FIGURE 2

Sketch of the history of precipitation measurement in North America related to precipitation time-series homogeneity. Major large-scale changes caused inhomogeneities in these time series. (a) Canadian primary network; (b) U.S. primary network.

obvious sources of inhomogeneities. The data are therefore free of the large-scale inhomogeneities shown in Figure 2, but other inhomogeneities may still exist.

The Canadian network, which seems quite large in Figure 3b, declined rapidly in size during the first half of the century (see Table 1). In southern Canada it contained only 190 stations by 1940, and 26 stations in 1900. As a consequence, we selected a special network of Canadian stations that were operating in the 1920s (Figure 3c) to use in to studying Canadian precipitation prior to World War II. The area-averaged precipitation time series based on this network were combined with the corresponding time series developed from the main network shown in Figure 3b.

Data Processing

The precipitation data for the 593 contiguous U.S. stations and the snowfall data were used without adjustments.

FIGURE 3

Stations used in this paper for analysis of: (a) snowfall (squares depict the primary Canadian stations where the elevated snow gauges were installed in the 1960s); (b) precipitation; (c) accuracy of precipitation changes in southern Canada before World War II.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement