National Academies Press: OpenBook

Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education (1995)

Chapter: Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992

« Previous: Case Study 54: Childhood Asthma and Indoor Enviromental Risk Factors
Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×

Health Objectives for the Nation

Populations at Risk from Particulate Air Pollution—United States, 1992

Despite improvements in air quality since the 1970s, air pollution remains an important environmental risk to human health. A national health objective for the year 2000 is to reduce exposure to air pollutants so that at least 85% of persons live in counties that meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards (objective 11.5) (1). This report provides estimates from the American Lung Association (ALA) of populations potentially at risk from exposure to particulate air pollution in the United States during 1992.

The National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter <10 µm in diameter (PM10) is 150 µg/m3, averaged over 24 hours (2). The federal standard is met if this value is not exceeded more than once per calendar year, and the annual arithmetic mean is ≤50 µg/m3. Information in this report is based on the second highest maximum 24-hour PM10 concentrations recorded by at least one monitor in 1992 (EPA, unpublished data, 1993). Both the federal “exceedance” definition (≥155 µg/m3) and a similar approach applied to the California standard* (≥55 µg/m3) were used as cutoff values. Estimates of the numbers of persons potentially exposed to levels of PM10

*  

California’s particulate matter air quality standard of 50 µg/m3 averaged over 24 hours (3) is the most stringent standard in the United States.

Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×

above these cutoff values were derived from 1991 census figures for each county (U.S. Bureau of the Census, unpublished data, 1992).

For this report, a population at risk was defined as persons who have a “significantly higher probability of developing a condition, illness, or other abnormal status,” as described by EPA (4). Five at-risk populations were included: preadolescent children (aged ≤13 years), the elderly (aged ≥65 years), persons aged <18 years with asthma, adults (aged ≥18 years) with asthma, and persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (e.g., chronic bronchitis and emphysema). Age-specific county populations for 1991 were estimated by applying the population age distribution of each state (U.S. Bureau of the Census, unpublished data, 1992) to the counties within that state. The number of persons with asthma or COPD in each county was estimated by applying age-specific prevalences from CDC’s National Health Interview Survey (5) to age-specific population estimates for each county. Although PM10 levels are presented on a county basis, they do not indicate that all areas of the county were subject to that level or that all persons in the county were exposed to the recorded concentration.

During 1992, PM10 levels were ≥155 µg/m3 in 16 counties; an estimated 23 million persons (9.1% of the total U.S. population) resided in these counties (Table 1). Approximately 92 million additional persons (36% of the U.S. population) resided in counties in which PM10 levels were 55 µg/m3−154 µg/m3. Overall, an estimated 115 million persons (45% of the U.S. population) resided in counties with PM10 levels ≥55 µg/m3 (Table 1). In the United States during 1992, 46% of persons with asthma lived in communities with levels of particulate air pollution higher than the California standard.

TABLE 1. Estimated number and percentage of the total population and at-risk* subgroups residing in counties with particulate air pollution with a diameter of <10 µm (PM10) at levels ≥155 µg/m3and ≥55 µg/m3—United States, 1992§

 

PM10levels ≥155 µg/m3

PM10levels ≥55 µg/m3

Population at risk

No.

(%)

No.

(%)

Total population

22,894,856

(9.1)

114,671,632

(45.5)

Preadolescent children (aged ≤13 yrs)

4,931,408

(9.5)

23,794,139

(46.0)

Elderly (aged ≥65 yrs)

2,649,477

(8.3)

14,010,297

(44.1)

Persons (aged <18 yrs) with asthma

387,220

(9.5)

1,878,848

(45.9)

Persons (aged ≥18 yrs) with asthma

697,444

(9.1)

3,528,475

(46.2)

Persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease**

1,243,407

(9.1)

6,263,409

(46.0)

*Population-at-risk estimates should not be added to form totals. These categories are not mutually exclusive.

PM10 ≥155 µg/m3 is the federal “exceedance” definition; PM10 ≥55 µg/m3 is the California “exceedance” standard.

§The PM10 level of the county does not imply responsibility for the disease status of its population.

Of the total population in the category, the proportion of each population subgroup potentially exposed.

**Includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema.

Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×

Reported by: P Vigliarolo, Communications Div; S Rappaport, MPH, K Lieber, MPH, A Gorman, Epidemiology and Statistics Div; R White, MST, National Programs Div, American Lung Association, New York. Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Br, Div of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC.

Editorial Note: Particulate matter (e.g., dust, dirt, and smoke) is a complex and varying mixture of substances. Sources include motor-vehicle emissions, factory and utility smokestacks, residential wood burning, construction activity, mining, agricultural tilling, open burning, wind-blown dust, and fire. Some particles are formed in the atmosphere through the condensation or transformation of other chemical substances. Particles with diameters <10 µm pose a greater health risk than larger particles because particles of this size are easily inhaled deep into the lungs.

Increased risks for illness and death have been associated with particulate air pollution at levels comparable to those presented in this report (68). Acute effects on the respiratory system are well established and include exacerbations of chronic respiratory disease, restrictions in activity, and increases in emergency department visits and hospitalizations for respiratory illness (8). Persons with asthma are particularly sensitive to the effects of particulate air pollution (8). A national health objective for the year 2000 is to reduce asthma morbidity, measured by a reduction in asthma hospitalizations, from 188 per 100,000 in 1987 to no more than 160 per 100,000 (objective 11.1) (1).

The estimates presented in this report underscore the potential public health importance of particulate air pollution. Although levels of airborne particulate pollution declined substantially from 1988 to 1992 (emissions of PM10 decreased 8% and air concentrations of PM10 decreased 17%) (9), continued efforts are required to reduce health risks associated with particulate air pollution. EPA is reviewing technical and scientific information to determine whether the federal ambient air quality standard for particulate matter, established in 1987, should be revised.

ALA recently issued The Perils of Particulates (10), which includes national and county estimates of populations at potential risk for exposure to particulate air pollution. Copies are available from local offices of the ALA, telephone (800) 586–4872.

References

1. Public Health Service. Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1991; DHHS publication no. (PHS)91–50213.

2. US Environmental Protection Agency. Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter: final rule. Federal Register 1987;52:24634.

3. Air Resources Board. California ambient air quality standard for particulate matter (PM10). Sacramento, California: State of California, Air Resources Board, Research Division, December 1982.

4. US Environmental Protection Agency. Air quality criteria document for lead. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1977.

5. NCHS. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1991. Hyattsville, Maryland: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, 1992; DHHS publication no. (PHS)92–1509. (Vital and health statistics; series 10, no. 184).

6. Ostro B. The association of air pollution and mortality: examining the case for inference. Arch Environ Health 1993;48:336–42.

7. Schwartz J. Air pollution and daily mortality: a review and meta analysis. Environ Res 1994;64:36–52.

8. Dockery DW, Pope CA. Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health 1994;15:107–32.

Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×

9. Curran T, Faoro R, Fitz-Simons T, et al. National air quality and emissions trends report. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, October 1993; publication no. EPA-454/R-93/031.

10. American Lung Association. The perils of particulates: an estimation of populations at risk of adverse health consequences from particulate matter in areas with particulate matter levels above the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) of the Clean Air Act and the state of California’s air quality standard. New York: American Lung Association, 1994.

Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×
Page 904
Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×
Page 905
Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×
Page 906
Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×
Page 907
Suggested Citation:"Case Study 55: Populations at Risk From Particulate Air Pollution - United States, 1992." Institute of Medicine. 1995. Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4795.
×
Page 908
Next: D: Resources: Agencies, Organizations, Services, REferences, and Tables of Environmental Health Hazards »
Environmental Medicine: Integrating a Missing Element into Medical Education Get This Book
×
Buy Hardback | $90.00 Buy Ebook | $69.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

People are increasingly concerned about potential environmental health hazards and often ask their physicians questions such as: "Is the tap water safe to drink?" "Is it safe to live near power lines?" Unfortunately, physicians often lack the information and training related to environmental health risks needed to answer such questions. This book discusses six competency based learning objectives for all medical school students, discusses the relevance of environmental health to specific courses and clerkships, and demonstrates how to integrate environmental health into the curriculum through published case studies, some of which are included in one of the book's three appendices. Also included is a guide on where to obtain additional information for treatment, referral, and follow-up for diseases with possible environmental and/or occupational origins.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!