Have the students discuss each of the questions. Accept any reasonable explanations students offer. Try consistently to point out the difference between what they observe and what they infer. Ask them to suggest evidence that would support their proposed explanations.
Explore Reveal the second position of the puzzle and allow time for the students to consider the new information. Students will see that the first explanation may need to be modified and new ones added.
Next project the complete puzzle and ask students to interpret what happened. A key point for students to recognize is that any reasonable explanation must be based only on those proposed explanations that still apply when all of the puzzle is projected. Any interpretation that is consistent with all the evidence is acceptable.
Should it become necessary to challenge the students' thinking and stimulate the discussion, the following questions may help. Students should give evidence or suggest what they would look for as evidence to support their proposed explanations.
In what directions did the animals move?
Did they change their speed and direction?
What might have changed the footprint pattern?
Was the land level or irregular?
Was the soil moist or dry on the day these tracks were made?
In what kind of rock were the prints made?
Were the sediments coarse or fine where the tracks were made?
The environment of the track area also should be discussed. If dinosaurs made the tracks, the climate probably was warm and humid. If students propose that some sort of obstruction prevented the animals from seeing each other, this might suggest vegetation. Or perhaps the widened pace might suggest a slope. Speculate on the condition of the surface at the time the footprints were made. What conditions were necessary for their preservation?
Explain An imaginative student should be able to propose several possible explanations. One of the most common is that two animals met and fought. No real reason exists to assume that one animal attacked and ate the other. Ask students who propose this explanation to indicate the evidence. If they could visit the site, what evidence would they look for that would support their explanation. Certain lines of evidence—the quickened gaits, circular pattern, and disappearance of one set of tracks—could support the fight explanation. They might, however, support an explanation of a mother picking up her baby. The description and temperament of the animals involved are open to question. Indeed, we lack the evidence to say that the tracks were made at the same time. The intermingling shown in the middle section of the puzzle may be evidence that both tracks were made at one time, but it could be only a coincidence. Perhaps one animal passed by and left, and then the other arrived.
Discuss the expected learning outcomes related to scientific inquiry and the nature of science. To answer the questions posed by the set of fossil footprints, the students, like scientists, constructed reasonable explanations based solely on their logical interpretation of the available evidence. They recognized and analyzed alternative explanations by weighing the evidence and examining the logic to decide which explanations seemed most reasonable. Although there may have been several plausible explanations, they did not all have equal weight. In a manner similar to the way scientists work, students should be able to use scientific criteria to find, communicate, and defend the preferred explanation.
Elaborate You can have more discussions on interpreting series of events using animal prints students find outdoors and reproduce for the class. Do not forget to look for human footprints. Have students design a different fossil footprint puzzle. Choose several different ones and have student teams repeat the activity using the same learning goals.
Evaluate Describe a specific event involving two or more people or animals where footprint evidence remains. Ask the students, either in teams or individually, to diagram footprint evidence that could lead to several different, yet defensible, explanations regarding what took place. They should be able to explain the strengths and weaknesses of each explanation using their footprint puzzle.