Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$23.00
Web:$20.70
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $18.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Airline Passenger Security Screening: New Technologies and Implementation Issues (1996)
National Materials Advisory Board (NMAB)

Page
21
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Page 21

detection of true threat materials, and the need for operators to clear the equipment before being able to proceed with passenger screening.

SUMMARY

The trade-off between technology performance and acceptance by air carriers or the public is a feature common to imaging, nonimaging, and trace-detection technologies. For example, a sharper (i.e., less ambiguous) image could be obtained by increasing observation time, but doing so could add to passenger delays. The intensity of the incident beam could also be increased, but this could lead to increased passenger concerns about exposure to radiation. Similarly, a more aggressive sampling for trace detection could lead to a higher rate of positive identification of explosive materials, at the expense of making the sample-collection phase more personally invasive to the passenger. Ultimately, the performance capability and quality of a passenger screening technology is unlikely to be the limiting factor in its implementation or application. Limitations on the technology will instead be imposed as a result of passenger intolerance for invasion of privacy, delays, or discomfort.

Page
21