National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

REFERENCES

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Facility Safety to the U.S. Department of Energy. 1991. Final Report on DOE Nuclear Facilities. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

Anderson, A., and P. Couture. 1984. The U.S. Army Installation Restoration Program. Pp. 511-516 in the 5th National Conference on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, Nov. 7-9.

Applied Decision Analysis, Inc. 1987. A Site-Ranking Panel Evaluation of the Relative Risk Posed by Twenty Superfund Sites. Draft report to the Office of Policy and Planning Evaluation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

Arcos, J.C., Y-t. Woo, and G. Polansky. 1989. Ranking of complex mixtures for potential cancer hazard: Structure of a computerized system—An outline. J. Environ. Sci. Health C7:129-144.

Arula, X.J.R. 1987. Mathemati-

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

cal modeling. Pp. 719-728 in Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, Vol. 7. New York: Academic Press.

ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). 1984. Practice for Evaluating Environmental Fate Models of Chemicals. Designation E978-84, Committee on Biological Effects and Environmental Fate. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.

Barnthouse, L.W., J.E. Breck, T.D. Jones, S.R. Kraemer, E.D. Smith, and G.W. Suter II. 1986. Development and Demonstration of a Hazard Assessment Rating Methodology for Phase II of the Installation Restoration Program. ORNL/TM-9857. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn.

Brown, K.W., J.F. Slowey, and H.W. Wolf. 1977. Accumulation and Passage of Pollutants in Domestic Septic Tank Disposal Fields. R801955-01-2. Final Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Monitoring, Robert S. Kerr Water Research Center, Ada, Okla.

Butler, J., and W. Jones. 1992. Priorities of Actions on Super-fund Sites. Paper presented to the Coalition on Superfund. Putnam, Hayes and Bartlett, Inc., Washington, D.C.


Caldwell, S., and A. Ortiz. 1989. Overview of Proposed Revisions to the Superfund Hazard Ranking System. J. Air Waste Mgmt. Assoc. 39:801-807.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 1991. Integrated Site Mitigation Process, Final Draft. California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Sacramento, Calif.

Campbell, C. 1991. Toxins taint bases future. Home News (New Brunswick, N.J.), May 26, p. 1.

Canter, L.W., and L.G. Hill. 1979. Handbook of Variables for Environmental Impact Assessment. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ann Arbor Science Publishers.

Carpenter, G.F. 1990. Environmental Contamination Site Risk Assessment and Ranking in Michigan: Revision of the Site Assessment System Model. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich.

CBO (Congressional Budget Office, U.S. Congress). 1990. Federal Liabilities Under Hazardous Waste Laws. U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, D.C.

Chang, S., K. Barrett, S. Haus, and A. Platt. 1981. Site Ranking Model for Determining Remedial Action Priorities Among Uncontrolled Hazardous Substances Facilities. Mitre Corporation, McLean, Va.

Chapra, S.C., and K.H. Reckhow. 1983. Engineering Approaches for Lake Management , Vol. 2. Mechanistic Modeling. Boston: Butterworth Publishers.

Conservation Foundation. 1987. State of the Environment: A View Toward the Nineties. Washington, D.C.: Conservation Foundation.

Cohrssen, J.J., and V.T. Covello. 1989. Risk Analysis: A Guide to Principles and Methods for Analyzing Health and Environmental Risks. U.S. Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C.

Crouch, E.A.C. and R. Wilson. 1981. The regulation of carcinogens. Risk Anal. 1:47-57.

Crouch, E.A.C., R. Wilson, and L. Zeise. 1983. The risks of drinking water. Water Resources Res. 19:1359-1375.

Davos, C.A. 1977. Priority-tradeoff-scanning approach to evaluation in environmental management. J. Environ. Mgmt. 5:259-273.

DOD (U.S. Department of Defense). 1987. Directive, Real Property Acquisition, Management, and Disposal. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C.

DOD (U.S. Department of Defense). 1990a. Defense Priority Model, User's Manual, Version 3.0. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense , U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C.

DOD (U.S. Department of Defense). 1990b. Defense Priority

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Model FY 90 Scoring Quality Assurance Program Report. Report submitted to the Defense Environmental Support Office, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Environment) by Peer Consultants, Rockville, Md.

DOD (Department of Defense). 1991a. Installation Restoration Program Cost Estimate. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Environment), U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C.

