Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$40.50
Web:$36.45
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

topleft topright

Glass as a Waste Form and Vitrification Technology: Summary of an International Workshop (1996)
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER)

Page
2
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Glass as a Waste Form and Vitrification Technology: Summary of an International Workshop

knowledge and understanding of the corrosion of waste form glasses that result from future research and development.

  1. In the United States there is almost no connection between waste acceptance criteria (essentially a determination of product consistency) and the scientific basis for understanding the long-term behavior of glass waste forms.

  2. There is considerable worldwide experience in the vitrification of high level waste, providing a strong basis for proceeding with vitrification technologies; however, a single technology will not solve every waste problem. The properties of any solid (glass, crystalline, or glass-ceramic) depend, to a considerable extent, on composition as well as on the solid's thermal and processing history. The diverse waste streams found in the DOE complex may require (a) extensive pretreatment to develop more narrowly defined compositions for vitrification, (b) the development of alternative waste glass compositions, and/or (c) the development of alternative waste forms.

In summary, the present knowledge of glass properties, particularly corrosion behavior, is considerable, and industrial-scale experience with the vitrification of radioactive waste is impressive. This provides a firm basis for present DOE programs. However, based on what its members heard at the workshop, the steering committee believes that continued research and development to improve waste form performance, as discussed in the body of this report, may lead to substantially reduced risks to the public, reduced costs to the taxpayers, and reduced uncertainty in the regulatory analysis of compliance.

Page
2