National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix G: Prototype Testing
Page 533
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 533
Page 534
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 534
Page 535
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 535
Page 536
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 536
Page 537
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 537
Page 538
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 538
Page 539
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 539
Page 540
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 540
Page 541
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 541
Page 542
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 542
Page 543
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 543
Page 544
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 544
Page 545
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 545
Page 546
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 546
Page 547
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 547
Page 548
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 548
Page 549
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 549
Page 550
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 550
Page 551
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 551
Page 552
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 552
Page 553
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 553
Page 554
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 554
Page 555
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 555
Page 556
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 556
Page 557
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 557
Page 558
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 558
Page 559
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 559
Page 560
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 560
Page 561
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 561
Page 562
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 562
Page 563
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 563
Page 564
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 564
Page 565
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 565
Page 566
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 566
Page 567
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 567
Page 568
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 568
Page 569
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 569
Page 570
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 570
Page 571
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 571
Page 572
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 572
Page 573
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 573
Page 574
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 574
Page 575
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 575
Page 576
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 576
Page 577
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 577
Page 578
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 578
Page 579
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 579
Page 580
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 580
Page 581
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 581
Page 582
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 582
Page 583
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 583
Page 584
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 584
Page 585
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 585
Page 586
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 586
Page 587
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 587
Page 588
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 588
Page 589
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 589
Page 590
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 590
Page 591
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 591
Page 592
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 592
Page 593
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 593
Page 594
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 594
Page 595
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 595
Page 596
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 596
Page 597
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 597
Page 598
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 598
Page 599
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 599
Page 600
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 600
Page 601
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 601
Page 602
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 602
Page 603
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 603
Page 604
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 604
Page 605
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 605
Page 606
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 606
Page 607
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 607
Page 608
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 608
Page 609
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 609
Page 610
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 610
Page 611
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 611
Page 612
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 612
Page 613
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 613
Page 614
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 614
Page 615
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 615
Page 616
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 616
Page 617
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 617
Page 618
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 618
Page 619
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 619
Page 620
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 620
Page 621
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 621
Page 622
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 622
Page 623
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 623
Page 624
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 624
Page 625
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 625
Page 626
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 626
Page 627
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 627
Page 628
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 628
Page 629
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 629
Page 630
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 630
Page 631
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 631
Page 632
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 632
Page 633
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 633
Page 634
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 634
Page 635
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 635
Page 636
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 636
Page 637
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 637
Page 638
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 638
Page 639
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 639
Page 640
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 640
Page 641
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 641
Page 642
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 642
Page 643
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 643
Page 644
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 644
Page 645
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 645
Page 646
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 646
Page 647
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 647
Page 648
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 648
Page 649
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 649
Page 650
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 650
Page 651
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 651
Page 652
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 652
Page 653
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 653
Page 654
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 654
Page 655
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 655
Page 656
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 656
Page 657
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 657
Page 658
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 658
Page 659
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 659
Page 660
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 660
Page 661
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 661
Page 662
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 662
Page 663
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 663
Page 664
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 664
Page 665
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 665
Page 666
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 666
Page 667
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 667
Page 668
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 668
Page 669
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 669
Page 670
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 670
Page 671
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 671
Page 672
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 672
Page 673
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 673
Page 674
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 674
Page 675
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 675
Page 676
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 676
Page 677
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 677
Page 678
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 678
Page 679
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 679
Page 680
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 680
Page 681
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 681
Page 682
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 682
Page 683
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 683
Page 684
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 684
Page 685
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 685
Page 686
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 686
Page 687
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 687
Page 688
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 688
Page 689
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 689
Page 690
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 690
Page 691
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 691
Page 692
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 692
Page 693
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 693
Page 694
Suggested Citation:"G-1." Transportation Research Board. 1997. Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6343.
×
Page 694

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

I. Test Methods I.! Measurement Method (Metrics/ Materials/ Apparatus/ Measurement Time Frame/ Data Sampling) G-1

GO Test Methods . _ c _ _ ~ ~_ _ _ G '> _ E o E F ', ; E , cat ~ ~ i, 2'_ c, con _ _ ~O ~A c O _ E _ (D , E _ E a) o ° o ~ ~ E q) _ _ lD ·0 Q fD 00' C~ .~ {g u) CDC C ~ U} C US =~F -~1-18~8N ~ UTU ~ O O O O O O O O O l ~r ~ TT~: r r ~r ~r~rrT~T~ n r :~r ~: TT~E E] i ~ T: T~ :~ F e ~ ~ I ~ _ .C _ ~ o G ., .o - ~ c C G) 'u' E 8 u) .c ~ U) g ~ oE G-2

GO Test Methods I.2 Protocol (Procedures/ Instructions/ Recording Sheet) G-3

G-1: Test Methods 1. Summary of Testing Procedure and Instruction Phase Introduction Testing Procedure / Instruction . 1. Introduce a subject the prototype testing. 2. Ask the subject to sign an informed consent fond. 3. Record the participant profile. 4. Measure a max. grip force of the subject using the hand dynamometer three times; the interval time between trials is at least 2 min. The subject's right forearm and wrist should be in a neutral position while sitting comfortably; the subject's elbow should be flexed to 90 degrees; the grip span of the hand dynamometer should be set at 1.5 inch. 5. Measure a grip span of the subject using the grip glider three times. 6. Attach visual marks on the subject. 1. Set the seat to the initial condition (the seat should be placed all the way back and down). 9. Ask the subject to adjust the seat ensuring a comfortable driving posture, a natural reach, and a sufficient visibility. 3. Record the adjustments. . 1. Ask the subject to hold the mid of steering wheel at '9 and 3' (positions of a clock), and to reach the reference points of LIP / accelerator / brake pedal / floor mounted signals sequentially. 2. Measure each posture and evaluate each reach according to the reach rating table. 3. Ask the subject to evaluate the workstation from 1 (undesirable) to 5 (excellent) in teens of visibility, postural comfort, reach, and adjustability. 4. Ask the subject to get in and out the workstation three times and to evaluate the workstation in terms of ingress/egress from 1 to 5. 5. Ask the subject to assess discomfort of each body part in the workstation from 1 (uncomfortable) to 5 (very comfortable). 1. Set the components to the initial condition (the seat should be placed all the way back and down; the steering wheel should be at most upright position; the LIP and RIP should be placed all the way forward and down). 2. Ask the subject to adjust the workstation components (seat / steering wheel / left instrument panel / right instrument panel / . mirrors) ensuring a comfortable driving posture. . Driving Testing distance ~time (fur) speed 0.3 Pre-driving (standard bus) Pre-driving (prototype) adjusting workstation components stitic driving adjusting workstation components GO 0.2 0.3 0.2

GO Test Methods 2. Prologue Testing P~i~ r ~-= ~ Section 0. Introduciion T. Introduce a subject the prototype testing. 2. Ask the subject to sign an informed consent fop-. 3. Record the participant profile. 4. Measure a max. grip force of the subject using the hand dynamometer three times; the interval time between trials is at least 2 min. The subject's right forearm and wrist should be in a neutral position while sitting comfortably; the subject's elbow should be flexed to 90 degrees; the grip span of the hand dynamometer should be set at ~ .5 inch. 5. Measure a grip span of the subject using the grip glider three times. 6. Attach visual marks on the subject. G-5

G-I: Test Methods Section I. Pre-driving (standard bus) I. adjusting workstation components 1. Set the seat to the initial condition (the seat should be placed all the way back and down). 2. Ask the subject to adjust the seat ensuring a comfortable driving posture, a natural reach. and a sufficient visibility. 3. Record the adjustments. Il. static driving I. Ask the subject to hold the mid of steering wheel at '9 and 3' (positions of a clock), and to reach the reference points of LIP / accelerator / brake pedal / floor mounted signals sequentially. 2. Measure each posture and evaluate each reach according to the reach rating table. 3. Ask the subject to evaluate the workstation from i (undesirable) to 5 (excellent) in terms of visibility, postural comfort, reach, and adjustability. 4. Ask the subject to get in and out the workstation three times and to evaluate the workstation in teens of ingress/egress from ~ to 5. 5. Ask the subject to assess discomfort of each body part in the workstation from (uncomfortable) to 5 (very comfortable). GO

