National Academies Press: OpenBook

Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments (1998)

Chapter: D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists

« Previous: C. Materials Received from National Marine Fisheries Service
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×

Appendix D Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists (9 July, 1997, Bedford, Massachusetts)

Agenda

Time

Issue

Presenter

10:00-10:10

Overview, Introductions

M. Sissenwine

10:10-10:20

Stock Assessment Workshop Process, Terms of Reference, Interaction with Canadian Process

E. Anderson

10:20-10:45

Generic Issues: Databases, Survey Calibration, Assessment, and Prediction Methods

S. Murawski

 

Assessments Inputs, Assumptions, Results, and Research Recommendations

S. Murawski

10:45-11:00

Georges Bank Haddock

R. Mayo

11:00-11:15

Georges Bank Cod

R. Mayo

11:15-11:30

Gulf of Maine Cod

R. Mayo

11:30-11:45

Southern New England Yellowtail Flounder

W. Overholtz

11:45-12:00

Georges Bank Yellowtail Flounder

W. Overholtz

12:00-12:45

Lunch

 

12:45-1:15

Management Advice, Context with Previous Assessments, A#7/A#5, Canadian Management

M. Sissenwine

1:15-1:45

Questions and Discussion

 

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×

Information Presented

 

SAW-24 Agenda

NORTHEAST REGIONAL STOCK ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP (SAWPROCESS)

• Steering Committee

• Working Groups

• Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC)

• Public Review Workshop

• Stocks

Gulf of Maine Cod

Georges Bank Cod

Georges Bank Haddock

Georges Bank Yellowtail Flounder

Southern New England Yellowtail Flounder of estimates of stock abundance and fishing mortality rates

• Terms of Reference

Assess the stock status through 1996 and characterize the variability

Provide projected estimates of catch for 1997-1998 and SSB for 1998-1999 at various level of F, including all relevant biological reference points

Advise on the assessment and management implications of incorporating recreational catch and commercial discard data in the assessment

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×

Generic Assessment Issues I

Generic Assessment Issues II

• Assessment Databases

Changes in Landings Data Collection System

Proration of Landings to Stock Area

Effort & CPUE/LPUE

Rates of Biological Sampling of the Catch

Discard Estimates

• Survey Calibration Studies

Vessel/Door/Net Changes over Time

Estimation of Calibration Coefficients

Effects of Alternative Estimation Methods

Uncertainty in Assessments

< Bootstrap Estimates of Precision in ADAPT

< Sensitivity of Assessment Results to Potential Biases

< Explicit vs. Implicit Sources of Uncertainty

< Conveying Uncertainty to Managers

Medium-Term Projections

< Utility of Results

< Stock Rebuilding Targets

< Estimation Methods

< Presentation of Results

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Georges Bank Haddock Research Recommendations
  • Improve biological sampling of U.S. commercial landings and discards.

  • Examine the effects of large tows on overall and age-specific abundance indices, specifically with reference to closed areas.

  • Examine effects of abrupt changes in mean weights during the 1990s, specifically with respect to the 1989-1991 year classes in the eastern part of Georges Bank.

  • Investigate factors associated with apparent recent improvements in survival ratios (R/SSB).

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Georges Bank Cod Issues in Assessment
  • Data Used:

    • ANALYTICAL, Age structured assessment

    • ADAPT VPA Calibration of age 1-10+catch at age, 1978-1996

    • NEFSC spring and autumn RV indices (1978-1996)

    • Canadian DFO spring RV indices (1986-1997)

    • CAA estimated for recreational landings 1981-1996

    • Discard ratios estimated for 1989-1996

  • CAA:

    • Commercial: sufficient age/length data not available prior to 1978

    • 1994-1996 sampling poorest since 1982, notably in ''large" market category.

    • 1996 "scrod" and "market" samples greater than 1995 samples

    • Recreational: derived from very few length samples, 1981-1996

  • Sensitivity Runs:

    • Recreational (1981-1996): slightly higher stock size, with similar [Text incomplete in source] and SSB as base run

    • LPUE (1978-1996): lower stock size and higher F than final run

  • Other issues:

    • Transboundary stock: use Canadian CAA and RV survey  

    • Canadian RV survey indices for 1993 and 1994 not used (lack of coverage)

    • LPUE not used as in previous assessments (1994-1996 data unreliable)

    • Discards not incorporated: lack of samples, 1978-1988

    • Recreational not used: poor sampling, lack of samples, 1978-198[Text incomplete in source]

Georges Bank Cod Assessment Summary
  • Current landings (1996) = 8,900; up from 7,900 mt in 1995

  • Survey indices fluctuate near record-low values

  • LPUE declined by 1993 to the lowest LPUE in time series

  • VPA results  

  • Current F(1996) = 0.17

  • Current SSB(1997) = 46,400 t

  • Shift to older ages in PR

  • Mean F (4-8, u) declined from record-high in 1994 to record-low in 1996

  • Record-low recruitment of the 1994-1996 year classes

  • Yield and SSB per Recruit Model  

  • F0.1= 0.17  

  • Fmax= 0.32  

  • F20%= 0.43

  • Projections  

  • Short term: At status quo F, landings in 1998 (8,400 t) remain stable, SSB increases 35% during 1996 (41,200 t) to 1999 (55,000 t) Higher F scenarios initially increase landings and SSB, with subsequent declines  

  • Medium term: 1998 to 2006 Landings increase from 8,200 mt to 29,400 mt SSB improves from 53,700 mt to 199,900 mt Median recruitment increases from 14 million to 34.4 million

  • CONCLUSIONS  

    • Stock remains in overexploited state with low biomass  

    • Recruitment of three most recent year classes at record low  

    • SSB remains near record low value  

    • Current F(96) nearly equal to F0.1

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Georges Bank Cod Research Recommendations
  •  Further investigate the effect of closed areas on the use of LPUE as an index of abundance, specifically examine the impact of change in fleet distribution as a result of progressive exclusion from the Canadian zone and then from Closed Area II.

  • Further investigate the basis for deriving the recreational component of the cod catch. Specifically, the effect of sampling levels in the party and charter categories at age can be used to augment the commercial landings at age in the VPA.

  • Further examine discard rates in years prior to 1989 before discard data can be incorporated into the catch at age.

Gulf of Maine Cod Assessment Issues — I Data Used
  • CURRENT ASSESSMENT

  • ANALYTICAL (Age Structured)

  • ADAPT VPA Calibration of Age 2-7+ CAA, 1982-1996  

  • ANALYTICAL (Age Structured)  

  • ADAPT VPA Calibration of Age 2-7+ CAA, 1982-1996

  • 1996 landings were 7,200 t; up from 6,800 t in 1995

  • Sample summary  

  • 1994-1995 sampling improved over 1993, but low re: landings  

  • 1996 much improved

  • Catch at Age  

  • Reduction in proportion of older 9>7 yr) ages and few fish >9 yr after 1990  

  • 1992 year class 62% by number, 57% by weight in 1996

  • Commercial LPUE  

  • LPUE declined in 1993 to pre-1989 level; not used in 1994-1996

  • Survey Indices  

  • Low number and weight per tow persist through autumn 1996  

  • Low recruitment indices in NEFSC and Massachusetts DMF surveys in 1995 and 1996  

  • Survey Zx 1.1 in 1991-1993 and 1994-1996

  • VPA Calibration  

  • Unusual F pattern in 1994 for fully recruited ages 4 and 5  

  • Record low recruitment of 1994 and 1995 year classes <1 million fish

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Gulf of Maine Cod Assessment Issues — II Quality of CAA

Commercial CAA

  • Catch at Age

    • Majority of catch at ages 3 and 4 (by number) and ages 4 and 5 (by weight)

    • Reduction in proportion of older (>7 yr) ages and few fish > [Text incomplete in source] yr after 1990

