I Key Barriers and Critical Strategies in the Research and Public Arenas

RESEARCH ARENA

Facilitating Integration and Collaboration

Barrier: Lack of Integrative and Collaborative Research Within and Across Institutions

Strategies:

  • Develop collaborative agreements between deans, chairs, and administrators of institutions to participate in collaborative efforts and to identify individuals and areas for collaboration.

  • Develop resource- and facility-sharing plans.

  • Convene conferences, forums, and planning sessions to promote collaboration.

  • Encourage multi-site clinical and preclinical trials and utilize direct funding to increase cost-effectiveness of research, clinical trials, and training at collaborating institutions.

  • Develop mechanisms to involve industry (e.g., consortia, centers without walls, Requests for Applications [RFAs]).

  • Expand forums and develop innovative mechanisms to present and share scientific information.

  • Convene jointly sponsored workshops, seminars, symposia, and RFAs with different National Institutes of Health institutes.

  • Integrate peer-review panels.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 205
I Key Barriers and Critical Strategies in the Research and Public Arenas RESEARCH ARENA Facilitating Integration and Collaboration Barrier: Lack of Integrative and Collaborative Research Within and Across Institutions Strategies: Develop collaborative agreements between deans, chairs, and administrators of institutions to participate in collaborative efforts and to identify individuals and areas for collaboration. Develop resource- and facility-sharing plans. Convene conferences, forums, and planning sessions to promote collaboration. Encourage multi-site clinical and preclinical trials and utilize direct funding to increase cost-effectiveness of research, clinical trials, and training at collaborating institutions. Develop mechanisms to involve industry (e.g., consortia, centers without walls, Requests for Applications [RFAs]). Expand forums and develop innovative mechanisms to present and share scientific information. Convene jointly sponsored workshops, seminars, symposia, and RFAs with different National Institutes of Health institutes. Integrate peer-review panels.

OCR for page 205
Create "new" interdisciplinary centers of excellence. Create new funding mechanism for interdisciplinary research for young and senior investigators. Examine and possibly revise federal rules for research protocols (e.g., confidentiality). Educate Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) about the risks, benefits, and needs of addiction research. Encourage researchers to publish in clinical journals and other publications. Increasing Skilled Human Resources and Improving Quality Barrier: Lack of Educational Curricula Strategies: Introduce addiction research at an early stage of education. Improve educational curricula in addiction research at all levels, especially among health professionals. Provide a progression of educational training opportunities and permit ready access to the study of addiction research issues. Barrier: Lack of Certification Opportunities Strategies: Clarify definition and requirements for expertise in addiction as it relates to specific specialties. Intensify training requirements and ensure that addiction is part of the educational credentialing process for all health care providers. Enhance educational curricula to convey understanding of concepts related to genetic, biological, and behavioral aspects of addiction. Barrier: Inadequate Mentoring Strategies: Enhance effectiveness of existing programs (e.g., K05, K07). Develop shorter grant review cycles. Ensure mentoring through innovative mechanisms (e.g., satellite programs or a network of mentors for co-mentoring). Implement a systematic assessment of the effects of mentoring experiences. Provide support for short-term internships in clinical settings.

OCR for page 205
  Develop joint programs with industry, foundations, universities, and government. Funding Stability and Adequacy Barrier: Low Levels and Instability of Funding Strategies: Establish stable funding trajectory for research and training grants. Incrementally increase percentage of extramural research funding assigned to training support at National Institute on Drug Abuse and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Develop joint programs with other agencies and institutions (e.g., industry, private foundations, academia) to support research training and ease the difficult transition periods for career development of researchers (utilize memorandum of understanding). Develop mechanisms to provide bridging support for promising young investigators (particularly at difficult transition periods). Barrier: Attracting New Investigators Strategies: Develop more effective targeting of specific awards. Encourage wider use of B/START (Behavioral Science Track Award for Rapid Transition) mechanism. Provide set-aside funds for summer internships. Provide travel money for conferences. Barrier: Special Problems for M.D./Ph.D.s Strategies: Provide a new fellowship that combines research and training. Provide mechanisms for longer training intervals. Develop a debt forgiveness program. Provide support for staggered or short-term clinical internships.

OCR for page 205
PUBLIC ARENA Education and Training Barrier: Lack of Education Strategies: Launch a campaign to educate the public and others in the medical and scientific communities about the commonalities among addictive drugs. Emphasize the importance of addiction research and its accomplishments. Stress the complex nature of addiction—that it is a chronic, relapsing disease involving fundamental changes in brain circuitry. Encourage school- and community-based programs to address issues of addiction at age-appropriate levels. Promote the education of science writers through press conferences and public symposia. Encourage private and public funding of efforts to develop educational programs for schools, adult education programs, educational computer programs, or other media communications. Encourage the development of educational materials for undergraduate-level courses. Educate the public and professionals about myths versus scientific clinical facts regarding addiction. Tackling Stigma and Building Advocacy Barrier: Lack of Advocacy Strategies: Build advocacy groups from families of nicotine, alcohol, and illegal drug users. Emphasize what works and why and link research and treatment to other areas. Involve private foundations, industry, universities, and other organizations as well as M.D./Ph.D. scientist leaders to translate research findings and new clinical developments into lay terms. Increase communications with media to report timely, accurate, and reliable information about research findings. Disseminate scientific information to the public. Forge an alliance between local citizens' groups and scientists to conduct symposia.

OCR for page 205
Organize grassroots organizations into a national network of advocates Aggressively seek increased support for research. Increase the visibility of addiction research within existing organizations that advocate on behalf of addiction treatment and services.

OCR for page 205
This page is blank in original.