Gel: Test Methods Section 2. Pre-d~riving (profotype) I. adjusting workstation components . Set the components to the initial condition (the seat should be placed all the way back and down; the steering wheel should be at most upright position; the LIP and RIP should be placed all the way forward and down). 2. Ask the subject to adjust the workstation components (seat / steering wheel / left instrument pane} / right instrument panel / mirrors) ensuring a comfortable driving posture, a natural reach, and a sufficient visibility. 3. Record the adjustments. Il. static driving . Measure the eye height of the subject, the horizontal distance of eye point from the workstation origin, downward viewing angles with the visibility pole, and the field of views of the left and right mirrors at the specified locations. 2. Ask the subject to hold the mid of steering wheel at '9 and 3' (positions of a clock), and to reach the reference points of LIP / RIP / accelerator / brake pedal / floor mounted signals sequentially. 3. Measure each posture and evaluate each reach according to the reach rating table. 4. Ask the subject to evaluate the workstation from 1 (undesirable) to 5 (excellent) in terms of visibility, postural comfort, reach, and adjustability. 5. Ask the subject to assess discomfort of each body part in the workstation from (uncomfortable) to 5 (very comfortable). G-7

G-I: Test Methods Section 3. Driving fiprototype I. oval track driving 1. Ask the subject to grip the steering wheel with a maximum force and measure the grip force using the FSR glove. 2. Attach accelerometers on the floor and the hip of the subject. 3. Explain the driving course layout. 4. Apply the safety belt. 5. Ask the subject to drive the oval track once around for familiarization. 6. Ask the subject to simulate the picking-up/depositing passenger tasks at the bus stop C.179 through`643. 7. Videotape driving postures at the 2nd and 1 9th laps. 8. Collect accelerometer data at the 1 0th lap. 9. Ask the subject to assess discomfort of each body part in the workstation every ~ O laps from 1 (uncomfortable) to 5 (very comfortable). Il. lock-to-Iock driving I. Ask the subject to drive the durability track. 2. Let the subject wear the FSR glove. 3. Videotape driving postures. 4. Collect grip force data using the FSR glove. 0-8

GO Test Methods Section 4. Post-clriving (prolotype) I. adiustin~ workstation components ~ ~ -= I. Ask the subject to adjust the workstation components (seat / steering wheel / left instrument pane! / right instrument pane! / mirrors) if necessary ensuring a comfortable driving posture, a natural reach, and a sufficient visibility. 2. Record the adjustments. Il. static driving . Measure the eye height of the subject, the horizontal distance of eye point from the workstation origin' downward viewing angles with the visibility pole, and the field of views of the left and right mirrors at the specified locations. 2. Ask the subject to hold the mid of steering wheel at '9 and 3' (positions of a clock), and to reach the reference points of LIP / RIP / accelerator / brake pedal / floor mounted signals sequentially. 3. Measure each posture and evaluate each reach according to the reach rating table. 4. Ask the subject to evaluate the workstation from ~ (undesirable) to 5 (excellent' in terms of visibility, postural comfort, reach. adjustability, strength requirement. nde quality, and ease of use. 5. Ask the subject to get in and out the workstation three times and to evaluate the workstation in terms of ingress/egress from ~ to 5. 6. Ask the subject to assess discomfort of each body part in the workstation from (uncomfortable) to 5 (very comfortable). IlI. open-end question I. Ask the subject to give any comments or recommendations on the work station. G-9

G-I: Test Methods 3. Ergonomic Bus Operator Workstation Prototype Test Test Administrators: Section 0. Participant Prof le Name Test Date: Age: Gender: Male Female Stature: cm Weight: Ibs. Transit Company: Years of Bus Driving Experience: yrs. Present Vehicle Type & Model: Handedness: Left Right Max. Grip Strength: (1) Kg (2) Kg Grip Span: ( I ) cm (3) Kg (2) cm (3) cm G-lo

G-I: Test Methods Section I. Pre-Driving (Stan card Bus) I. Adjustments Seat SRP hor. distance from W.O. cm SRP height from floor cm angle bwn seat-pan & seat-back deg. seat-back angle _ Il. Objective Measurement A. Posture Joint Movement APRP (right leg) un pressed BPRP (right leg) full pressed un pressed fil11 pressed High Beam (left leg) Steering Wheel (right am) LlPRP (left arm) shoulder extension (-) / flexion (+) elbow flexion (+) hip flexion (+) knee flexion (+) ankle dorsal (-) / planter (+) flexion B. Reach Reach Point | I | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 Mid of Steering Wheel LIPRP Accelerator Pedal RP Brake Pedal RP ~ High Beam Switch C. Ingress / Egress t: ~ __ 4_ .'' term '~~~~ ~~ . ~..... G-11

Gel: Test Methods IlI. Subjective Judgment A. Overall Judgment Criteria ~ (undesirable) 2 | 3 | 4 | Stexcellent, Visibility Postural Comfort Reach Adjustability Ingress / Egress G-12

B. Posture . Joint Movement APRP (right leg) un pressed pressed shoulder extension (-) / flexion (+) elbow flexion (+) hip flexion (+) knee flexion (+) ankle dorsal (-) / planter ( +) flexion _ pressed un pressed G-I: Test Methods Section 2. Pre-Driving (Prototype) I. Adjustments Seat SRP hor. distance from W.O. | cm ~:~ angle bwn seat-pan & seat-back deg. seat-back angle deg. Steering Wheel SWRP hor. distance from W.O. cm SWRP height from platform cm hub uLc =gle deg. Left Instrument Panel LIPRP her divans rn~:n 0~ 0 cm LIPRP height from platform cm Right Instrument Panel RIPRP hor. distance from W.O. cm RIPRP height from floor cm Il. Objective Measurement A. Visibility A= ~cm Eye point hor. distance from W.O. cm Downward over steering wheel cm Viewing Angle over right instrument pane! cm over farebox cm Field-of-View left side mirror vertical distance cm lateral distance cm right side mirror vertical distance cm lateral distance cm BPRP (right leg) Floor full pressed Mounted Signals (left leg) . Steering LlPRP Wheel (right am) (left arm) R1PRP (right ar G-13 ~ ~

G-I: Test Methods C. Reach Reach Point Mid of Steering Wheel LIPRP RIPRP Accelerator Pedal RP Brake Pedal RP Floor Mounted Signals RP Ill. Subjective Judgment A. Overall Judgment Criteria 1 (undesirable) | 2 | 3 | 4 1 5(e:<cellent) Visibility Postural Comfort Reach Adjustability G-14

G-I: Test Methods Section 3. Track Driving (fro totypeJ I. Objective Measurement A. Posture (Videotaping) - Lap 2 and Lap 19 of oval track driving, Lock-to-Iock driving . B. Ride Quality (Accelerometer) - Lap 9 of oval track driving C. Grip Force (FSR GIove) - Lock-to-Iock driving Il. Subjective Judgment - Body Part Discomfort Questionnaire (use the forms on next two pages) G-15

Gel: Test Methods Section 4. PosI-Driving (Prototype) I. Adjustments (if re-aa~justment is required Seat SRP hor. distance from W.O. ~ ~ ~cm SRP height from floor cm seat-pan angle deg. seat-back angle deg. Steering Wheel SWRP hor. distance from W.O. cm SWRP height from platform _ cm hub tilt angle deg. Left Instrument Pane! LIPRP hor. distance from W.O. cm LIPRP height from platform cm Right Instrument Panel RIPRP hor. distance from W.O. cm RIPRP height from floor cm IT. Objective Measurement {if re-acijustment is made A. Visibility Eye point height from floor cm Eye point hor. dista nce from W.O. cm Downward over steering wheel cm Viewing Angle over right instrument pane! cm over farebox cm Field-of-View left side mirror vertical distance cm lateral distance cm right side mirror vertical distance cm lateral distance cm B. Posture Joint Movement shoulder extension (-) 'flexion (+) _ _ . elbow flexion (+) hip flexion (+) knee flexion (+) ankle dorsal (-) / planter (+) flexion APRP (right leg) un pressed fd11 pressed BPRP (right leg) . .. un pressed fb11 pressed Floor Mounted Signals (left leg) G-16 Steering Wheel (right arm) LIPRP (left arm) RIPRP (right am)

