Cover Image

PAPERBACK
$34.75



View/Hide Left Panel

References

Alexander, L. , and H. James . 1987 The Nation's Report Card. Washington, D.C. : National Academy of Education .

1991 America 2000: Excellence in Education Act.

Forgione, Jr., P.D. 1996Memorandum to Mark Musick on NCES's Review of NAGB Redesign Paper. July 1, 1996 .

Forsyth, R. , R. Hambleton , R. Linn , R. Mislevy , and W. Yen . 1996 Design/Feasibility Team Report to the National Assessment Governing Board. Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board .

Glaser, R. , R. Linn , and G. Bohrnstedt . 1996 Letter to Roy Truby on the future of NAEP . February 23, 1996 ,

Glaser, R. , K. Raghavan , and G. Baxter . 1992 Cognitive Theory as the Basis for Design of Innovative Assessment: Design Characteristics of Science Assessments.CSE Technical Report No. 349 . Los Angeles : University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing .

Gifford, B. , and M. O'Connor , eds. 1992 Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement, and Instruction. Boston, Mass. : Kluwer Academic Publishers .

Johnson, S.T. 1996 Letter to Ray Fields on behalf of the Design and Analyses Committee . June 19, 1996 .

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP and Mathtech, Inc. 1996 A Review of the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Management and Methodological Procedures. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Education .

Messick, S. , A. Beaton , and F. Lord . 1983 National Assessment of Educational Progress Reconsidered: A New Design for a New Era. Princeton, N.J. : Educational Testing Service .

National Academy of Education 1993 Setting Performance Standards for Student Assessment. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University, National Academy of Education .

1996 Quality and Utility: The 1994 Trial State Assessment in Reading. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University, National Academy of Education .

in press Capstone Report of the National Academy of Education Panel on the Evaluation of NAEP. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University, National Academy of Education .

National Assessment Governing Board 1996 Redesigning the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Draft for Public Comment (May 1996) . Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board .

no date The National Assessment of Educational Progress: Demands, Realities and Assumptions.Work Group on Planning . Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board .

National Center for Education Statistics 1974 NAEP General Information Yearbook. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Education .

no date NAEP Validation Studies for 1996 . Unpublished paper . U.S. Department of Education .

National Commission on Excellence in Education 1983 A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office .

Porter, A. , and S. Kilgore . 1996 Letters to Mr. William Randall on behalf of the Advisory Council on Education Statistics . April 23, 1996 ; June 27, 1996 .

Tyler, R. 1966 The development of instruments for assessing educational progress . Pp. 95-101 in Proceedings of the 1965 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, N.J. : Educational Testing Service .



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 11
Evaluation of “Redesigning the National Assessment of Educational Progress” References Alexander, L. , and H. James . 1987 The Nation's Report Card. Washington, D.C. : National Academy of Education . 1991 America 2000: Excellence in Education Act. Forgione, Jr., P.D. 1996Memorandum to Mark Musick on NCES's Review of NAGB Redesign Paper. July 1, 1996 . Forsyth, R. , R. Hambleton , R. Linn , R. Mislevy , and W. Yen . 1996 Design/Feasibility Team Report to the National Assessment Governing Board. Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board . Glaser, R. , R. Linn , and G. Bohrnstedt . 1996 Letter to Roy Truby on the future of NAEP . February 23, 1996 , Glaser, R. , K. Raghavan , and G. Baxter . 1992 Cognitive Theory as the Basis for Design of Innovative Assessment: Design Characteristics of Science Assessments.CSE Technical Report No. 349 . Los Angeles : University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing . Gifford, B. , and M. O'Connor , eds. 1992 Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement, and Instruction. Boston, Mass. : Kluwer Academic Publishers . Johnson, S.T. 1996 Letter to Ray Fields on behalf of the Design and Analyses Committee . June 19, 1996 . KPMG Peat Marwick LLP and Mathtech, Inc. 1996 A Review of the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Management and Methodological Procedures. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Education . Messick, S. , A. Beaton , and F. Lord . 1983 National Assessment of Educational Progress Reconsidered: A New Design for a New Era. Princeton, N.J. : Educational Testing Service . National Academy of Education 1993 Setting Performance Standards for Student Assessment. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University, National Academy of Education . 1996 Quality and Utility: The 1994 Trial State Assessment in Reading. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University, National Academy of Education . in press Capstone Report of the National Academy of Education Panel on the Evaluation of NAEP. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University, National Academy of Education . National Assessment Governing Board 1996 Redesigning the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Draft for Public Comment (May 1996) . Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board . no date The National Assessment of Educational Progress: Demands, Realities and Assumptions.Work Group on Planning . Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board . National Center for Education Statistics 1974 NAEP General Information Yearbook. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Education . no date NAEP Validation Studies for 1996 . Unpublished paper . U.S. Department of Education . National Commission on Excellence in Education 1983 A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office . Porter, A. , and S. Kilgore . 1996 Letters to Mr. William Randall on behalf of the Advisory Council on Education Statistics . April 23, 1996 ; June 27, 1996 . Tyler, R. 1966 The development of instruments for assessing educational progress . Pp. 95-101 in Proceedings of the 1965 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, N.J. : Educational Testing Service .

OCR for page 11
Evaluation of “Redesigning the National Assessment of Educational Progress” U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment 1992 Testing in American Schools: Asking the Right Questions. Washington D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office . U.S. General Accounting Office 1992 National Assessment Technical Quality.GAO/ PEMD-92-22R . Washington, D.C. : U.S. General Accounting Office . 1993 Educational Achievement Standards: NAGB's Approach Yields Misleading Interpretations.GAO/ PEMD-93-12, June 1993 . Washington, D.C. : U.S. General Accounting Office . Wittrock, M. , and E. Baker , eds. 1991 Testing and Cognition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall .