Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF
your price: $53.00
add to cart

PAPERBACK
list:$44.95
Web:$40.46
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $34.50
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $2.90
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Nutrient Requirements of Swine: 10th Revised Edition (1998)
Board on Agriculture (BOA)

Page
16
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


2
Proteins and Amino Acids

Protein generally refers to crude protein, which is defined for mixed feedstuffs as the nitrogen content × 6.25. This definition is based on the assumption that, on average, the nitrogen content is 16 g of nitrogen/100 g of protein. Proteins are composed of amino acids, and it is actually the amino acids that are the essential nutrients. Therefore, the dietary provision of amino acids in correct amounts and proportions determines the adequacy of a dietary protein concentrate. Supplemental nonprotein nitrogen, such as urea, has not produced beneficial responses in swine that were fed practical diets (Hays et al., 1957; Kornegay et al., 1965; Wehrbein et al., 1970).

Essential And Nonessential Amino Acids

Although there are 20 primary amino acids that occur in proteins, not all of them are essential dietary components. Some amino acids can be synthesized by using carbon skeletons (derived primarily from glucose and other amino acids) and amino groups derived from other amino acids present in excess of the requirement. Amino acids synthesized in this manner are termed nonessential (or dispensable). Amino acids that cannot be synthesized, or cannot be synthesized at a sufficient rate to permit optimal growth or reproduction, are termed essential (or indispensable). Although amino acids in both categories are needed at the physiologic or metabolic level, normal swine diets contain adequate amounts of nonessential amino acids or of amino groups for their synthesis. This seems to be true even for low-protein diets that are supplemented with crystalline amino acids (Brudevoid and Southern, 1994). Thus, most of the emphasis in swine nutrition is on the essential amino acids.

A few amino acids do not fit neatly into the essential and nonessential classifications. An example is arginine, which is generally classified as an essential amino acid. Swine can synthesize arginine, and arginine synthesis from glutamine has been detected in pig enterocytes prepared within 1 hour of farrowing (Wu and Knabe, 1995). However, synthesis is not adequate to meet nutrient requirements during the early stages of growth (Southern and Baker, 1983). Consequently, the diets of growing swine must contain a source of arginine. However, during postpubertal growth and pregnancy, swine can synthesize arginine at a rate sufficient to meet most or all of their needs (Easter et al., 1974; Easter and Baker, 1976). Synthesis of arginine is probably insufficient to meet the demands of lactation.

Proline is not considered an essential amino acid for swine. Initial research by Ball et al. (1986) suggested that very young pigs (1 to 5 kg) were unable to synthesize proline rapidly enough to meet their requirements, and, as a result, a dietary source of proline must be provided. These conclusions were reached on the basis of changes in the oxidation of an indicator amino acid. However, subsequent research from the same laboratory revealed no differences in growth rate between pigs given a diet with almost no dietary supply of proline and pigs fed a diet with supplemental proline (Murphy, 1992). This finding led the author to conclude that proline is not a dietary essential amino acid for neonatal pigs. Furthermore, Chung and Baker (1993) fed a proline-free diet to 5-kg pigs and also observed no growth response to supplemental proline. There are no reports that other classes of swine (greater than 5 kg) require a dietary source of proline.

Cysteine can be synthesized from methionine, and therefore it is classified as nonessential. However, cysteine and its oxidation product cystine can satisfy approximately 50 percent of the need for total sulfur amino acids (methionine + cystine) (Shelton et al., 1951; Becker et al., 1955; Mitchell et al., 1968; Baker et al., 1969; Roth and Kirchgessner,

Page
16

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 16
--> 2 Proteins and Amino Acids Protein generally refers to crude protein, which is defined for mixed feedstuffs as the nitrogen content × 6.25. This definition is based on the assumption that, on average, the nitrogen content is 16 g of nitrogen/100 g of protein. Proteins are composed of amino acids, and it is actually the amino acids that are the essential nutrients. Therefore, the dietary provision of amino acids in correct amounts and proportions determines the adequacy of a dietary protein concentrate. Supplemental nonprotein nitrogen, such as urea, has not produced beneficial responses in swine that were fed practical diets (Hays et al., 1957; Kornegay et al., 1965; Wehrbein et al., 1970). Essential And Nonessential Amino Acids Although there are 20 primary amino acids that occur in proteins, not all of them are essential dietary components. Some amino acids can be synthesized by using carbon skeletons (derived primarily from glucose and other amino acids) and amino groups derived from other amino acids present in excess of the requirement. Amino acids synthesized in this manner are termed nonessential (or dispensable). Amino acids that cannot be synthesized, or cannot be synthesized at a sufficient rate to permit optimal growth or reproduction, are termed essential (or indispensable). Although amino acids in both categories are needed at the physiologic or metabolic level, normal swine diets contain adequate amounts of nonessential amino acids or of amino groups for their synthesis. This seems to be true even for low-protein diets that are supplemented with crystalline amino acids (Brudevoid and Southern, 1994). Thus, most of the emphasis in swine nutrition is on the essential amino acids. A few amino acids do not fit neatly into the essential and nonessential classifications. An example is arginine, which is generally classified as an essential amino acid. Swine can synthesize arginine, and arginine synthesis from glutamine has been detected in pig enterocytes prepared within 1 hour of farrowing (Wu and Knabe, 1995). However, synthesis is not adequate to meet nutrient requirements during the early stages of growth (Southern and Baker, 1983). Consequently, the diets of growing swine must contain a source of arginine. However, during postpubertal growth and pregnancy, swine can synthesize arginine at a rate sufficient to meet most or all of their needs (Easter et al., 1974; Easter and Baker, 1976). Synthesis of arginine is probably insufficient to meet the demands of lactation. Proline is not considered an essential amino acid for swine. Initial research by Ball et al. (1986) suggested that very young pigs (1 to 5 kg) were unable to synthesize proline rapidly enough to meet their requirements, and, as a result, a dietary source of proline must be provided. These conclusions were reached on the basis of changes in the oxidation of an indicator amino acid. However, subsequent research from the same laboratory revealed no differences in growth rate between pigs given a diet with almost no dietary supply of proline and pigs fed a diet with supplemental proline (Murphy, 1992). This finding led the author to conclude that proline is not a dietary essential amino acid for neonatal pigs. Furthermore, Chung and Baker (1993) fed a proline-free diet to 5-kg pigs and also observed no growth response to supplemental proline. There are no reports that other classes of swine (greater than 5 kg) require a dietary source of proline. Cysteine can be synthesized from methionine, and therefore it is classified as nonessential. However, cysteine and its oxidation product cystine can satisfy approximately 50 percent of the need for total sulfur amino acids (methionine + cystine) (Shelton et al., 1951; Becker et al., 1955; Mitchell et al., 1968; Baker et al., 1969; Roth and Kirchgessner,

OCR for page 17
--> 1989; Chung and Baker, 1992a), and in this way can reduce the need for methionine. Methionine cannot be synthesized from cystine, and therefore it is essential. Methionine can meet the total need for sulfur amino acids in the absence of cystine. Similarly, phenylalanine can meet the total requirement for phenylalanine and tyrosine (aromatic amino acids) because it can be converted to tyrosine. Tyrosine can satisfy at least 50 percent of the total need for these two amino acids (Robbins and Baker, 1977), but it cannot serve as the sole source, because it cannot be converted to phenylalanine. Glutamine is considered to be a conditionally essential amino acid in some species (Lacey and Wilmore, 1990), because it prevents intestinal atrophy under certain conditions. Wu et al. (1996) recently reported that addition of 1 percent glutamine to a corn—soybean meal diet prevented jejunal atrophy in pigs weaned at 21 days during the first week postweaning and increased feed efficiency during the second week postweaning. Amino Acids In Diets Cereal grains, such as corn, sorghum, barley, or wheat, are the primary ingredients of most swine diets and usually provide 30 to 60 percent of the total amino acid requirements. But other sources of protein, such as soybean meal, must be provided to ensure adequate amounts of, and a proper balance among, the essential amino acids. Supplements of crystalline amino acids may also be used to increase intakes of specific amino acids. The protein levels necessary to provide adequate intakes of essential amino acids will depend on the feedstuffs used. Feedstuffs that contain ''high quality" proteins (i.e., they have an amino acid pattern relatively similar to the pig's needs) or mixtures of feedstuffs in which the amino acid pattern in one complements the pattern in another will meet the essential amino acid requirements at lower dietary protein levels than feedstuffs with a less desirable amino acid pattern. This is important if one of the goals is to minimize nitrogen excretion. Another method of reducing dietary protein levels, and thereby reducing nitrogen excretion, is the judicious use of supplements of crystalline amino acids. The amino acid requirements of growing-finishing swine, expressed in terms of dietary concentration, increase as the energy density of the diet increases. Research data (Chiba et al., 1991a,b) indicate that at higher or lower energy densities than those found in standard grain—soybean meal diets, amino acid requirements (expressed as a percentage of the diet) may need to be adjusted upward or downward, respectively. The procedures used for amino acid analyses may cause variations in published estimates of amino acid requirements. Determined values for tryptophan and sulfur amino acids in dietary ingredients, in particular, vary considerably. Tryptophan analysis is difficult because of the relatively low concentration in most feedstuffs and because tryptophan is partially destroyed during standard acid hydrolysis. Consequently, special precautions are necessary, such as hydrolysis with barium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, or lithium hydroxide, or protection against oxidation in acid. Methionine and cystine undergo oxidation to multiple derivatives, and controlled oxidation of methionine to methionine sulfone and of cystine to cysteic acid must be carried out with performic acid before acid hydrolysis (Williams, 1994). Ratios Among Amino Acids (Ideal Protein) In determining amino acid requirements, a fundamental concept of this publication is that there is an optimal dietary pattern among essential amino acids that corresponds to the needs of the animal. This optimal dietary pattern is often called "ideal protein." The basis for ideal protein has been discussed by several authors, including the Agricultural Research Council (1981), Fuller and Wang (1990), Baker and Chung (1992), Cole and Van Lunen (1994), and Baker (1997). The concept of an optimal pattern among amino acids has been applied in previous editions of this publication, particularly the ninth edition (National Research Council, 1988), in which the pattern was explicitly listed in a table. However, in the ninth edition the pattern was developed after an examination of the results of experiments to determine amino acid requirements. In the present edition, the pattern was developed primarily from experiments specifically designed for that purpose. Three ideal proteins are used in this publication, one for maintenance, one for protein accretion, and one for milk synthesis. These three patterns, along with a pattern for body tissue protein, are presented in Table 2-1. The ratios for maintenance were calculated by taking the mean of the maintenance requirements for each amino acid determined at the University of Illinois (Baker et al., 1966a, b; Baker and Allee, 1970) and at the Rowett Research Institute (Fuller et al., 1989) and dividing by the maintenance requirement for lysine. The phenylalanine + tyrosine requirement determined at the University of Illinois was not considered reliable and was not included in the mean. Arginine is not required for maintenance. The value of -200 was set to reflect the fact that arginine synthesis can satisfy all the maintenance needs and some of the needs for protein accretion. The maintenance requirement for histidine has not been determined, and so the maintenance ratio was set equal to the ratio for protein accretion.