Gel: Test Methods C. Reach Reach Point ~2 | 3 | 4 Mid of Steering Wheel LIPRP RIPRP Accelerator Pedal RP Brake Pedal RP ~I I Floor Mounted Signals RP D. Ingress / Egress ' ' '::: i- I----, ~ ~ -- ..,----- .~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ - ,,,-:, -I, ,~-:-~-~-~ - ~ -- , Is--.:,'' ':' : ~.,~:~,~.,.~-~:~.- it- I-. . -, - -,.-., .~.~,.~ ~.~,.~ - ,, ~ : S. .. .. . . . .: . ~ ~ ! ~ - ~ ~ :: ::: ~ , , : : gas :.:: ::::.. -::: ::::::::::::::: :: :: ::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: ::: :::: ::::: : :: . :!t t :: A:.:' :. ::l :::::I::::;l::::::-::: ~ if: ::: :::. .: :::: : :::: ::::::: ::: :::: :::: ::::: :::: ~ ~ tnm~ce : IlI. Subjective Judgment A. Overall Judgment Criteria ~ (undesirable) 3 | 4 ~5`excetient, Visibility ~ ~I Postural Comfort Reach Adjustabilitv Strength Requirement Ingress / Egress G-17

GO Test Met hods IV. Recommendations / Comments G-18

G-1: Test Methods I.3 Subjects (Participant Profile/ Anthropometry/ Composition) G-19

G-I: Test Methods - - c - ._ ·t ~n Q) ._ = c _ c u' .= O. _ , _ _ , _ ._ c _ Q o C~ _ C ~ ,_ u' E _ ., _ G-20 ·~ tn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u~ c ;~` ~ - O ~ O ~ OD ~ ~ S ~ ~ . 4, c ~ _ O .c 4, c~ E o C,, ~ o . ~ o ·> oo ~ _ Z ~ o t o §.' X . . . _ _ V, _ E ~r - ~ o~ E . _ o ~ _ V~ Vl °° o~ - oo _ ~, _ 4, _ c, ~ E ~ = ~ 63 E ~ ° C ~ _ ~ _ :t o~ ° ~ ° , _ ~ . - C _] o,o - , _ ~ ~ ° o. ~ 3 ~0 o o oo E · _ _ ~ _ C) c E ~ _ . . . ~ - ~ ~

Gel: Test Methods 2. Summary of Participants' Profile Participants' Profile - Gender 20 `~' 1 6 `,' ]2 ._ - o o z 8 O Female Gender Male Participants' Profile - Stature 6 T Small GrouP _ s st 5 _ _ _ Q 4 - ~ ~_ ._ ~ 3 - _ _ t_ _ O 2 - O _ Z - , 1 - ~ 2 1. _ Medium Group _ _ Large Group 5 2 1 4 150.6 159.4 164.2 169 1 173.9 178.8 183.6 188 0 5U, %ble 15~ %tile 50m %ble 85U1 %ble 95U1 %ble Female Female Stature (unit: cm) Male Male Participants' Profile - Transit Bus Driving Experience 14 Junlor _~_ Inte~ediate Group Group o' 4,, 1 0 ._ Q o Z ~4 12 - 11 8 2 Senior Group 4 ~_ 0 5 10 15 20 Transit Bus Driving Exper~ence (unit: years) G-21 | Female N 8 Mean 160.2 S.D. 2.7 Min. ~157.1 Max. ~165.4 Range 8.3 , .Male | 6 79.9 6.4 170.6 189.3 18.7 Small Medium . . 13 , 172.9 6.8 . ~ 161.9 183.0 21.1 , Large 6 186.? 1.7 185.2 189.3 4.1 2 N Mean S.D. Min. I _ ~ Max. L1 Ranee 159.4 2.3 - 158.5 0.9 157.1 ~_ | Mean | S.D. | ~ 1 I Min. I . | Max~ | Ranze: Junlor 1 172.0 11.4 157.1 188.2 31.1 I Inter~nediate 7 178.8 9.7 1619 1 1 189.3 27.4 ; Senior | . 1 6 1 , . 169.5 10.5 :IS8.7 1 1 186.4 1 1 ~ 1 27.7 1

Il. Results & Analysis Il.1 Workstation Component Locations G-22

G-II. 1: Workstation Component Locations In m ~5 _. In 1 In :' ._ o o Cal to ._ In By o In _ 15 i' _ ~ ~ urn In ~ ~ CO O ~ ~ Us ~ {D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ In ~ us _ _ _ It) ~ ~ ~ ~ N CD ~ N IO ~ ~ ~ CD CO CNi Cal Cal 0 I_ ~ ~ N |= - 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ FRU ~ ~ T ~t ,~- W: ~Z Z _ N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O _ N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N N N _r,- . =1 ~1 _ ~1 N - '~1~1~-1=l°~ 1~1~1~1~1= ~ ~ :~_ I N T1 ~la~lu~ G-23 - Q cn z - ._ o 8 a) - - - a) o - ct a) -ct Q o - ~n o 3 1 ~ 1 o 1= 1. - 1 ~ 10 1~ ~ ._ 1 ~ 1~ , ._ 1' 6 ~ . . I ._ 1= 10 1= 1 o - 1m 1 1 1

G-II. 1: Workstation Component Locations c) - E ~n - s m ~ ~ E O O" ~ J _ E o Ci: E o _ . o _ ·_ ~n y o ~n - tn _ _ U1 ~n .m _ C~ ~ o s ° ~ _ t, _ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ _ ~_ ~o _ a)g ~ Cl:: ~ _ J _, _ . o ~ o E _ ~_ - =' a, ._ _ ._ E _ s ,_ ~n aJ~ , ~ . ~ Y - _ ~ ._ , ~. . , a, 3 ~n _ o. _ ~ _ 0. UD (D ~ ~ ~ (D ~n (D CO (D . _ ___ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ 0 C~ ~ ~ CD O a, ~ (D ~ 0 _ __ _ o _ C) i~ (D O O v, ~ ~ r, ~ i=-0 _ a' r' E ~ ~ i o i~7 ~ C _ C u~ (D ~ ~ : ~ _ : N _ ___ _ CD ~n c~ N ~1 ~ - 1 . _ _ O. O. O ;;i ~ N . ~ QX ~- i~ . _ ~ ~ ~ It) _ ~ . . _ _ ~ O . C~ ~ := . O. ~ O 0 :; ~ ~n r, r' a) _ CO C~ _ _. _ 0 UD _ _ ~ ~ . CO ~ . ~ [0 . ~ : ~n 0 . ~ O C~ CO _ 0 a) . ~ L . _ . _ _ {D ~ _ 0 _ _ a' _ _ _ ~o _ __ ~ 1~ 1 c~ 0 0 o ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ 1 C~ 1 ~ {D {D ~ (D {D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r" ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ ~1=i 0 0 ~ cv, 0 ~i ~ 1` uD (D 0 (O-1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ := i ~ . L 0 _ _ _ _ _ o __ ~ __ i` 10. I_ a, ~ ~ 1` 0 -~ ~ tO 1-1-1 - 1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ;L LL o, o. ~ 0. ~ 0. __ ~ ~-0. ~ 1,n {D ~ ~) tO O tD N O ~ ~1 1` ~ 0 1 ~ ~7 ~t ~ ~) ~ c~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =1= 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ o c~ 1 ~ ~) C~l ~ C~ CO ~ C~ ~ CO CO (O ~ ~ O ID O. _ _ _ ___ ~ a' _ 1a, ~ C~) ~ Cr) ~ _ In ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ UD 1 tD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LL~ ; ·L o, _ o.-o. _ __-o. _ 0 =10 ~ C~ ~ ~ In ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 U~ ~ ~ I CD U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ UD ~ ~ ; . ~, ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ u~ ~ ~ a, _ ~-~T~ __ 0. ~ 0. o ~ ~ - 1= 1 U-) 0 U') _ a, C~i O) ~ U-) ~ ~ 0 ~ 1 C~1 1 ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~. ~ _ 0 _ _ a) a, __ ~ _ _ ~ ~ 1- 1 -, ~ L.L~L- Li_i ~ _ m !~C ii ~ ~ ~ I-~ __ ~ ~ (D a, o-_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ ~ G-24 01c~ ., . T 01c~ ., . 1` 18- 1 ·' 1 - 11- 1~ 1` 1~ 1= .1 1 - 1~ 1` 1^ . , . 1C~11-1 1 - 1m 1 C~l~ ~ , ~ T ola) ., . 1 ~1= 1~3 IZ 1~1m m1~1~1~1=' 1~1~1~1-1~= 10 1~101tD1= ~1E 1m 1~r 1= 1~ 1= 1~1~1~1~1~ 1 ~FU3 °1~1~1~1°~ ~L =1~T`10T~ ~ 1 1'~ 1 1'~ T] ICD 1 - , . . 1~10 r~- l 1= 11- iol_ 1~ 1 - 1~ 1U~1 ol~n 1~10 T O)10 ., . 1. inl~ ., . r~l 1= 1~ 1C53 1~ . i0 10 1a)1_ 1 1'~ 1 ~ 1 ~-1 1~1~1 Ct z - o Q a) 1a, 1 1_ 1 C\S 1 ~ 1- 1 Ctl 1, 1~ 10 1-' 1 1~ 1 ~ 1= 1 |E 12 1 '~ I Q 1= 1 ° 1m 1 ~ IY I O3 1m 1= 1 0 o - - ~ co 1 ~ .. I ~ i.E 1= 16 1= , . 1 O) .. 10 1= 1 o 1_ 1 Ct '1m ~Y