DOD (U.S. Department of Defense). 1991b. Defense Priority Model, User's Manual, FY 92 Version. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Environment), U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 1990. A Preliminary Conceptual Design of a Formal Priority System for Environmental Restoration. Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 1991a. Preliminary Design Report. DOE Environmental Restoration Priority System. Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 1991b. Instructions for Generating Inputs for the FY 1993 Application of the DOE Environmental Restoration Priority System. Office of Environmental Restoration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

Donahue, R.L., R.W. Miller, and J.C. Shickluna. 1977. Soils: An Introduction to Soils and Plant Growth, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Doty, C.B., and C.C. Travis. 1990. Is EPA's national priorities list correct? Environ. Sci. Technol. 24:1778-1780.

Dyer, J.S. 1990. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Mgmt. Sci. 36:249-258.

Edelstein, M. 1988. Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Edwards, W., and J.R. Newman. 1982. Multi-attribute Evaluation. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Vol. 26. Troy, N.Y.: Sage Publications.

ELI (Environmental Law Institute). 1989. An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: A 50-State Study. EPA/540/8-89/011. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Contract 68-W8-0098, by the Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C.

ELI (Environmental Law Institute). 1991. An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State Study, 1991 Update. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Contract CR-817553-01, by the Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C.

Ellenhorn, M.J., and D.G. Barceloux. 1988. Medical Toxicology: Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Poisoning . New York: Elsevier.

Environmental Response Division. 1990. User's Manual Site Assessment Model. Environmental Response Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, Mich.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1977. Report to Congress: Waste Disposal Practices and Their Effects on Ground Water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1988. Review of the Superfund Hazard Ranking System. SAB-EC-88-008. Review by the Hazard Ranking System Review Subcommittee of the Science Advisory Board. Office of the Administrator, Science Advisory Board, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1989a. A Management Review of the Superfund Program. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1989b. Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of Cleanup Standards, Vol. 1:

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Soils and Solid Media. EPA/230/2-89-042. Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1989a. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol. 1: Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part A, Baseline Risk Assessment. Interim Final. EPA/540/1-89-002. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1989b. Soil Sampling Quality Assurance User's Guide , 2nd ed. EPA/600/8-89-046. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nev.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1990a. Environmental Investments: The Costs of a Clean Environment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1990b. Super-fund: Focusing on the Nation at Large. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1990c. Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities. OSWER Directive No. 9200.3-11. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1991a. National Priorities List, Supplementary Lists and Supporting Materials. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1991b. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Publication 9345.0-06. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1991c. PA Method: Development and Test Results. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Federal Facility Agreement. In the Matter of the U.S. Department of the Air Force, Air Force Bases.

Federal Facilities Environmental Restoration Dialogue Committee. 1993. Recommendations for Improving the Federal Facility Environmental Restoration Decision-Making Process and Setting Priorities in the Event of Funding Shortfalls . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

Federal Register. 1981. Presidential Documents, Executive Order 12316. Responses to Environmental Damage. Fed. Regist. 46(161):42237-42240.

Federal Register. 1989. Defense Priority Model: Defense Environmental Restoration Program. Action: Notice of Plans to Implement. Fed. Regist. 54(202):43104-43106.

Federal Register. 1990. Hazard Ranking System: Final Rule. Fed. Regist. 55(241):51532-51667.

Federal Register. 1992. Guidelines for Exposure Assessment. Fed. Regist. 57(104):22888-22938.

Foley, R.E., S.J. Jackling, R.J. Sloan, and M.K Brown. 1988. Organochlorine and mercury residues in wild mink and otter: Comparison with fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 7:363-374.

Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.


GAO (General Accounting Office). 1987. Simulations: Improved Assessment Procedures Would Increase the Credibility of Results. GAO/PEMD-88-3. U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C.

GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). 1991. Hazardous Waste: DOD Estimates for Cleaning Up Contaminated Sites Improved but Still Constrained. GAO NSIAD 92-37. U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C.

Gass, S.I. 1983. Decision-aiding models: Validation, assessment, and related issues for policy analysis. Comput. Ops. Res. 31:603-631.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Gass, S.I., and B.W. Thompson. 1980. Guidelines for model evaluation: An abridged version of the U.S. General Accounting Office Exposure Draft. Comput. Ops. Res. 28:431-439.

Gass, S.I., and L.S. Joel. 1981. Concepts of model confidence. Comput. Ops. Res. 8:341-346.