OCR for page 18
--> TABLE 2-1 Ideal Ratios of Amino Acids to Lysine for Maintenance, Protein Accretion, Milk Synthesis, and Body Tissue Amino Acid Maintenancea Protein Accretionb Milk Synthesisc Body Tissued Lysine 100 100 100 100 Arginine -200 48 66 105 Histidine 32 32 40 45 Isoleucine 75 54 55 50 Leucine 70 102 115 109 Methionine 28 27 26 27 Methionine + cystine 123 55 45 45 Phenylalanine 50 60 55 60 Phenylalanine + tyrosine 121 93 112 103 Threonine 151 60 58 58 Tryptophan 26 18 18 10 Valine 67 68 85 69 a Maintenance ratios were calculated based on the data of Baker et al. (1996a,b), Baker and Allee (1970), and Fuller et al. (1989). The negative value for arginine reflects arginine synthesis in excess of the needs for maintenance. b Accretion ratios were derived by starting with ratios from Fuller et al. (1989) and then adjusting to values that produced blends for maintenance + accretion that were more consistent with recent empirically determined values (Baker and Chung, 1992; Baker et al., 1993; Hahn and Baker, 1995; Baker, 1997). c Milk protein synthesis ratios were those proposed by Pettigrew (1993) based on a survey of the literature; the value of 73 for valine proposed by Pettigrew was modified to 85. d Body tissue protein ratios were from a survey of the literature (Pettigrew, 1993). The ratios for protein accretion were derived by starting with the ratios proposed by Fuller et al. (1989). However, these ratios were adjusted to values that produced blends for maintenance and accretion which were more consistent with recent empirically determined values (for a discussion, see Baker and Chung, 1992; Baker et al., 1993; Hahn and Baker, 1995; Baker, 1997). The ratios for milk production were from the review of Pettigrew (1993) except that the value of 73 for valine was modified to 85 (see Chapter 3). The ratios for body tissue protein were also from the review of Pettigrew (1993). Although it is recognized that the amino acid composition of body protein changes as a pig matures (Kyriazakis et al., 1993), a fixed pattern was used. Bioavailability of Amino Acids In most swine diets, a portion of each amino acid that is present is not biologically available to the animal. This is because most proteins are not fully digested and the amino acids are not fully absorbed, and also because not all absorbed amino acids are metabolically available. Diets vary considerably in the proportions of their amino acids that are biologically available. The amino acids in some proteins such as milk products are almost fully bioavailable, whereas those in other proteins such as certain plant seeds are much less so (Southern, 1991; Lewis and Bayley, 1995). Expressing amino acid requirements in terms of bioavailable requirements is, therefore, desirable. However, it means that to formulate swine diets, the bioavailable amino acid content of the ingredients being considered must be known. The bioavailability of amino acids in the protein of dietary ingredients has been determined for a wide range of protein sources fed to swine (Tanksley and Knabe, 1984; Sauer and Ozimek, 1986; Southern, 1991; Lewis and Bayley, 1995). The primary method to determine bioavailability has been to measure the proportion of a dietary amino acid that has disappeared from the gut when digesta reach the terminal ileum. Values determined in this manner are termed "ileal digestibilities" rather than bioavailabilities because amino acids are sometimes absorbed in a form that cannot be fully used in metabolism. Furthermore, unless a correction is made for endogenous amino acid losses, the complete terminology is "apparent ileal digestibilities." In this publication, minimum endogenous losses are accounted for, and both requirements and ingredient contents are expressed in terms of "true" (or standardized) ileal digestible amino acids. When apparent digestibilities are determined, feedstuffs with low-protein content are undervalued relative to feedstuffs with high protein content because of the relatively greater contribution of endogenous amino acids. True digestibilities correct for this. In addition, because of the way in which ideal protein patterns were determined, these patterns reflect true ileal digestibility rather than apparent ileal digestibility. In general, ileal digestibility values are similar to values determined by other methods such as growth assays (Green and Kiener, 1989; Kovar et al., 1993; Adeola et al., 1994). For feedstuffs exposed to excess heat treatment, however, ileal digestibilities overestimate bioavailabilities of lysine, threonine, methionine, and tryptophan as determined by growth assays (Batterham, 1992, 1994). Apparent and true

OCR for page 19
--> ileal digestibility coefficients for various feed ingredients are given in Tables 11-5 and 11-6 in Chapter 11. Amino Acid Isomers In all cases, the requirements listed in this publication refer to the L isomer, the form in which most amino acids occur in plant and animal proteins. When crystalline amino acid supplements are provided, DL-methionine can replace the L form in meeting the need for methionine (Reifsnyder et al., 1984; Chung and Baker, 1992b), although there is evidence that the D form may be used less effectively than the L form by very young pigs (Kim and Bayley, 1983). Estimates of the biological activity of D-tryptophan vary from 60 to 100 percent of that of L-tryptophan for the growing pig (Baker et al., 1971; Arentson and Zimmerman, 1985; Kirchgessner and Roth, 1985; Schutte et al., 1988). The activity of the D form may depend on the proportion of D- and L-tryptophan in the diet and on whether the crystalline amino acid is added as D-tryptophan or as DL-tryptophan (the racemic mixture). D-Lysine and D-threonine are not used by any of the animal species that have been tested. The values of the D forms of other essential amino acids for the pig are not known. Commercial feed-grade sources of crystalline amino acids include L-lysine·HCl (98.5 percent pure = 78.8 percent lysine activity), L-threonine (98.5 percent pure), L-tryptophan (98.5 percent pure), DL-methionine (99 percent pure), and DL-methionine hydroxy analog (a liquid that contains 88 percent methionine hydroxy analog). Research has indicated that on a molar basis DL-methionine and DL-methionine hydroxy analog have the same methionine activity for young pigs (Reifsnyder et al., 1984; Chung and Baker, 1992b). In addition, some amino acids can be purchased together in a mixture (e.g., lysine and tryptophan), and others are available in a liquid form (e.g., lysine). Amino Acid Deficiencies And Excesses There are few characteristic clinical signs of amino acid deficiencies in swine. The primary sign is usually a reduction in feed intake that is accompanied by increased feed wastage, impaired growth, and general unthriftiness. Swine can tolerate high intakes of protein with few specific ill effects, except occasional mild diarrhea. However, feeding high levels of protein (e.g., in excess of 25 percent protein to growing-finishing pigs) is wasteful, contributes to environmental pollution, and usually results in reduced weight gain and feed efficiency. A corn—soybean meal diet contains quantities of certain amino acids (e.g., arginine, leucine, phenylalanine + tyrosine) in excess of the levels needed for optimal growth, but these excesses have little effect on swine performance. In contrast, additions of excessive supplements of crystalline amino acids, such as arginine, leucine, and methionine, can reduce feed intake and growth rate (Oestemer et al., 1973; Henry et al., 1976; Southern and Baker, 1982; Hagemeier et al., 1983; Anderson et al., 1984a,b; Edmonds and Baker, 1987a; Edmonds et al., 1987; Brudevoid and Southern, 1994). Large intakes of individual amino acids can lead to a variety of negative syndromes that have been classified as toxicity, antagonism, and imbalance, depending on the nature of the effect. Antagonisms commonly occur among amino acids that are structurally related. An example is the lysine-arginine antagonism in poultry, in which excessive dietary lysine increases the requirement for arginine. In pigs, however, excess lysine does not seem to increase the arginine requirement (Edmonds and Baker, 1987b). An amino acid imbalance may result when diets are supplemented with one or more amino acids other than the limiting amino acid. A reduction in feed intake is common in most of these situations. Swine usually recover rapidly when the offending amino acid is removed from the diet. Amino Acid Requirements Starting Pigs A summary of recent research on the amino acid requirements of starting pigs (3 to 20 kg) is included in Table 2-2 and a summary of the lysine requirements from these tabular data is shown in Figure 2-1. Based on these data, the total lysine requirements were set as: 5 kg, 1.45 percent; 10 kg, 1.25 percent; 15 kg, 1.15 percent; and 20 kg, 1.05 FIGURE 2-1 Lysine requirements of starting, growing, and finishing pigs in research published since 1985. Each block represents an estimated requirement (total lysine basis) plotted against the mean body weight of the pigs in the experiment (final body weight minus initial body weight divided by 2). The line represents an estimate of the lysine requirement (total lysine basis).

OCR for page 20
--> TABLE 2-2 Research Findings on Amino Acid Requirements of Growing Swine Since 1985 Amino Acid and Estimated Requirement (%)a (g/d) Weight (kg) Type of Diet Response Criteria Commentsc References Lysine 1.27b – 2–6 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency, nitrogen retention Diets contained 0.88 to 1.47% Leibholz and Parks, 1987 1.40 5.0 5–11 Corn–soybean meal–dried skim milk Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea Diets contained 1.10 to 1.70% Goodband et al., 1988 1.20b – 5–16 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency, nitrogen retention Diets contained 0.70 to 1.30% Leibholz and Parks, 1987 1.15 7.2 6–10 Corn–peanut meal–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Digestible lysine requirement 1.03% Martinez and Knabe, 1990 1.10 4.3 6–11 Corn–soybean meal–whey Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 1.10 to 1.50%. Lepine et al., 1991 1.25 – 7–10 Corn–soybean meal–whey Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 1.15, 1.25, and 1.35% Kornegay et al., 1993 1.25 7.4 7–17 Corn–soybean meal–whey Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 0.95, 1.10, and 1.25% Mahan et al., 1993 1.30 11.0 7–25 Corn–soybean meal–whey Weight gain, feed efficiency, protein accretion 1.30% was superior to 0.70 or 1.00%. Two energy concentrations and two thermal environments Schenck et al., 1992a,b 1.48 9.1 8–19 – Weight gain, feed efficiency 1.48% was superior to 1.24% Danielsen et al., 1989 1.31 13.0 8–20 Wheat–starch–mixed protein supplements Protein accretion Boars Campbell et al., 1988b 1.10 7.7 8–20 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 0.75 to 1.25% Thaler et al., 1986 0.95 – 8–20 Corn–soybean meal–whey Weight gain, blood urea nitrogen Diets contained 0.80 to 1.25% Weaver et al., 1988 1.06 7.7 8–21 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency A supplement of 0.20% lysine improved performance over the basal diet (0.86%) Hamilton and Veum, 1986 1.49 13.3 8–25 Wheat–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Lysine requirement 1.08 g/MJ of DE Gatel et al., 1992 1.34 9.7 9–19 Wheat–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 1.16 to 1.34% Gatel and Fékéte, 1989 1.34 14.3 9–26 Wheat–barley–soybean meal–oat groats Weight gain, feed efficiency Lysine requirement 0.95 g/MJ of DE Nam and Aherne, 1994 1.05 – 10–20 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 0.95, 1.05, and 1.15% Kornegay et al., 1993 0.98 10.0 10–20 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, nitrogen gain, lysine gain Higher estimates if nitrogen or lysine gains are used as the criterion Gahl et al., 1994 1.07 14.7 18–45 Barley–soybean meal–fishmeal Weight gain, feed efficiency Supplemental lysine provided by crystalline lysine and by soybean meal Fuller et al., 1986 1.20 15.7 20–45 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits, protein accretion Boars. Limit feeding (3.0 × maintenance). Ileal digestible lysine requirement 0.76–0.82 g/MJ of DE Batterham et al., 1990 0.94 12.4 20–45 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits, protein accretion Gilts. Limit feeding (3.0 × maintenance). Ileal digestible lysine requirement 0.58–0.65 g/MJ of DE Batterham et al., 1990 1.08 13.5 20–45 Barley–mixed protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency, protein accretion Limit feeding (3.0 × maintenance). Ileal digestible lysine requirement 0.60 g/MJ of DE Bikker et al., 1994 0.99 14.0 20–50 Mixed cereal and protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Humid tropical conditions Kuan et al., 1986

OCR for page 21
--> Amino Acid and Estimated Requirement (%)1 (g/d) Weight (kg) Type of Diet Response Criteria Commentsc References 1.04 17.6 20–50 Barley–soybean meal Lean growth rate Boars Giles et al., 1986 0.99 20.0 20–50 Barley–soybean meal and wheat soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Boars. Diets contained 0.70 to 1.40% Giles et al., 1987 0.76 16.0 20–50 Barley–soybean meal and wheat soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Gilts. Diets contained 0.70 to 1.40% Giles et al., 1987 1.09 17.9 20–50 Wheat plus mixed protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Boars. Lysine requirement 0.75 g/MJ of DE Campbell et al., 1988a 1.03 16.9 20–50 Wheat plus mixed protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Gilts. Lysine requirement 0.71 g/MJ of DE Campbell et al., 1988a 1.02 19.0 20–50 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea Barrows and gilts. Lysine requirement 3.0 g/Mcal of DE Chiba et al., 1991a 1.02 23.0 20–50 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, protein accretion rate, nitrogen retention Barrows. Lysine requirement 3.0 g/Mcal of DE Lawrence et al., 1994 1.02 22.0 20–60 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, protein accretion rate Slightly higher requirements for pigs treated with porcine somatotropin Krick et al., 1993 0.89 17.0 21–50 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency A supplement of 0.20% lysine improved performance over the basal diet (0.69%) Hamilton and Veum, 1986 0.86 17.2 21–50 Corn–peanut meal–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Digestible lysine requirement 0.71% Martinez and Knabe, 1990 0.95 19.5 22–52 Sorghum–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Barrows and gilts Owen et al., 1994 0.97 17.6 23–57 Barley–wheat–soybean meal–canola Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 0.72 to 0.97% Bell et al., 1988 1.07 17.4 25–55 Barley–soybean meal–fishmeal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Limit feeding. Average of boars, barrows, and gilts Yen et al., 1986a 1.22 21.5 25–95 Wheat–barley–fishmeal–soybean meal Weight gain, carcass traits Boars and gilts. Limit feeding. Improved strain McPhee et al., 1991 1.04 – 26–30 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, plasma urea, nitrogen retention Barrows Coma et al., 1995a 1.03 17.5 27–35 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, plasma urea, Barrows. Diets contained 0.75 to 1.35% Coma et al., 1995b 0.65 – 30–40 Corn plus amino acid mix Phenylalanine oxidation Boars Lin et al., 1986a 0.85 – 32–36 Corn–soybean meal Plasma urea Barrows and gilts Coma et al., 1995a 1.13 21.2 33–55 Barley–wheat–soybean meal–fishmeal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits, nitrogen retention Boars. Lysine requirement 0.80 g/MJ of DE Rao and McCracken, 1990 0.96 22.0 34–72 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits, protein accretion rate Digestible lysine requirement 18 g/d Friesen et al., 1994a 0.86 19.9 40–85 Mixed cereal and protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Humid tropical conditions Kuan et al., 1986 0.65 21.1 42–101 Wheat–peanut meal–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits 0.65% was superior to 0.55% Henry et al., 1992a 0.76 – 44–49 Corn–soybean meal Plasma urea Barrows and gilts Coma et al., 1995a 1.17 25.0 44–63 Barley–wheat–wheat gluten–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Barrows. Response up the highest lysine concentration fed Susenbeth et al., 1994

OCR for page 22
--> Amino Acid and Estimated Requirement (%)a (g/d) Weight (kg) Type of Diet Response Criteria Commentsc References 0.90 26.5 44–104 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits, protein accretion rate 0.90% was superior to 0.70% for medium and high lean growth barrows and gilts Friesen et al., 1994b 0.60 17.4 47–103 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Barrows Cromwell et al., 1993 0.87 22.3 47–103 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Gilts Cromwell et al., 1993 0.70 18.6 49–100 Wheat–soybean meal–peanut meal Muscle gain Limit feeding. Barrows Bourdon and Henry, 1988 0.80 20.0 49–100 Wheat–soybean meal–peanut meal Muscle gain Limit feeding. Gilts Bourdon and Henry, 1988 0.83 18.6 50–85 Barley–soybean meal Lean growth rate Boars Giles et al., 1986 0.82 20.9 50–90 Barley–soybean meal–fishmeal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Limit feeding. Average of boars barrows, and gilts Yen et al., 1986b 0.73 16.2 50–90 Wheat plus mixed protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Boars. Lysine requirement 0.51 g/MJ of DE Campbell et al., 1988a 0.63 14.1 50–90 Wheat plus mixed protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Gilts. Lysine requirement 0.44 g/MJ of DE Campbell et al., 1988a 0.70 19.3 50–95 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency A supplement of 0.20% lysine improved performance over the basal diet (0.50%) Hamilton and Veum, 1986 0.68 23.8 50–95 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea, carcass traits Barrows. Digestible lysine requirement 0.58% Hahn et al., 1995 0.75 21.0 50–95 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea, carcass traits Gilts. Digestible lysine requirement 0.64% Hahn et al., 1995 0.80 22.4 52–78 Sorghum–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Barrows and gilts Owen et al., 1994 1.13 27.9 55–88 Barley–wheat–soybean meal–fishmeal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits, nitrogen retention Boars. Lysine requirement 0.80 g/MJ of DE Rao and McCracken, 1990 0.80 26.5 59–105 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits, protein accretion No response to levels > 0.80% Johnston et al., 1993 0.60 16.7 62–108 Corn–sesame meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea, carcass traits Diets contained 0.60 to 1.40% Goodband et al., 1989 0.80 25.5 63–99 Corn plus mixed protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits, nitrogen retention Lysine concentrations greater than 0.80% reduced growth performance Hansen et al., 1994 0.79 22.0 63–100 Barley–wheat–wheat gluten–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Barrows Susenbeth et al., 1994 0.72 – 70–74 Corn–soybean meal Plasma urea Barrows and gilts Coma et al., 1995a 0.70 22.7 78–109 Sorghum–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Barrows and gilts Owen et al., 1994 0.58 22.9 90–110 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea, carcass traits Barrows. Digestible lysine requirement 0.49% Hahn et al., 1995 0.61 20.4 90–110 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea, carcass traits Gilts. Digestible lysine requirement 0.52% Hahn et al., 1995 0.65 22.7 93–104 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, plasma urea Barrows. Diets contained 0.45 to 1.05% Coma et al., 1995b