Il.2 Overall Subjective Judgment (Visibility/ Postural Comfort/ Reach/ Adjustability/ Ease of Ingress-Egress/ Strength Requirement) G-25

G-II.2: Call S-cc1i~c judgment . ~ o e = ~ m ~ 1 4 I 0 .~ ~ : 1 = E = . 1 ~ : 1 ~ ! .E ~ .@ ~ :) ! m = m a

G-I1.2: Overall Subjective Judgment 2. ANOVA Results on Overai! Subjective Judgment 2.1 ANOVA on Subjective Judgment of Visibility Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F p Stature Group 0.7 2 0.3 0.52 0.598 Test Session 2.3 2 1.1 1.80 0.173 Stature Group x Test Session 0.3 4 0.1 0.12 0.973 Error 39.7 63 0.6 Total 42.9 71 2.2 ANOVA on Subjective Judgment of Postural Comfort Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F p Stature Group 1.6 2 0.8 1.23 0.300 Test Session 45.2 2 22.6 35.70 0.000 Stature Group x Test Session 0.5 4 0.1 0.20 0.937 Error 39.9 63 0.6 Total 87.2 71 2.3 ANOVA on Subjective Judgment of Reach Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F p Stature Group 0.5 2 0.2 0.37 0.690 Test Session 30.8 2 15.4 23.51 0.000 Stature Group x Test Session 1.2 4 0.3 0.46 0.765 Error 41.2 63 0.7 Total 73.7 71 2.4 ANOVA on Subjective Judgment of Adjustability ~ _ . Test Session 78.9 2 39.5 83.04 0.000 Stature Group x Test Session 0.9 4 0.2 0.47 0.761 Error 29.9 63 0.5 Total 110.2 7 1 2.5 ANOVA on Subjective Judgment of Ease of Ingress/Egress Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F p Stature Group 4.6 2 2.3 4.68 0.015 Test Session 13.7 1 13.7 28.27 0.000 Stature Group x Test Session 1.4 2 0.7 1.45 0.247 Error 20.4 42 0.5 Total 40.1 47 2.6 ANOVA on Subjective Judgment of Strength Requirement _ Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F p Stature Group 1.6 2 0.8 1.98 0.162 Error 8.4 21 0.4 Total 10.0 23 G-27

G-II.2: Overall Subjective Judgment 3. t-test Results on Overall Subjective Judgment 3. ~ t-test results on subjective judgments of stature group pair Criteria I Stature Group Pair 1 l-value | df | p ease of ingress/egress iSmall group vs. Medium gl oup | 1.82 | 30 | 0.078 Small group vs. Large group 2.34 14 0.034 |Medium group vs. Large g] oup | 1.20 ~ 16 | 0.250 3.2 Paired t-test results on subjective judgments of test condition pair (STD: Standard. PROTO: Prototype) Criteria | Test Condition Pair value | df | p comfort |STD bus, Pre-driving vs PR DTO bus, Pre-driving | -8.94 1 23 ~0.000 STD bus, Pre-driving vs. PROTO bus, Post-driving -10.25 23 0.000 PROTO bus. Pre-driving vs. PROTO bus, Post-driving 1.42 23 0.170 reach STD bus, Pre-driving vs. PROTO bus, Pre-driving -5.56 23 0.000 STD bus, Pre-driving vs. PROTO bus, Post-driving -5.17 23 0.000 PROTO bus. Pre-driving vs. PROTO bus' Post-driving -0.37 23 0.714 adjustability STD bus, Pre-driving vs. PROTO bus, Pre-driving -10.27 23 0.000 |STD bus, Pre-driving vs. PR VITO bus, Post-driving | -10.94 | 23 ~0.000 PROTO bus. Pre-driving vs. PROTO bus, Post-driving -1.28 23 0.213 ease of ingress/egress ~STD bus, Pre-driving vs. PR INTO bus, Post-driving ; -6.46 ~23 ~0.000 G-28

II.3 Visibility G-29

G-II.3: Visibility 1 ~ _ IBM ~ C N = _ . O am ~ U" ~ ~ ~ . =E Am, In =~ ~ . m O - ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ O ~ 99 9 ~ O _ ~ en = 9 9 9 2 ·.s _ 99 9 . 0 3 ~ 9 . _ _ _ In An o Z ~ . - a) a) ~ a) 0 a) ~ _ ~ In ~ ~ ]~R ~ ~ ~R' Cat ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cad Cat ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (v, CO CN1 C~1 CN1 ~ CN1 Con) ~1 CD ~ 1~) 1 i:~1- 1~ =1~1~1_ ~ 1~10 :~: ~ ~ i. I ::U ~ ~ I~RE ~ (v, ~ (I CO ~ C~) Cal Cal Cal I) ~ Cal ~ C-l Cad ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ Cal C~l I-~ | I) | ~ I ~ J:L ~ ~ J-101~E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~1~ O ~ 0 ~) U] O N t~ O O In O 0 ~ ~ O O ~ In ~ ~ ~ ;~ N C~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J C~J ~1 C~J C~l ~J C~ {v) ~ ~ C~l O1 C~l C~l ~ C~ N C~ ~1 ~ C~) ~ 1= _ a) 0 U-) ~ 0 _ _ N N _ N O) ~ ~ _ N 0 O _ N ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 12 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~1- _ a) 0 ~ (O N 0 t~ 0 ~ ~ _ I_ rl ~ ~ ~ ~ a) O ~£~ l_ N ~ ~ _ ~) N N N N ~ N CO N ~7 ~) ~) C~) ~) ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N ~ N N O tO oJ 0 0 ~ 1O 0 0 0 ~ a) a) ~ 0 N 0 ~ ~ ~ _ a) N 1D ~ ~ _ ~ 121 N _ _ _ _ _ _ N N N _ _ N ~ N N N N N N _ N N N N N C -1~ 1- ILL ~ ~ :~F - iLE ~ ~ I:~: 4~ ~ ~ i~h _ N _ _ _ _ _ 0 _ O _ N _ _ _ _ _ 0 _ N N N N N _ _ I I It G-30

G-II. 3: Visibility 2. ANOVA Results on Viewing Angles Measured in Prototype Bus 2.1 ANOVA on Downward Viewing Angle Over Steering Wheel (SW) . Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F P Stature 84.3 2 42.2 2.68 0.092 Error 330.6 21 15.7 Total 414.9 23 ~. . _ 2.2 ANOVA on Downward Viewing Angle Over Central Instrument Panel (CIP) Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F P Stature 229.7 2 114.8 12.12 0.000 Error 199.0 21 9.5 Total 428.7 23 2.3 ANOVA on Downward Viewing Angle Over Right Instrument Panel (RIP) Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F P Stature 94.2 247.1 1.59 0.228 Error 623.0 2129.7 Total 717.2 23 2.4 ANOVA on Downward Viewing Angle Over Farebox Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F P Stature 78.3 239.2 3.05 0.069 Error 270. 2112.9 Total 348.3 23 2.5 ANOVA on Downward Viewing Angle of Left Mirror - Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F P Stature 36.1 2 18.1 0.88 0.429 Error 430.6 21 20.5 Total 466.7 23 .. . . . . 2.6 ANOVA on Horizontal Viewing Angle of Left Mirror Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F P Stature 20.0 2 10.0 0.19 0.829 Error 1108.2 21 52.8 Total 1128.2 23 2.7 ANOVA on Downward Viewing Angle of Right Mirror Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F P Stature 182.6 2 91.3 0.61 0.554 Error 3153.1 21 150.1 Total 3335.6 23 2.8 ANOVA on Horizontal Viewing Angle of Right Mirror Source Adjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F P Stature 42.9 2 21.4 0.55 0.586 Error 820.7 21 39.1 Total 863.5 23 G-31

