National Academies Press: OpenBook

Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators: Report of a Workshop (1997)

Chapter: 11 Cross-Cutting Data Issues

« Previous: 10 Internationalization of Innovative Activity
Suggested Citation:"11 Cross-Cutting Data Issues." National Research Council. 1997. Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5976.
×

11
Cross-Cutting Data Issues

Four cross-cutting themes emerged from the day's discussions of how to improve understanding of innovation: (1) the need for better data integration, (2) the importance of broader industry coverage, (3) the need for data collection and reporting at lower levels of aggregation, (4) the need for greater geographic detail, and (5) the need to achieve and maintain the cooperation of private firms in the provision and use of the information.

Database Integration

The need to integrate technology, innovation, and human resource databases was a frequent theme of participants' comments at the workshop. Linkages are difficult or impossible because databases use different classification systems, contain different levels of aggregation, result from different collection methods, or lack identifying information. Such barriers are a major obstacle to research that would produce policy-relevant information and analysis. Simply within the Commerce Department's portfolio of technology-related information, for example, the R&D data collected by the Census Bureau on Form RD-1 are not integrated with the Bureau of Economic Analysis's (BEA's) data on R&D of firms with foreign direct investment nor with the Patent and Trademark Office's patent records nor with the Census R&D laboratory information reported in the Auxiliary Establishment Survey.

Beyond the difficulties of linking technology-related data lie the challenges of relating innovation data to relevant economic data. For example, the difficulty of matching the establishment-level data in the Longitudinal Research Data file with the enterprise-level RD-1 data has obstructed analysis of the relationship

Suggested Citation:"11 Cross-Cutting Data Issues." National Research Council. 1997. Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5976.
×

between R&D and productivity. Workshop participants suggested several steps to overcome these barriers, ranging from integration of databases across agencies to the inclusion of a single item of identifying information in a standard survey form. For example, Adam Jaffe suggested that companies be asked on the RD-1 form to list the names of the entities under which they hold patents, allowing researchers to match the R&D data to patent data by industry.

The workshop was not designed to assign priorities to these suggestions nor to examine their cost and feasibility. Nevertheless, Steve Landefeld made the encouraging observation that although considerable economic data are acquired by BEA under the condition that they not be linked to other data, a 1990 law allows BEA's foreign direct investment and services data to be linked to Census Bureau establishment data.7 Furthermore, proposed legislation would allow broad data sharing among BEA, the Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and most of the principal U.S. statistical agencies.

Broad Coverage of Industries, Activities, Firms, and Technologies

High-technology and service-sector industries have not been adequately represented in the national technology and innovation-related databases. Many workshop participants endorsed NSF's current efforts to expand the coverage to service and emerging high-technology industries but agreed that a good deal of fundamental research on the structure and nature of industrial innovation systems in these industries is needed to inform new data collection efforts. Unfortunately, the Standard Industrial Classification system, in spite of its recent revision, still does not represent important new areas of economic activity such as biotechnology.

Appropriate Levels of Aggregation

Many workshop participants endorsed the proposition that collection and reporting of R&D and innovation survey information at the level of the business unit rather than the firm level or establishment level would not only enhance its utility but also improve its quality. Survey instruments should be addressed to the most appropriate person or unit in the firm. In large multiproduct firms, R&D units may not have accurate information on firm-level sales, and specific units often report operational figures that do not match those used in other units or by headquarters management.

Greater Geographic Detail

The NSF collects information on R&D activities at the state level, but the state is not the most useful level of geographic aggregation for analyzing innova-

Suggested Citation:"11 Cross-Cutting Data Issues." National Research Council. 1997. Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5976.
×

tion activity. If appropriate business units were required to give the addresses of their R&D operations on the RD-1 survey, the data could be linked to metropolitan statistical areas or counties, enabling the analysis of regional clustering of technology-based enterprises and employment. Nestor Terleckyj of NPA Data Service, Inc., noted that the Office of Patents and Trademarks has allocated recent patent grants to counties and is continuing to do so. He urged increased efforts to achieve geographic disaggregation.

Private-Sector Cooperation

In discussions of data needs the conclusion is often, ''more is better"; but "more" may be unaffordable or impractical to obtain from private-sector respondents. The burden is likely to be greater and the incentives for cooperation less for small firms than for large firms, but it is important not to exclude smaller businesses from consideration.

It was not the intention of the sponsors of this one-day workshop to examine in depth the practical considerations that would determine the feasibility of the suggestions offered by participants. Nevertheless, the workshop did underscore the limitations on resources and the need for private-sector cooperation through, among other means, identification of essential information, exploration of common interests in acquiring information useful to both public policy makers and corporate managers and investors, and, when appropriate, formation of data collection and dissemination partnerships on a cost-shared basis.

Suggested Citation:"11 Cross-Cutting Data Issues." National Research Council. 1997. Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5976.
×
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"11 Cross-Cutting Data Issues." National Research Council. 1997. Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5976.
×
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"11 Cross-Cutting Data Issues." National Research Council. 1997. Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5976.
×
Page 41
Next: Notes »
Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators: Report of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $47.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!

Workshop participants offered a variety of suggestions to the National Science Foundation (NSF) and other federal agencies to improve the usefulness and relevance of data on industrial research and innovation, as well as to increase efficiency in collecting and processing the data. The suggestions dealt with the need to (1) clarify policy information needs; (2) improve the quality, coverage, and collection of existing data items; and (3) identify and collect new types of data.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!