|
Criticism
|
No. of Letters
|
|
Application Process
|
|
|
Cumbersome application process (e.g., length of forms, details required of safety plans, laboratory environment)
|
46
|
|
Communication with DOD staff inadequate regarding grant submission
|
8
|
|
No mechanisms to resubmit or improve grants not funded
|
3
|
|
Training grant applications should request and evaluate training environment, mentors, other key factors in training program
|
3
|
|
Time from submission to notification about funding too long
|
3
|
|
Grants Management
|
|
|
Annual report requirements too long, not well reviewed, oversight too rigid
|
13
|
|
Human volunteers regulations too burdensome
|
8
|
|
No flexibility in spending across budget categories
|
3
|
|
Peer/programmatic review
|
|
|
Concerns about funding out of priority score order
|
10
|
|
Lack of continuity in study section members
|
3
|