Golden, B.L., E.A. Wasil, P.T. Harker, and J.M. Alexander, eds. 1989. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Greenberg, M., and R. Anderson. 1984. Hazardous Waste Sites: The Credibility Gap. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.

Griffin, R.A., B.L. Herzog, T.M. Johnson, W.J. Morse, R.E. Hughes, S.F.J. Chou, and L.R. Follmer. 1985. Mechanisms of contaminant migration through a clay barrier-Case study, Wilsonville, Illinois. Pp. 27-38 in Land Disposal of Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Research Symposium. EPA 600/9-85/013. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Halfon, E. 1989. Comparison of an index function and a vectorial approach method for ranking waste disposal sites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23:600-609.

Halfon, E., and M.G. Reggiani. 1986. On ranking chemicals for environmental hazard. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20:1173-1179.

Hall, C.W. 1988. Practical limits to pump and treat technology for aquifer remediation. Pp. 7-12 in Proceedings: Groundwater Quality Protection Pre-Conference Workshop. Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, D.C.

Hammer, P.L., Keeney, R.L., R.H. Möhring, H. Otway, F.J. Radermacher, and M.M. Richter, eds. 1988. Multi-attribute Decision Making via O.R.-based Expert Systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-Attribute Decision Making via O.R.-based Expert Systems, April 20-27. Ann. Operat. Res. 16.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Haness, S.J., and J.J. Warwick. 1991. Evaluating the hazard ranking system. J. Environ. Mgmt. 32:165-176.

Harker, P.T, and L.G. Vargas. 1990. Reply to Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process by J.S. Dyer. Mgmt. Sci., pp. 269-273.

Harris, R.H., and G.C. Wrenn. 1988. Making Superfund work. Issues Sci. Technol. 4(3):54-58.

Hill, M. 1968. A goals-achievement matrix for evaluating alternative plans. J. Am. Inst. Planners 34:19-29.

Hird, J.A. 1990. Superfund expenditures and cleanup priorities: Distributive politics and the public interest? J. Policy Anal. Mgmt. 9:455-483.

Home News. 1991. Bill would stop Superfund polluters from passing buck. Home News (New Brunswick, N.J.), July 19, p. A4.

Hwang, C.L., and K. Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications: A state-of-the-art survey. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 186. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Hyman, E.L., and B. Stiftel. 1988. Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment: Theories and Techniques. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Inhaber, H. 1976. Environmental Indices. New York: John Wiley-Interscience.

Inside E.P.A. 1991. EPA officials call for major overhaul to standardize Superfund cleanups. Inside E.P.A. Weekly Rep. 12(39):Sept. 27.

Inside E.P.A. 1992. Reilly approves plan to speed superfund waste removal, reduce study time. Inside E.P.A. Weekly Rep. 13(10):March 6.


Johnson, R.C., and L.J. Zaragoza. 1991. The Hazard Ranking System and Relative Risk. Paper presented at a meeting of the Division of Environmental Chemistry, American Chemical Society, Aug. 25-30, New York.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Julien, B., S.J. Fenves, and M.J. Small. 1992. Knowledge acquisition methods for environmental evaluation. AI Appl. 6:1-20.

Keeney, R.L. 1977. The art of assessing multi-attribute utility functions. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Perf. 19:267-310.

Keeney, R.L, and H.R. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs . New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Keystone Center. 1991. Keystone National Dialogue on Federal Facility Environmental Management. First Plenary Session Summary, June 12-13, Washington, D.C.

Krupnick, A.J., and P.R. Portney. 1991. Controlling urban air pollution: A benefit-cost assessment. Science 252:522-527.


Landy, M.K., M.J. Roberts, and S.R. Thomas. 1990. The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lave, L., and H. Gruenspecht. 1991. Increasing the efficiency and effectivensss of environmental decisions: Benefit-cost analysis and effluent fees. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 41:680-693.

Lichfield, N., P. Kettle, and M. Whitbread. 1975. Evaluation in the Planning Process. Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Press.


Mackay, D.M., and J.A. Cherry. 1989. Groundwater contamination: Pump-and treat remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23(6):630-636.

Mazmanian, D., and D. Morell. 1992. Beyond Superfailure. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

McAllister, D.M. 1980. Evaluation in Environmental Planning: Assessing Environmental, Social, Economic and Political Trade-Offs. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

McClelland, G., W. Schulze, and B. Hurd. 1990. The effect of risk beliefs on property values: A case study of a hazardous waste site. Risk Anal. 10:485-497.

