Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
J.S. INDUSTRY IN 8000 ties in Cow lye Be DAVID C. MOWERY, Editor lormance Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1999
OCR for page R2
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS · 2101 Constitution Ave., N.W. · Washington, D.C. 20418 NOTICE: The conference from which the papers in this publication were drawn was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members come from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the board responsible for the project were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This publication was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Na- tional Science Foundation, the Office of Industrial Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Ralph Landau, and the Lockheed Martin Corporation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided supoort for the project. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data U.S. industry in 2000: studies in competitive performance / David C. Mowery, editor. p. cm. Papers presented at a conference held at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 8-9, 1997. ISBN 0-309-06179-2 (pbk.) 1. Industries United States Forecasting Congresses. 2. Economic forecasting United States Congresses. 3. United States Economic conditions 1981 Congresses. I. Mowery, David C. II. National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy. III. Title: US industry in 2000 HC106.82.U17 1999 338.0973'09'051 dc21 99-6102 Copyright 1999 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Cover: The emblem appearing on the cover of this publication is an illustration of the bronze medal- lion in the floor of the Great Hall in the National Academy of Sciences building in Washington, D.C. The medallion is the wellhead placed in the floor when the spectroscopic case over which the Fou- cault pendulum swings is lowered below floor level. The design is based on a map of the solar system published in 1661 by Andreas Cellarius Palatinus. The array of the planets is the Copernican system as know to Galileo. Printed in the United States of America
OCR for page R3
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL BOARD ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND ECONOMIC POLICY DALE JORGENSON, Chairman Frederic Eaton Abbe Professor of Economics Harvard University M. KATHY BEHRENS Managing Partner Robertson Stephens Investment Management JAMES F. GIBBONS Professor of Electrical Engineering Stanford University RALPH LANDAU Consulting Professor Economics Stanford University RICHARD C. LEVIN President Yale University JAMES T. LYNN Advisor Lazard Freres MARK B. MYERS Senior Vice President Xerox Corporation RUBEN METTLER Chairman and CEO (retired) TRW, Inc. A. MICHAEL SPENCE Dean, Graduate School of Business Stanford University . . . WILLIAM J. SPENCER, Vice Chairman Chairman SEMATECH JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ Senior Vice President and Chief Economist The World Bank ALAN WM. WOLFF Managing Partner Dewey Ballantine Ex-Officio Members BRUCE ALBERTS President National Academy of Sciences WILLIAM A. WULF President National Academy of Engineering KENNETH I. SHINE President Institute of Medicine Staff STEPHEN A. MERRILL Executive Director CHARLES W. WESSNER Program Director CRAIG SCHULTZ Program Associate
OCR for page R4
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. On the authority of the charter granted to it by Congress in 1863, the Academy has a working mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical mat- ters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meet- ing national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sci- ences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the exami- nation of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is the president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The council is administered jointly by both acad- emies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.
OCR for page R5
Preface In 1991 the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering established the Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy as a forum in which econo- mists, technologists, scientists, financial and management experts, and policymak- ers could broaden and deepen understanding of the relationships between science and technology and economic performance. In its first three years, the Board's activities focused on the adequacy and efficiency of public and private domestic investment in physical and human capital. The Board's first report, Investing for Productivity and Prosperity, underscored the need for higher rates of national saving and investment. Its principal recommendation was to shift the base for taxation from income to consumption. In the past two years, the Board has turned its attention to more microeco- nomic concerns technology policies broadly defined and their relationship to international trade relations, determinants of competitive performance in a wide range of manufacturing and service industries, and changes in patterns of R&D and innovation investments. A series of conferences, workshops, and reports, of which this volume is the third, comprises the latter body of STEP work which we are calling, U.S. Industry: Restructuring and Renewal, because it represents a broad assessment of U.S. industrial performance in an international context at a time of domestic economic confidence and optimism but uncertainty about the consequences of fundamental changes in the composition of the economy, pro- cesses of innovation, and economic troubles abroad. Previous publications under this title include Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators, the report of a workshop on measurement of industrial research and innovation, and Borderline Case: International Tax Policy, Corporate Research and Development and In- vestment, a collection of papers by leading tax scholars, practitioners, and policy v
OCR for page R6
v! U.S. INDUSTRYIN2000 analysts. A report of the STEP Board's conclusions from the project, Securing America's Industrial Strength, is being published simultaneously. This series of activities would not have been possible without the financial support of the Na- tional Aeronautics and Space Administration and National Science Foundation and the personal encouragement of Daniel Goldin, NASA Administrator. This volume was conceived by Ralph Landau, a founding member of the STEP Board. With the exception of the Introduction, the papers included in it were presented at a conference, "America's Industrial Resurgence: Sources and Prospects," held at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, D.C., on December 8-9, 1997. The authors are members of multidisciplinary research teams studying economic performance and technological change at the industry level most of them projects sponsored by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The group of industries examined does not represent a carefully selected sample rep- resentative of the economy but rather reflects a decision to capitalize on the work of these groups. Notable omissions are the natural resource extraction indus- tries petroleum and mining agriculture and forestry, and automobiles. On the other hand, the selection includes three "service" industries retail banking, trucking, and food retailing and thus addresses by far the largest and in many ways most dynamic sector of the economy. To help integrate this work, the Board asked David Mowery, professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley, to develop a general framework to analyze the determinants of performance over the past 15 or 20 years. The single exception was an analysis of shifts in comparative advan- tage in the chemical industry over a 150-year period. Following two workshops in which the investigators shared their analysis with other industry experts, the resulting papers were discussed with representatives of the subject industries, interested government officials, and other scholars at the Washington conference. Commentators included Jeff Burke, Seagate Technology; Tim Cyrus, General Motors Powertrain Group; Linda Dworak, Garment Industry Development Cor- poration; Mike Eskew, United Parcel Service; Kenneth Flamm, The Brookings Institution; F.G. Jauss, U.S. Steel Corporation; Richard Manning, Pfizer, Inc.; Joy Nicholas, Food Marketing Institute; Dan Schutzer, Citicorp; James Sinnett, The Boeing Company; Larry Sumney, Semiconductor Research Corporation; and Ed Wasserman, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. The labor market implications of structural and technological change in these industries were addressed by a panel including Howard Rosen, Minority Chief of Staff of the congressional Joint Eco- nomic Committee; Jared Bernstein, Economic Policy Institute; Craig Olson, Uni- versity of Wisconsin School of Business; and Thomas I. Palley, AFL-CIO. Addi tional funds for the conference and this publication were provided by the Office of Industrial Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy, the Sloan Foundation, Ralph Landau, and the Lockheed Martin Corporation. The Board is grateful to all of these participants and sponsors, but especially to David Mowery and Ralph Landau.
OCR for page R7
PREFACE Vi! The industries studied exhibit great diversity in structure and evolution as well as enormous "churning" that has taken a variety of forms, often negative for some regions and workers employment downsizing, shifts in location of opera- tion, and changes in the skill requirements of many jobs. Nevertheless, the gen- eral picture is one of stronger performance in the 1990s than in the early 1980s, attributable to a variety of factors including supportive public policies, competi- tion and openness to innovation, and changes in supplier and customer relation- ships factors that might not be as readily apparent if the analysis were of the macroeconomy or at the level of the firm. Vigorous foreign competition forced changes in manufacturing processes, organization, and strategy but then receded, making the performance of U.S. industries look even better. None of these favor- able conditions, least of all the latter, is permanent. The studies persuasively make the point that U.S. industries' superior performance in the past decade is not guaranteed to continue. For that reason among others, incidentally, the stud- ies underscore the importance of maintaining independent centers of industry expertise. This collection has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC' s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this indepen- dent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institu- tion in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confi- dential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their participation in the re- view of this report: Eileen Appelbaum, Economic Policy Institute; Thomas Bailey, Institute on Education and the Economy, Teachers College, Columbia University; France Cordova, University of California at Santa Barbara (review coordinator); Katherine Hughes, Institute on Education and the Economy, Teach- ers College, Columbia University; Anita McGahan, Graduate School of Business, Harvard University; and Richard Rosenbloom, Graduate School of Business, Harvard University While the individuals listed above have provided constructive comments and suggestions, responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authors, the STEP Board, and the institution. A. MICHAEL SPENCE Chairman (until June 30, 1998) DALE W. JORGENSON Chairman (from July 1, 1998) STEPHEN A. MERRILL Executive Director and Project Director
OCR for page R8
OCR for page R9
Contents 1 AMERICA'S INDUSTRIAL RESURGENCE (?): AN OVERVIEW David C. Mowery 2 THE DYNAMICS OF LONG-TERM GROWTH: GAINING AND LOSING ADVANTAGE IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY Ralph Landau and Ashish Arora 3 CHEMICALS.............................................................................................. Ashish Arora and Alfonso Gambardella ......... 17 45 4 STEEL 75 Richard J. Fruchan, Dany A. Cheij, and David M. Vislosky 5 POWDER METALLURGY PARTS 103 Diran Apelian, John J. Healy, P. Ulf Gummeson, and Chickery J. Kasouf 6 TRUCKING 123 Anuradha Nagarajan, James L. Bander, and Chelsea C. White III 7 GROCERY RETAILING Jay Coggins and Ben Senauer Six 155
OCR for page R10
x 8 RETAIL BANKING 1 Frances X. Fret, Patrick T. Harker, and Larry W. Hunter CONTENTS 179 9 COMPUTING 215 Timothy F. Bresnahan 10 SEMICONDUCTORS Jeffrey T. Macher, David C. Mowery, and David A. Hodges 11 HARD DISK DRIVES David McKendrick 245 287 12 APPAREL 329 Peter Doeringer and Audrey Watson 13 PHARMACEUTICALS AND BIOTECHNOLOGY 363 Lain Cockburn, Rebecca Henderson, Luigi Orsenigo, and Gary P. Pisano INDEX 399
OCR for page R11
U.S. INDUSTRY IN zoos Studies in Competitive Performance
OCR for page R12