley, 1992; Schlesinger
and Ramankutty, 1992) that decreases the predicted temperature
change associated with a doubling of atmospheric CO2 by nearly half (Lacis and Carlson,
1992).
From the perspective of the U.S. Global Change Research Program,
it is important to know how solar irradiance variations can be
expected to vary in the future and, in particular, the likelihood
that events such as another Little Ice Age, will occur in the
coming century. Were the only variations in solar radiative output
an 11-year cycle with peak-to-peak amplitude of about 0.1 percent,
solar forcing could be expected to modulate the net anthropogenic
climate forcing as shown in Figure 2.2. But another scenario is
that additional solar forcing might arise from