National Academies Press: OpenBook

Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity (1998)

Chapter: A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment

« Previous: Appendixes
Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×

Appendix A

Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment

As the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment entered its third phase, the nature of its task changed significantly from that governing previous reports of this committee. As a result of a significant reduction in the scope of ANL's electrometallurgical demonstration project, the committee was asked by DOE to review the viability of electrometallurgical treatment technology in light of other possible treatment technologies only within the context of spent EBR-II sodium-bonded fuel. Included in this appendix are copies of letters from DOE to the committee describing these new tasks for the third phase of this study.

Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×
Department of Energy
Washington, DC 20585
October 31, 1997
Dr. Douglas J. Raber
National Academy of Sciences National Research Council 2101 Constitution Avenue, N. W. Washington, D.C. 20418

Dear Dr. Reber:

The Department is very pleased with the assessments on the Argonne National Laboratory electrometallurgical research and development activity carried out by the National Research Council, Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniquesfor DOE Spent Fuel Treatment. The Committee's reports have been of considerable value to the Department in evaluating the technical progress of the electrometallurgical research program.

The Committee's work thus far has covered three important areas:

  • evaluating the viability of electrometallurgical technology for the treatment of DOE spent nuclear fuel and considering whether the technology warrants further research and development;

  • conducting an ongoing evaluation of Argonne National Laboratory's R&D activity on electrometallurgical techniques for DOE spent fuel treatment, including their specific application to EBR-II spent fuel; and

  • evaluating the scientific and technological issues associated with extending this research and development program to handle plutonium, should the DOE decide that an electrometallurgical treatment option for the disposition of excess weapons plutonium is worth pursuing.

As the Committee is aware, a variety of factors have combined to extend the schedule for the EBR-II spent fuel demonstration, which is now expected to be completed in June 1999. As a result, we request that your Committee continue its ongoing evaluation for the duration of this project. The Department requests that the Committee plan to issue a final report with final recommendations and observations subsequent to the completion of the demonstration project.

Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×

In addition, there may be other technologies available that might be relevant for treating some of the Department's spent nuclear fuel. In response to these developments, we request that the Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation, review the viability of electrometallurgical treatment technology in light of technical progress in other possible treatment technologies. It is the Department's expectation that the Committee will assess the applicability of alternative technologies in considering the viability of electrometallurgical technology. Further, we request the Committee's evaluation of criteria developed by Argonne National Laboratory and the Department to determine the success of the demonstration project.

We request that the Committee's consideration of alternative treatment technologies and of the success criteria be provided to the Department in the next of its reports to be completed by April 1998.

Finally, we would like to recognize the excellent support provided to this activity by Dr. Tamae Wong over the last year. Dr. Wong' s efforts have been appreciated by the Department and we will miss her as she moves on to her next assignment with the Council.

We appreciate the Council's support in continuing the evaluation of the electrometallurgical treatment research program. Please call me on (202) 586-6630 should you have any questions.

Sincerely,
William D. Magwood, IV
Associate Director for Planning and Analysis
Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology
Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×
Department of Energy
Germantown, MD 20874-1290
February 12, 1998
Dr. Douglas J. Raber
National Academy of Sciences National Research Council 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418

Dear Dr. Raber:

We are pleased that the National Research Council, “Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment, ” is continuing its assessments of Argonne National Laboratory's electrometallurgical research and development activities, pursuant to our letter of October 31, 1997. We appreciate the opportunity to coordinate with your staff in planning the committee's future activities.

To confirm these recent agreements between our staffs, we request that the committee include an assessment of the applicability of a “no-treatment” option in its review of alternatives to the electrometallurgical technology for the disposition of Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II) spent nuclear fuel. Such an option could involve use of a canister and overpack or some other technology to allow emplacement of the EBR-II spent fuel in a geologic repository without treatment of the fuel. We will identify experts to present this disposition option to the committee at the March 16-17, 1998, sessions to address alternative technologies.

We look forward to the committee's consideration of alternative treatment technologies to be provided to the Department in the next committee report. Please call me at (301) 903-2915 should you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Robert G. Lange,
Associate Director for Facilities

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology

Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×
Department of Energy
Washington, DC 20585
August 19, 1998
Dr. Douglas J. Raber
National Academy of Sciences National Research Council 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418

Dear Dr. Raber:

As you requested, we are pleased to clarify the intent of the current task under which the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment is reviewing alternatives to electrometallurgical treatment. In a letter to you from Mr. William Magwood dated October 31, 1997, we asked the committee to “review the viability of electrometallurgical treatment technology in light of technical progress in other possible treatment technologies.” We intended that this review be undertaken specifically within the context of Experimental Breeder Reactor (EBR)-II sodium-bonded spent fuel since we are responsible for its dispositioning and are pursuing activities to support a Department of Energy decision on its treatment. This intent was also reflected in my letter to you dated February 12, 1998, which asked that the committee “include an assessment of the applicability of a ‘no-treatment' option in its review of alternatives to the electrometallurgical technology for the disposition of EBR-II spent nuclear fuel.”

We appreciate the council's support in continuing the evaluation of electrometallurgical research and hope this information is beneficial to your efforts to expeditiously publish the results of this review. Please call me at (301) 903-2915 should you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Robert G. Lange,
Associate Director for Nuclear Facilities Management

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology

Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"A Letters from the Department of Energy to the Committee on Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment." National Research Council. 1998. Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6291.
×
Page 35
Next: B ANL Monthly Highlights of the Electrometallurgical Treatment Program »
Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!