The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Chemical Ecology: The Chemistry of Biotic Interaction
ecology has benefited from this conceptual framework, as demonstrated by the recent suggestion that pheromones mediate the interaction of a pheromone-binding protein with another protein target (50). We can expect additional examples.
Several disciplines, including chemical ecology, seek to understand the molecular basis of information transfer in biological systems, and general molecular strategies are beginning to emerge. Often these strategies are discovered by a careful analysis of natural products and their biological effects. Cyclosporin A, FK506, and rapamycin are produced by soil microorganisms and are being used or considered as clinical immunosuppressive agents. They interrupt the cytoplasmic portion of T-cell signaling by forming a complex with a binding protein—FKBP12 in the case of FK506 and rapamycin and cyclophilin A (CyPA) in the case of cyclosporin A (CsA). This complex in turn inhibits a protein target, and the best understood target is calcineurin, which is inhibited by FK506-FKBP12 and CyPA-CsA. Mutational and structural studies help define how FK506-FKBP12 interacts with calcineurin, and the results of these studies are summarized. The existence of strong FK506-FKBP12 binding suggests that FK506 is mimicking some natural ligand for FKBP12. Synthetic and structural studies to probe this mimicry are also described.
I am grateful to Stuart L. Schreiber for generously sharing unpublished information from his laboratory. L. Wayne Schultz helped prepare the illustrations. I am grateful to the National Institutes of Health (Grant R01-CA59021) for financial support.
1. Agosta, W.C. (1992) Chemical Communication: The Language of Pheromones (Freeman, New York), pp. 14-18, 29-31.
2. Rosen, M. K. & Schreiber, S. L. (1992) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.31, 384-400.
3. Sigal, N. H. & Dumont, F. J. (1992) Annu. Rev. Immunol.10, 519-560.
4. Fliri, H., Bauman, G., Enz, A., Kallen, J., Luyten, M., Mikol, V., Movva, R., Quesniauz, V., Schreier, M., Walkinshaw, M., Wenger, R., Zenke, G. & Zurini, M. (1993) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.696, 39-47.
5. Williams, D. H., Stone, M. J., Hauck, P. R. & Rahman, S. K. (1989) J. Nat. Prod.52, 1189-1208.
6. Schreiber, S. L. (1991) Science251, 283-287.
7. Stern, L. J., Brown, J. H., Jardetzky, T. S., Gorga, J. C., Urban, R. G., Strominger, J. L. & Wiley, D. C. (1994) Nature(London)368 , 215-221.
8. Chicz, R. M. & Urban, R. G. (1994) Immunol. Today15, 155-159.
9. Emmel, E. A., Verweij, C. L., Durand, D. B., Higgins, K. M., Lacy, E. & Crabtree, G. R. (1989) Science246, 1617-1620.