OCR for page 23
--> Amino Acid and Estimated Requirement (%)a (g/d) Weight (kg) Type of Diet Response Criteria Commentsc References Tryptophan 0.23 0.7 5–10 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency 0.14% was inadequate; 0.23% was adequate Sève et al., 1991 0.19 1.0 6–16 Corn–fishmeal–corn gluten meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.15% Burgoon et al., 1992 0.16 1.2 6–22 Corn–sunflower meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, serum urea Diets contained 0.10 to 0.22% Borg et al., 1987 0.16 1.8 10–20 Corn and mixed protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.14% Han et al., 1993 0.23 2.3 10–35 Corn and mixed protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 0.13 to 0.25% Schutte et al., 1988 0.16 2.3 15–40 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 0.11 to 0.18% Henry et al., 1986 0.18 2.8 17–38 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Improved response with addition of 0.04% tryptophan to a diet containing 0.14% Russell et al., 1986 0.14 1.9 20–45 Sorghum–meat and bone meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Diets contained 0.11 to 0.22% Batterham and Watson, 1985 0.13 2.2 22–50 Corn–fishmeal–corn gluten meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.10% Burgoon et al., 1992 0.17 3.2 25–60 Mixed cereals and protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 0.13 to 0.17% Kiener et al., 1988 0.13 – 30–45 Corn–gelatin Phenylalanine oxidation Boars Lin et al., 1986b 0.17 4.1 35–105 Mixed cereals and protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.135% Lenis et al., 1990 0.13 3.5 44–99 Corn–soybean meal–corn gluten meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Improved response with addition of 0.04% tryptophan to a diet containing 0.09% Henry et al., 1992b 0.09 2.8 55–97 Corn–fishmeal–corn gluten meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.06% Burgoon et al., 1992 0.17b 4.3 60–105 Corn–peas Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Limit feeding. Small reductions in tryptophan had little effect Möhn and Susenbeth, 1994 Threonine 0.66 1.7 2–5 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency, N retention Threonine may have been highly bioavailable Leibholz, 1988 0.70 3.5 5–15 Sorghum–oat groats–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma amino acids, plasma urea Diets contained 0.53 to 0.83% Lewis and Peo, 1986 0.54 3.8 5–20 Wheat–peanut meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, N retention Diets contained 0.49 to 0.77% Leibholz, 1988 0.68 4.0 6–16 Sorghum–peanut meal–soybean meal–whey Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.52% Saldana et al., 1994 0.63 5.7 8–21 Corn–sunflower meal Weight gain, feed efficiency, serum urea Diets contained 0.50 to 0.78% Borg et al., 1987 0.75 7.1 10–25 Wheat–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Diets contained 0.50 to 0.89% Gatel and Fékéte, 1989 0.60 9.4 17–38 Corn–soybean meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Improved response with addition of 0.10% threonine to a diet containing 0.50% Russell et al., 1986 0.70 8.5 17–50 Corn–hominy feed–meat meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.44% Conway et al., 1990 0.73 9.8 20–40 Mixed cereals and protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.59% Schutte et al., 1990 0.57 14.1 35–105 Mixed cereals and protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.42% Lenis et al., 1990 0.55 15.0 45–105 Mixed cereals and soy flour Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.42% Lenis and van Diepen, 1990

OCR for page 24
--> Amino Acid and Estimated Requirement (%)a (g/d) Weight (kg) Type of Diet Response Criteria Commentsc References 0.41 12.0 58–96 Sorghum–crystalline amino acids Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.28% Saldana et al., 1994 0.36 10.4 59–102 Corn–wheat–corn gluten meal–amino acids Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea, carcass traits Higher requirement to minimize plasma urea and maximize carcass traits Zimmerman, 1987 Methionine + cystine 0.58 3.2 5–10 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency Bioavailable methionine requirement 0.255% Chung and Baker, 1992c 0.82 3.4 5–13 Corn–soybean meal–porcine plasma Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea Methionine requirement 0.41% in the presence of adequate cystine Owen et al., 1995 0.55 3.6 6–18 Corn–soybean meal–sugar Weight gain, feed efficiency Addition of 0.17% methionine to a diet containing 0.55% did not increase performance Lovett et al., 1986 0.58 5.7 10–20 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency Bioavailable methionine requirement 0.255% Chung and Baker, 1992c 0.50 12.8 25–85 Barley–lentils Weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass traits Diets contained 0.40, 0.50, or 0.60% Castell and Cliplef, 1990 0.57 9.4 30–60 Mixed cereals and protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Limit feeding Roth and Kirchgessner, 1987 0.53 12.9 35–105 Mixed cereals and protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Apparent ileal digestible requirement 0.42% Lenis et al., 1990 0.45 12.0 50–80 Corn–soybean meal–feather meal Weight gain, feed efficiency Bioavailable methionine + cystine requirement 0.40% Chung et al., 1989 0.47 10.7 60–90 Mixed cereals and protein supplements Weight gain, feed efficiency Limit feeding Roth and Kirchgessner, 1987 Valine 0.45 11.3 70 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency, plasma urea, urea excretion Apparent ileal digestible requirement = 0.38% Lewis and Nishimura, 1995 Histidine 0.36 2.8 10 Semipurified Weight gain, feed efficiency Bioavailable requirement 0.31% Izquierdo et al., 1988 NOTE: Dashes (–) indicate that no information was available. aValues represent total amino acids on a percentage of the diet as-fed basis. bValues represent total amino acids on a percentage of the diet dry matter basis. c1 MJ = 239 kcal. percent. These estimates are also shown in Figure 2-1. These requirements can be described by the equation: where Requirement = lysine requirement (percent of the air-dry diet) and BW = body weight (kg). Requirements for other amino acids were calculated from lysine using the ratios established for maintenance and protein accretion on a true ileal digestible basis (Table 2-1), even though there are few empirical data to support these ratios. In general, these requirements for starting pigs are slightly higher than those listed in the previous edition of this publication. Growing-Finishing Pigs Amino acid requirements of growing-finishing pigs are influenced by their genetic capacity to deposit body protein. The amino acid requirements were calculated by the growth model described in Chapter 3. A summary of recent empirical data on the lysine, tryptophan, threonine, methionine + cystine, valine, and histidine requirements is included in Table 2-2. Some of the lysine estimates in this table were used to validate the model. Figure 2-1 shows estimates of the lysine requirements (total lysine, percentage basis) from these studies along with an estimate of the lysine requirement at various body weights. In general, these lysine requirements are higher than the estimates listed in the previous edition of this publication. The

OCR for page 25
--> increase in the lysine requirements is attributed to several factors, among which are improved genetics, health, and other environmental conditions in contemporary pigs. Sows Amino acid requirements of gestating sows are influenced by their requirements for maintenance, protein deposition in maternal proteinaceous tissues, and protein deposition in the products of conception. Amino acid requirements of lactating sows are affected by their needs for maintenance and synthesis of milk protein, adjusted for amino acids that become available from maternal body protein if sows lose weight. Amino acid requirements for sows during gestation and lactation were also developed by computer modeling, as described in Chapter 3. A summary of recent references on the lysine requirements of gestating and lactating sows, some of which were used to validate the models, is shown in Table 2-3. In general, the lysine requirements of pregnant sows are slightly higher, and the lysine requirements of lactating sows are considerably higher, than those listed in the previous edition of this publication. The increased estimates for lactation are supported by the results from a number of studies published since the last edition (Cera et al., 1990; Coffey, 1990; Stahly et al., 1990, 1992; Monegue et al., 1993; Sauber et al., 1994; Knabe et al., 1996). These studies have shown that lactating sows nursing large litters produce more milk (as reflected by increased weaning weights of nursing pigs) and lose less maternal body weight when fed 0.75 to 0.90% dietary lysine (45 to 55 g/day) than when fed the lysine levels cited in the previous edition (0.60% lysine, 35 g/day). Boars There has been little research to determine the amino acid requirements for reproduction in the boar (for a review, see Kemp and Den Hartog, 1989). Inadequate protein intake during development delays sexual maturity and reduces sperm output per ejaculation, but recovery from mild undernutrition (a 12 percent crude protein diet) is fairly rapid (Uzu, 1979). Sexually active board do not seem to have any unusual amino acid requirements. Early experiments (most of them in Eastern Europe) concerning the effects of lysine and methionine supplements on the reproductive functions of boars indicated that sexually active boars may have a relatively high requirement for sulfur amino acids and perhaps lysine (Moskutelo, 1970; Netesa and Pashkevich, 1971; Fufaev and Pashkevich, 1972; Tommé and Loskutnikov, 1972; Hühn et al., 1973, 1974; Poppe et al., 1974a,b,c; Pashkevich, 1974, 1976; Zaripova and Shakirov, 1978). Positive responses to methionine and lysine supplements TABLE 2-3 Lysine Requirements of Gestating and Lactating Sowsa Azain, M. J., T. Tomkins, and J. S. Sowinski. 1994. Effect of a protein and energy enriched lactation diet in sow and litter performance: Interaction with supplemental milk replacer. J. Anim. Sci. 72(Suppl. 2):65 (Abstr.). Cera, K. R., L. G. Sterling, and D. Warrington. 1990. Effect of lysine level in lactating diets on sow performance over successive reproduction cycles. J. Anim. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):365 (Abstr.). Coffey, M. T. 1990. Effect of dietary lysine concentration during lactation on reproductive performance of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):368 (Abstr.). Coma, J., D. R. Zimmerman, and D. Carrion. 1996. Lysine requirement of the lactating sow determined by using plasma urea nitrogen as a rapid response criterion. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1056–1062. Dourmad, J. Y., M. Etienne, and J. Noblet. 1991. Lysine and other amino acid requirements for lactating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 69(Suppl. 1):366 (Abstr.). Dunn, J. M., and V. C. Speer. 1988. Protein requirement of pregnant gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 66(Suppl. 1):145 (Abstr.). Dunn, J. M., and V. C. Speer. 1989. Minimum nitrogen requirement of pregnant swine. J. Anim. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):119 (Abstr.). Etienne, M., J. Noblet, J. Y. Dourmad, and H. Fortune. 1989. Study of the lysine requirement of sows during lactation. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr. 21:101–107. Fernandes, L. C. O., J. H. Britt, and M. T. Coffey. 1990. Effect of frequency of feeding and lysine intake on production and reproduction of primiparous sows. J. Anim. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):367 (Abstr.). Grandhi, R. R. 1986. Effect of energy and lysine levels on reproductive performance of gilts. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:1177(Abstr.). Grandhi, R. R. 1988. Effect of nutritional flushing, supplemental fat and supplemental lysine from puberty to breeding and during early gestation on reproductive performance of gilts. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68:941–951. Grandhi, R. R. 1992. Effect of feeding supplemental fat or lysine during the postweaning period on the reproductive performance of sows with low or high lactation body weight and fat losses. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72:679–690. Grandhi, R. R. 1994. Apparent absorption and retention of nutrients during the postweaning period in sows fed supplemental fat or lysine. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 74:123–128. Johnston, L. J., J. E. Pettigrew, and J. W. Rust. 1993. Response of maternal-line sows to dietary protein concentration during lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2151–2156. Jones, D. B., and T. S. Stahly. 1995. Impact of amino acid nutrition during lactation on subsequent reproductive function of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 73(Suppl. 1):85 (Abstr.). Kaji, Y., Y. Hatori, S. Furuya, and T. Ishibashi. 1992a. Lysine requirements of gilts during mid and late pregnancy and mid lactating periods. Anim. Sci. Technol. 63:955–963. Kaji, Y., Y. Hatori, S. Furuya, and T. Ishibashi. 1992b. Lysine requirements of multiparous sows during mid and late pregnancy and mid lactating periods. Anim. Sci. Technol. 63:1175–1181. King, R. H. 1991. Response of pregnant gilts to dietary protein as determined by nitrogen retention. J. Anim. Sci. 69(Suppl. 1):361 (Abstr.). King, R. H., M. S. Toner, H. Dove, C. S. Atwood, and W. G. Brown. 1993. The response of first-litter sows to dietary protein level during lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2457–2463. Knabe, D. A., J. H. Brendemuhl, L. I. Chiba, and C. R. Dove. 1996. Supplemental lysine for sows nursing large litters. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1635–1640. Laurin, J. L., R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, R. D. Richard, and D. R. Keesecker. 1991. Dietary lysine during lactation affects sow and litter performance. J. Anim. Sci. 69(Suppl. 1):109 (Abstr.). Laurin, J. L., J. L. Nelssen, R. D. Goodband, and M. D. Tokach. 1993. The interrelationships between dietary lysine and litter size on sow and litter performance. J. Anim. Sci. 71(Suppl. 1):65 (Abstr.).

