Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$26.00
Web:$23.40
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Intellectual Property Rights and Research Tools in Molecular Biology: Summary of a Workshop Held at the National Academy of Sciences, February 15-16, 1996 (1997)
Commission on Life Sciences (CLS)

Page
27
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Intellectual Property Rights and Research Tools in Molecular Biology: Summary of a Workshop Held at the National Academy of Sciences, February 15–16, 1996

REFERENCES

Arora A and Gambardella A. 1994. The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labor. Research Policy Sept. 94: 523–532.

Arrow KJ. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson RR, editor. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. New York: Princeton University Press.


Barzel Y. 1968. Optimal timing of innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics 50: 348–355.


Dasgupta P and Stiglitz JE. 1980a. Uncertainty: Industrial structure and the speed of R&D. Bell Journal of Economics 11: 1–28.

Dasgupta P and Stiglitz JE. 1980b. Industrial Structure and the nature of innovative activity. Economic Journal 90: 266–293.


Gilbert R and Shapiro C. 1990. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND J Econ 21: 106–112.


Kitch EW. 1977. The nature and function of the patent system. J Law Econ 20: 265–290.

Klemperer P. 1990. How broad should the scope of patent protection be? RAND J Econ.: 113–130.


Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, and Winter SG. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 14: 783–820.

Loury GL. 1979. Market structure and innovation. Qtly J Econ. XCIII: 395–410.


Machlup F. 1958. An economic review of the patent system. Washington, U.S. Govt. Printing Office.

Mansfield E. 1986. Patents and innovation. Mgmt Sci 32: 173–181.

McFetridge DG, and Rafiquzzaman M. 1986. The Scope and duration of the patent right and the nature of research rivalry. Res Law Econ 8: 91–120.

Merges R. 1995. Contracting into liability rules: institutions supporting transactions and intellectual property rights, [manuscript], Berkeley: University of California Law School.

Merges R, and Nelson RR. 1990. On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review 90(4): 839–916.

Mueller, WF. 1962. The origins of the basic inventions underlying DuPont's major product and process innovations. In: Nelson RR, editor. The rate and direction of inventive activity, NBER, New York: Princeton University Press.


Nordhaus WD. 1969. Invention, growth, and welfare. A theoretical treatment of technological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Reich LS. 1985. The making of American industrial research: science and business at GE and Bell, 1876–1926, New York: Cambridge University Press.


Samuelson P, Davis R, Kapor MD, and Reichman JH. 1994. A manifesto concerning the legal protection of computer programs. Columbia Law Rev 94(8): 2308–2431.

Scherer FM. 1972. Nordhaus's theory of optimal patent life: a geometric reinterpretation. Am Econ Rev 62: 422–427.


Van Dijk TWP. 1994. The limits of patent protection. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Universitaire Pers Maastricht.

Page
27