References

Abacus Technology Corporation. 1993. Lessons Learned under the United States Advanced Battery Consortium, Final Report. November 8. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies. Chevy Chase, Md.: Abacus Technology Corporation.

Abacus Technology Corporation. 1996. Review of the U.S. Department of Energy's Implementation of the 1993 USABC Lessons Learned Study. May 17. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies. Chevy Chase, Md.: Abacus Technology Corporation.


Branscomb, L.M., and J.H. Keller. 1998. Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy That Works. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.


CARB (California Air Resources Board). 1967. The California Air Resources Board. Sacramento, Calif.: California Air Resources Board.

CARB. 1994. 1994 Low-Emission Vehicle and Zero-Emission Vehicle Program Review. Sacramento, Calif.: California Air Resources Board, Mobile Source Division .

CARB. 1996. The California Zero-Emission Vehicle Program. Sacramento, Calif.: California Air Resources Board.

Christensen, C.M. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.


Daverse, C. 1997. Sematech: an alternative model for a government/industry R&D consortium. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Selection Process, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., December 10, 1997.

Davis, R. 1997. Establishment of technical goals and objectives for battery development. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Project Selection Process, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., October 20, 1997.

Davis, S.C. 1997. Transportation Energy Databook (17th ed.). ORNL-6919. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Detroit News. 1997. Ford, Daimler unite to develop fuel cells. December 16, 1997.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 67
--> References Abacus Technology Corporation. 1993. Lessons Learned under the United States Advanced Battery Consortium, Final Report. November 8. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies. Chevy Chase, Md.: Abacus Technology Corporation. Abacus Technology Corporation. 1996. Review of the U.S. Department of Energy's Implementation of the 1993 USABC Lessons Learned Study. May 17. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies. Chevy Chase, Md.: Abacus Technology Corporation. Branscomb, L.M., and J.H. Keller. 1998. Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy That Works. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. CARB (California Air Resources Board). 1967. The California Air Resources Board. Sacramento, Calif.: California Air Resources Board. CARB. 1994. 1994 Low-Emission Vehicle and Zero-Emission Vehicle Program Review. Sacramento, Calif.: California Air Resources Board, Mobile Source Division . CARB. 1996. The California Zero-Emission Vehicle Program. Sacramento, Calif.: California Air Resources Board. Christensen, C.M. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press. Daverse, C. 1997. Sematech: an alternative model for a government/industry R&D consortium. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Selection Process, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., December 10, 1997. Davis, R. 1997. Establishment of technical goals and objectives for battery development. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Project Selection Process, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., October 20, 1997. Davis, S.C. 1997. Transportation Energy Databook (17th ed.). ORNL-6919. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Detroit News. 1997. Ford, Daimler unite to develop fuel cells. December 16, 1997.

OCR for page 67
--> DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 1991. DOE-USABC Cooperative Agreement, Advanced Battery Research and Development for Electric Vehicles. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Advanced Automotive Technology. DOE. 1996. New USABC Battery Commercialization Criteria. Presented to the U.S. Department of Energy's Automotive Technology Development Contractors' Coordination Meeting, Detroit, Michigan, October 30, 1996 . GAO (General Accounting Office). 1992. Lessons Learned from Sematech. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. GAO. 1994. Technology Transfers: Benefits of Cooperative R&D Agreements. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. GAO. 1995. Electric Vehicles. Efforts to Complete Advanced Battery Development Will Require More Time and Funding. Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Governmental Affairs, GAO/RCED-95-234. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. Heitner, K. 1997. DOE role in USABC management and battery technology selection. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Project Selection Process. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., December 10, 1997. Heitner, K. 1998. Personal communication. Office of Advanced Automotive Technology, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. Kalhammer, F., A. Kozawa, C.B. Moyer, and B.B. Owen. 1995. Performance and Availability of Batteries for Electric Vehicles: A Report of the Battery Technical Advisory Panel (December 11). Prepared for the California Air Resources Board, El Monte, California. Kurani, K., D. Sperling, and T. Turrentine. 1996. The marketability of electric vehicles: battery performance and consumer demand for driving range. Pp. 153-158 in Proceedings of the 11th Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances, Long Beach, California . January 9(12, 1996). Piscataway, N.J.: Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Leclair, V. 1997. EPA proposes a national low-emission vehicle program. Environmental Science and Technology 31(7): 310A-311A. Letourneau, C., M. Gauthier, A. Belanger, D. Kuller, and J. Hoffman. 1997. Lithium polymer pack design. Presented at EVS-14, the 14th International Electric Vehicle Symposium, Orlando, Florida, December 15-17, 1997. Moseley, P. 1997. Advanced Lead-Acid Battery Consortium. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Project Selection Process, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., October 20, 1997. Nichols, R. 1992. Advanced Battery Consortium. Testimony before the Committee on Government Affairs. United States Senate, 102nd Congress, Second Session, February 18, 1992. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles. Board on Energy and Environmental Systems and Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1996. Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles, Second Report. Board on Energy and Environmental Systems and Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1997a. Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles, Third Report. Board on Energy and Environmental Systems and Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1997b. Peer Review in the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology: Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Patil, P. 1997. Sponsor expectations for study. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Project Selection Process, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., October 20, 1997.

OCR for page 67
--> PCAST (President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology). 1997. Federal Energy Research and Development of the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century (November 5). Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President. Rauhe, B. 1997. In-depth review of a nickel-metal hydride battery contract. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Project Selection Process, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., October 20, 1997. Stroven, M. 1997. Processes used by USABC to solicit proposals, choose contractors, and make awards. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Project Selection Process, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. , October 19, 1997. Sutula, R. 1997. Letter to Dr. Jill Wilson, National Research Council staff. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Advanced Automotive Technology. Washington, D.C., November 6, 1997. Thorpe, N. 1997. Introduction to USABC. Presentation to the Committee to Review the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium's Electric Vehicle Battery R&D Project Selection Process, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., October 20, 1997. USABC (United States Advanced Battery Consortium). 1991. Advanced Battery Technology Request for Proposal Information (RFPI), April 4, 1991. Dearborn, Mich.: United States Advanced Battery Consortium. USABC. 1996. USABC Moves into Phase II, EPRI Extends Commitment. USABC: News for and about the United States Advanced Battery Consortium. 1996 (summer):1. USABC. 1997. Final Report: Phase I Battery Research and Development 1992-1996. Submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Battery Consortium. December. Dearborn, Mich.: USABC. Wells, J. 1993. Technology Transfer: Implementation of CRADAs at NIST, Army, and DOE. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, House of Representatives, GAO/T-RCED-93-53, June 10, 1993. Wilkinson, S.L. 1997. Electric vehicles gear up. Chemical and Engineering News 75(41): 18-24.

OCR for page 67
This page in the original is blank.