OCR for page 26
--> Monegue, H. J., G. L. Cromwell, R. D. Coffey, S. D. Carter, and M. Cervantes. 1993. Elevated dietary lysine levels for sows nursing large litters. J. Anim. Sci. 71(Suppl. 1):67 (Abstr.). NCR-89. 1995. Effect of room temperature and dietary amino acid concentration on performance of lactating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 73(Suppl. 1):250 (Abstr.). Pinheiro, J. W., H. S. Rostagno, R. Sant'Anna, J. Pereira, and P. M. A. Costa. 1986. Nutritional lysine requirement for lactating sows. Rev. Soc. Bras. Zootec. 15:234–240. Sauber, T. E., T. S. Stahly, R. C. Ewan, and N. H. Williams. 1994. Interactive effects of sow genotype and dietary amino acid intake on lactational performance of sows nursing large litters. J. Anim. Sci. 72(Suppl. 2):66 (Abstr.). Speer, V. C. 1990. Partitioning nitrogen and amino acids for pregnancy and lactation in swine: A review. J. Anim. Sci. 68:553–561. Stahly, T. S., G. L. Cromwell, and H. J. Monegue. 1990. Lactational responses of sows nursing large litters to dietary lysine levels. J. Anim. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):369 (Abstr.). Stahly, T. S., G. L. Cromwell, and H. J. Monegue. 1992. Milk yield responses of sows nursing large litters. J. Anim. Sci. 70(Suppl. 1):238 (Abstr.). Sterling, L. G., and K. R. Cera. 1990. The effect of dietary lysine level during lactation on milk composition and litter gain efficiency over successive reproduction cycles. J. Anim. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):365 (Abstr.). Thaler, R. C., R. L. Woerman, and D. B. Britzman. 1992. Effect of lysine level in lactation diets on sow performance and milk composition. J. Anim. Sci. 70(Suppl. 1):238 (Abstr.). Tokach, M. D., R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, J. L. Laurin, and J. A. Hansen. 1992. The effects of an ideal protein lactation diet on sow and litter performance. J. Anim. Sci. 70(Suppl. 1):69 (Abstr.). Tokach, M. D., J. E. Pettigrew, B. A. Crooker, G. D. Dial, and A. F. Sower. 1992. Quantitative influence of lysine and energy intake on yield of milk components in the primiparous sow. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1864–1872. Touchette, K. J., G. L. Allee, M. D. Newcomb, K. M. Halpin, and R. D. Boyd. 1996. Lysine requirement of the lactating primiparous sow. J. Anim. Sci. 74 (Suppl. 1):63 (Abstr.). Weeden, T. L., J. L. Nelssen, R. C. Thaler, G. E. Fitzner, and R. D. Goodband. 1994. Effect of dietary protein and supplemental soybean oil fed during lactation on sow and litter performance through two parities. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 45:211–226. Wilson, M. E., H. Stein, N. L. Trottier, D. D. Hall, R. L. Moser, D. E. Orr, and R. A. Easter. 1996. Effect of lysine intake on reproductive performance in first parity sows. J. Anim. Sci. 74 (Suppl. 1): 63 (Abstr.). a Papers published from 1985 to 1996 and abstracts published in the Journal of Animal Science from 1990 to 1996. above the NRC (1988) requirements have also been reported by Kim and Moon (1990a,b). In other experiments, however, methionine and lysine supplements have not been beneficial (Ju et al., 1985; Van de Kerk and Willems, 1985). Inadequate protein intakes reduce sperm concentration and total sperm count per ejaculate (Yen and Yu, 1985) as well as libido and semen volume (Louis et al., 1994a). Although minimum protein and amino acid requirements have not been established, a low-protein corn-soybean meal diet (10.6 percent protein, 0.44 percent lysine) fed to provide 7.7 g/day of total lysine was inadequate (Louis et al., 1974b). In this research, a corn-soybean meal diet (15.3 percent protein, 0.83 percent lysine) that provided 360 g/day of protein and 18.1 g/day of total lysine maintained good libido and semen characteristics. Yen and Yu (1985) reported that 280 g/day of protein and 11.6 g/day of total lysine were adequate for boars. Meding and Nielsen (1977) found that there was no increase in sperm production when dietary protein concentration was increased from 15.4 to 18.4 percent. Similarly, Kemp et al. (1988) reported that a diet containing 22.2 percent protein (1.20 percent lysine) did not increase sperm production and semen quality relative to a diet containing 14.5 percent protein (0.68 percent lysine). Because feed intake of adult boars is usually limited to avoid excess weight gain, the daily intakes of amino acids are more important than the dietary amino acid concentrations. References Adeola, O., B. V. Lawrence, and T. R. Cline. 1994. Availability of amino acids for 10- to 20-kilogram pigs: Lysine and threonine in soybean meal. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2061–2067. Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs: Technical Review. Rev. ed. Slough, England. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. xxii, 307 pp. Anderson, L. C., A. J. Lewis, E. R. Peo, Jr., and J. D. Crenshaw. 1984a. Effect of various dietary arginine:lysine ratios on performance, carcass composition and plasma amino acid concentrations of growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 58:362–368. Anderson, L. C., A. J. Lewis, E. R. Peo, Jr., and J. D. Crenshaw. 1984b. Effect of excess arginine with and without supplemental lysine on performance, plasma amino acid concentrations and nitrogen balance of young swine. J. Anim. Sci. 58:369–377. Arentson, B. E., and D. R. Zimmerman. 1985. Nutritive value of D-tryptophan for the growing pig. J. Anim. Sci. 60:474–479. Baker, D. H. 1997. Ideal amino acid profiles for swine and poultry and their applications in feed formulation. Biokyowa Technical Review—9. Chesterfield, MO: Nutri-Quest, Inc. Baker, D. H., and G. L. Allee. 1970. Effect of dietary carbohydrate on assessment of the leucine need for maintenance of adult swine. J. Nutr. 100:277–280. Baker, D. H., and T. K. Chung. 1992. Ideal protein for swine and poultry. BioKyowa Technical Review—4. Chesterfield, MO: Nutri-Quest, Inc. Baker, D. H., D. E. Becker, H. W. Norton, A. H. Jensen, and B. G. Harmon. 1966a. Quantitative evaluation of the threonine, isoleucine, valine and phenylalanine needs of adult swine for maintenance. J. Nutr. 88:391–396. Baker, D. H., D. E. Becker, H. W. Norton, A. H. Jensen, and B. G. Harmon. 1966b. Quantitative evaluation of the tryptophan, methionine and lysine needs of adult swine for maintenance. J. Nutr. 89:441–447. Baker, D. H., W. W. Clausing, B. G. Harmon, A. H. Jensen, and D. E. Becker. 1969. Replacement value of cystine for methionine for the young pig. J. Anim. Sci. 29:581–584. Baker, D. H., N. K. Allen, J. Boomgaardt, G. Graber, and H. W. Norton. 1971. Quantitative aspects of D- and L-tryptophan utilization by the young pig. J. Anim. Sci. 33:42–46. Baker, D. H., J. D. Hahn, T. K. Chung, and Y. Han. 1993. Nutrition and Growth: The application of an ideal protein for swine growth. Pp. 133–139 in Growth of the Pig. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International. Ball, R. O., J. L. Atkinson, and H. S. Bayley. 1986. Proline as an essential amino acid for the young pig. Br. J. Nutr. 55:659–668.