Michel, K.L. 1992. An Overview of the Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System. ES/ER/TM-14. Environmental Restoration Division, Oak Ridge, Tenn.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Missouri Department of Natural Resources. 1991. Confirmed Abandoned or Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in Missouri and Hazardous Waste Remedial Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance. Annual Report. Division of Environmental Quality, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Jefferson City, Mo.

MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 1992. Breaking the Backlog: Improving Superfund Priority Setting. Paper prepared for the Coalition on Superfund. The Center for Technology, Policy and Industrial Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences. 1991. Solid and Hazardous Waste Bureau Superfund Program CECRA Facility Ranking Process. Solid and Hazardous Waste Bureau, Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Helena, Mont.

Naylor, T.H., and J.M. Finger. 1967. Verification of computer simulation models. Mgmt. Sci. 14:92-101.

Neuhold, J., and L. Ruggiero. 1976. Ecosystem Processes and Organic Contaminants. NSF/RA 76-0008. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 1992. Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New York State, Annual Report. Division of Hazardous Waste Remediation, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York.

NJDEPE (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy). 1992. Proposed Rule: Cleanup Standards for Contaminated Sites. New Jersey Register (24 N.J.R. 373):Feb. 3.

NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

NRC (National Research Council). 1989. Improving Risk Communication. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1990a. Ground Water and Soil Contamination Remediation: Toward Compatible Science, Policy, and Public Perception. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1990. Ground Water Models: Scientific and Regulatory Applications. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1991. Human Exposure Assessment for Airborne Pollutants: Advances and Opportunities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1992. The Department of Defense Priority Model for Hazardous Waste Site Restoration: An Independent Assessment of Methods, Assumptions, and Constraints. Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1994a. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1994b. Building Consensus Through Risk Assessment and Management of the Department of Energy's Environmental Remediation Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Odell, R. 1976. NEPA-It's still a hard act to follow. Environ. Act. 8(July 31):4-8.

Ohio Division of Emergency and Remedial Response. 1992. Ohio Ranking Method Manual. (Under revision). Division of Emergency and Remedial Response, State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Columbus, Ohio.

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. 1991. Appendix A of Inventory Ranking Rule: Site Scoring Procedures. Envi-

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

ronmental Cleanup Division, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Portland, Oreg.

OTA (Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress). 1985. Superfund Strategy. OTA-ITE-252. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

OTA (Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress). 1989. Coming Clean: Superfund's Problems Can Be Solved. OTA-ITE-433. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

OTA (Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress). 1991. Complex Cleanup: The Environmental Legacy of Nuclear Weapons Production. OTA-O-485. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Passell, P. 1991. Experts question staggering costs of toxic dean-ups. New York Times, Sept. 1, p. 1.

Plaster, E.J. 1985. P. 393 in Soil Science and Management. Albany, N.Y.: Delmar Publishers.

Prest, A.R., and R. Turvey, eds. 1965. Cost-benefit analysis. Pp. 155-207 in Surveys of Economic Theory: Resource Analysis, American Economic Association and the Royal Economics Society. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Puskin, J.S. 1992. An analysis of the uncertainties in estimates of radon induced lung cancer. Risk Anal. 12:277-285.


Reckhow, K.H., J.T. Clements, and R.C. Dodd. 1990. Statistical evaluation of mechanistic water-quality models. J. Environ. Eng. 116:250-268.

Rezendes, V. 1992. Nuclear Weapons Complex: Improving DOE's Management of the Environmental Cleanup. Statement of V. Rezendes before the Department of Energy Defense Nuclear Facilities Panel Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. GAO/T-RCED-92-43. U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C.

Reid, R.C., J.M. Prausnitz, and T.K. Sherwood. 1977. The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Ridley, S. 1987. State of the States. Washington, D.C.: Renew America.

Roberts, L. 1991. Costs of a clean environment. Science 251: 1182.

Roy, W.R., and R.A. Griffin. 1989. In-situ Extraction of Organic Vapor from Unsaturated Porous Media. Open File Report prepared for the Environmental Institute for Waste Management Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Ala.

Russell, M., E.W. Colglazier, and M.R. English. 1991. Hazardous Waste Remediation: The Task Ahead. Waste Management Research and Education Institute, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn.

Ryan, A.P., and Y. Cohen. 1989. Chemical transport in the top soil zone: The role of moisture and temperature gradients. J. Hazard. Mater. 22:283-304.

Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Saaty, T.L. 1990. An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper "Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process." Mgmt. Sci. 36:259-268.

Shaeffer, D.L. 1980. A model evaluation methodology applicable to environmental assessment models. Ecol. Model. 8:297-311.

Skaburskis, A. 1989. Impact attenuation in conflict situations: The price effects of a nuisance land-use. Environ. Planning A21:375-383.

Schneider, K. 1991. Military has new strategic goal of cleanup of vast toxic waste. New York Times, Aug. 5, p. 1.

Schleifstein, M. and J. O'Byrne. 1991. The wasteland. The Times-Picayune (New Orleans), March 24, p. 1.

SCS (Soil Conservation Service, U.S.Department of Agriculture). 1972. SCS National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Suppl. A. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Shulman, S. 1990. Toxic travels: Inside the military's environmental nightmare. Nuclear Times 8:20-32.

Science. 1991. 11.5-million housecleaning. Science 252:643.

Skaburskis, A. 1989. Impact attenuation in conflict situations: The price effects of a nuisance land-use. Environ. Planning A21:375-383.

Smith, K., J. Martin, and E. Als. 1989. Field Investigation to Characterize Relationship Between Groundwater and Subsurface Gas Contamination at a Municipal Landfill. Presented at the Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute's 10th National Conference and Exhibition, Nov. 27-29, 1989, Washington, D.C.

Stafford, R. 1981. Why Superfund was needed. EPA J. 7(June):8-10.

State of California, Toxic Substances Control Program. 1990. Interim Guidance for Preparation of a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report. State of California Toxic Substances Control Program, Department of Health Sciences, Health and Welfare Agency, Sacramento, Calif.

Superfund Fact Sheet. 1981. EPA J. 7(June):13.

Technical Review Group of the Department of Energy. 1991. Priority System for Environmental Restoration. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

Thibodeaux, L.J. 1979. Chemodynamics: Environmental Movement of Chemicals in Air, Water, and Soil. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Thompson, M.A. 1990. Determining impact significance in EIA: A review of 24 methodologies. J. Environ. Mgmt. 30:235-250.


U.S. Congress, House Committee Public Works Transport Hearings. 1983. Hazardous Waste Contamination of Water Resources, Aug. 10. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×

Walsh, W., I. Susel, and A. Ronayne. 1991. Setting risk-based priorities—A method for ranking sites for response. Pp. 112-123 in Proceedings of National Research and Development Conference on the Control of Hazardous Materials, Feb. 20-22, Anaheim, Calif.

Washington State Department of Ecology. 1992. Washington Ranking Method: Scoring Manual. Toxics Cleanup Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Wash.

Westman, W.E. 1985. Ecology, Impact Assessment, and Environmental Planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Whelan, G., D.L. Strenge, J.G. Droppo, Jr., B.L. Steelman, and J.W. Buck. 1987. The Remedial Action Priority System (RAPS): Mathematical Formulations. DOE/RL/87-09, PNL 6200. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Wash.

Wilson, A.R. 1991. Environmental Risk: Identification and Management. Chelsea, Mich.: Lewis Publishers.

Wood, J.A., and M.L. Potter. 1987. Hazardous pollutants in class II landfills. Hazardous Waste Mgmt. 37:609-615.

Wright, J., and L. Cole. 1985. Risk Management and the Hazardous Waste Problem in State Governments. Rep. No. NSF/PRA-85028. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. Available from National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. PB 86-187515.

Wu, J.S., and H. Hilger. 1984. Evaluation of EPA's Hazard Ranking System. J. Environ. Eng. 110:797-807.


Zaragoza, L.J. 1990. Cutoff Score Analysis for the Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Docket, U.S. Environmental. Protection Agency Memo to HRS Docket. 105NCP-HRS-18-18. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 279
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 280
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 281
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 282
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 283
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 284
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 285
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 286
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 287
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 288
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 289
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 290
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 291
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 292
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 293
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1994. Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4781.
×
Page 294
Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $50.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The United States may not be able to make all hazardous-waste sites as clean as possible. Therefore, priorities must be set for the timing of waste site remediations. This book assesses several of the government's methods of ranking sites for remediation and compares the performance of three such models using input data developed from the same set of waste sites. Because inconsistent methods may be neither effective nor prudent, the book recommends that the government consider developing a unified national approach to setting priorities to replace the current multiple approaches.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!