National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$39.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Barrier Technologies for Environmental Management: Summary of a Workshop (1997)
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER)

Citation Manager

. "Introduction." Barrier Technologies for Environmental Management: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1997.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
3
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Introduction

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is the federal agency responsible for the remediation of this country's nuclear weapons complex, a large network of industrial facilities for the research, production, and testing of nuclear weapons. This enormous undertaking currently is estimated to cost several hundreds of billion dollars over the next 75 years (U.S. Department of Energy, 1996).

Not all radioactive waste problems can be solved by excavating and treating wastes. Properly engineered containment systems can provide both interim isolation of contaminants, while remedial technologies are being developed, and longer-term isolation of those contaminants that will remain at DOE sites after remediation. Consequently, engineered containment structures (collectively referred to as ''barriers" in this report) such as surface caps and subsurface vertical and horizontal barriers will be needed as important components of remediation strategies.

The Committee on Remediation of Buried and Tank Wastes (hereafter, the "committee") was appointed by the National Research Council and has the general task of addressing critical generic and site-specific issues relevant to remediation of the environmental contamination from buried and tank-contained defense radioactive and mixed waste. Among the issues under study by the committee is the application of new and evolving remediation technologies and strategies. During its studies, the committee found that effective containment-in-place approaches are needed at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington, and across the DOE complex (National Research Council, 1996). The committee also found that DOE was performing significant research, including prototype evaluations at facilities such as the Hanford Site in Washington and the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls. In addition, DOE has constructed and maintained surface barriers under the Uranium Mill Tailing Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project. Other entities have used barrier technologies successfully for many years to isolate waste materials and contaminated ground water and soil.

Consequently, the committee and representatives of the DOE Office of Environmental Restoration agreed that a workshop on containment barriers would be useful. Participants in such a workshop would include government researchers and contractors, as well as barrier designers and builders from the private sector. DOE and the committee cosponsored the workshop on August 13, 1995, in conjunction with the DOE ER'95 (Environmental Restoration 1995) Conference in Denver, Colorado.

The workshop program was designed to cover a wide range of barrier approaches using various materials, both natural and man-made, and different installation techniques. Information was presented on surface and subsurface barrier technologies being evaluated or used within the DOE complex and by other entities. Two overview presentations were followed by sessions on surface and subsurface barriers. Each session was completed by discussion with a panel of the presenters. The next day, the session chairs presented a summary to the attendees of ER'95. The program for the workshop is included as Appendix B, and workshop participants are listed in Appendix C.

Page
3
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Executive Summary (1-2)
Introduction (3-3)
Workshop Overview (4-5)
Themes Identified at Workshop (6-6)
References (7-8)
Appendix A: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members (9-14)
Appendix B: Program Outline (15-16)
Appendix C: Participants (17-18)
Appendix D: Table of Contents of Papers Presented (19-20)
Development and Testing of Permanent Isolation Surface Barriers at the Hanford Site (21-40)
New Technologies for Subsurface Barrier Wall Construction (41-53)
Ecology, Design, and Long-Term Performance of Surface Barriers: Applications at a Uranium Mill Tailings Site (54-67)
Soil, Plant and Structural considerations for Surface Barriers in Arid Environments: Application of Results from Studies in the Mojave Desear near Beatty, Nevada (68-78)
Natural Physical and Biological Processes Compromise the Long-term Performance of Compacted Soil Caps (79-88)
Geomembranes in Surface Barriers (89-96)
Earthen Materials in Surface Barriers (97-107)
Comparison of Clay and Asphaltic Materials for Use as Low-Permeability Layers in Engineered Covers at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (108-118)
Alternatives for Ground Water Cleanup (119-132)
Construction of Deep Barrier Walls for Waste Containment (133-141)
Self-Hardening Slurries and Stable Grouts from Cement-Bentonite to IMPERMIX (142-149)
A Field Test of Permeation Grouting in Heterogeneous Soils Using a New Generation of Barrier Liquids (150-161)
Sealable Joint Steel Sheet Piling for Ground-Water Pollution Control (162-170)
Artifically Frozen Ground as a Subsurface Barrier Technology (171-179)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 3
Introduction The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is the federal agency responsible for the remediation of this country's nuclear weapons complex, a large network of industrial facilities for the research, production, and testing of nuclear weapons. This enormous undertaking currently is estimated to cost several hundreds of billion dollars over the next 75 years (U.S. Department of Energy, 1996). Not all radioactive waste problems can be solved by excavating and treating wastes. Properly engineered containment systems can provide both interim isolation of contaminants, while remedial technologies are being developed, and longer-term isolation of those contaminants that will remain at DOE sites after remediation. Consequently, engineered containment structures (collectively referred to as ''barriers" in this report) such as surface caps and subsurface vertical and horizontal barriers will be needed as important components of remediation strategies. The Committee on Remediation of Buried and Tank Wastes (hereafter, the "committee") was appointed by the National Research Council and has the general task of addressing critical generic and site-specific issues relevant to remediation of the environmental contamination from buried and tank-contained defense radioactive and mixed waste. Among the issues under study by the committee is the application of new and evolving remediation technologies and strategies. During its studies, the committee found that effective containment-in-place approaches are needed at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington, and across the DOE complex (National Research Council, 1996). The committee also found that DOE was performing significant research, including prototype evaluations at facilities such as the Hanford Site in Washington and the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls. In addition, DOE has constructed and maintained surface barriers under the Uranium Mill Tailing Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project. Other entities have used barrier technologies successfully for many years to isolate waste materials and contaminated ground water and soil. Consequently, the committee and representatives of the DOE Office of Environmental Restoration agreed that a workshop on containment barriers would be useful. Participants in such a workshop would include government researchers and contractors, as well as barrier designers and builders from the private sector. DOE and the committee cosponsored the workshop on August 13, 1995, in conjunction with the DOE ER'95 (Environmental Restoration 1995) Conference in Denver, Colorado. The workshop program was designed to cover a wide range of barrier approaches using various materials, both natural and man-made, and different installation techniques. Information was presented on surface and subsurface barrier technologies being evaluated or used within the DOE complex and by other entities. Two overview presentations were followed by sessions on surface and subsurface barriers. Each session was completed by discussion with a panel of the presenters. The next day, the session chairs presented a summary to the attendees of ER'95. The program for the workshop is included as Appendix B, and workshop participants are listed in Appendix C.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

barrier technologies