OCR for page 27
--> Batterham, E. S. 1992. Availability and utilization of amino acids for growing pigs. Nutr. Res. Rev. 5:1–18. Batterham, E. S. 1994. Ileal digestibilities of amino acids in feedstuffs for pigs. Pp. 113–131 in Amino Acids in Farm Animal Nutrition. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International. Batterham, E. S., and C. Watson. 1985. Tryptophan content of feeds, limitations in diets and requirement for growing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 13:171–182. Batterham, E. S., L. M. Andersen, D. R. Baigent, and E. White. 1990. Utilization of ileal digestible amino acids by growing pigs: Effect of dietary lysine concentration on efficiency of lysine retention. Br. J. Nutr. 64:81–94. Becker, D. E., A. H. Jensen, S. W. Terrill, and H. W. Norton. 1955. The methionine-cystine need of the young pig. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1086–1094. Bell, J. M., M. O. Keith, and C. S. Darroch. 1988. Lysine supplementation of grower and finisher pig diets based on high protein barley, wheat and soybean meal or canola meal, with observations on thyroid and zinc status. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68:931–940. Bikker, P., M. W. A. Verstegen, R. G. Campbell, and B. Kemp. 1994. Digestible lysine requirement of gilts with high genetic potential for lean gain, in relation to the level of energy intake. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1744–1753. Borg, B. S., G. W. Libal, and R. C. Wahlstrom. 1987. Tryphtophan and threonine requirements of young pigs and their effects on serum calcium, phosphorus and zinc concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 64:1070–1078. Bourdon, D., and Y. Henry. 1988. Lysine requirement of the finishing pig according to sex. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr. 20:409–414. Brudevoid, A. B., and L. L. Southern. 1994. Low-protein, crystalline amino acid supplemented, sorghum-soybean meal diets for the 10- to 20-kilogram pig. J. Anim. Sci. 72:638–647. Burgoon, K. G., D. A. Knabe, and E. J. Gregg. 1992. Digestible tryptophan requirements of starting, growing, and finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 70:2493–2500. Campbell, R. G., M. R. Taverner, and D. M. Curic. 1988a. The effects of sex and live weight on the growing pig's response to dietary protein. Anim. Prod. 46:123–130. Campbell, R. G., M. R. Taverner, and C. J. Rayner. 1988b. The tissue and dietary protein and amino acid requirements of pigs from 8.0 to 20.0 kg live weight. Anim. Prod. 46:283–290. Castell, A. G., and R. L. Cliplef. 1990. Methionine supplementation of barley diets containing lentils (Lens culinaris) or soybean meal: Live performance and carcass responses by gilts fed ad libitum. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 70:329–332. Cera, K. R., L. G. Sterling, and D. Warrington. 1990. Effect of lysine level in lactating diets on sow performance over successive reproduction cycles. J. Anim. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):365 (Abstr.). Chiba, L. I., A. J. Lewis, and E. R. Peo, Jr. 1991a. Amino acid and energy interrelationships in pigs weighing 20 to 50 kilograms: I. Rate and efficiency of weight gain. J. Anim. Sci. 69:694–707. Chiba, L. I., A. J. Lewis, and E. R. Peo, Jr. 1991b. Amino acid and energy interrelationships in pigs weighing 20 to 50 kilograms: II. Rate and efficiency of protein and fat deposition. J. Anim. Sci. 69:708–718. Chung, T. K., and D. H. Baker. 1992a. Maximal portion of the young pig's sulfur amino acid requirement that can be furnished by cystine. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1182–1187. Chung, T. K., and D. H. Baker. 1992b. Utilization of methionine isomers and analogs by pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72:185–188. Chung, T. K., and D. H. Baker. 1992c. Methionine requirement of pigs between 5 and 20 kilograms of body weight. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1857–1863. Chung, T. K., and D. H. Baker. 1993. A note on the dispensability of proline for weanling pigs. Anim. Prod. 56:407–408. Chung, T. K., O. A. Izquierdo, K. Hashimoto, and D. H. Baker. 1989. Methionine requirement of the finishing pig. J. Anim. Sci. 67:2677–2683. Coffey, M. T. 1990. Effect of dietary lysine concentration during lactation on reproductive performance of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):368 (Abstr.). Cole, D. J. A., and T. A. Van Lunen. 1994. Ideal amino acid patterns. Pp. 99–112 in Amino Acids in Farm Animal Nutrition. J. P. F. D'Mello, ed. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International. Coma, J., D. Carrion, and D. R. Zimmerman. 1995a. Use of plasma urea nitrogen as a rapid response criterion to determine the lysine requirement of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 73:472–481. Coma, J., D. R. Zimmerman, and D. Carrion. 1995b. Interactive effects of feed intake and stage of growth on the lysine requirement of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 73:3369–3375. Conway, D., W. C. Sauer, L. A. den Hartog, and J. Huisman. 1990. Studies on the threonine requirements of growing pigs based on the total, ileal and faecal digestible contents. Livest. Prod. Sci. 25:105–120. Cromwell, G. L., T. R. Cline, J. D. Crenshaw, T. D. Crenshaw, R. C. Ewan, C. R. Hamilton, A. J. Lewis, D. C. Mahan, E. R. Miller, J. E. Pettigrew, L. F. Tribble, and T. L. Veum. 1993. The dietary protein and (or) lysine requirements of barrows and gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 71:1510–1519. Danielsen, V., B. O. Eggum, and H. Jørgensen. 1989. The effect of increased dietary levels of lysine, methionine and threonine on N-retention and growth in weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 67(Suppl. 1):242 (Abstr.). Easter, R. A., and D. H. Baker. 1976. Nitrogen metabolism and reproductive response of gravid swine fed an arginine-free diet during the last 84 days of gestation. J. Nutr. 106:636–641. Easter, R. A., R. S. Katz, and D. H. Baker. 1974. Arginine: A dispensable amino acid for postpubertal growth and pregnancy of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 39:1123–1128. Edmonds, M. S., and D. H. Baker. 1987a. Amino acid excesses for young pigs: Effects of excess methionine, tryptophan, threonine or leucine. J. Anim. Sci. 64:1664–1671. Edmonds, M. S., and D. H. Baker. 1987b. Failure of excess dietary lysine to antagonize arginine in young pigs. J. Nutr. 117:1396–1401. Edmonds, M. S., Gonyou, H. W., and D. H. Baker. 1987. Effect of excess levels of methionine, tryptophan, arginine, lysine or threonine on growth and dietary choice in the pig. J. Anim. Sci. 65:179–185. Friesen, K. G., J. L. Nelssen, R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, J. A. Unruh, D. H. Kropf, and B. J. Kerr. 1994a. Influence of dietary lysine on growth and carcass composition of high lean growth gilts fed from 34 to 72 kilograms. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1761–1770. Friesen, K. G., J. L. Nelssen, J. A. Unruh, R. D. Goodband, and M. D. Tokach. 1994b. Effects of the interrelationship between genotype, sex, and dietary lysine on growth performance and carcass composition in finishing pigs fed to either 104 or 127 kilograms. J. Anim. Sci. 72:946–954. Fufaev, I., and A. Pashkevich. 1972. Effect of synthetic lysine on reproductive functions of boars. Svinovodstvo 36(7):32. Fuller, M. F., and T. C. Wang. 1990. Digestible ideal protein—A measure of dietary protein value. Pig News Info. 11:353–357. Fuller, M. F., J. Wood, A. C. Brewer, K. Pennie, and R. MacWilliam. 1986. The responses of growing pigs to dietary lysine, as free lysine hydrochloride or in soya-bean meal, and the influence of food intake. Anim. Prod. 43:477–484. Fuller, M. F., R. McWilliam, T. C. Wang, and L. R. Giles. 1989. The optimum dietary amino acid pattern for growing pigs. 2. Requirements for maintenance and for tissue protein accretion. Br. J. Nutr. 62:255–267. Gahl, M. J., T. D. Crenshaw, and N. J. Benevenga. 1994. Diminishing returns in weight, nitrogen, and lysine gain of pigs fed six levels of lysine from three supplemental sources. J. Anim. Sci. 72:3177–3178. Gatel, F., and J. Fékéte. 1989. Lysine and threonine balance and requirements for weaned piglets 10–25 kg live weight fed cereal-based diets. Livest. Prod. Sci. 23:195–206.

