Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$39.95
Web:$35.96
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $31.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Assessing Readiness in Military Women: The Relationship of Body, Composition, Nutrition, and Health (1998)
Food and Nutrition Board (FNB)

Page
237
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


FIGURE A-2 Current weight versus screening table weight (n = 1,106).

cited for using undesirable weight loss practices (such as use of diuretics, laxatives, purging, or saunas) was upcoming weight-in. Since so few overweight women (and probably men) are actually placed on the weight control program, dietary counseling and nutrition education should be readily available to all soldiers without risk of stigma.

References

King, N. J.E. Arsenault, S.H. Mutter, C. Champagne, T.C. Murphy, K.A. Westphal, E.W. Askew. 1994. Nutritional intake of female soldiers during the U.S. Army basic combat training. Technical Report No. 94-17. Natick, Mass.: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine.

Klicka, M.V., D.E. Sherman, N. King, K.E. Friedl, and E.W. Askew. 1993. Nutritional assessment of U.S. Military Academy cadets at West Point: Part 2. Assessment of nutritional intake. Technical Report No. T94-1. Natick, Mass.: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine.


Rose, M.S., R. Moore, R. Mahnke, E. Christensen, and E.W. Askew. 1993. Weight reduction techniques adopted when weight standards are enforced. Technical Report No. T4-93. Natick, Mass.: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine.

Gender Differences In Food Ration Preferences And Consumption Among Military Personnel

Edward Hirsch, Ph.D., and Dianne Engell, Ph.D., Behavioral Sciences Division, U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA 01760

Operational rations have been developed to satisfy the food preferences of male troops. They have been modified based on feedback from male personnel in focus groups and extensive field tests where detailed measures of nutrient intake, fluid balance, body weight, food acceptance, and troop perceptions of ration attributes are used both to evaluate the adequacy of the ration and to make improvements in future versions. This approach to ration development and design was fully justified when women comprised a small fraction of servicemembers and were rarely on the front lines where troops frequently subsist on operational rations as their sole source of food. This situation has changed dramatically as women have come to represent a larger fraction of servicemembers with over 203,000 in active-duty status as of 1993. The question, of course, arises as to whether current military rations satisfy the food preferences of female servicemembers and whether the rations are consumed in adequate quantity to meet women's nutritional needs.

Page
237