National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$37.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Related Titles

topleft topright

Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: I. Immediate Priorities and a Long-Range Research Portfolio (1998)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)
Commission on Life Sciences (CLS)
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER)

Citation Manager

. "1. Introduction." Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: I. Immediate Priorities and a Long-Range Research Portfolio. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1998.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
16
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: I Immediate Priorities and a Long-Range Research Portfolio

transformations of particulate matter in the atmosphere produce airborne particles of different sizes and chemical composition. For example, the particles can contain heavy metals, acids, biological or biogenic material, or other organic and inorganic compounds.

Although particulate matter is regulated as a single pollutant by EPA, it consists of a mixture of materials that are far more complex than regulated gaseous pollutants, such as ozone or carbon monoxide. Particles that can be inhaled into the respiratory tract span a range of aerodynamic diameters from molecular clusters as small as 0.001 µm up to larger particles of 10 µm or more in diameter. The numbers of particles and their chemical composition can vary within specific particle size fractions from location to location and over time, depending on the types of source emissions and atmospheric conditions.

Concern about airborne particulate matter in recent years has been driven largely by epidemiological studies that have reported relatively consistent associations between outdoor particulate-matter levels and adverse health effects. However, assessing the specific health risks resulting from exposures to airborne particulate matter, and distinguishing these effects from those produced by gaseous copollutants, involves substantial scientific uncertainty about the influence of copollutants and weather, about whether some particulate-matter fractions (size or chemical) might be more highly associated with health risks, and about the nature of dose-response relationships between particulate matter and health. Many previous analyses have not considered the simultaneous presence of all of the gaseous criteria air pollutants (sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and ozone) and potentially important weather factors in estimating the association between particulate matter and health, and the treatment of such factors has not been uniform across previous studies. It will be important to understand how these factors influence estimates of particulate-matter risks to health and to learn whether the relationships are consistent across study areas. There is limited information about the physical, chemical, or biological properties of particles that might cause the observed adverse health effects, and information is also limited on the mechanisms of toxicity and the locations, activities, and intensity of actual human exposures to such particles. To date, researchers have

Page
16