D

Letter from the Office of Management and Budget to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, June 22, 1981



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 139
--> D Letter from the Office of Management and Budget to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, June 22, 1981

OCR for page 139
--> EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON. D.C. 20503 JUNE 22 1981 Honorable Alan M. Lovelace Acting Administrator National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Dear Dr. Lovelace: Thank you for your letter of April 24, 1981, regarding the International Solar Polar Mission, a joint space venture involving the European Space Agency and NASA. Your letter noted that the recent ESA proposal for NASA to buy a West German spacecraft for ISPM is scientifically acceptable, but that additional funds would be required in fiscal years 1983 to 1986. You asked for guidance on how to proceed. A meeting was recently held between representatives of ESA and this office to discuss the future and funding for ISPM. The view was conveyed to ESA that due to further likely cost growth on the space shuttle and other space projects which would exacerbate the already difficult fiscal year 1983 situation, no add-on was possible for the ISPM. However, it was noted that NASA has the flexibility to reprogram funds from within budgetary resource levels to pursue projects within its overall priorities, particularly those that involve important international commitments. I thank you for your views on this important matter. Sincerely, David A. Stockman Director