National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$74.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals (1996)
Policy Division (PD)

Citation Manager

. "Measurement of Environmental Quality in the United States." Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1996.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
147
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals

Environmental and Scientific Affairs, the Department formulates proposals and implements U.S. policy on international issues and significant global problems related to environment, oceans, fisheries, population, and space and other fields of advanced technology.

  • Department of Transportation—Environmental responsibilities include environmental impact assessments, and analyses of current and emerging transportation issues related to energy and the environment. It also enforces various laws related to transportation and discharge of oil and hazardous materials.

  • Environmental Protection Agency—The mission of this independent agency is to control and abate pollution in the areas of air, water, solid waste, pesticides, radiation, and toxic substances. Its mandate is to mount an integrated, coordinated attack on environmental pollution in cooperation with state and local governments.

Several independent commissions and government corporations also share some of the responsibility for our environment. Chief among these are the Federal Emergency Management Agency (emergency planning, preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery from natural disasters and human-caused emergencies); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (studies global climate change and integrated functioning of the earth as a system); National Science Foundation (supports research for improved understanding of the fundamental laws of nature); Nuclear Regulatory Commission (licenses and regulates civilian use of nuclear energy to protect public health and safety and the environment); Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (transmission and pricing of electricity and hydroelectric licensing); U.S. Information Agency (encourages international discussion and cooperation on fundamental concerns, including the global environment); Marine Mammal Commission (protection and conservation of marine mammals); Tennessee Valley Authority (in support of its mission to advance economic growth in the Tennessee Valley, conducts research and development programs in forestry, fish and game, and watershed protection).

WHAT INITIATIVES ARE UNDER WAY FOR THE FUTURE?

Environmental Strategies for the 1990s and Beyond

The United States is entering a new phase in the evolution of environmental protection, one that recognizes that effective environmental protection and control involve more subtle and complex variables than have been considered under earlier, centralized, command-and-control approaches. It also one that emphasizes the positive relationship between a healthy environment and a prosperous economy. The following strategies embrace these concepts:

Ecosystem Approach to Resource Management.

Public concern about the environment, together with new thinking by scientists and resource managers,

Page
147
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Part I: Committee Report (1-2)
Summary (3-14)
Society's Environmental Goals (15-26)
Use Social Science and Risk Assessment to Make Better Societal Choices (27-36)
Focus on Monitoring to Build Better Understanding of Our Ecological Systems (37-50)
Reduce the Adverse Impacts of Chemicals in the Environment (51-60)
Develop Environmental Options for the Energy System (61-72)
Use a Systems Engineering and Ecological Approach to Reduce Resource Use (73-80)
Improve Understanding of the Relationship Between Population and Consumption as a Means to Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Population Growth (81-86)
Set Environmental Goals Via Rates and Directions of Change (87-90)
Bibliography (91-94)
Part II: Commissioned Papers (95-96)
National Environmental Goals: Implementing the Laws, Visions of the Future, and Research (97-134)
Measurement of Environmental Quality in the United States (135-178)
Attitudes Toward the Environment Twenty-Five Years After Earth Day (179-190)
Environmental Goals and Science Policy: A Review of Selected Countries (191-242)
Can States Make a Market for Environmental Goals? (243-280)
Setting Environmental Goals: The View from Industry. A Review of Practices from the 1960s (281-326)
Status of Ecological Knowledge Related to Policy Decision-Making Needs in the Area of (327-344)
The Federal Budget and Environmental Priorities (345-398)
Part III: Keynote Addresses and Presentations (399-400)
D. James Baker, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (401-406)
Thomas Grumbly, U.S. Department of Energy (407-412)
Barry Gold, U.S. Department of the Interior (413-418)
Harlan Watson, House Committee on Science (419-422)
David Garman, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (423-430)
John Wise and Peter Truitt, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (431-436)
Judith Espinosa and Peggy Duxbury, President's Council on (437-448)
Gilbert S. Omenn, University of Washington (449-462)
Part IV: Appendixes (463-464)
A Committee Member and Staff Biographical Information (465-470)
B Forum Agenda (471-474)
C Forum Participants (475-482)
D Summary of Responses to Call for Comments (483-488)
E Respondents to Call for Comments (489-496)
F Summary of Breakout-Group Discussions (497-500)
G Detecting Changes in Time and Space (501-504)
H Contents and Executive Summary of a Report of the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government (505-516)
Index (517-530)