National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$198.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Twenty-First Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics (1997)
Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications (CPSMA)

Citation Manager

. "Measurements of Hydrodynamic Damping of Bluff Bodies with Application to the Prediction of Viscous Damping of TLP Hulls." Twenty-First Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1997.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
623
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Twenty-First Symposium on NAVAL HYDRODYNAMICS

structure the magnitude of the response depends critically on the damping level and viscous effects may make a significant contribution to this damping. Estimates of damping coefficients are required to predict both surge and heave motions. Here we will present some direct measurements of the viscous damping of components of TLP hulls obtained by displacing them and recording their decay in still water. By appropriately combining these it should be possible to approximate the damping of a complete hull. It is intended to check the accuracy of this procedure by also measuring the damping of a model of a TLP hull.

In reality, of course, the fluid is always viscous and the damping is just that part of the total loading that happens to be in phase with the structure velocity. When a structure is excited into oscillation by wave forces is it permissible to predict the response using damping levels obtained in still water? Sarpkaya (1) has expressed a similar concern about this approach and states “damping is used to lump into one parameter our inability to solve the fluid-structure interaction problem”. However, until we are able to solve satisfactorily this interaction problem designers will need estimates of damping. Hence damping values, expressed in terms of drag coefficients, will be presented in this paper.

When considering the damping of TLP hulls in real seas the relative motion between the water and the structure is considerably more complex than the harmonic motion considered in simple decay tests. The relative flow has three components which in the general case are not collinear. These motions are due to waves, currents and the response of the structure. The wave motion may excite response of the structure in three distinct frequency ranges appropriate to slow drift response, wave response and springing response. There is evidence available to suggest that damping due to a current and waves, together with response in surge, can be dealt with by the relative motion form of Morison's equation, provided there is no resonance with vortex shedding. The heave response in the springing mode is characterised by relatively high frequencies and very small motions and it may not be appropriate to lump this motion together with the others into Morison's equation. One possibility is that it may act independently within a much slower varying velocity field. It is clear that there are many outstanding questions surrounding the concept of hydrodynamic damping. However, the study of viscous effects for small amplitude oscillatory motion is in itself an interesting subject and some new results, and perhaps some fresh understanding, may result from our experiments.

Assuming that the fluid loading on an oscillating body can be described by Morison's equation then the hydrodynamic damping is related to the drag term in this equation. It can be shown, see for example Bearman and Mackwood (2), that the logarithmic decrement of damping, δ, is related to the drag coefficient of a body, CD, through the relationship:

δ=2ρD2.KC.CD/3πm. (1)

In this expression ρ is water density, D a length scale used in CD (in the case of a circular cylinder it would normally be the diameter), KC is Keulegan Carpenter number and m is the effective mass per unit length of the body. KC is defined as UT/D, where U is the maximum velocity of the body relative to the water during a cycle and T is the period of oscillation. For harmonic motion KC can be defined as 2πA/D, where A is the amplitude of oscillation.

The viscous drag coefficient is composed of a skin friction component and a component related to the pressure force on the body. For circular cylinders, at KC values of order unity or less the contributions from pressure and skin friction are of a similar magnitude. However, at higher KC numbers separation occurs and the drag coefficient, and hence damping, is then dominated by the pressure component. Mooring lines, tethers and risers experience large motions relative to their diameters and hence their KC numbers are also large and in a range where there is considerable data available on drag coefficients. Apart from large amplitude slow drift oscillations, the flow around hulls is characterised by small KC numbers and is in a regime where there is sparse information on CD values that can be applied with confidence to full scale structures.

In the case of TLP hulls viscous damping arises from flow about the vertical columns and from the pontoon. The columns are usually circular whereas the pontoon may be constructed from square or rectangular section with various degrees of corner rounding. The damping level is dependent on characteristics of the boundary layer flow and on whether separation occurs from the circular members

Page
623
Front Matter (R1-R16)
Opening Remarks (1-4)
Progress Toward Understanding How Waves Break (5-28)
Radiation and Diffraction Waves of a Ship at Forward Speed (29-44)
Nonlinear Ship Motions and Wave-Induced Loads by a Rankine Method (45-63)
Nonlinear Water Wave Computations Using a Multipole Accelerated, Desingularized Method (64-74)
Computations of Wave Loads Using a B-Spline Panel Method (75-92)
Simulation of Strongly Nonlinear Wave Generation and Wave-Body Interactions Using a 3-D Model (93-109)
Analysis of Interactions Between Nonlinear Waves and Bodies by Domain Decomposition (110-119)
Fourier-Kochin Theory of Free-Surface Flows (120-135)
24-inch Water Tunnel Flow Field Measurements During Propeller Crashback (136-146)
Accuracy of Wave Pattern Analysis Methods in Towing Tanks (147-160)
Unsteady Three-Dimensional Cross-Flow Separation Measurements on a Prolate Spheroid Undergoing Time-Dependent Maneuvers (161-176)
Time-Domain Calculations of First-and Second-Order Forces on a Vessel Sailing in Waves (177-188)
Third-Order Volterra Modeling Ship Responses Based on Regular Wave Results (189-204)
Nonlinearly Interacting Responses of the Two Rotational Modes of Motion-Roll and Pitch Motions (205-219)
Nonlinear Shallow-Water Flow on Deck Coupled with Ship Motion (220-234)
Radar Backscatter of a V-like Ship Wake from a Sea Surface Covered by Surfactants (235-248)
Turbulent Free-Surface Flows: A Comparison Between Numerical Simulations and Experimental Measurements (249-265)
Conductivity Measurements in the Wake of Submerged Bodies in Density-Stratified Media (266-277)
Macro Wake Measurements for a Range of Ships (278-290)
Time-Marching CFD Simulation for Moving Boundary Problems (291-311)
Yaw Effects on Model-Scale Ship Flows (312-327)
A Multigrid Velocity-Pressure-Free Surface Elevation Fully Coupled Solver for Calculation of Turbulent Incompressible Flow around a Hull (328-345)
The Shoulder Wave and Separation Generated by a Surface-Piercing Strut (346-358)
Vorticity Fields due to Rolling Bodies in a Free Surface-Experiment and Theory (359-376)
Numerical Calculations of Ship Stern Flows at Full-Scale Reynolds Numbers (377-391)
Near-and Far-Field CFD for a Naval Combatant Including Thermal-Stratification and Two-Fluid Modeling (392-407)
Water Entry of Arbitrary Two-Dimensional Sections with and Without Flow Separation (408-423)
Coupled Hydrodynamic Impact and Elastic Response (424-437)
A Practical Prediction of Wave-Induced Structural Responses in Ships with Large Amplitude Motion (438-452)
Evaluation of Eddy Viscosity and Second-Moment Turbulence Closures for Steady Flows Around Ships (453-469)
On the Modeling of the Flow Past a Free-Surface-Piercing Flat Plate (470-477)
Self-Propelled Maneuvering Underwater Vehicles (478-489)
Spray Formation at the Free Surface of Turbulent Bow Sheets (490-505)
Numerical Simulation of Three-Dimensional Breaking Waves About Ships (506-519)
Generation Mechanisms and Sources of Vorticity Within a Spilling Breaking Wave (520-533)
The Flow Field in Steady Breaking Waves (534-549)
Freak Waves-A Three-Dimensional Wave Simulation (550-560)
Bluff Body Hydrodynamics (561-579)
Large-Eddy Simulation of the Vortical Motion Resulting from Flow over Bluff Bodies (580-591)
The Wake of a Bluff Body Moving Through Waves (592-604)
Low-Dimensional Modeling of Flow-Induced Vibrations via Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (605-621)
Measurements of Hydrodynamic Damping of Bluff Bodies with Application to the Prediction of Viscous Damping of TLP Hulls (622-634)
Hydrodynamics in Advanced Sailing Design (635-660)
Divergent Bow Waves (661-679)
A Method for the Optimization of Ship Hulls from a Resistance Point of View (680-696)
Hydrodynamic Optimization of Fast-Displacement Catamarans (697-714)
On Ships at Supercritical Speeds (715-726)
The Influence of a Bottom Mud Layer on the Steady-State Hydrodynamics of Marine Vehicles (727-742)
A Hybrid Approach to Capture Free-Surface and Viscous Effects for a Ship in a Channel (743-755)
Shock Waves in Cloud Cavitation (756-771)
Asymptotic Solution of the Flow Problem and Estimate of Delay of Cavitation Inception for a Hydrofoil with a Jet Flap (772-782)
Examination of the Flow Near the Leading Edge and Closure of Stable Attached Cavitation (783-793)
Numerical Investigation on the Turbulent and Vortical Flows Beneath the Free Surface Around Struts (794-811)
Steep and Breaking Faraday Waves (812-826)
The Forces Exerted by Internal Waves on a Restrained Body Submerged in a Stratified Fluid (827-838)
Influence of the Cavitation Nuclei on the Cavitation Bucket when Predicting the Full-Scale Behavior of a Marine Propeller (839-850)
Inception, Development, and Noise of a Tip Vortex Cavitation (851-864)
Velocity and Turbulence in the Near-Field Region of Tip Vortices from Elliptical Wings: Its Impact on Cavitation (865-881)
Calculations of Pressure Fluctuations on the Ship Hull Induced by Intermittently Cavitating Propellers (882-897)
Hydroacoustic Considerations in Marine Propulsor Design (898-912)
Prediction of Unsteady Performance of Marine Propellers with Cavitation Using Surface-Panel Method (913-929)
A Comparitive Study of Conventional and Tip-Fin Propeller Performance (930-945)
A New Way of Stimulating Whale Tail Propulsion (946-958)
Effects of Tip-Clearance Flows (959-972)
Experiments in the Swirling Wake of a Self-Propelled Axisymmetric Body (973-985)
Hydrodynamic Forces on a Surface-Piercing Plate in Steady Maneuvering Motion (986-996)
Advances in Panel Methods (997-1006)
Effect of Ship Motion on DD-963 Ship Airwake Simulated by Multizone Navier-Stokes Solution (1007-1017)
Large-Eddy Simulation of Decaying Free-Surface Turbulence with Dynamic Mixed Subgrid-Scale Models (1018-1032)
Fully Nonlinear Hydrodynamic Calculations for Ship Design on Parallel Computing Platforms (1033-1047)
Validation of Incompressible Flow Computation of Forces and Moments on Axisymmetric Bodies Undergoing Constant Radius Turning (1048-1060)
The Validation of CFD Predictions of Nominal Wake for the SUBOFF Fully Appended Geometry (1061-1076)
Appendix-List of Participants (1077-1084)