National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$74.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals (1996)
Policy Division (PD)

Citation Manager

. "Focus on Monitoring to Build Better Understanding of Our Ecological Systems." Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1996.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
38
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Linking Science and Technology to Society's Environmental Goals

The nation's future environmental goals should be to maintain the progress made thus far.…We would not want to see water or air pollutants increase, nor would we want to undo proper handling of hazardous wastes.

Nonetheless, every area of current environmental activity should be reassessed and priority given to the areas most affecting public health—long-term, as well as short-term health. Ecological concerns that do not relate to public health deserve serious consideration but should not be presumed to have transcendent intrinsic worth. The loss of a subspecies must be weighed against the costs visited on ordinary citizens.

All risks should be considered in the context of natural hazards and assumed risks. While there is no magic cutoff for acceptable risk, rankings of the cost of risk avoidance and of natural and man-made risks can help to defuse the hysteria that causes an allocation of resources to low-risk, high-cost concerns.

—Forum Participant Comment

As particular environmental concerns became prominent, systems of measurement were put into place to provide the needed information. The interest in temperatures and rainfall led to the establishment of national weather bureaus, which then proceeded to add other dimensions as demands arose. Some of the data systems use relatively simple instruments and training, as with the thousands of amateur observers around the United States who report daily measurements. Others are highly sophisticated, such as the satellites that furnish the images that record the approach of tropical hurricanes. Some need to be global because the phenomena being investigated and recorded occur on a global scale—for example, satellite measurements of stratospheric ozone.

Although the desirability of directly comparable measurements has long been recognized, the great majority of environmental data collected over the last several decades fails to meet this criterion. Most scientific environmental research has the primary goal of understanding a particular system at one time and in one place, and only later and separately does the question of whether this understanding is substantially different in another place or in the same location at some future time arise.

Science and technology can contribute to achieving environmental goals by identifying and developing improved data-collection methods, systems and sensors that are faster, have wider collection area(s), and are less expensive, more accurate, and more remote.

—Forum Participant Comment

Environmental monitoring has been going on in a quantitative instrumental manner since before the 1870s. In general, the development of research efforts in long-term environmental monitoring originated first in the geophysical sciences and only much later spread to the biological sciences.

Page
38
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Part I: Committee Report (1-2)
Summary (3-14)
Society's Environmental Goals (15-26)
Use Social Science and Risk Assessment to Make Better Societal Choices (27-36)
Focus on Monitoring to Build Better Understanding of Our Ecological Systems (37-50)
Reduce the Adverse Impacts of Chemicals in the Environment (51-60)
Develop Environmental Options for the Energy System (61-72)
Use a Systems Engineering and Ecological Approach to Reduce Resource Use (73-80)
Improve Understanding of the Relationship Between Population and Consumption as a Means to Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Population Growth (81-86)
Set Environmental Goals Via Rates and Directions of Change (87-90)
Bibliography (91-94)
Part II: Commissioned Papers (95-96)
National Environmental Goals: Implementing the Laws, Visions of the Future, and Research (97-134)
Measurement of Environmental Quality in the United States (135-178)
Attitudes Toward the Environment Twenty-Five Years After Earth Day (179-190)
Environmental Goals and Science Policy: A Review of Selected Countries (191-242)
Can States Make a Market for Environmental Goals? (243-280)
Setting Environmental Goals: The View from Industry. A Review of Practices from the 1960s (281-326)
Status of Ecological Knowledge Related to Policy Decision-Making Needs in the Area of (327-344)
The Federal Budget and Environmental Priorities (345-398)
Part III: Keynote Addresses and Presentations (399-400)
D. James Baker, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (401-406)
Thomas Grumbly, U.S. Department of Energy (407-412)
Barry Gold, U.S. Department of the Interior (413-418)
Harlan Watson, House Committee on Science (419-422)
David Garman, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (423-430)
John Wise and Peter Truitt, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (431-436)
Judith Espinosa and Peggy Duxbury, President's Council on (437-448)
Gilbert S. Omenn, University of Washington (449-462)
Part IV: Appendixes (463-464)
A Committee Member and Staff Biographical Information (465-470)
B Forum Agenda (471-474)
C Forum Participants (475-482)
D Summary of Responses to Call for Comments (483-488)
E Respondents to Call for Comments (489-496)
F Summary of Breakout-Group Discussions (497-500)
G Detecting Changes in Time and Space (501-504)
H Contents and Executive Summary of a Report of the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government (505-516)
Index (517-530)