Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 28
4
Quality of the Work Force
A critical characteristic of a work force is its quality. Some observers
have expressed concern that the quality of the engineering [and scien-
tific) work force in this country may be declining. This concern is not
consistent with the results of the panel's informal survey of employers
of engineers See Appendix DJ and may reflect not so much a decline in
quality as rising expectations of what engineers should be able to do or
guarantee. On the other hand, evidence that might support the nega-
tive view includes the difficulties in the construction and operation of
nuclear power plants, the many recalls of automobiles to correct engi-
neering defects, and the problems that generally afflict U.S. industries,
especially the traditional industries.
Industrial decline can have many interrelated causes in addition to
inadequate engineering. They include shortsighted management;
national priorities that have assigned a large percentage of highly
skilled engineers to defense and space programs rather than to indus-
trial production; investment in foreign countries having relatively
cheap labor; and many others.
Current Views of Quality
There is no direct measure of the quality of the engineering work
force. Opinions on the question differ, and these differences are typified
by the results of the panel's informal survey and the contrasting aca-
demic analysis, as discussed in this section.
28
OCR for page 29
QUALITY OF THE WORK FORCE
29
More than half of the industrial respondents to the panel's survey of
employers reported difficulty in finding quality graduates in computer
hardware, computer software, electrical, and electronics engineering.
Difficulty in finding quality graduates in other engineering disciplines
ranged from 14 percent of respondents for civil engineers to 47 percent
for mechanical engineers. Nevertheless, relatively few respondents
noted a decline in the quality of recent graduates, and the predominant
opinion was that quality is rising, although most forefront industrial
organizations believe in and provide for some training above the B.S.
level.
The academic appraisal is less sanguine. The initial premise is that
the scope of engineering and the knowledge required in the practice of
engineering have broadened steadily over the years and will continue to
do so very rapidly. The conceptual level of that knowledge and, conse-
quently, the complexity of engineering practice also are rising signifi-
cantly, but at a more moderate rate. Historically, the engineering
community has kept pace with the scope and amount of available
knowledge through professional literature, computers and technical
course work, and by means of its own growth in numbers. An impor-
tant change has occurred, however.
For many years, while the average level of secondary education
throughout the United States population was rising, the average level
of undergraduate education in engineering rose correspondingly. But 15
or 20 years ago, the average level of secondary education peaked and
began to decline. The average level of engineering education has
declined as well. In terms of numbers awarded annually, bachelor's
degrees in engineering rose about 75 percent between 1968 and 1982,
while numbers of master's degrees stayed about the same; numbers of
doctoral degrees, which peaked in 1972, had declined by 1982 to about
the level of 1968. Moreover, doctoral degrees awarded to U.S. citizens
in 1982 were down more than 40 percent from the peak of 1972 and
more than 20 percent from 1968.
Thus, during a time of rapid growth in the scope and conceptual level
of knowledge required to practice engineering successfully, the average
degree level of education of our younger engineers has actually
declined. That this trend might have a long-lasting, harmful effect on
engineering education is a source of concern. A similar harmful effect
on industrial innovation and competitiveness might also occur and
jeopardize this country's posture in world markets. Continuing educa-
tion in industry has grown during the past 15 years but can only partly
counteract the general downturn.
Academics believe that they can explain the apparent conflict
OCR for page 30
30
ENGINEERING EMPLOYMENT CHAMCTERIS TICS
between this analysis and other opinions which hold that the quality of
recent engineering graduates is at least as high as it has ever been. They
argue that engineering schools in recent years have been able to restrict
their undergraduate enrollments to only the best students. High school
seniors planning to major in engineering have scored well above the
average for college-bound seniors on both the verbal and mathematical
parts of the Scholastic Aptitude Test. ~ Quantitative scores on the Grad-
uate Record Examination have remained-high among engineers headed
for graduate school. These factors, educators contend, have tended to
obscure the negative effects of problems such as high student-to-fac-
ulty ratios and obsolete equipment. Thus, wha-t-^employers may be
seeing in young engineers, according to the academic argument, is
basic intelligence and aptitude, not necessarily depth of education.
Opinions of the quality of the engineering work force are varied, as
we have seen, and necessarily subjective. Nevertheless, the issue is
critical and warrants continuing serious attention.
Representative terms from entire chapter:
quality graduates