G-II.3: Visibility 3. t-test Results on Viewing Angles over Central Instrument Panel (CIP) 3.! Summary of viewing angles of CIP of stature groups Small Group I Medium Group Large Group N 5 13 6 Average 2A.7 32.2 32.6 S.D. 3.7 3.2 2.2 Min. 19.9 27.5 29.5 Max. 29.3 37.2 35.2 Range 9.4 9.7 5.8 3.2 t-test results on viewing angles over CIP of stature group pair Stature Group Pair l-value df CIP visibility Small group vs Medium group -4.00 0.007 | Small groul vs Large group | -4.21 1 6 1 0.006 l ~Medium grouts Medium group l -0.32 | 14 1 0.750 G-32

Il.4 PosturalComfort Il.4.! Static Driving Posture G-33

G-II.4: Postural Comfon to m ~5 An 1 3 In o ._ ._ c' ._ _, - o In - ~n In . E ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ To F E ~= ~ a- OF 7151 ~ ~ ~ 71 ~ Tl At [ r ~ =~ ~ lair i" ~" ~= or ~= ~ ~l; 0 of= ~ T ~ TTEEEE:~R E , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ 1~ T T T G iT I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .= _ ~ _ c`i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 co co a, ~ ~ ~ ~i cxi _ ~ 0 ~ 1 - 1co 1c~ 1= o~ 0 a:, ~ _ ~ ~ C _ 1= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ - ~ ~` ~ ~0 ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ ~` ~ IN ~ ~ - ~ ~= - s ~ E ~ ~ jN ~ ~N ~ ~ T T T T ~ T T T ~ ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ W77 TT:TTT:~~ . ~ _ o ~ ~ N _ _ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~o~ F-f=- ~: I x |5 |o Im |~ 1~1~1517;171 151~ 1iTi1 ~ ~ ~ ~ = . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G-34

G-II.~: Postural Comfort E ° | _ | ~ 1 ~ I-~ ~ T T ~ ~ ~ | ~ T -~- ~ I N I 17 1 0 1 0 = ~ ,=' by-= W:~T car E 8 = ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ In ~ ~ ~ one 1 - ~ ~ F ~ ~ _ Cal ~1 ~ O ~ 1 en) 1 1- 1 0 ~ _ O be) a) O O ~-a) UD (D ~ C~l At (= lO ~ O _ C ~ c~ C |~ ~ ~n ~n ~ ~ ~n 1~ ~r ~n en n cD nll~n ~n ~ ~n~ ~n a~ ~nlN co a~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ r 8 0 |'n ~ ~ ~n ~ ~ ~ T ~ T ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~n| ~n |= |= ~1n T C 1~ =']~D WFFFFFFW O I c ~117;, ~ ~n N ~ N ~ ~n ~ FiTEF~= ~n "N =.~0. N ~n F. ~ 1 c ]~t W751~: m mJ: F| ;F ~ - ~ ~N - IT 1=F IT IT EF FT ~ IN~NI- ~ 1 ~ ;1D WFRPFJP: O G :[~ ~ ~ 4 ~4 _ N 17 ll II ~ ~ 13~ ~ I i D | Q ~ ~ ~ W ~ = 1T 17 I6F 11 1~1 O |c ~1 ~ ili Tr ~ ~n ~ ~ ~ ~n ~n ~ ~f Ft ~ ~ ;F rf l n 1~ ~ ~ 4 n ~ 1 ~ :~t WFFF]~ _ I ~C,L ~JP LITI ~ ~ - ~;FFL~;~'n~ 1ltn C~ ~n InlNl~lWNT 1 O~ ]~q W:~ r lctlx l~ l~ ~- Ic l;ililililf7~>l<~l<~lzlElzl~lc c _ N _ _ ~n _ ~ | ~ | a, l o _ N _ _ n _ _ _ _ N N N N N _ _ _ _ _ G-35

G-II.4: Postural Comfort - 1= us or or us CONS~lNlrol~:rluD or uncut or ~r|u~ u~|=lu~j=~a~lr~u~lm O ^ is' ~ ~ CJ) An 0 co ~ ~ a: con 0 con-urn ~ ~ ~ ~ urn ~ i` ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ Jo ~ == lug r- us rtD a) N us ~ to U'~<D or ~. u, r· ~ U us Q1IN; r ~r~~ r- .' ~u~ ~ ~ ]ZEL]~] ~o ~ =. ~D I~o lu~ ~ ~ua~u~u~ IU'~I~ r~ ]~;11~ O ^ ~ ~ CO ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ 0 (D ~ ~-O CD i- r~ 0 0 a, a) a, 0 ~ co _ _ O I ~ 1 {D IE ~ X ~ r- ~o ~ CD r. ~ ~ 1 °1 1= lrl 1111 t m c ~ E 8 ~ ~r ~r ~ ~r ~r ~ ~r FFI ~j: i:I 1= ;1~1'~1 71~1 T~ ~ ~1: ~ I C ~ = ~ ~ ~ t]] :~t r E 8 ;11 IU~ U U U N uD 71;] ; ili1 1 ~ ]~t o 1~ ~ ~r ~F:~: Is ~ ~ i~ U~ u~ u~ ~r u~ ~ u~j ~13 i3 ~ 51~1~t ~L (O Is; ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 1]ZlI~I~ FFI~I$RT: I:: - 1 60 ~ ~ ro ~ _ 11; i~ Ti ~1] N l 0 ~1 17 ~ ~ i1~1i ~ 7~ ] i t1] _ Ix Ix | ' - |o | x | ~ | ~ ~ F1 ~ ~ ~ F[ _ N ~ u) _ r-_ _ O _ N _ _ u~ _ r- _ _ N N N N N _ _ _ _ _ I G-36

G-II.~: Postural Comfort ~ ii ~ It r 1- 1= 1~ Ad HI =~ i t FT I I at LT ~ AL ~ FITLID~: ~ E ~ 1~ or Err or ~ er ~ FFIE i al J;i] 7116~ ~ =~ ~ Aye ~ ~ ~ T~1Til:~- -I ~ 1= ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ 1r T ~ ~TTl:T:TT r 1 ~o hAt ~L _ | ~ c ~ 1 Fi r ~ ~ or IN or ~ FI; ~ 5 15 t[ 1] I ~ c ~ ~ 1 1 ~T T1 1 F 1 LI 11;1 111~1~t 1~t ] F~ ~r ~ =1~ N;~r N ~ TF ~ Fff ~TF] ° 1 ~m ~ ~ b1;71 W1NlIF1~15111?1~1517 O I ~c ~ ~lj j ~ ~r C~ In N u~ ~r N ~ 1771F 1 tT~ ]l/~g ~ 1 aD 0 CD O ~ ~ o lc~ i` ~ co a, 0 - - ~ - Co ~ u~ ~ 0 o - ~ ~ ~ lo l`D ICD o ~ I [D~ ~ (~) 1~ r- ~ u~ ~o r- ~r CD ~ ~r tt) ~ (D; a~ t° ~;~ F° ° UT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | ( ~ 1 1~1 1U~ ~ u~ ~= ~ u~ ~ 718 17 F~ I=F 11 |]elU9 215 ~ 11 ° 1 ~= ~ 4111 F FF: TP115 ~TlTl FIThF~ _ I ~ G ~:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~r t t ~ t : ~ ~ ~ 1 ~I a' ~ C~ N ~ N O I e' t_ ~ CD a, I_ 0 C~ O _ ~ a, ~ O (D 0 ~ N ~ 0 I C~ 1 ~ I C~ I CS) ~| I 1' I I-1= CD I`D I<oI=Ico Ir- 1= 1u~l Ir-l-l`D1 1'-1 1CDI'DIr-ll-lCDIr-lr-1441c'>ll_lu~l4OlN r ~|m |~ | - |m l~) l ~ 71i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~T ~T ~ ~ ~ c~- | z _ N _ ~r _ ~ 0 cn O _ N _ ~r __ r-0 cn N N N N N _ l l l l G-37

G-II.4: Postural Co~nfon - ._ o ._ a) o o ._ - o E o a) E o ~n a) - c ._ a, a, ~n . . - o z - S cn o ._ - - o - - ~n o ~m..~. T. X _ V O N N ~ O 0 O N f LLUE ~ = ~ _ -_ _ _ _ _ ._ ~ 0 0 0 ao 0 o: 0 0 0 ~ ~ I V I ° I | u' | c, | 0 | ~ | o | _ =_ o, o, o. CO U' _ o, o~ 0 ~ 0 ~ CO C~ ~ UD 0 T1~ 1:L = _ _ _ | O ~ O l | ~ | ~ | N | O | ~ | C ~ T1~1~: = I Ico 1 171~ .o=5 o. c~ ~ co ~ ~ a) 0 o°' x ~ o u~ ~ ~ o u~ 0 ~ ~ V U-) ~ CNi CD 1` ~) C~i A ==~ W~. G-38

