have become quite ill, they—and those close to them—may still change their perceptions of the benefits and burdens of continuing or foregoing treatment. A large study of seriously ill hospitalized patients found that most patients desired cardiopulmonary resuscitation during their initial interview and 70 percent expressed that preference two months later. Of those preferring resuscitation initially, 85 percent maintained that view whereas of those preferring no resuscitation, 69 percent sustained that view (Rosenfeld, Wenger, et al., 1996). Dialysis patients in another study varied greatly in their desires that previously prepared advance directives be followed as compared with allowing surrogates to exercise discretion (Sehgal, 1992). Given these considerations, communication about goals, options, and preferences should not be envisioned as a single event but as a process that occurs as a patient moves toward death.

Issues in Advance Care Planning

Overall, experience with advance care planning indicates that continued investigation is needed to determine the value and limits of such planning and the factors that make it more or less likely to occur and to be helpful to patients and clinicians. The general literature on decisionmaking and decision implementation and the research on advance care planning specifically suggest that effective advance care planning depends on several factors (see, e.g., Lo et al., 1986; Brunetti et al., 1991; Emanuel, 1991; Sachs et al., 1992; Emanuel, 1994; Emanuel and Emanuel, 1994; Morrison et al., 1994; Virmani et al., 1994; Emanuel et al., 1995; Lo, 1995; SUPPORT Principal Investigators, 1995). These factors include:

  • patient and family knowledge. As indicated earlier, some patients and families may want to defer to physician judgments and choices. Patient knowledge is also a consideration in advance care planning. Research suggests that a significant proportion of patients are not familiar with such instruments as living wills or durable powers of attorney, that patients may not understand the language used in these instruments, and that patients may be more optimistic about their prospects and options than is warranted (Murphy et al., 1989; Joos et al., 1993; Teno, Lynn, Wenger, et al., 1997). Interventions to inform patients and provide them the opportunity to complete advance directives have generally shown increases—often substantial—in the proportion of patients with advance directives (Reilly et al., 1994; Baines, Barnhart, et al., 1996; Hammes and Rooney, 1996; Teno, Lynn, Wenger, et al., 1997). In contrast, one study of interest in advance directives found that the 5 percent of patients who were not at all interested in advance directives were more likely than the other 95 percent to have spent time in an intensive care unit (Gilligan and Jensen, 1995).


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement