Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 1
--> Background In 1992 the Committee on Human Rights of the National Academy of Sciences and the Committee on Health and Human Rights of the Institute of Medicine undertook a fact-finding mission to Guatemala.1 The committees' report, Scientists and Human Rights in Guatemala (1992), describes the mission and its findings. It focuses especially on the September 11, 1990, murder of anthropologist Myrna Elizabeth Mack Chang. Myrna Mack researched and wrote about indigenous populations displaced or destroyed due to armed political-military conflict and military counterinsurgency practices.2 She was murdered outside her workplace in Guatemala City only two days after her research was published in English. A portion of the 1992 report reviews the legal steps in the Mack case from the time of the murder to the end of the accusatory phase of the judicial proceeding against Noél de Jesús Beteta Alvarez. Beteta, formerly of the intelligence branch of the Presidential High Command (Estado Mayor Presidencial), was then under indictment as one of the killers, although it was widely believed that Beteta's military superiors were involved in planning the murder. This update provides a synopsis of the Myrna Mack case through 1997, with an overview and a descriptive chronology of the primary legal steps taken to prosecute the three military officers accused of ordering Myrna Mack's murder. 1 In 1994 the committees merged into what is now the Committee on Human Rights of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. 2 Myrna Mack was the principal researcher for the monograph, Assistance and Control: Policies Toward Internally Displaced Populations in Guatemala (Washington, D.C.: Center for Immigration Policy and Refugee Assistance, Georgetown University, 1990). Mack conducted her research under the auspices of the Association for the Advancement of the Social Sciences (Asociación para el Avance de las Ciencias Sociales or AVANCSO), Guatemala, which she cofounded in 1986.
OCR for page 2
--> The Committee on Human Rights works to gain the release of imprisoned scientists, engineers, and health professionals worldwide whose basic human rights, as recognized by the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, have been violated by their governments. Most of the committee's cases involve colleagues who are in jail or who have recently disappeared and may still be alive. Since so many colleagues in Latin America in the 1980s were either killed outright or killed after abduction and torture for the peaceful expression of their ideas, the committee began to develop lists of such cases and to register protests in their behalf with the governments involved. In the case of Myrna Mack, the murder was so egregious, the record of the Guatemalan military's impunity so flagrant, and the resulting cessation of virtually all anthropological research in Guatemala so unfortunate, that the committee decided to devote special attention to the development of the legal case and to persistently urge that all those responsible for Myrna Mack's death be brought to justice. The committee recognizes with deep respect the courageous, unselfish, and tireless efforts of Helen Beatriz Mack Chang, Myrna's sister and the self-appointed private prosecutor in the case.3 Without her initiative in leading the prosecution forward through institutional barriers and resistance, the legal proceedings would not have advanced as far as they have. Thanks primarily to her tireless insistence, this case has become a test of the justice system in Guatemala. 3 Guatemalan law permits a Guatemalan citizen to act independently as a private prosecutor, although the state still has the responsibility to appoint a state prosecutor. At the trial phase, the private and state prosecutors have equal rights to introduce evidence, questions, and witnesses.
Representative terms from entire chapter: