National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6. NEXT STEPS
Suggested Citation:"A. THE TITLE I ALLOCATION PROCESS." National Research Council. 1997. Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5885.
×

Appendices

Suggested Citation:"A. THE TITLE I ALLOCATION PROCESS." National Research Council. 1997. Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5885.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"A. THE TITLE I ALLOCATION PROCESS." National Research Council. 1997. Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5885.
×

APPENDIX A
The Title I Allocation Process

Title I allocations are based primarily on Census Bureau estimates of the number of children aged 5–17 in families with income below the poverty level. The formula also counts three other categories of children aged 5–17 (about 5 percent of all formula-eligible children): children in foster homes, in families above the poverty level that receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), and in local institutions for neglected and delinquent children. The Census Bureau estimates are combined with factors defined in the Title I statute to determine the allocations to each state and school district. Title I funds are provided to school districts through a two-stage process: the Department of Education allocates funds to the county level, and the states then suballocate the funds to school districts within each county.

The statute contains four formulas for allocating Title I funds—basic grants, concentration grants, targeted grants, and the Education Finance Incentive Program—but Congress has to date appropriated funds only for the basic and concentration formulas. Basic grants have existed since the program's inception in 1965; concentration grants were added in 1978 to provide additional funds to school districts with high concentrations of school-age children in poverty (Moskowitz et al., 1993). The fiscal 1997 appropriation was $6.195 billion for basic grants (86 percent of the total) and $999 million for concentration grants.

The basic grant formula allocates funds to all counties based on each county's number of formula-eligible children and the state's average per-pupil expenditures, a factor intended to compensate for state differences in the cost of education. County allocations are calculated in an iterative process. The number of formula children in each county is multiplied by 40 percent of the state's per-pupil expenditure (which is limited to between 80 and 120 percent of the national

Suggested Citation:"A. THE TITLE I ALLOCATION PROCESS." National Research Council. 1997. Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5885.
×

average); the resulting allocations are then proportionally reduced so that the total matches the total appropriation for basic grants. Allocations are then adjusted to meet hold-harmless and state minimum grant provisions (see below). Although there are no minimum eligibility criteria for counties, school districts must have at least 10 formula-eligible children, and the number of eligible children must exceed 2 percent of the district's population aged 5–17, in order to receive a basic grant.

The concentration grant formula allocates funds only to counties and school districts with high numbers or percentages of poor school-age children. To be eligible to receive a concentration grant, a county or district must have at least 6,500 formula-eligible children or more than 15 percent of the children in the county or district must be formula eligible. For concentration grants, allocations for eligible counties are calculated based on numbers of formula-eligible children, the state's per-pupil expenditure, and a state minimum provision.

The Title I formula includes a hold-harmless provision to cushion the impact of decreases in allocations. Historically, there has been no hold-harmless provision for concentration grants, but in fiscal 1996, a hold-harmless provision applied to both formulas at a rate of 100 percent: that is, a county could not receive less funds than it had received in fiscal 1995. Beginning in fiscal 1997, the hold-harmless provision applies to basic grants at variable rates, with a higher rate for higher poverty counties and school districts: counties and districts with 30 percent or more poor school-age children are guaranteed at least 95 percent of the prior year's grant; the guarantee is 90 percent for counties with 15–30 percent poor school-age children and 85 percent for counties with fewer than 15 percent poor school-age children. For fiscal 1997 and subsequent years, there is no hold-harmless provision for concentration grants.

A state minimum grant provision applies to each of the two formulas as well. For basic grants, the state minimum grant is equal to the lesser of (1) 0.25 percent of total funds available for Title I basic grants and (2) the average of 0.25 percent of total funds and 150 percent of the national average per-pupil grant payment multiplied by the number of poor children in the state. There is some added complexity for the state minimum for concentration grants (Moskowitz et al., 1993).

Suggested Citation:"A. THE TITLE I ALLOCATION PROCESS." National Research Council. 1997. Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5885.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"A. THE TITLE I ALLOCATION PROCESS." National Research Council. 1997. Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5885.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"A. THE TITLE I ALLOCATION PROCESS." National Research Council. 1997. Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5885.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"A. THE TITLE I ALLOCATION PROCESS." National Research Council. 1997. Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5885.
×
Page 50
Next: B. COMPARISON OF CENSUS AND CPS ESTIMATES OF POVERTY »
Small-Area Estimates of School-Age Children in Poverty: Interim Report 1, Evaluation of 1993 County Estimates for Title I Allocations Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!