It is probable that cross-contamination among objects augments the variety of parent bodies represented in what reaches Earth by natural influx. For example, while outer-belt asteroids cannot be dynamically converted into Earth-crossing orbits, such objects in moderately eccentric orbits do collide with asteroids in the inner asteroid belt, which do communicate with Earth. One could imagine a chain of contamination providing an access route for materials from virtually any body—e.g., ejecta from Europa is encountered by a comet passing through the Jupiter system, which ultimately crashes on the Moon; then such material gets to Earth by excavation in a lunar cratering impact. Obviously, as in this example, the probabilities of occurrence of most multichain contamination routes drop geometrically toward zero, but cannot be totally ruled out in principle. However, to the degree that the apparent safety of the natural influx is relied upon to declare a body safe for sample return, it must be realized that the episodic nature of cross-contamination and delivery processes probably means that exactly zero percent (not just a very small percentage) of material impacting Earth during a finite time (e.g., a century) can be expected to come via such multichain routes. Only the tiniest particles might escape this generalization, and any biological materials are rapidly sterilized by radiation in such small particles.

SUMMARY

Earth receives from other bodies in the solar system abundant material that is ejected from such bodies and delivered to the surface of Earth. Because of cross-contamination, small but significant fractions of the delivered materials could have been formed originally on bodies from which Earth does not receive meteorites directly. However, there are some bodies, as well as places on other bodies, from which material would be so difficult to obtain, or would arrive so infrequently, that it is unlikely that Earth has received samples during our lifetimes, even if such material is delivered on rare occasions. For some planetary satellites and small bodies, the uncertainty associated with cross-contamination reduced the degree of confidence in the inherent safety of a sample returned from such bodies.

REFERENCES

Alvarez, L.W., W. Alvarez, F. Asaro, and H.V. Michel. 1980. Extraterrestrial cause of the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Science 208:1095–1108.


Burns, J.A. 1987. The motion of interplanetary dust. Pp. 252–275 in The Evolution of the Small Bodies of the Solar System, M. Fulchignoni and L. Kresak (eds.). Amsterdam: North-Holland.


Ceplecha, Z. 1997. Influx of large meteoroids onto Earth. Pp. 1–9 in SPIE's International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, 0and Instrumentation. Conference 3116B, San Diego. Bellingham, Washington: International Society for Optical Engineering.

Chapman, C.R., and D. Morrison. 1994. Impacts on the Earth by asteroids and comets: Assessing the hazard. Nature 367:33–40.


Davis D.R., and P. Farinella. 1996. Short period comets—primordial bodies or collisional fragments? Pp. 293–294, in Lunar and Planetary Science XXVII, 27th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Houston, Texas. Houston, Texas: Lunar Planetary Institute.


Gladman, B.J., J.A. Burns, M. Duncan, P. Lee, and H.F. Levison. 1996. The exchange of impact ejecta between terrestrial planets. Science 271:1387–1392.


Wetherill, G. 1988. Where do the Apollo objects come from? Icarus 76:1–18.


Zolensky, M.E., M.K. Weisberg, P.C. Buchman, and D.W. Millefehlat. 1996. Mineralogy of carbonaceous chondrite clast in HED chondrites and the moon. Meteoritics Planet. Sci. 31:5518–5537.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement