Page 211

TABLE 6.2 Continued
I103	II	III	IV	V	VI	VII	VIII
Jurisdiction	Standard Of Admissibility	DNA Test	Method Of Computation	Opinion As To Source Admissible?	Only Fact Of Match Admissible?	Product Admissible?	Ceiling Admissible?
NC	R	RFLP	Product			Yes
Ohio	R	RFLP	Product			Yes
		PCR				Yes
Okla	D	RFLP	Product			Yes
Ore	R	RFLP	Product			Yes
		PCR					Yes
Pa	F	RFLP	None		Yes
SC	F,R	RFLP	Product			Yes
SD	F	RFLP	Product			Yes
Tenn	F,D,R,S	RFLP	Product			Yes
Tex	R	RFLP	Product			Yes
		DQA, PCR
Vt	D	RFLP	Product			No	Yes
			Ceiling
Va	R,S	RFLP	Product			Yes
		DQA	Product			Yes
Wash	F	RFLP	Product	No		No	Yes
		PCR
Wisc	R	RFLP	Product			Yes	Yes
			Ceiling
Wyo	R	RFLP	Product				Yes
			Ceiling
103I. Federal or state jurisdiction in which at least one court opinion on the admissibility of DNA test results that incriminated the defendant was reported. II. Frye (F), Daubert (D), relevance-helpfulness (R), or special statutory (S) standard applied. R refers to cases applying a non—Frye standard adopted before Daubert; all federal courts are now required to apply the Daubert standard. III. Type of DNA test performed. IV. Procedure used to compute probability or frequency offered in the case. V. Is expert-opinion testimony that defendant is the source or that the type is unique admissible? VI. Is only the fact of a match admissible? VII. Is the product-rule estimate admissible? VIII. Is the interim-ceiling-principle estimate admissible?