G-II.~: Postural Comfort _ _ ~ N ~ 0 ~ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ ~ O _ ~ O _ ~ O _ ~ ~ N _ O O U) ~ ~ O O O ~ O _ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ _ _ ~ O ~ _ r c N _ _ ~ O ~ ~ _ ~ N ~ _ _ ~ _ ~ ~ _ O ~ O ~ ~ _ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ :=. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~T Ut:~d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T:~T _ _ 0 ~ _ 0 _s O ~ ~ ~ ~ -0 ~ -O ~ O _ ~ O O _ C O U) O ~ O O O ~ . Z Z Z ~ _ O ~ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ _ . r i| ~ |; | ;| i| i| T| i|~|i| | \~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T:~T :<, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iiLliJ: TITl~BT Ri ~ ~ i:~T I, j:~. ._0 0 n Q O S =o -uO) O n .Q Y ~ .= Y ~ .= Y ~ .= Y ~ ~ | ·_ O ~l o ~ ~ = ~ 0 1 ~ <= E ~ ~| , 0 l ~c c | ~ 0 ~ I _ | ~ ~ ,, | z E 1: ~ 2 ~ | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z G-39 a Q . _ C~ 1 _ 1 ~n 1 t~s 1 ~ 8 ~C) ~. _ m m ~ ~ ~

G-II.~: Postural Comfort Il.4.2 Dynamic Driving Posture GINO

G-II.4: Postura] Comfort 1. Test Results of Dynamic Driving Posture of Prototype Bus . _ , . No. Initials Elbow Comfort al you c er comfort Oval Lap Lock-to-Lock 1 RXE 4.6 4.6 2 JXB 3.4 3.0 3 PKM _ 4 JXO 5 TXB 6 PEC _ 7 GM 8 JTB 9 BEM 10 KJM 11 RAS _ 12 SCR 13 DCB 14 ALD _ 15 RLH _ 16 WAM 17 PEW _ 18 MW\I 19 MAC _ 20 KAK 21 RAL _ 22 CAM 23 NRK 24 KLM Synthesis 4 6 1 3.0 2.3 3.9 2.6 3.7 3.3 4.0 24 24 23 . 4.1 3.2 . 0.3 0.7 3.2 1.8 4.6 4.3 . 1.4 2.5 G~1 2.3 0.8 1.0 3.9 2.9 .

G-II.4: Postural Comfon Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Nots: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comton elbaw movement zor~e. 2.weighted posturail comfort score = ~ {'tJmJtJn levels Ci ) x percentag~ Pi ) ..l A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Movemont Distribution . elbow flex~on angle (unit: deg.) < 15.0 . t 15.0.:~.i3QEl . t XJ,4.~45.t}! ~°1~ , :, ,i,,~so=;..;7S.~] 1 :'~iA' ;.~ 1 t. .:9O.~=iO 1 105.0.130.0 > 1 30. Totd A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation . _ Frequency Percontage _ O O.OYO 60% ' s.r~ 2 ~I~ 0.~%, ... 18 . i 7.49~; 1. 40` . :;: 48 . ~ ~- ~^ 22.~; I E 30% . . '' 2.2 11S,` . . .;;:::~:~='. :. _ St ~ <; ~ i . . t4~;4%: ~ . : 2. .~^'^ . 0.9%.: 10% · . O 0.0% l O O.OY. 216 100.0% Comtort Rating | elbov. tlexion angb ~ Froquenc,, Pe~9c (Pi) 1 (iow) ~ 15.0 O 0.0°/. 7` ~ [ 15.0. 28.8 1 1 0.5% 60~ 3,~,~. - 1 2~ 4251 - 8: 1 I ~:~ 42%~: 50% 4 ~^ . 1 42= 56431 33 ~I 1 15.:~% ~E ~s ~{ s~.; .7rs 1 142;.: : : 1 I ' . .6547%' . ~, . . ( 77~,' 85~0t 27 :: ~l I .. 12^ ~ [ 8S.O; ~ZS 1 2 ~' ^0.9X 2 t ~.~100.01 2 ~: Q9* o~ 1 (low) ~ 100.0 O 0.0% 1 Total 216 100.0% I wdghted postural comton acore · 4.6 B. Lock-to-Lock B.1 Joint Movement Distribution elb tlexion angl Fre uenc (unit deg.) ~q Y :;;;~| < 15.0 1 0 0.0% i . 1 1 1~0 ~.01 1 ~z3% 1 [ 30.0, dS.01 1 B' 13.6% 45.0. 60.01 1 15 .~34.~% t ~Q.O. 75~01 1 22 : 50.0'C _ 0.0%' 1 [ 90.e,'= ~. 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 > 130.0 1 0 o~oy. Total ~44 100.0% B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation 1 | Comtort Rati~ng | I (ci) I . . (10W) 1 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 ~I L~ 4 ^ - 1 3 1 1 2 I 1 (low) Subject No.: 1 Dvnamic Drivino Postuto Analvais - Elbow (subpct t, oval la,o) 1 22.7% /~ ~ ;4.4% o ~ 0 9%~ I 1 1 ° ~ 0'0% ° ~ 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Eb~ P-xbn Ang. Dvnamic Dnvina Posn~ro Analveis ~ Elbo~ (subicct 1, oval lap) 65.7% 1 27.8% L' 5'1% 1.4% 0.0% - . , _ 5(hkO 4 3 2 1 pot) Comlo~ ~ 1 SO% 1 45% 1 40% 1 35% ~ 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% . elbow tlexion angle | l < 15.0 1 1 '5.~. 28~91 1 1 2a8. :42.5 l ~ t 42~5. 5631 1 563. 77S 7J.5; 85.01 1 1 85.0,. 925 92,5,100.0 , 100.0 weighW postural comfort score · 4.6 D~namic Drivino Posture Analveis ~ Elbow (subject 1, ovd lep) , - _ 6 I , ~, 2.3% o oSe 0 0% _ , _ , _ , , , S(h~l) 4 3 2 1 (b~ Co_rt 1

G-II.4: Postural Comfon c. Synthesi. ~ Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Mov~nent Distribution eIbow flexion angio | FreqUenCy Percentage (unit de9 1 ·150 0 0.0°/. . t .1S;0, 30.431-.- . 3: :: ~I ::;: 1;2'C:^ ^ 1.30.0. d5.o]::. : : 25!'A' 1 :::.8S*.: t 45.~.- 60.t,} ^^ 84^w: '~: 1 2~:- . :i: t eQ° ~ ';; 1= ~ ~; ~^~.:I . 75-~ .So.o]. ' 31 ~| : tt.~:::: :: . ~ ~O,Q 185nl - : :2 - .: ~: 1 ~: . ^~.B%~.: [ 105.0. 130.0 1 0 0.0% ,1 30.0 0 O.OY. Total 260 100.0# C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation -. Comtort Rating elbow tlexion angb Frequ ~Percontage (Pi) (10W) ~ 15.0 O 0.0% . ^ 2.^A^-^. ~ 15~0, 28~8t . . t : :: - . 0.~% ~ . 3 : ~. ::.~.; ~ 28.8. ~ ~ .~: . - 10 ;: : 3,8% 4, : - ~ .~S. 56.3] . n :.-~ . 1at~C: 5~):: . {.563 nsl 17t ~ : (15.8%: . . ` j^. ~. .~` n ~J . n. .;~ tO;~% . : 3^~: .:t aS.Q 9251 . 2:: ::: 0.8*. . 2 . ;:^ . ~ 1 ~S 100.0 1. : 2:^ :: : O.8% :~. . 1 tlow) · lc(U o o.o% Total 260 100.0% ., ~ightod postural comton score · 4.6 G - 3 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Elbov' (subioct 1, oval lep) 60% 50% . 40# o ' 30% ~La 10% o% 53.~% ' /1 24.6# 8.5~ "o~o%> ~ ~ 5 30 45 60 75 90 E~ fles" "ob !1 ^. ., ~o.^ oo~ o.~ 105 130 DYnamic Drivino Posturo Analvais - Elbow (subpct 1, synthesis) ~o~ . 60% so~s . c 2~% 10% o% 65.8# :: ~ 28.5% l 1.2% o.O% .- I 1 S(hI9h) 4 3 2 1 (be' Co~o~ "_

