National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Concluding Comments
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1998. The Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process: A Framework for Research, Second Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6194.
×

References

Berk, R.A., and Rossi, P.H. Thinking About Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1990.


Carmines, E.G., and Zeller, R.A. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1979.


DHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Implementation of Section 304(g) of Public Law 96–265, Social Security Disability Amendments of 1980. Report to the Congress by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Washington, D.C.: DHHS/Social Security Administration, 1982.


Gallicchio, S., and Bye, B. Consistency of Initial Disability Decisions Among and Within States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No. 13–11869, 1980.

GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). Social Security Disability: SSA Quality Assurance Improvements Can Produce More Accurate Payments. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-94–107. Washington, D.C.: GAO, June 1994.

GAO. Social Security Disability: Management Action and Program Redesign Needed to Address Long-Standing Problems. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-95–233. Washington, D.C.: GAO, August 1995.

GAO. Supplemental Security Income: Long-Standing Problems Put Program at Risk for Fraud, Waste, and Abuse. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Committee on the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-97-88. Washington, D.C.: GAO, March 1997a.

GAO. Social Security Disability: SSA Must Hold Itself Accountable for Continued Improvement in Decision-making. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee of the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-97–102. Washington, D.C.: GAO, August 1997b.


Hu, J., Lahiri, K., Vaughan, D., and Wixon, B. A. Structural Model of Social Security's Disability Determination Process. ORES Working Paper Series, No. 72 Ed. Washington, D.C.: SSA/Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, 1997.


Institute for Health and Aging. Strengthening Policy Development Work Within the Social Security Administration: A Review of the Mission, Resources, and Capabilities in the Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics. San Francisco: University of California, December 1997.

Institute of Medicine. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1985.


Lahiri, K., Vaughan, D., and Wixon, B. Modeling SSA's sequential disability determination process using matched SIPP data. Social Security Bulletin 58(4):3–42, 1995.

Last, J.M., ed. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.


Mashaw J.L., and Reno V.P., eds. Disability Policy Panel Report: Balancing Security and Opportunity: The Challenge of Disability Income Policy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Social Insurance, 1996.


Raizen, S.A., and Rossi, P.H. Program Evaluation in Education: When? How? To What Ends? Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1981.


Sirken, M.G. The Role of a Cognitive Laboratory in a Statistical Agency. Statistical Policy Working Paper 20: Seminar on Federal Quality of Federal Data. Washington, D.C.: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Statistical Policy Office, March 1991.

SSA (Social Security Administration). Documentation of the SSA Disability Claim and Appeal Process. Washington, D.C.: SSA, Office of Human Resources, Office of Workforce Analysis, April 1993. (Unpublished Draft)

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1998. The Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process: A Framework for Research, Second Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6194.
×

SSA. Plan for a New Disability Claim Process. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No. 01–005, September 1994a.

SSA. Disability Process Redesign: Next Steps in Implementation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No. 01–006, November 1994b.

SSA. Research plan for the development of a redesigned method of evaluating disability in Social Security claims. Federal Register 61(175):47542–47544, 1996.

SSA. An Analysis of Other Disability Programs. Request for Proposals for SSA-RFP-97–2971 (Issue Date: June 12, 1997). Washington, D.C.: SSA, 1997a.

SSA. Progress report on development of a redesigned method of evaluating disability in Social Security claims. Federal Register 62(121):34097–34101, 1997b.

SSA. In-Depth Analysis of the Role of Vocational Factors in a New Disability Determination Process. Request for Proposals for SSA-RFP-97–3114 (Issue Date: June 30, 1997). Washington, D.C.: SSA, 1997c.

SSA. Integration of Disability Methodology Research. Request for Proposals for SSA-RFP-97–3118 (Issue Date: August 6, 1997). Washington, D.C.: SSA, 1997d.

SSA. Social Security Programs Throughout the World—1997. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (SSA/Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics), SSA Pub. No. 13-1-11805, (August) 1997e.

SSA. Disability Evaluation Study (DES). Request for Proposals for SSA-RFP-98–3102 (Issue Date: January 15, 1998). Washington, D.C.: SSA, 1998a.

SSA. Disability Redesign—Overview and Status [WWW document]. URL http://www.ssa.gov/DPRT/DPRT_intro.html. (January 26), 1998b.

Social Security Advisory Board. Developing Social Security Policy: How the Social Security Administration Can Provide Greater Policy Leadership. Washington, D.C.: Social Security Advisory Board, March 1997.

Social Security Advisory Board. Strengthening Social Security Research: The Responsibilities of the Social Security Administration. Washington, D.C.: Social Security Advisory Board, January 1998.

Steuerle, C.E., and Bakija, J.M. Retooling Social Security in the 21st century. Social Security Bulletin 60(2):37–60, 1997.

Swets J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293, 1988.

Swets J.A. The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high stakes diagnostics. American Psychologist 47:522–532, 1992.

Yelin E.H. Displaced concern: The social context of the work disability problem. Milbank Quarterly 67(Suppl 2, Part 1):114–165, 1989.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1998. The Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process: A Framework for Research, Second Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6194.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine. 1998. The Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process: A Framework for Research, Second Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6194.
×
Page 39
Next: Appendix »
The Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process: A Framework for Research, Second Interim Report Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $47.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!