National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$74.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals (1996)
Policy Division (PD)

Citation Manager

. "Setting Environmental Goals: The View from Industry. A Review of Practices from the 1960s." Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1996.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
305
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals

assessments, and environmental performance evaluation are in much early phases of the adoption process. One of the draft guidelines on Environmental Performance Evaluation (EPE) (to become ISO 14031) notes that EPE "is a process and tool which provides management with information linked to the achievement of an organization's targets and objectives in the environmental management system."53

It is much too soon to predict how the adoption of ISO 14000 will affect the way firms set objectives and targets, but it will certainly make whatever process they use more visible and subject to scrutiny. The standard does not require the firms to make public their progress to these goals, but many will choose to do so in their efforts to gain more legitimacy and public trust, as discussed earlier. And, since many expect that installing ISO 14000 will rapidly become a prerequisite for doing business in the same way that ISO 9000 has, many firms that have not yet become explicit about their intentions with respect to environment will have to first determine what they are going to do and then act to get there. Most U.S. firms ignored the potential power of ISO 9000 as a ticket of admission; this time around, with ISO 14000, they are determined not to make the same mistake and have taken a very active role in the drafting process.

Coordinated Action to Promote an Environmentally Attractive Product

Several industry associations have taken action to promote the products or processes of their member firms as environmentally attractive alternatives. For example, the Aluminum Association (AA) and the Steel Manufacturer's Association are stressing that the ability to recycle certain metals makes their industry less dependent on non-renewable ore resources, and therefore imposes a lower burden on the environment through reduced extraction activities and energy use.

Promoting recycling of aluminum has long been a focus of the AA. Barry Myers of the AA observes that the emphasis has shifted recently from merely recycling beverage cans, to working with auto manufacturers to develop recyclable car parts. He adds that, in 1994, the share of aluminum used in the auto industry surpassed the share used in packaging for the first time.

The plastics industry also sees scope for promoting recyclable plastics as an alternative to heavier materials typically used in durable products. A spokesperson for the American Plastics Council noted that there has been a shift in focus from four years ago when the greatest concern for the industry was reducing and recycling packaging material. There is now a greater emphasis on recycling durable plastics (which are expected to last three years or more) as opposed to non-durable (e.g., soda bottles). While people held the belief that plastic bottles were filling up landfill sites, durable plastics actually contribute two to three times the volume of non-durables in landfills. The APC spokesperson also noted a trend towards increasing the use of plastics in durable items like automobiles and appliances.

Page
305
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Part I: Committee Report (1-2)
Summary (3-14)
Society's Environmental Goals (15-26)
Use Social Science and Risk Assessment to Make Better Societal Choices (27-36)
Focus on Monitoring to Build Better Understanding of Our Ecological Systems (37-50)
Reduce the Adverse Impacts of Chemicals in the Environment (51-60)
Develop Environmental Options for the Energy System (61-72)
Use a Systems Engineering and Ecological Approach to Reduce Resource Use (73-80)
Improve Understanding of the Relationship Between Population and Consumption as a Means to Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Population Growth (81-86)
Set Environmental Goals Via Rates and Directions of Change (87-90)
Bibliography (91-94)
Part II: Commissioned Papers (95-96)
National Environmental Goals: Implementing the Laws, Visions of the Future, and Research (97-134)
Measurement of Environmental Quality in the United States (135-178)
Attitudes Toward the Environment Twenty-Five Years After Earth Day (179-190)
Environmental Goals and Science Policy: A Review of Selected Countries (191-242)
Can States Make a Market for Environmental Goals? (243-280)
Setting Environmental Goals: The View from Industry. A Review of Practices from the 1960s (281-326)
Status of Ecological Knowledge Related to Policy Decision-Making Needs in the Area of (327-344)
The Federal Budget and Environmental Priorities (345-398)
Part III: Keynote Addresses and Presentations (399-400)
D. James Baker, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (401-406)
Thomas Grumbly, U.S. Department of Energy (407-412)
Barry Gold, U.S. Department of the Interior (413-418)
Harlan Watson, House Committee on Science (419-422)
David Garman, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (423-430)
John Wise and Peter Truitt, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (431-436)
Judith Espinosa and Peggy Duxbury, President's Council on (437-448)
Gilbert S. Omenn, University of Washington (449-462)
Part IV: Appendixes (463-464)
A Committee Member and Staff Biographical Information (465-470)
B Forum Agenda (471-474)
C Forum Participants (475-482)
D Summary of Responses to Call for Comments (483-488)
E Respondents to Call for Comments (489-496)
F Summary of Breakout-Group Discussions (497-500)
G Detecting Changes in Time and Space (501-504)
H Contents and Executive Summary of a Report of the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government (505-516)
Index (517-530)