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comfort snoulder movement zone. 2.weighted postural comfort score = :; ~ omt~'rt iel~el/ Ci ) x perc entu~c( Pi ) ..' A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to~Lock B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation A.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution .. _ shouldertlexion angle | FreqU.nCy Percentage (unit deg.) ! : 1~15.0. ^5~01 ~ ->i ~1 ; O0% ;; t -5~ 5~l ^- 4 :~^ - ~t.~:. ^> l~ 5.Q. t5.O1 4:~; I; tti8% 15*0.~01 76~; ~ ~352% 37 ~I ~17*t~ 1 35~0. 45-0 1 32 14.8°/ I [ 45.0, 55.0 l 1 13 6.0% > 55.0 | 11 5.1% Total i 216 100.0# I A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation shouldor tlexion angle | F~ll~n~v (unit: deg.) 1- c -15.0 ~- [-15.Q ~ 8-B].- t.-a~..i2~.1: t-2§, 3~1 ' '1 - 3^' 1B.31 :. 1 - r zs,,zs81 1 28~8, 35.01 1 (low) > 35.0 _ Total 1 216 wdghted postural comfon score B.1 Joint Movemont Distribution ahouldor tlexion angh Frequency (unik deg.) l < -15.0 5,0.~5.0 ~5.0. 5.01 S.Q t5.0] 1 15.a, 2S.~] 25.0. SS.D 35.0. 45.0 l Total 1 4. Pe~ 0.0% O.OY. QO.`C; tt.~% .20 S% . 29S% 18.2°/. 1 3.6% 6.8% _ 100.0# l weighted postural comfort score · 2.3 G~4 ! 40` . I 3s% + t ~ 2s% t E. 20` t ts~ t *~ t S''to.o% Subject No.: 1 DYnamic DrivinQ Posture Anaivsis - Slloulder (subject 1, oval lap) 3S2% 1 .9% - no% I 17.1% !;j ~ \e 0% S.1% o~ I I ~r - I-, - , 1 1 ~ I ~ I -15 -s s ls 2s 3s 4s ss 5_ F-~-- ! pvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Shoulder (subject 1, oval lap) 1 30~- 26.9% x.s~ j 2s~. ~ ~ 1 20. - _ ! . 20~l ~ ~ ~ 10% t _ _ 1 ,~. 1 ~1 . 5 (b oh) 4 3 2 1 ~1 Coado~ ~1 30` . 25%: . 20~ t 1~ I · 1 1C 15% + · ~ ~ 1 i~ ·o*~ t 1 s~ + 11 o.o% o% 1 1 i Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais- Shoulder ! (.U~.ct . Iock-to~ock) 29.S% 20.sl ~ \ ~ · 18.2Y. /8 ~ .\t3.6% J%lllr6^ ! 40% ~ ~t 2S% t 5` ~11.4% S (hI9b) Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Shoulder (sub~c,t 1. Iock-to~ock) 3e - 22~% ~ _ _ 1e2% ~ ~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synth~i. - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution shoulder flexion angle | Frequency Percentage (unit deg ) ~. ^1S.Q - 5.01 l -~.Q 5;0 ] _ {'s.0. 15,0} _ '1 ts.0,. 25.0 ~ . . 2S t1, ~ ) ] 350, 4501 40 _ [ 450' 550] ! '9 85 ~ 50 327~. : 19.~:, . 154% 73% ~= C.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation _ Comton Radng shoulder tlexion angb (ci) (unit deg ) 1 (lOw) ~ -15 0 : :., .2,,.~..:. ' . . 3 : . ~ ~ 8.8. -35 ~ : ~[-23 3.8}. 1 5~91~. 1- 3.8,.163) . ~, [ 1~ 51: . 3 .i: 122~ 8 Z>: j . :t 2&~.3sn . 1 (low) , 35 0 ~ Total 2tiO Frequency o 73 Percentago (Pi) 0.0% 0,0%: :~; . o.al%. O. - C,:^...^, . 18.2%~ 23.1% . 13.S%~: 15.4% 28.1% 1 00.0% w~ghted postural comfort score ~2 9 G~5 Dvr~amic Drivina Posture Analvais - Shoulder (subject 1, syntheeis) 35% T 32.7% 25% · , I ~ \ ~0% 0 0% 1-5% i ~l,l,rl~, ·15 ·5 5 15 25 35 45 55 Sho_ F~bn ~b ; ~T 25% · , 20%- . . ~ 15%- . ; 10% 5% - . 1 0% _ l pvnamic Drivino Posture Analveh" Shoulder (su~oct 1, synt~is) 23.8% ~ 9 2'L .. ~1 _ _ 15.4% ~13.S# 5 (t~) · 3 2 C~ 28.1# 1 (ba\

G-II.4: Posu~ral Con~fort DYnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded ce Is ~ndicale results related to the comfort e bOW movement zone. 2.weighted poStural comton score = ~ ~ omtorr · levels Ci ) x percentage( Pi ) ,., A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution elbow tiexion angh (unit: deg.) ~ 15.0 t ~ ^t531. :3Qo l `.~14~ ~=1 '{' ' ~ .. :7S~1 ' · I:'^?5,t);:'S0~1: . t S~O;.~;S)1 . 105.0, 130.0 , 130.0 - Total Comtort Rating elbow tioxion angh (Cl) (unit: deg.) 1 (low) ~ 15.0 2 [ 15.0, 28.8 3 : .:: A , I ~ :4ZS ~ 4., ,.,.~; :''' '1 :~,;:~1 s~- 1 ~: 7751 4 ;:. ~: :' ~ .77.~S;~BS.01 ., 3 ~,.,., . 1':~.^' =51 2. ~ I 112;S, 1CO~ 1 (low) ·1COD 1~ wdghtod postural comfort score 8.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution m~~ ~_ ' <15.0 _ _ 1 15.0, :30.0 1 1 I . 1 30 0. ~ 0 1 2 - I _ f 45.Q - .o1 3~.+ - j ~. , O. 75.01 3 , _ 75-~. 90.01 20 _ 80.0,105.Ol 20 l _ [105.0.130-01 O _ ,130.0 0 _ Tot~a~ 49 _ B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort RaUng elbo. tlexion angle (Ci) (unit: deg.) ~ 15.0 - 1 t5.0. 28~1 t 2~ . 42S 1 t ~ii. S631 .'"~1 1 77~. ssn1 . [ 8!i.Q 92Sl ~1 ~Q.6,100.01 , 100.0 :;= Petcentage(Pi) l 0.0% 1 4s%. , O^ ~ 00% 1 40%· . 2 d,1% I . 30% 1 2.0'C I E 2s% 6^: 1Z2% ~ 20%. 5. 102% ~ 15%. - 15's'.^ 30.~: 10% 20 ': :' ' . '~40.8% n~ . . O 0.0~e . 49 100.0% _ weghted postural comfort scom · 3.0 G~6 Sub,~ct No.: 2 60% 50% , 40% - C 30% . ° 20% 10% 0% 1 | Percontage | 1 1 o.oY. 1 1 ~:o.o~^ 1 1 1 t;. .':,,'0;~:.: 1 .. ': . :~,141~^ '" 1 ' ~- ;~ .; 1 1 I': 2~'l`' 1 1 1 . .~: 2t~C.::; 1 ~ ' ~ 1 o.o~ 1 40.0°h 1 00.0 | Percentago (Pi) 0-O ~1 1 40% 0.0% 1 1 35% I Q=C I I ~ t I ' I 1 · ~ . I .: ~a.o%; I I ~ ''~ T |- :::~:.:20.t%- - 1 1 ~ 20% 1..^...2~-.. 1 i io% I:''''''''~'' ' 1 1 5% | . :: 2t ,~; | | 0% 1 o.o.~e 1 1 s (high} 4 3 2 1 1 100.0% I 3.4 Dvnamic Drivino Po~ Analvais - Elbo~ (sub - ,t 2. oval lap) ss.l~ /~\21.^ ~0.~0.~0.0%1-1~ 1 r.0%0.^ _, _, ' , i 15 30 45 eo 7s 90 105 130 a~F~ r {?vnamic DrivinQ Posture Analvais - Elbo~v I (subject 2~ oval lap) 3e 9% - I 7' _ 1 I Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Elbo~v Percentage | | (subjoct 2, ovd bp) 1 0.0% 1 z0% 1 ~ 11' 1 .. . ~1%' 1 1 :.., ~t%. I 44.8% 1 . 44~.8% 1 o.oY. 1 1 o.o% 1 1 100.0% 1 t 45% 3os# ! ~ 30% t | ·t 20# ~ ~s# t~ 10% t6.1% e.l% 5%to.o%,~' 45 60 75 90 105 130 Ebo- P-xbn Ang~ Dvnamic Drivina Postum Analvais - Elbo~r (subject 2~ lock~to~lock) 40. 34.7% 12.2% 12.2% _~ . ~ , ~ , ~ , ~ , 0.^ S(l-d9h) 4 3 2 1 (b~ Co~on

