The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 40
If, therefore, we can predict the boundary conditions of the
atmosphere at a specific time, particularly SST and sea ice, we
will have some information about the statistics of the atmosphere
at that time. We will not be able to predict the precise state of
the atmosphere, because it can vary in equilibrium with the
predicted boundary conditions, but we will know something about its
average conditions. We may be able to predict the average monthly
or seasonal precipitation over a region even if we cannot say on
what specific day the precipitation will fall. Knowing only a mean
value at a given time can still be helpful if the associated
variability is small. Predictions of tropical boundary conditions
at a certain time are likely to be useful because tropical climate
variability is low, while predictions of mid-latitude boundary
conditions would be less useful because mid-latitude variability,
especially during winter, is high.
Two more important points need to be made. First is the
distinction between initialized and uninitialized prediction. To
make a prediction about a specific time in the future, say the
summer of 2009, there must be some connection to the actual
conditions now. We call this estimation of the actual beginning
state of the system "initialization" (while recognizing that this
term is sometimes used elsewhere to mean the act of bringing a
model system to a state of equilibrium without estimating its
current conditions). If we do not make this initial estimation, we
will not be able to forecast the time at which the climate will
assume a given state, though we may still draw conclusions about
its statistics (that is, changes of its mean and the nature of its
variability). The difference between initialized and uninitialized
prediction becomes important in discussing greenhouse-warming
predictions versus ENSO predictions. The second important point is
the potential for making empirically or statistically based
(analog) predictions. Sufficient information is available from past
climate records to allow predictions to be made (with specified
uncertainty) whenever specific climate states exist that have in
the past been accompanied or followed by particular regional or
local climate conditions. "Climate state" is defined here, as in
NRC (1975), as the average of the complete set of atmospheric,
hydrospheric, and cryospheric variables over a specified period of
time in a specified domain of the earth-atmosphere system.
For climate prediction on all time scales, whether initialized
or not, the tool for predicting the boundary conditions of SST and
sea ice is the coupled climate modela model that consistently
links the atmosphere, ocean, and ice together in responding to a
specified external forcing.
Short-, Medium-, and Long-Range
Climate Prediction
There is no accepted terminology describing the various time
scales for prediction. This report will use "short-range climate
prediction" to denote prediction on time scales up to interannual,
"medium-range climate prediction" to mean prediction at decadal
time scales, and "long-range climate prediction'' (sometimes called
"greenhouse prediction'') for prediction on centennial time
scalesthe scale of a human lifetime.
Short-range climate prediction is an established enterprise:
Skill has been demonstrated for predicting the SST changes in the
tropical Pacific that are characteristic of the ENSO phenomenon on
lead times of 6 to 12 months. Atmospheric properties elsewhere may
then be inferred from these forecasts. These predictive skills,
which vary as a function of several factors (including season,
model type, and decade), have been well documented (Battisti and
Sarachik, 1995; Glantz, 1996; Latif et al., 1998). ENSO prediction
is initialized prediction (in the sense defined above), so a
real-time observing system in the tropical Pacific was put in place
by the TOGA research program. It has been kept in place even though
TOGA has ended, which should permit us to develop our skill
further.
Long-range climate prediction has so far been limited to
predicting forced climate change in response to the anthropogenic
addition of radiatively active gases and aerosols to the
atmosphere. Because this type of prediction is essentially
uninitialized, it cannot predict the actual state of the boundary
conditions at some specific future time. It can, however, be used
to derive the statistics of the boundary conditions (and therefore
the statistics of the atmosphere in equilibrium with the statistics
of the boundary conditions) at some future time. Thus, initialized
short-range climate prediction can predict the SST in the tropical
Pacific for January of 1999, say, while greenhouse predictions can
only say that annually averaged SST will be warmer in the year 2050
by some specified amount, or within a certain range. Such
greenhouse predictions are still valuable if the forcing changes
the mean boundary conditions enough for a difference beyond natural
variability to be apparent; again, small shifts of the mean may be
noticeable in the tropics where the variability is low, while
larger shifts may be masked in mid-latitudes where variability is
high. Long-range forecasts permit the assessment of shifts in
average precipitation, or length of the growing season, or changes
in patterns of runoff; as indicated by Karl et al. (1996), even
subtle shifts in the mean state can have considerable implications
for the frequency and magnitude of extreme climate events.
Medium-range climate prediction, prediction on time scales of a
decade or so, is the most problematic type of prediction. Its value
as uninitialized prediction is limited: The year-to-year
variability of climate, together with the relatively slow approach
of the climate system to equilibrium with anthropogenically added
radiatively active atmospheric constituents, limit the value of
prediction of the statistics of boundary conditions a decade in
advance. Even this type of prediction may be useful under certain
circumstances, however. When regional changes are fast and crossing
the threshold of a new climate state can be predicted,