References

Berk, R.A., and Rossi, P.H. Thinking About Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1990.


Carmines, E.G., and Zeller, R.A. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1979.


DHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Implementation of Section 304(g) of Public Law 96–265, Social Security Disability Amendments of 1980. Report to the Congress by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Washington, D.C.: DHHS/Social Security Administration, 1982.


Gallicchio, S., and Bye, B. Consistency of Initial Disability Decisions Among and Within States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No. 13–11869, 1980.

GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). Social Security Disability: SSA Quality Assurance Improvements Can Produce More Accurate Payments. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-94–107. Washington, D.C.: GAO, June 1994.

GAO. Social Security Disability: Management Action and Program Redesign Needed to Address Long-Standing Problems. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-95–233. Washington, D.C.: GAO, August 1995.

GAO. Supplemental Security Income: Long-Standing Problems Put Program at Risk for Fraud, Waste, and Abuse. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Committee on the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-97-88. Washington, D.C.: GAO, March 1997a.

GAO. Social Security Disability: SSA Must Hold Itself Accountable for Continued Improvement in Decision-making. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee of the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-97–102. Washington, D.C.: GAO, August 1997b.


Hu, J., Lahiri, K., Vaughan, D., and Wixon, B. A. Structural Model of Social Security's Disability Determination Process. ORES Working Paper Series, No. 72 Ed. Washington, D.C.: SSA/Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, 1997.


Institute for Health and Aging. Strengthening Policy Development Work Within the Social Security Administration: A Review of the Mission, Resources, and Capabilities in the Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics. San Francisco: University of California, December 1997.

Institute of Medicine. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1985.


Lahiri, K., Vaughan, D., and Wixon, B. Modeling SSA's sequential disability determination process using matched SIPP data. Social Security Bulletin 58(4):3–42, 1995.

Last, J.M., ed. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.


Mashaw J.L., and Reno V.P., eds. Disability Policy Panel Report: Balancing Security and Opportunity: The Challenge of Disability Income Policy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Social Insurance, 1996.


Raizen, S.A., and Rossi, P.H. Program Evaluation in Education: When? How? To What Ends? Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1981.


Sirken, M.G. The Role of a Cognitive Laboratory in a Statistical Agency. Statistical Policy Working Paper 20: Seminar on Federal Quality of Federal Data. Washington, D.C.: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Statistical Policy Office, March 1991.

SSA (Social Security Administration). Documentation of the SSA Disability Claim and Appeal Process. Washington, D.C.: SSA, Office of Human Resources, Office of Workforce Analysis, April 1993. (Unpublished Draft)



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 38
The Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process: A Framework for Research, Second Interim Report References Berk, R.A., and Rossi, P.H. Thinking About Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1990. Carmines, E.G., and Zeller, R.A. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1979. DHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Implementation of Section 304(g) of Public Law 96–265, Social Security Disability Amendments of 1980. Report to the Congress by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Washington, D.C.: DHHS/Social Security Administration, 1982. Gallicchio, S., and Bye, B. Consistency of Initial Disability Decisions Among and Within States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No. 13–11869, 1980. GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). Social Security Disability: SSA Quality Assurance Improvements Can Produce More Accurate Payments. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-94–107. Washington, D.C.: GAO, June 1994. GAO. Social Security Disability: Management Action and Program Redesign Needed to Address Long-Standing Problems. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-95–233. Washington, D.C.: GAO, August 1995. GAO. Supplemental Security Income: Long-Standing Problems Put Program at Risk for Fraud, Waste, and Abuse. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Committee on the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-97-88. Washington, D.C.: GAO, March 1997a. GAO. Social Security Disability: SSA Must Hold Itself Accountable for Continued Improvement in Decision-making. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee of the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-97–102. Washington, D.C.: GAO, August 1997b. Hu, J., Lahiri, K., Vaughan, D., and Wixon, B. A. Structural Model of Social Security's Disability Determination Process. ORES Working Paper Series, No. 72 Ed. Washington, D.C.: SSA/Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, 1997. Institute for Health and Aging. Strengthening Policy Development Work Within the Social Security Administration: A Review of the Mission, Resources, and Capabilities in the Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics. San Francisco: University of California, December 1997. Institute of Medicine. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1985. Lahiri, K., Vaughan, D., and Wixon, B. Modeling SSA's sequential disability determination process using matched SIPP data. Social Security Bulletin 58(4):3–42, 1995. Last, J.M., ed. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983. Mashaw J.L., and Reno V.P., eds. Disability Policy Panel Report: Balancing Security and Opportunity: The Challenge of Disability Income Policy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Social Insurance, 1996. Raizen, S.A., and Rossi, P.H. Program Evaluation in Education: When? How? To What Ends? Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1981. Sirken, M.G. The Role of a Cognitive Laboratory in a Statistical Agency. Statistical Policy Working Paper 20: Seminar on Federal Quality of Federal Data. Washington, D.C.: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Statistical Policy Office, March 1991. SSA (Social Security Administration). Documentation of the SSA Disability Claim and Appeal Process. Washington, D.C.: SSA, Office of Human Resources, Office of Workforce Analysis, April 1993. (Unpublished Draft)

OCR for page 38
The Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process: A Framework for Research, Second Interim Report SSA. Plan for a New Disability Claim Process. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No. 01–005, September 1994a. SSA. Disability Process Redesign: Next Steps in Implementation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (DHHS/SSA): SSA Pub. No. 01–006, November 1994b. SSA. Research plan for the development of a redesigned method of evaluating disability in Social Security claims. Federal Register 61(175):47542–47544, 1996. SSA. An Analysis of Other Disability Programs. Request for Proposals for SSA-RFP-97–2971 (Issue Date: June 12, 1997). Washington, D.C.: SSA, 1997a. SSA. Progress report on development of a redesigned method of evaluating disability in Social Security claims. Federal Register 62(121):34097–34101, 1997b. SSA. In-Depth Analysis of the Role of Vocational Factors in a New Disability Determination Process. Request for Proposals for SSA-RFP-97–3114 (Issue Date: June 30, 1997). Washington, D.C.: SSA, 1997c. SSA. Integration of Disability Methodology Research. Request for Proposals for SSA-RFP-97–3118 (Issue Date: August 6, 1997). Washington, D.C.: SSA, 1997d. SSA. Social Security Programs Throughout the World—1997. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (SSA/Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics), SSA Pub. No. 13-1-11805, (August) 1997e. SSA. Disability Evaluation Study (DES). Request for Proposals for SSA-RFP-98–3102 (Issue Date: January 15, 1998). Washington, D.C.: SSA, 1998a. SSA. Disability Redesign—Overview and Status [WWW document]. URL http://www.ssa.gov/DPRT/DPRT_intro.html. (January 26), 1998b. Social Security Advisory Board. Developing Social Security Policy: How the Social Security Administration Can Provide Greater Policy Leadership. Washington, D.C.: Social Security Advisory Board, March 1997. Social Security Advisory Board. Strengthening Social Security Research: The Responsibilities of the Social Security Administration. Washington, D.C.: Social Security Advisory Board, January 1998. Steuerle, C.E., and Bakija, J.M. Retooling Social Security in the 21st century. Social Security Bulletin 60(2):37–60, 1997. Swets J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293, 1988. Swets J.A. The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high stakes diagnostics. American Psychologist 47:522–532, 1992. Yelin E.H. Displaced concern: The social context of the work disability problem. Milbank Quarterly 67(Suppl 2, Part 1):114–165, 1989.