OCR for page 28
--> Gatel, F., G. Buron, and J. Fékéte. 1992. Total amino acid requirements of weaned piglets 8 to 25 kg live weight given diets based on wheat and soya-bean meal fortified with free amino acids. Anim. Prod. 54:281–287. Giles, L. R., E. S. Batterham, and E. B. Dettmann. 1986. Amino acid and energy interactions in growing pigs. 2. Effects of food intake, sex and live weight on the responses to lysine concentration in barley-based diets. Anim. Prod. 42:133–144. Giles, L. R., E. S. Batterham, E. B. Dettmann, and R. F. Lowe. 1987. Amino acid and energy interactions in growing pigs. 3. Effects of sex and live weight and cereal on the responses to dietary lysine concentration when fed ad libitum or to a restricted food scale on diets based on wheat or barley. Anim. Prod. 45:493–502. Goodband, R. D., R. H. Hines, J. L. Nelssen, and R. C. Thaler. 1988. The effects of dietary lysine level on performance of pigs weaned at two weeks of age. J. Anim. Sci. 66(Suppl. 1):315 (Abstr.). Goodband, R. D., R. H. Hines, J. L. Nelssen, D. H. Kropf, and G. R. Stoner. 1989. The effects of excess dietary lysine additions on growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 67(Suppl. 1):260 (Abstr.). Green, S., and T. Kiener. 1989. Digestibilities of nitrogen and amino acids in soya-bean, sunflower, meat and rapeseed meals measured with pigs and poultry. Anim. Prod. 48:157–179. Hagemeier, D. L., G. W. Libal, and R. C. Wahlstrom. 1983. Effects of excess arginine on swine growth and plasma amino acid levels. J. Anim. Sci. 57:99–105. Hahn, J. D., and D. H. Baker. 1995. Optimum ratio of lysine to threonine, tryptophan, and sulfur amino acids for finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 73:482–489. Hahn, J. D., R. R. Biehl, and D. H. Baker. 1995. Ideal digestible lysine level for early- and late-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 73:773–784. Hamilton, C. R., and T. L. Veum. 1986. Effect of biotin and (or) lysine additions to corn-soybean meal diets on the performance and nutrient balance of growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 62:155–162. Han, Y., T. K. Chung, and D. H. Baker. 1993. Tryptophan requirement of pigs in the weight category 10 to 20 kilograms. J. Anim. Sci. 71:139–143. Hansen, J. A., J. L. Nelssen, R. D. Goodband, and J. L. Laurin. 1994. Interactive effects among porcine somatotropin, the beta-adrenergic agonist salbutamol, and dietary lysine on growth performance and nitrogen balance of finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1540–1547. Hays, V. W., G. C. Ashton, C. H. Liu, V. C. Speer, and D. V. Catron. 1957. Studies on the utilization of urea by growing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 16:44–54. Henry, Y., P. H. Duée, and A. Rérat. 1976. Isoleucine requirement of the growing pig and leucine-isoleucine interrelationship. J. Anim. Sci. 42:357–364. Henry, Y., P. H. Duée, A. Rérat, and R. Pion. 1986. Determination of tryptophan requirement of growing pigs between 15 and 40 kg live weight. Nutr. Rep. Int. 34:565–573. Henry, Y., Y. Colleaux, and B. Sève. 1992a. Effects of dietary level of lysine and of level and source of protein on feed intake, growth performance, and plasma amino acid pattern in the finishing pig. J. Anim. Sci. 70:188–195. Henry, Y., B. Sève, Y. Colleaux, and P. Ganier, C. Saligaut, and P. Jégo. 1992b. Interactive effects of dietary levels of tryptophan and protein on voluntary feed intake and growth performance in pigs, in relation to plasma free amino acids and hypothalamic serotonin. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1873–1887. Hühn, U., F. Kleemann, I. König, and S. Poppe. 1973. Studies on the sexual performance of male pigs fed rations of varying amino acid composition. 1. The influence of amino acid supply and intensity of service on some semen properties of young and old boars. Arch. Tierzucht. 16:347–358. Hühn, U., S. Poppe, B. Numsen, I. König, and F. Kleemann. 1974. Investigations on the sexual productivity of male pigs fed varying levels of amino acids in the ration. 2. Testicle condition, daily semen yield and fertility performances of intensively used boars fed rations supplemented with synthetic amino acids. Arch. Tierzucht. 17:259–268. Izquierdo, O. A., K. J. Wedekind, and D. H. Baker. 1988. Histidine requirement of the young pig. J. Anim. Sci. 66:2886–2892. Johnston, M. E., J. L. Nelssen, R. D. Goodband, D. H. Kropf, R. H. Hines, and B. R. Schricker. 1993. The effects of porcine somatotropin and dietary lysine on growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing swine fed to 105 or 127 kilograms. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2986–2995. Ju, J. C., S. P. Cheng, and H. T. Yen. 1985. Effect of amino acid supplemented diets on semen characters of boars. J. Chin. Soc. Anim. Sci. 14(1–2):27–35. Kemp, B., and L. A. Den Hartog. 1989. The influence of energy and protein intake on the reproductive performance of the breeding boar: A review . Anim. Reprod. Sci. 20:103–115. Kemp, B., H. J. G. Grooten, L. A. Den Hartog, P. Luiting, and M. W. A. Verstegen. 1988. The effect of a high protein intake on sperm production in boars at two semen collection frequencies. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 17:103–113. Kiener, T., J. Lougnon, and J. C. Jugy. 1988. Contribution to the study of the tryptophan requirement of the growing pig. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr. 20:401–407. Kim, K. H., and S. J. Moon. 1990a. Effect of lysine levels on semen quality of boars. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 32:767–771. Kim, K. H., and S. J. Moon. 1990b. Effect of methionine levels on semen quality of boars. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 32:800–804. Kim, K. I., and H. S. Bayley. 1983. Amino acid oxidation by young pigs receiving diets with varying levels of sulphur amino acids. Br. J. Nutr. 50:383–390. Kirchgessner, V. M., and F. X. Roth. 1985. Biologische wirksamkeit von DL-tryptophan bei mastschweinen. Z Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelkd. 54:135–141. Knabe, D. A., J. H. Brendemuhl, L. I. Chiba, and C. R. Dove. 1996. Supplemental lysine for sows nursing large litters. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1635–1640. Kornegay, E. T., E. R. Miller, D. E. Ullrey, B. H. Vincent, and J. A. Hoefer. 1965. Influence of dietary urea on performance, antibody production and hematology of growing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 24:951–954. Kornegay, E. T., M. D. Lindemann, and V. Ravindran. 1993. Effects of dietary lysine levels on performance and immune response of weanling pigs housed at two floor space allowances. J. Anim. Sci. 71:552–556. Kovar, J. L., A. J. Lewis, T. R. Radke, and P. S. Miller. 1993. Bioavailability of threonine in soybean meal for young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2133–2139. Krick, B. J., R. D. Boyd, K. R. Roneker, D. H. Beermann, D. E. Bauman, D. A. Ross, and D. J. Meisinger. 1993. Porcine somatotropin affects the dietary lysine requirement and net lysine utilization for growing pigs. J. Nutr. 123:1913–1922. Kuan, K. K., T. K. Mak, and D. J. Farrell. 1986. Effect of dietary energy concentration, protein:energy and lysine:energy ratios on growth of pigs in the humid tropics. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 26:285–289. Kyriazakis, I., G. C. Emmans, and R. McDaniel. 1993. Whole body amino acid composition of the growing pig. J. Sci. Food Agric. 62:29–33. Lacey, J.M., and D. W. Wilmore. 1990. Is glutamine a conditionally essential amino acid? Nutr. Rev. 48:297–309. Lawrence, B. V., O. Adeola, and T. R. Cline. 1994. Nitrogen utilization and lean growth performance of 20- to 50-kilogram pigs fed diets balanced for lysine:energy ratio. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2887–2895. Leibholz, J. 1988. Threonine supplementation of diets for pigs between 7 and 56 days of age. Anim. Prod. 47:475–480. Leibholz, J., and J. R. Parks. 1987. Lysine supplementation of diets for pigs between 7 and 56 days of age . Anim. Prod. 44:421–426. Lenis, N. P., and J. T. M. van Diepen. 1990. Amino acid requirements of pigs. 3. Requirement for apparent digestible threonine of pigs in different stages of growth. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 38:609–622.

OCR for page 29
--> Lenis, N. P., J. T. M. van Diepen, and P. W. Goedhart. 1990. Amino acid requirements of pigs. 1. Requirements for methionine + cystine, threonine and tryptophan of fast-growing boars and gilts, fed ad libitum. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 38:577–595. Lepine, A. J., D. C. Mahan, and Y. K. Chung. 1991. Growth performance of weanling pigs fed corn-soybean meal diets with or without dried whey at various L-lysine•HCl levels. J. Anim. Sci. 69:2026–2032. Lewis, A. J., and H. S. Bayley. 1995. Amino acid bioavailability. Pp. 35–65 in Bioavailability of Nutrients for Animals: Amino Acids, Minerals, and Vitamins. Ammerman, C. B., D. H. Baker, and A. J. Lewis, eds. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Lewis, A.J., and N. Nishimura. 1995. Valine requirement of the finishing pig. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2315–2318. Lewis, A. J., and E. R. Peo, Jr. 1986. Threonine requirement of pigs weighing 5 to 15 kg. J. Anim. Sci. 62:1617–1623. Lin, F. D., T. K. Smith, and H. S. Bayley. 1986a. Influence of dietary lysine concentration on the oxidation of an indicator amino acid by growing boars. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1179–1183. Lin, F. D., T. K. Smith, and H. S. Bayley. 1986b. Tryptophan requirement of growing swine as determined by the oxidation of an indicator amino acid. J. Anim. Sci. 63:467–471. Louis, G. F., A. J. Lewis, W. C. Weldon, P. S. Miller, R. J. Kittok, and W. W. Stroup. 1994a. The effect of protein intake on boar libido, semen characteristics, and plasma hormone concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2038–2050. Louis, G. F., A. J. Lewis, W. C. Weldon, P. M. Ermer, P. S. Miller, R. J. Kittok, and W. W. Stroup. 1994b. The effect of energy and protein intakes on boar libido, semen characteristics, and plasma hormone concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2051–2060. Lovett, T. D., M. T. Coffey, R. D. Miles, and G. E. Combs. 1986. Methionine, choline and sulfate interrelationships in the diet of weanling swine. J. Anim. Sci. 63:467–471. Mahan, D. C., R. A. Easter, G. L. Cromwell, E. R. Miller, and T. L. Veum. 1993. Effect of dietary lysine levels formulated by altering the ratio of corn-soybean meal with or without dried whey and L-lysine•HCl in diets for weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 71:1848–1852. Martinez, G. M., and D. A. Knabe. 1990. Digestible lysine requirement of starter and grower pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 68:2748–2755. McPhee, C. P., K. C. Williams, and L. J. Danials. 1991. The effect of selection for rapid lean growth on the dietary lysine and energy requirements of pigs fed to scale. Livest. Prod. Sci. 27:185–198. Meding, A. J. H., and H. E. Nielsen. 1977. Fortskellige proteinnormers indflydelse pa frugtbarheden hos orner, der anvendes til kunstig saerdoverforing. Statens Husdyrbrugsforog, Copenhagen, Denmark. Mitchell, J. R., Jr., D. E. Baker, B. G. Harmon, H. W. Norton, and A. H. Jensen. 1968. Some amino acid needs of the young pig fed a semisynthetic diet. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1322–1326. Möhn, S., and A. Susenbeth. 1994. Tryptophan requirement of pigs between 60 and 105 kg live weight. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 72:252–259. Monegue, H. J., G. L. Cromwell, R. D. Coffey, S. D. Carter, and M. Cervantes. 1993. Elevated dietary lysine levels for sows nursing large litters. J. Anim. Sci. 71(Suppl. 1):67 (Abstr.). Moskutelo, I. I. 1970. Different amounts of lysine for boars. Svinovodstvo 1:27–28. (Cited in Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 1970. 40:1478.) Murphy, J. M. 1992. Effects of Nutrition and Development on Proline Metabolism in the Neonatal Piglet. M.S. Thesis. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. December 1992. Nam, D. S., and F. X. Aherne. 1994. The effects of lysine:energy ratio on the performance of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1247–1256. National Research Council. 1988. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. Ninth revised ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 93 pp. Netesa, A., and A. Pashkevich. 1971. Effect of level of lysine in the diet on sperm production. Svinovodstvo 10:34. (Cited in Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 1972. 42:769.) Oestemer, G. A., L. E. Hanson, and R. J. Meade. 1973. Leucine-isoleucine interrelationship in the young pig. J. Anim. Sci. 36:674–678. Owen, K. Q., D. A. Knabe, K. G. Burgoon, and E. J. Gregg. 1994. Self-selection of diets and lysine requirements of growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 72:554–564. Owen, K. Q., J. L. Nelssen, R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, L. J. Kats, and K. G. Friesen. 1995. Added dietary methionine in starter diets containing spray dried blood products. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2647–2654. Pashkevich, A. I. 1974. Changes in the reproductive function of boar sires under the effect of different conditions of lysine in rations. Izv Timiryazevsk-S-kh Akad. 4:180–187. Pashkevich, A. I. 1976. Change in the reproductive function of stud boars with different levels of lysine in the ration. Izv Timiryazevsk-S-kh Akad. 2:168–175. Pettigrew, J. E. 1993. Amino acid nutrition of gestating and lactating sows. BioKyowa Technical Review—5. Chesterfield, MO: Nutri-Quest. Poppe, S., U. Hühn, F. Kleemann, and I. König. 1974a. Studies on the effect of diet on the production of sperms in young boars and boars used for AI. 1. Effect of diet on the sperm production of boars used for AI. Arch. Tierernahr. 24:499–512. Poppe, S., U. Hühn, F. Kleemann, and I. König. 1974b. Studies on the effect of diet on the production of sperms in young boars and boars used for AI. 2. Influence of nutrition upon the sperm production in young boars. Arch. Tierernahr. 24:551–565. Poppe, S., U. Hühn, F. Kleemann, and I. König. 1974c. Studies on the effect of diet on the production of sperms in young boars and boars used for AI. 3. Influence of nutrition upon the sperm production and service efficiency of boars used for artificial insemination. Arch. Tierernahr. 24:637–648. Rao, D. S., and K. J. McCracken. 1990. Protein requirements of boars of high genetic potential for lean growth . Anim. Prod. 51:179–187. Reifsnyder, D. H., C. T. Young, and E. E. Jones. 1984. The use of low-protein liquid diets to determine the methionine requirement and the efficacy of methionine hydroxy analogue for the three-week-old pig. J. Nutr. 114:1705–1715. Robbins, K. R., and D. H. Baker. 1977. Phenylalanine requirement of the weanling pig and its relationship to tyrosine. J. Anim. Sci. 45:113–118. Roth, F. X., and M. Kirchgessner. 1987. Biological efficiency of dietary methionine or cystine supplementation with growing pigs: A contribution to the requirement for S-containing amino acids. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 58:267–280. Roth, F. X., and M. Kirchgessner. 1989. Influence of the methionine:cystine relationship in the feed on the performance of growing pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 61:265–274. Russell, L. E., R. A. Easter, V. Gomez-Rojas, G. L. Cromwell, and T. S. Stahly. 1986. A note on the supplementation of low-protein, maizesoya-bean meal diets with lysine, tryptophan, threonine and methionine for growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 42:291–295. Saldana, C. I., D. A. Knabe, K. Q. Owen, K. G. Burgoon, and E. J. Gregg. 1994. Digestible threonine requirements of starter and finisher pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72:144–150. Sauber, T. E., T. S. Stahly, R. C. Ewan, and N. H. Williams. 1994. Interactive effects of sow genotype and dietary amino acid intake on lactational performance of sows nursing large litters. J. Anim. Sci. 72(Suppl. 2):66 (Abstr.). Sauer, W. C., and L. Ozimek. 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: Results and their practical applications. A review. Livestock Prod. Sci. 15:367–388. Schenck, B. C., T. S. Stahly, and G. L. Cromwell. 1992a. Interactive effects of thermal environment and dietary lysine and fat levels on rate, efficiency, and composition of growth of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3791–3802. Schenck, B. C., T. S. Stahly, and G. L. Cromwell. 1992b. Interactive effects of thermal environment and dietary amino acid and fat levels

OCR for page 30
--> on rate and efficiency of growth of pigs housed in a conventional nursery. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3803–3811. Schutte, J. B., E. J. Van Weerden, and F. Koch. 1988. Utilization of DL-and L-tryptophan in young pigs. Anim. Prod. 46:447–452. Schutte, J. B., M. W. Bosch, N. P. Lenis, J. de Jong, and J. T. M. van Diepen. 1990. Amino acid requirements of pigs. 2. Requirement for apparent digestible threonine of young pigs. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 38:597–607. Sève, B., M. C. Meunier-Salaün, M. Monnier, Y. Colléaux, and Y. Henry. 1991. Impact of dietary tryptophan and behavioral type on growth performance and plasma amino acids of young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 69:3679–3688. Shelton, D. C., W. M. Beeson, and E. T. Mertz. 1951. The effect of methionine and cystine on the growth of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 10:57–64. Southern, L. L. 1991. Digestible Amino Acids and Digestible Amino Acid Requirements for Swine. BioKyowa Technical Review—2. Chesterfield, MO: Nutri-Quest, Inc. Southern, L. L., and D. H. Baker. 1982. Performance and concentration of amino acids in plasma and urine of young pigs fed diets with excesses of either arginine or lysine. J. Anim. Sci. 55:857–866. Southern, L. L., and D. H. Baker. 1983. Arginine requirement of the young pig. J. Anim. Sci. 57:402–412. Stahly, T. S., G. L. Cromwell, and H. J. Monegue. 1990. Lactational responses of sows nursing large litters to dietary lysine levels. J. Anim. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):369 (Abstr.). Stahly, T. S., G. L. Cromwell, and H. J. Monegue. 1992. Milk yield responses of sows nursing large litters. J. Anim. Sci. 70(Suppl. 1):238 (Abstr.). Susenbeth, A., R. Schneider, and K. H. Menke. 1994. The effect of protein and lysine intake on growth and protein retention in pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 71:200–207. Tanksley, T. D., Jr., and D. A. Knabe. 1984. Ileal digestibilities of amino acids in pig feeds and their use in formulating diets. Pp. 75–95 in Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, W. Haresign and D. J. A. Cole, eds. London: Butterworth. Thaler, R. C., G. W. Libal, and R. C. Wahlstrom. 1986. Effect of lysine levels in pig starter diets on performance to 20 kg and on subsequent performance and carcass characteristics . J. Anim. Sci. 63:139–144. Tommé, M. F., and P. L. Loskutnikov. 1972. Effect of methionine level in rations of adult breeding boars on metabolism and semen production. Dokl. Vses Ord. Lenina Akad. Skh. Nauk. 7:23–25. (Cited in Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 1973. 43:261.) Uzu, G. 1979. Influence of protein feeding on the reproductive performance of 30 to 90 kg young boars. Ann. Zootech. 28:431–441. Van de Kerk, P., and C. M. T. Willems. 1985. The influence of crude protein, lysine and methionine + cystine on the fertility of boars. Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernaehrg. Futtermittelkde 53:43–49. Weaver, E. M., B. S. Borg, G. W. Libal, and R. C. Wahlstrom. 1988. Effect of lysine levels in starter diets on subsequent performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 66(Suppl. 1):314 (Abstr.). Wehrbein, G. F., P. E. Vipperman, Jr., E. R. Peo, Jr., and P. J. Cunningham. 1970. Diammonium citrate and diammonium phosphate as sources of dietary nitrogen for growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 31:327–332. Williams, A. P. 1994. Recent developments in amino acid analysis. Pp. 11–36 in Amino Acids in Farm Animal Nutrition. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International. Wu, G., and D. A. Knabe. 1995. Arginine synthesis in enterocytes of neonatal pigs. Am. J. Physiol. 269:R621–R629. Wu, G., S. A. Meier, and D. A. Knabe. 1996. Dietary glutamine supplementation prevents jejunal atrophy in weaned pigs. J. Nutr. 126:2578–2584. Yen, H. T., and I. T. Yu. 1985. Influence of digestible energy and protein feeding on semen characteristics of breeding boars. In: Efficient Animal Production for Asian Welfare. Proc. 3rd AAAP Animal Science Congress, Seoul, South Korea, 2:610–612. Yen, H. T., D. J. A. Cole, and D. Lewis. 1986a. Amino acid requirements of growing pigs. 7. The response of pigs from 25 to 55 kg live weight to dietary ideal protein. Anim. Prod. 43:141–154. Yen, H. T., D. J. A. Cole, and D. Lewis. 1986b. Amino acid requirements of growing pigs. 8. The response of pigs from 50 to 90 kg live weight to dietary ideal protein. Anim. Prod. 43:155–165. Zaripova, L., and Sh. Shakirov. 1978. Fodder lysine and methionine in diets for boars. Svinovodstvo 5:14–15. (Cited in Nutr. Abstr. Rev., Series B 48:644.) Zimmerman, D. R. 1987. Threonine requirement of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 65(Suppl. 1):130 (Abstr.).

Representative terms from entire chapter:

amino acids