    • 1992 year class 62% by number, 57% by weight in 1996

    • High mean wts. at age in 1995 at ages 5 and 6 ==> Low Numbers may have influenced high F at age 4 and 5 in 1994

  • Sampling Intensity

  • Poor sampling in 1993

  • 1994-1995 sampling improved, but low for older ages (Large market category)

  • Overall improvement in 1996

Recreational CAA

  • Catch at Age

  • Length composition indicates higher proportion of smaller fish compared to commercial catch

  • Majority of catch at ages 2 and 3 (by number) and ages 3 and 4 (by weight)

  • Note: Commercial age/length key used to distribute number at length to numbers at age

  • Sampling Intensity

  • Generally fewer than 1,000 (often <500) fish measured per year

  • Length data (and age) samples pooled on annual basis

Gulf of Maine Cod Assessment Issues—III Alternative Runs
  • Six alternative assessment models using Stock Synthesis Approach (Fournier and Archibald, 1982)

  • Employed same survey indices as ADAPT  

  • Included commercial CAA alone and commercial and recreational CAA  

  • Lognormal, multinomial, and robust error structure assumptions

  • Lognormal model results

  • Log-normal error structure most closely approximated ADAPT/VPA

  • 1996 and 1997 Fs for fully recruited ages were estimated to be approximately 1.0

  • Recent recruitment (1994 and 1995 year classes) poorest ever in both analyses

  • SSB declining sharply since 1989, remaining lowest ever through 1997

  • Multinomial model results

  • Better fit to older ages and slightly lower Fs

  • Lower Fs at older ages in earliest years

  • Slightly lower Fs in recent years at all ages

  • Slightly better recruitment of 1994 and 1995 year classes

  • Marked increase in catchability by the fishery over time

  • Robust likelihood results similar to multinomial, but with very high Fs at older ages since 1988

  • Conclusions

  • All model formulations produce results similar to ADAPT/VPA:

    1. Sharp decrease in SSB since 1989

    2. Poorest recruitment on record for 1994 and 1995 year classes

    3. F on fully recruited ages has remained at or above 1.0 since early 1980s

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Gulf of Maine Cod Assessment Issues — IV Sensitivity Runs
  • Four Sensitivity Runs (including final)

  • Two with commercial CAA alone

  • Two including recreational CAA

  • VPA results

  • 1996 terminal F for fully recruited ages ranged from 0.96 to 1.04 (essentially 1.0)

  • Recruitment estimates slightly higher when recreational CAA included

  • Recent recruitment (1994 and 1995 year classes) poorest ever in all runs

  • Retrospective patterns in recruitment not persistent

  • SSB remains low in all runs

  • Final VPA calibration used commercial CAA alone due to

  • poor sampling of recreational CAA

  • uncertain allocation of recreational cod catch between Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank

Gulf of Maine Cod Assessment Summary
  •  Current landings (1996) = 7,200 t

  • LPUE declined sharply in 1992, remained low in 1993-1996

  • Survey Indices remain close to record-low levels in 1995-1996

  • VPA results

  • current F(1996) = 1.04

  • current SSB(1996) = 9,200 t

  • Yield and SSB per Recruit Model

  • F0.1 = 0.16

  • Fmax = 0.29

  • F20% = 0.37

  • Projections

  • At status quo F, SSB declines to unprecedented record low

  • Landings decline in 1998 under all F scenarios

  • SSB increases over the medium term at Fmax (0.29) to 13,000 t

  • CONCLUSIONS

  • The stock is overexploited, current F(1996) is well above Fmax and about 3X F20%

  • Spawning stock biomass is at a record low level and is projected to decline further in 1998 and 1999

Gulf of Maine Cod Research Recommendations
  • Further investigation of the changes in effort and LPUE in the VTR data set is required before LPUE can be used to calibrate VPA.

  • Further investigation of the basis for deriving the recreational component of the cod catch, specifically the effect of sampling levels in the party and charter categories, is required before the recreational landings at age can be used to augment the commercial landings at age in the VPA.

  • Further examination of discard rates in years prior to 1989 is required before discard data can be incorporated into the catch at age.

SNE Yellowtail Flounder Assessment Issues
  • Commercial Landings 1973-1996

  • Collect data for quarterly estimation

  • Per capita sampling adequate 1973-1996

  • Commercial Discards 1973-1996

  • Need adequate sea sampling

  • VTR discard ratios

  • Survey Indices 1973-1996: Spring, Autumn, Scallop

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
SNE Yellowtail Flounder Assessment Summary
  • Fishing Mortality: F0.1=0.27, F96=0.12, below reference point in 1996

  • Spawning Stock Biomass: SSB-threshold=10,000 mt, SSB97=5,000 mt, below threshold, but increasing

  • Short-term: stock improving, could reach 8,000 mt SSB by 1999 at F=0.12

  • Medium-term: stock should rebuild if fishing rate remains low

SNE Yellowtail Flounder Research Recommendations
  • Improve sea sampling coverage on trawl and scallop vessels.

  • Increase sampling frequency on research surveys.

  • Improve commercial length and age samples.

  • Examine VTR data for mesh-specific discard ratios.

  • Evaluate changes in maturity at age in recent years.

  • Evaluate performance of the scallop survey as a tuning index.

  • Evaluate winter survey as a tuning index.

Georges Bank Yellowtail Flounder Issues in the Assessment
  • Data in the assessment: 1973-1996 U.S. and Canadian commercial landings and discards (recreational catch is negligible), U.S. spring and fall trawl survey indices, U.S. scallop survey indices, and Canadian trawl survey indices.

  • Quality of Catch at Age:

  • Age composition by quarter and statistical area not available 1994-1996. Catches characterized semiannually for the entire stock area.

  • Sexually dimorphic growth not considered in estimates of catch at age.

  • Sensitivity Runs: Log-transformed survey indices and removal of uncertain age-1 discard estimates. Results and diagnostics similar among all sensitivity runs.

  • Alternative Methods: Biomass dynamics model (ASPIC) using total catch (1963-1996), U.S. spring and fall survey indices, and the Canadian survey index of biomass. Magnitude and temporal pattern of mean biomass and F similar to those from VPA.

Georges Bank Yellowtail Flounder Assessment Summary
  • F and SSB Trends:

  • F averaged 1.2 during 1973-1994 and decreased to 0.1 in 1996

  • SSB was 21,000 mt in 1973, declined to less than 4,000 mt during 1984-1988, fluctuated below 6,000 mt from 1989 to 1994, and increased to 11,700 mt in 1996

  • Probability Distributions for F and SSB in 1996:

  • 80% chance that F was between 0.08 and 0.14, and nearly 0% probability that F exceeded F0.1 (0.25)

  • 80% chance that SSB was between 9,800 and 14,600 mt, and 12% probability that SSB was below the rebuilding threshold of 10,000 mt

  • Projections:

  • At F0.1, landings and SSB will continue to increase in the next three years. At F96, landings will decrease slightly in 1997, then increase in 1998 and 1999, and SSB will continue to increase in the next three years.

  • At F0.1, landings will increase to 8,400 mt in 2006, and SSB will increase to 46,200 mt in 2006. At F96, landings will increase to 5,500 mt in 2006, and SSB will increase to 71,600 mt in 2006.

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Georges Bank Yellowtail Flounder Research Recommendations
  • Extending the VPA back to the 1960s should be explored.

  • Changes in maturity should be closely monitored.

  • The NEFSC winter survey should be modified to ensure coverage of Georges Bank.

  • Evaluate the feasibility of sex identification in all field sampling to estimate catch at age and survey indices by sex.

  • The number of ages in the VPA should be expanded.

