National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$74.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals (1996)
Policy Division (PD)

Citation Manager

. "Measurement of Environmental Quality in the United States." Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1996.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
151
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals

Since Earth Day 1993, a number of new initiatives and executive orders have been implemented to establish the federal government as a leader in advancing pollution prevention. Most notably, federal facilities are now required to develop written pollution reduction strategies incorporating source reduction in facility management and acquisition programs. Each agency must begin immediately to minimize the acquisition of the most potent (Class I) ozone-depleting substances and to maximize the use of safe alternatives. Similarly, agencies must also establish a plan and goals for eliminating or reducing the unnecessary acquisition of products containing extremely hazardous substances or toxic chemicals. Federal facilities that manufacture, process, or use toxic chemicals are now required to reduce toxic emissions and report publicly on toxic wastes and releases under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. Energy efficiency in the workplace will be enhanced by government purchase of Energy Star computer equipment (which saves energy by automatically entering a low-power, standby state when inactive) and other energy-efficient products. Also toward this end, agencies are now required to set goals of reducing energy consumption, increasing energy efficient, auditing their facilities for energy and water use, increasing the use of solar and other renewable energy sources, designating ''showcase" facilities, and minimizing the use of petroleum-based fuels. In addition, federal agencies must implement affirmative acquisition programs for products less harmful to the environment when possible, including alternative-fueled vehicles and products containing pre- and post-consumer recycled materials. These and other federal initiatives will help augment the importance of adopting pollution prevention principles at every level of government and throughout the private sector. They are also aimed at encouraging new technologies and building markets for environmentally preferable and recycled products.

Enhanced Regional and International Environmental Cooperation

The United States has taken several steps toward greater cooperation on many of the most pressing environmental challenges facing the world. In addition to its work on a U.S. sustainable development plan, the United States has fulfilled several other commitments that grew out of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also known as the Earth Summit. At the Earth Summit, the United States joined other countries in signing the Framework Convention Climate Change, an international agreement whose ultimate objective is to achieve stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Since then, the United States has released the "Climate Change Action Plan" (1993), which details the initial U.S. response to climate change, and the "Climate Action Report" (1994), which describes the current U.S. program and represents the first formal U.S. communication under the Framework Convention on Climate Change. In June 1993, the United States

Page
151
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Part I: Committee Report (1-2)
Summary (3-14)
Society's Environmental Goals (15-26)
Use Social Science and Risk Assessment to Make Better Societal Choices (27-36)
Focus on Monitoring to Build Better Understanding of Our Ecological Systems (37-50)
Reduce the Adverse Impacts of Chemicals in the Environment (51-60)
Develop Environmental Options for the Energy System (61-72)
Use a Systems Engineering and Ecological Approach to Reduce Resource Use (73-80)
Improve Understanding of the Relationship Between Population and Consumption as a Means to Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Population Growth (81-86)
Set Environmental Goals Via Rates and Directions of Change (87-90)
Bibliography (91-94)
Part II: Commissioned Papers (95-96)
National Environmental Goals: Implementing the Laws, Visions of the Future, and Research (97-134)
Measurement of Environmental Quality in the United States (135-178)
Attitudes Toward the Environment Twenty-Five Years After Earth Day (179-190)
Environmental Goals and Science Policy: A Review of Selected Countries (191-242)
Can States Make a Market for Environmental Goals? (243-280)
Setting Environmental Goals: The View from Industry. A Review of Practices from the 1960s (281-326)
Status of Ecological Knowledge Related to Policy Decision-Making Needs in the Area of (327-344)
The Federal Budget and Environmental Priorities (345-398)
Part III: Keynote Addresses and Presentations (399-400)
D. James Baker, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (401-406)
Thomas Grumbly, U.S. Department of Energy (407-412)
Barry Gold, U.S. Department of the Interior (413-418)
Harlan Watson, House Committee on Science (419-422)
David Garman, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (423-430)
John Wise and Peter Truitt, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (431-436)
Judith Espinosa and Peggy Duxbury, President's Council on (437-448)
Gilbert S. Omenn, University of Washington (449-462)
Part IV: Appendixes (463-464)
A Committee Member and Staff Biographical Information (465-470)
B Forum Agenda (471-474)
C Forum Participants (475-482)
D Summary of Responses to Call for Comments (483-488)
E Respondents to Call for Comments (489-496)
F Summary of Breakout-Group Discussions (497-500)
G Detecting Changes in Time and Space (501-504)
H Contents and Executive Summary of a Report of the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government (505-516)
Index (517-530)