National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 4 Outstanding Issues
Suggested Citation:"5 Recommendations." National Research Council. 1998. The Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project: An Interim Review of Science and Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6255.
×

5
Recommendations

AESA has made praiseworthy progress toward its goal of providing a scientific basis for assessing the potential impact of a fleet of HSCTs on the atmosphere, particularly on stratospheric ozone. Its models project the ozone reduction by a fleet of 500 Mach 2.4 HSCTs to be almost an order of magnitude less than was projected in 1990, under operating conditions that include a conceptual HSCT engine with a low NOx emission index, and a choice of flight altitude and Mach number that would minimize the effect of added NOx. Through laboratory measurements of the rates of newly recognized heterogeneous chemical reactions, and simultaneous in situ measurements of almost all active chemical species at altitudes up to 20 kilometers, AESA has shown that heterogeneous reactions involving sulfuric-acid aerosols deactivate NOx in the lower stratosphere. Looking at patterns of correlation between reactive species and tracers such as N2O and CH4 has yielded new understanding of atmospheric chemistry and atmospheric motions. Although major uncertainties remain in how numerical models treat atmospheric motions (especially above 20 km), AESA's modeling work has been effective in translating both laboratory and in situ measurements into projected impacts. AESA has also identified new and important questions, such as how HSCT exhaust gases would interact with the polar stratospheric clouds that contribute to ozone depletion over the Antarctic. PAEAN commends AESA for its work; the recommendations that follow indicate areas that the panel feels are currently in need of greatest emphasis.

Suggested Citation:"5 Recommendations." National Research Council. 1998. The Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project: An Interim Review of Science and Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6255.
×

Transport Processes

Observations from aircraft and satellite programs have greatly increased our understanding of transport processes in the stratosphere. Major uncertainties in understanding air transport remain, however, especially above the tropical region and at altitudes above 20 kilometers, where fewer data are available. PAEAN recommends that AESA emphasize the analysis and interpretation of data from aircraft missions and satellites, in order to quantify better the meridional and vertical transport in the stratosphere, particularly at altitudes between 20 and 30 kilometers.

Polar Processing

The processing of HSCT emission products in the polar regions is not adequately represented in current 2-D models. Only when the evolution of liquid and solid PSC particles in the winter polar stratosphere is known can the effects of the additional input of HSCT-related gases and aerosols be properly assessed. PAEAN recommends that AESA support field measurements as well as model developments that are specifically designed to unravel the complex formation process of polar stratospheric cloud particles.

Assessment Models

Current assessments of the impact of a fleet of HSCT still rely on 2-D models. However, 3-D transport effects are of crucial importance for understanding this impact, and the use of the GMI model will be required for future assessments. PAEAN recommends that AESA continue to support the development and testing of the Global Modeling Initiative model.

Microphysics in the Plume-Wake Region

As the earlier AESA panel noted in 1994, the processes (both gas-phase and heterogeneous) within the plume-wake region need to be properly described so that they can be incorporated into large-scale atmospheric models. PAEAN recommends that the development of microphysical models of the plume-wake regime continue, in order to assess the role of the chemical and physical transformations that may occur before engine effluents mix into the background atmosphere.

Climate Studies

Because of the complexity of the climate system, it is not clear that any expansion of the limited climate studies AESA has sponsored will yield signifi-

Suggested Citation:"5 Recommendations." National Research Council. 1998. The Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project: An Interim Review of Science and Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6255.
×

cant further progress on the issue of climate impacts within the time frame of the 1998 assessment. Research to date suggests that the globally averaged direct radiative impact of stratospheric aircraft emissions can be expected to be small, although the effects of aerosols must be better quantified. PAEAN recommends that AESA continue its present policy of not undertaking model studies of the impact of aviation on climate, beyond calculating the degree of radiative forcing by components of HSCT exhaust.

Beyond the 1998 Assessment

Many of the uncertainties noted earlier, such as those related to transport processes, microphysics, and heterogeneous chemistry, have not yet been sufficiently reduced to permit an informed assessment of the possible atmospheric effects of a fleet of HSCTs to be made. AESA management needs to identify the most critical uncertainties, and develop a strategy that will enable them to be reduced as far as possible during AESA's remaining lifetime and even beyond. PAEAN recommends that AESA draw up and execute an adequately detailed plan that sets priorities for research to reduce the remaining critical uncertainties.

Suggested Citation:"5 Recommendations." National Research Council. 1998. The Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project: An Interim Review of Science and Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6255.
×
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"5 Recommendations." National Research Council. 1998. The Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project: An Interim Review of Science and Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6255.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"5 Recommendations." National Research Council. 1998. The Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project: An Interim Review of Science and Progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6255.
×
Page 48
Next: References »
The Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project: An Interim Review of Science and Progress Get This Book
×
 The Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft Project: An Interim Review of Science and Progress
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Scientists and policy-makers alike are concerned that operation of a fleet of high-speed civil transport (HSCT) aircraft could significantly affect the global atmosphere. HSCT emissions may have a direct effect on the chemistry of the atmosphere, leading to changes in the distribution of ozone; they may also have indirect effects on ozone and on global climate through coupling with radiative and dynamical processes in the atmosphere. An assessment of the atmospheric impact of a fleet of HSCTs thus requires not only an understanding of the chemistry of the natural stratosphere and its possible perturbations by HSCT emissions, but also an understanding of the pathways for transport of HSCT emissions within the atmosphere, and the resulting temporal and spatial distribution of HSCT emissions.

The results of NASA's Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft (AESA) project were summarized in a 1995 NASA assessment. The present report looks at that summary and at more recent work to evaluate the state of the science. AESA has made good progress in the past few years. Satellite and aircraft observations have elucidated important aspects of large-scale transport processes. Field campaigns have provided a much better picture of the relative importance, below 20 km altitude, of the major catalytic cycles for ozone destruction. Careful intercomparisons of assessment models have led to reduction of some of the differences among the models. However, a number of uncertainties and inconsistencies still remain.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!