Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $34.00
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$29.00
Web:$26.10
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $22.50
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $1.60
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading Edge Engineering from the 1996 NAE Symposium on Frontiers of Engineering (1997)
National Academy of Engineering (NAE)

Page
30
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


mean a VR capability whereby a participant perceives himself/herself, from a first-person point of view, to be inside the aircraft geometry, "wearing" a graphical human body whose positions and movements closely mimic his/her own. Position/orientation sensors on the participant's limbs, torso, and head provide the necessary information to the computer, enabling it to draw the graphical body (sometimes called an "avatar") in a corresponding position. Real-time collision detection software informs the participant if he/she has bumped into an obstacle. Someday, haptic feedback systems may enable the user actually to feel such a collision. In the meantime, we provide sound cues and make the object change color to notify the user of the collision.

The fundamental problem we face in trying to use aircraft CAD geometry as our virtual environment is one of scale. CAD geometry is orders of magnitude more complex than the scenes usually portrayed in VR systems. Any subset of interest to the aircraft engineers is likely to contain millions of polygons worth of geometric data, and rendering such data sets in stereo at 25 to 30 frames/second is a daunting challenge. Providing on-the-fly collision detection among such complex geometry is equally daunting. Our approach probably could best be characterized as "use every trick in the book," because all are probably necessary to handle geometry of this scale. The algorithmic techniques we are trying to combine include

  • parallel rendering algorithms,
  • upstream occlusion culling,
  • object simplification and level-of-detail control, and
  • substitution of texture maps for geometry.

Augmented Reality

Independently of the VR project, we are working on another technology involving a VR-style head position/orientation tracker; a see-through head-mounted display; and a belt-mounted, battery-operated computer. This combination makes up the hardware platform for our Augmented Reality (AR) system. Since the display is see-through, the AR system can be used to superimpose computer graphics on the surface of a real object the user is viewing. Because we employ a position/orientation tracking system, the computer can change the display whenever the user moves his/her head, making the graphics appear to be fixed on specific coordinates of the real object. Our goal is to have people who perform touch labor manufacturing tasks use this technology. At every step of a manufacturing or assembly procedure, the diagrams or text a worker needs to perform that step quickly and accurately will appear to him/her as if they were painted on the surface of the workpiece.

The critical technical issue for AR is the head position/orientation tracker. Current commercially available trackers are not adequate for factory use.

Page
30