National Academies Press: OpenBook

Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods (1999)

Chapter: Appendix A Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making

« Previous: 5 Conclusions and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making." National Research Council. 1999. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6330.
×

Appendix A
Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making

STATE: ____________

  1. How is it determined which state agency/department/division regulates a release to the environment?
    • a.)  

      By contaminant

    • b.)  

      By industry

    • c.)  

      By geographical area

    • d.)  

      By media impacted

    • e.)  

      Other, explain

    1. Does your state allow any flexibility in the establishment of cleanup levels? On what basis?

      Soil?

      Ground water?

    2. With regard to petroleum-impacted sites, do your state's rules______ risk-based decision making?
      • a.)  

        forbid

      • b.)  

        allow

      • c.)  

        encourage

      • d.)  

        require

      1. Is an evaluation of the risk of MTBE required?
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making." National Research Council. 1999. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6330.
×
  1. Is an evaluation of the risk of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) required and, if so, how is that accomplished?
  2. With regard to non-petroleum-impacted sites, do your state's rules ___ risk-based decision making?
    • a.)  

      forbid

    • b.)  

      allow

    • c.)  

      encourage

    • d.)  

      require

    1. Does your state have a non-degradation policy?

      Soil?

      Ground water?

      Surface water?

    2. Is all ground water considered a drinking water supply?
    3. Is all ground water considered a receptor?
    4. Is risk a factor in prioritizing impacted sites in your state?
    5. Even if risk-based decision making is not used to establish cleanup levels, can a case be closed by risk assessment?

      Petroleum-impacted sites?

      Non-petroleum-impacted sites?

    6. Do background concentrations affect the cleanup levels set for a site?
    7. How familiar are you with ASTM's RBCA methodology?
      • a.)  

        no familiarity

      • b.)  

        a little familiarity

      • c.)  

        some familiarity

      • d.)  

        very familiar

      1. How does your state's risk-based decision making differ from ASTM's RBCA methodology?
      2. What is the acceptable target risk level for carcinogens?

        Current conditions?

        Future conditions?

      3. What is the acceptable hazard quotient for toxins?
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making." National Research Council. 1999. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6330.
×
  1. Are the risks for exposure to carcinogens or toxins considered additive?
  2. Are there any pathways that are not considered viable conduits in your state?
  3. Have criteria been established for evaluating risks to ecological receptors?
  4. Has your state been divided into different hydrogeological regions for the application of certain fate and transport parameter values?
  5. Do your rules set any minimal requirements for a[n ASTM RBCA] Tier I or Tier II evaluation?
  6. Can off-site cleanup levels vary from what are established on site?
  7. Has your state developed any software for its risk-based decision making?
  8. Is commercial software acceptable?
  9. Is this software applicable to more than just petroleum releases?
  10. Under what conditions is natural attenuation an acceptable remediation strategy?
  11. Can cases with free product be closed under your state's risk-based decision-making rules?
  12. At what step is public notification required?
    • a.)  

      at case activation

    • b.)  

      prior to setting cleanup levels

    • c.)  

      anytime, but prior to case closure

    • d.)  

      not required

    1. Is notification of more than current or identifiable future potential receptors required?
    2. When evaluating for completed vapor pathways, is there a practical depth limit below which the pathway is no longer considered complete?
    3. What happens to a case where the best available technology has failed to reduce contaminant concentrations to below established cleanup levels?
    4. Pump-and-treat systems often discharge treated ground water into a surface waterbody. Soil vapor extraction systems discharge vapors into the atmosphere.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making." National Research Council. 1999. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6330.
×
  • Considering that most engineered remediation efforts involve transferring the contaminant from one media (soil, water, air) to another, is there any formal mechanism for comparing the risks to receptors if such a remediation system's treatment breaks down versus not implementing the system at all?
  • 33 . Are there any proposed rules that will change any of the answers to the prior questions? If so, please elaborate and give an estimated date of implementation.

To be completed by the person who completed this survey:

Name:

Title:

Affiliation:

Telephone No.:

Date:

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making." National Research Council. 1999. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6330.
×
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making." National Research Council. 1999. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6330.
×
Page 134
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making." National Research Council. 1999. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6330.
×
Page 135
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Survey of State Risk-Based Decision Making." National Research Council. 1999. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6330.
×
Page 136
Next: Appendix B Acronyms »
Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods Get This Book
×
 Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities: Risk-Based Methods
Buy Paperback | $68.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The fiscal and technological limitations associated with cleaning up hazardous waste sites to background conditions have prompted responsible parties to turn to risk-based methods for environmental rememdiation.

Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities reviews and critiques risk-based methods, including those developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the American Society of Testing and Materials. These critiques lead to the identification of eleven criteria that must be part of any risk-based methodology adopted by the Navy, a responsible party with a large number of complex and heavily contaminated waste sites. January

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!