 

 

 

STOCK LEVEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOW

MEDIUM

HIGH

 

 

 

OVER EXPLOITED

REDUCE EXPLOITATION REBUILD STOCK

REDUCE EXPLOITATION AGE DISTRIBUTION

REDUCE EXPLOITATION, INCREASE YIELD PER RECRUIT

 

EXPLOITATION STATUS

 

 

 

 

FULLY EXPLOITED

REDUCE EXPLOITATION, REBUILD STOCK LEVEL

MAINTAIN EXPLOITATION RATE AND YIELD

MAINTAIN EXPLOITATION RATE AND YIELD

 

 

 

UNDER EXPLOITED

MAINTAIN LOW EXPLOITATION WHILE STOCK REBUILDS

INCREASE EXPLOITATION SLOWLY

INCREASE EXPLOITATION, REDUCE STOCK LEVEL

 

 

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Stock Status Summary

 

 

Current Fishing Mortality

1994-1996 Recruitment

1994-1996 SSB

Biomass Threshold

Gulf of Maine Cod

Well Above Target

Low

Low/ Declining

Threshold Not Defined

Georges Bank Cod

Near Target

Low

Low/ Increasing

Well Below

Georges Bank Haddock

Below Target

Low

Low/ Increasing

Well Below

Georges Bank Yellowtail

Below Target

Average

Low/ Increasing

Near

SNE Yellowtail

Below Target

Low

Low/ Increasing

Below

Sarc 24 Advisory Overview
  •   The Situation for Georges Bay Cod, Haddock & Yellowtail, and SNE Yellowtail Has Improved; Gulf of Maine Cod is Unchanged

  •   Except for GM Cod, F Has Been Reduced BELOW Overfishing Reference Points & is NEAR Rebuilding Fs

  •   Except for GM Cod, Some Rebuilding of SSB has Occurred. GB Yellowtail is near SSB Threshold, but SSB for all Stocks is LOW relative to Historical Levels & BMSY

  •   Recruitment in Recent Years Remains LOW Relative to Historic Levels

  •   Short-Term Projections Indicate Maintenance or Modest Increases in SSB at Current Fs, Except for GM Cod

  •   Strong Management Measures Are Warranted for GM Cod to Reduce the Risk of Stock Collapse

  •   Continued Rebuilding of Four Stocks Will Be Jeopardized if Fishing Mortality Rates Are Allowed to Increase

  •   Efforts to Reduce F for GM Cod Should NOT Come at the Expense of Other Heavily Exploited Stocks in the Gulf of Maine or Elsewhere

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Probability SSB = Threshold by 2004 Based on Two Sets of Projections

 

Threshold (kmt)

Amendment 7

SARC 24

Georges Bank

Cod

70

0.76

1.00

Georges Bank

Haddock

80

0.27

0.43

Georges Bank

Yellowtail

10

0.98

1.00

SNE Yellowtail

 

10

 

0.94

 

1.00

 

Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 104
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 105
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 106
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 107
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 108
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 109
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 110
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 112
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 113
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 114
Suggested Citation:"D. Presentation to the Committee by NMFS Scientists." National Research Council. 1998. Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6067.
×
Page 115
Next: E. Glossary »
Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments Get This Book
×
 Review of Northeast Fishery Stock Assessments
Buy Paperback | $57.00 Buy Ebook | $45.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The collapse of cod, flounder, and haddock fish stocks in the Northeast United States has caused widespread concern among managers and fishers in the United States and Canada. The diminishing stocks have forced managers to take strict regulatory measures. Numerous questions have been raised about the adequacy of stock assessment science used to evaluate the status of these stocks and the appropriateness of the management measures taken. Based on these concerns, Congress mandated that a scientific review of the methodology and data used to evaluate these stocks be conducted. In this volume, the committee concludes that although there are improvements to be made in data collection, modeling uncertainty, and communicating between fishers, managers, and scientists, the scientific methods used in the Northeast stock assessments are sound. Recommendations are made on how the stock assessment process can be improved.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!