The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 22
chapter of the qualities desired from every-citizen interfaces
(ECIs). The steering committee emphasizes that this overview,
synthesized from workshop discussions and supporting materials, is
impressionistic rather than complete. More completeness is both
beyond the scope of this report and problematic: the ease of
extrapolating from what we see and do today may be misleading about
the future, although contemporary experiences do illuminate what
does and does not work well.1 In
particular, contemporary examples emphasize the characteristics of
contemporary personal computers and, to a lesser extent, telephones
and televisions; tomorrow's information infrastructure will draw
more on embedded systems and different kinds of devices, too
(Verity and Judge, 1996).
Diversity Of Demands To Be Met By
Every-Citizen Interfaces
The interdisciplinary nature of the workshop discussions
provided evidence for the contributions to technical development of
better interfaces from better understanding of the social context
and ''domestication" of system use. For example, how does the new
technology change or become integrated into household and community
routines? How is the definition of home computing evolving? As
explained by social scientists, that understanding should be
informed by a history of social change associated with computing
and communications systems, leveraging descriptive data and
analysis to anticipate the amount and style of use. For example,
what are the roles of service features, early experiences, and
social influences in the adoption and use of networked
infrastructure by mainstream users? Longitudinal,
multimethodological field research may be especially important for
systems intended for public access (e.g., library resident and
kiosk systems2). It may also help in
understanding how public knowledge, understanding, and educational
needs about security and trustworthiness should be factored into
technical decision making. For example, how far can one go in
providing anonymity and/or privacy protection to citizens without
huge increases in cost or effort associated with use of the
national information infrastructure (NII)? Is technology that is
aimed mainly at protecting institutional (government or
corporate/proprietary) information generalizable, or do individuals
present specific additional requirements?
Today's Diverse Uses of Information
and Communications Technologies
Reliable, comprehensive, and up-to-date data about everyday uses
to which people currently put information technology are in short
supply,