National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$52.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Vaccines for the 21st Century: A Tool for Decisionmaking (2000)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix 28: Summary of Workshops." Vaccines for the 21st Century: A Tool for Decisionmaking. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
361
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Vaccines for the 21st Century: A Tool for Decisionmaking

contrast, most of the tissue-crossreactive epitopes that have been identified to date occur at a distance from the amino terminus, typically in the A, B, or C repeat regions. Consequently, researchers have attempted to develop a vaccine that incorporates amino terminal fragments of several different M proteins, so that they can evoke opsonic antibodies without evoking tissue-crossreactive antibodies. This approach might be characterized as a “fragment of subunit vaccine.” By incorporating these fragments into a single construct, they hope to minimize the total amount of protein injected while representing the largest possible number of serotypes.

Development of Complex, Type-Specific M Protein Vaccines. Using specific PCR primers, researchers amplified the 5-prime regions of the M protein gene from four different serotypes—M24, M5, M6, and M19. They purified the PCR products, ligated them in a hybrid M protein gene, and inserted the gene into an expression vector, in this case a transformed E. coli. Schematically, the resulting hybrid protein contained 110 amino acids from M24, 58 from M5, and 35 each from M6 and M19. Recombinant hybrid protein was extracted from the E. coli, purified, and used as a vaccine in a series of animal tests.

Three rabbits immunized with the tetravalent protein produced significant levels of antibodies against all four serotypes of native protein. However, the level of relevant (i.e., opsonic) antibodies tended to be higher for the first two fragments (M24 and M5, nearest the amino terminus) and lower for the last two (M6 and M19, nearest the carboxy terminus). Researchers were uncertain whether this difference was a function of the size of the fragments or their position on the hybrid protein. To resolve this uncertainty, researchers added another four fragments toward the carboxy terminus—35 amino acids each from M1, M3, M18, and M2—and injected another set of rabbits with the resulting octavalent protein. Again, the immunized rabbits produced significant levels of antibodies against all of the serotypes, and again the level of opsonic antibodies tended to decline toward the carboxy terminus.

To determine whether multivalent hybrid M protein would be immunogenic when administered locally by the mucosal route, researchers constructed additional hybrid proteins consisting of the entire B subunit of E. coli labile toxin (LT-B) ligated to 15 amino acids from type 5 M protein (M5), using a proline-and glycine-rich linker. Mice that were immunized intranasally with the resulting LT-B-M5 vaccine produced opsonic serum antibodies against the M5 component, and this response afforded significant protection when the mice were challenged peritoneally with type 5 streptococci. When this experiment was repeated with a LT-B-tetravalent vaccine, however, one of the components (M19, nearest the carboxy terminus) was not immunogenic at all. These mice also developed secretory immunoglobulin-A (IGA) in their saliva, a sign of mucosal immunity, but the IgA level was not particularly high.

An alternative to this approach concentrates not on the hypervariable amino terminus but instead on epitopes in the so-called C-repeats region, epitopes that

Page
361
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Executive Summary (1-10)
Introduction (11-16)
Progress in Vaccine Development (17-38)
Considerations of Candidate Vaccines (39-52)
Overview of Analytic Approach and Results (53-92)
Review of the Analytical Model (93-108)
Ethical Considerations and Caveats (109-122)
Observations (123-132)
References (133-142)
Appendix 1: Borrelia burgdorferi (143-148)
Appendix 2: Chlamydia (149-158)
Appendix 3: Coccidioides Immitis (159-164)
Appendix 4: Cytomegalovirus (165-172)
Appendix 5: Enterotoxigenic E. coli (173-176)
Appendix 6: Epstein-Barr Virus (177-180)
Appendix 7: Helicobacter pylori (181-188)
Appendix 8: Hepatitis C (189-194)
Appendix 9: Herpes Simplex Virus (195-206)
Appendix 10: Histoplasma capsulatum (207-212)
Appendix 11: Human Paillomavirus (213-222)
Appendix 12: Influenza A and B (223-232)
Appendix 13: Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (233-238)
Appendix 14: Melanoma (239-244)
Appendix 15: Multiple Sclerosis (245-250)
Appendix 16: Mycobacterium tuberculosis (251-256)
Appendix 17: Neisseria gonnorrhea (257-266)
Appendix 18: Neisseria meningitidis (267-272)
Appendix 19: Parainfluenza Virus (273-278)
Appendix 20: Respiratory Syncytial Virus (279-284)
Appendix 21: Rheumatoid Arthritis (285-290)
Appendix 22: Rotavirus (291-294)
Appendix 23: Shigella (295-298)
Appendix 24: Streptococcus, Group A (299-304)
Appendix 25: Streptococcus, Group B (305-312)
Appendix 26: Streptococcus pneumoniae (313-322)
Appendix 27: Information on accessing Electronic Spreadsheets (323-324)
Appendix 28: Summary of Workshops (325-434)
Appendix 29: Questions Posed to Outside Experts and List of Responders (435-442)
Index (443-460)