. "TVA's Approach to Ecological Health Assessment in Streams and Reservoirs." Measures of Environmental Performance and Ecosystem Condition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1999.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
BOX 3Index of Biotic Integrity Metrics
Stream Fish Species Richness and Composition
Number of native species
Number of darter species
Number of native sunfish species (excluding Micropterus sp.)
Number of sucker species
Number of intolerant species
Percentage individuals as tolerant species
Stream Fish Trophic Structure
Percentage omnivores
Percentage specialized insectivorous minnows and darters
Percentage piscivores
Stream Fish Abundance and Condition
Catch rate (average number per unit of sampling effort, seine hauls, and electrofishing)
Percentage individuals as hybrids
Percentage individuals with poor condition, injury, deformity, disease, or other anomaly
Stream Fish Community
A modified version of Karr's (1981) Index of Biotic Integrity is used to assess the condition of the resident fish community at monitoring locations. An index and rating are produced for each site by applying the 12 metrics in Box 3.
Actual values obtained for each of these metrics are scored poor, fair, or good (1, 3, or 5) against values that would be expected at reference sites. The 12 metric scores are summed to produce an index ranging from 12 to 60, and the fish community at the stream sampling location is rated as poor (index < 36), fair (index 40-44), or good (index > 46). Professional judgment is used to rate fish community index values between 36 and 40 and index values of 45. These determinations are based on factors such as which of the 12 metrics rates poorest, the condition of the coexisting macroinvertebrate community, and previous Index of Biotic Integrity ratings for the station.
Results
The overall ecological health ratings for the 11 run-of-river reservoirs ranged from 58 to 88 percent in 1993 (Figure 5). Of the 11 reservoirs, 4 rated good (75-