G-Il.4: Postural Comfort C. Syn~esis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution eli~ Noxion angb Frequency Percentago (un~t: dog.) < 15.0 0 0.0°/. .. 1 : ... ..... .i .~^ t. t~ 3gse0}- ~ ~. .t . .~; . .-~- AQ4~- ~ ~s ~. f -3~r 4is~0~. I ~2 . ;s; ~ 0~ ~ ~. ... ,5.; , ,~.iii <. `' V .. 2.ZW 2 ~ ' ' r ~ 7~: 3~;-i^: -- ~d.2~- . .. : ~.~.01 : 1 124:., - . ~ . . .~.~- .. ::.^I'9°°,1~- I ~ - ~:~ ~ ~.~ =~;:i~ 105.0. 130.0 1 o o.o~. > 130.0 o o.oY. _ _ 1oQo# C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Com~ n R - n elf v fi~xion gb [~) (unJU dog.) 13~__~ (~) ; ~ (iOW) ~ '5.0 o o.oY. ~ .~. ; 2. i'. ;~.3:': ~ ~ : 0; . -; : . ~ : . :^ 0.^'?^:.: ^~ . 3, .~.;; . : { ? 28~:: 42S .~: - . ~ >;; ; ~ : ;.:: ^.o~ .: .-^ . 4,~s: t~S. 5B~J ~t~ .-:.; .: i~-~.~ - S r~, . i { ~&3~n~l 42 ~t8.~: ~,~. ~. I: n~. t]5.Ql 43 > ~18.-C .: . 3., ~ ~{ .8S.D; SQS} - 8t ~. 355% ~2'A%', . ' 1'' - ^'1~.} "',','-., '' ,, =~" ' . (tow) , 100.0 O 0.0# Total 228 100.0% weigh~d '~osmral comton scoro · 3.3 G~7 Qvnamic Drivina Posturo AndYsis - Eibo~r (subpct 2, oval lap,) 60% ;o% , 40%- C 30%~ v 20% 10% 0% 54.47. 1e.2% 1 0.0'% 04Y. O -~ \ \ 5.9% _ . _ 15 30 45 80 75 90 105 130 E~ f~bn h - , DYnamic Drivina Post~ Analvsis - Eli~ (sub'~ct 2, a,vnth~) 407. ~ . 35% 30% ~ . $ 2SY.- · 20S~- I84% ,93 5% 0% 36.4% 25.9% 5 pl~l} · 3 Co_I ~1 2 ~ (b.)

G-II.~: Postural Comfon Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Nota: 1. St~aded ce Is indicate resu~ts related to the corntort shoulder movement zone. 2.weighted postural comton score = :; c~,mJort Ie~ e'( C' ) x percentu~d P.' ) ..] A. Oval Lap B. Locic-to~ock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movement Distributior (unit ~ ~ ~ ~c~~ · b~ O ~ 0.0% " 1^1~,~_~ t0. . ~ :; ::~ ;% ..~ > ~ -~> 1501 1 ~:05~ : 47~ ~; ! £;~;~:~1 - 1 ~ ~: -^~",o~c~ . '^~.:. :'1^2S:~s.~] :.- . ~ ~ . :~ 5.6 l 35 0' 45.0 1 1 0.6% 1 45 0. 55.0 l 2 1.1% > 55.0 0 0.0% Total I ~ 80 100.0# Comtort Rating shouldor tlexion angle Frequency Percentago (h) (Ci) (unit deg.) 1 (low) c-15.0 1 0 0.0% .. 2;.:.~^.::: ^ 1: :: [,16.0~::~^B.Bl~::. : - o.;~. 0Q~, 3 ~r~ ; ~- ~[ _ ~ ~ ~. . ~ 0~ . 4 ~. ~;8~ ~~Q^; ; 4~% hi ,.: ^.S'~p)~,,, ~ _ ~ 1. ~=1 . ~ ' '~''.. ~ .,7 ~ ' '4 '.,.:'.,'2 . , ~, . . '',=^',.~: : 3< :: :- 1 ~7' :~: ::: :3:.9'Ci:~:^: ~ :: ~ :; ~ ^ ~: r:28;8~35,0;] B:: ~: : :.: 4.~'C; 1 (10w) · :IS O 3 l.7% Total 180 100.0% weigh~d postural comfort score · 4.3 sho~dorfex~on angle ~ F~_ ~ - <-15.0 0.0% -15.0, - 5,0 ~Q : 0.0% .~ 5.G,.:5Q] 7.~;-. ~. :14.3%: 5,E, . tS.01 . 22:: . ". - C : . ~01 '1~:: . . : ~ ^2Z4% ~=1 1 ~ao~c. 35.0. 45.01 ~4 8.2% 45.0, 55.0 1 1 1 2.0Y. ·550 3 6.1% 101~1 49 100.0% B.2 Postural Comton Evaluation shoulder ttexion angle (unit deg.) -15.0 .~, -~81 .~sl t - 2^ 3~ 1 l 3~ ~1~3] ^. ~ 16~,; 225'1' . ' 1 225, 2881 . 28.B..35.0 . ,35.0 ~- weighted postural comfort score · 3.9 Subject No.: 2 Dvnamic Drivino Po~^e Analvds - Shoulder (subioct 2, oval lap) .72% so~ ~,_ 4s%~ . 40% ~1. 3s%. ,1 - D 30~, - rI ~ E 2s~ ~I t , ~ ·s%. ~1 ~ '°` ts.e% ~s.6% 5~ + 0,0# O.OY'~ ~ ~ ~ O ~L -15 -s s 15 2s 3s 4s ss Sh~ F - ~ - - ~o.o% 1 ~\ Dvnamic Drivino Posture AnsiYds - Shoulder (subpct 2, ovat lap} 50% 4e.3% 4s% ~ ~ ~41.~% ! 40~. , ! 3s% ~ ~ _ _ ~ ° 30~ + E, 2s% t 8215%j 1 10% _ _ I t- ~ o~ 4.~` 5 (h - ) 4 3 2 1 - ) co~ ~ Dvnamic DrivinQ Posture Analvde- ShouIdet (subject 2, lock-to~lock) 44.~% 1 4s~ ~o% + 3s% t ~ 3o~ t E 2s% t ~ + t I ~ 15~ t _ !10~ + /. s~ ~ o.o% o.o~J/ o~ I 1 224\ 1 . 1 .~ 11 ~ s s 15 25 3s 4s ss ~_ F-abn An~- Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Shoulder (sub~ct 2, lock-to-tock) so ~49.0% 4s 3s%: ~ E 2s% ~ 1 2~.s7. 0%~ 5 (h~h) 4 3 2 1 (ba)

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. Syn~esis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution shouldor tlexion ongle Frequency (unit dog ) i {~:15.0; -5~1 ~ [ -~.Q .~5~1 _ {'%~.' t5.01 { 't5;O. 2~Ql ' _ . ~t.~=l Percontage 101~. - 83 -' ~ lt ~ L =_ C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort Rating _ (~) _ 1 (1ow) ~, 1 3;a:.l~31 . . . I: 1(L3~: 22~5 1 _ - 1 Z=2881 _ t 288. ,350 1 shouldor tlexion angio Frequency (unit deg ) ~. ~ -15 0 _ . t:-15~0. .. as1 - - l --8.& ~ 25 1 _ Percentage (Pi)| _ 11 v: #: '' . ,g':i:: . 1 1 weighted postural comton acoro · 4 2 G~49 48.5` 45% 40% . i 3S% ·. 30# ' E 25% ~ _ ~ 20% ~ ~ 1 ~ 15% ~ _ 10% 5# ~ ~ 0%- 1 - I . ~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analusis - Shouldor (subioct 2' synth~ia\ 50% T 45% + 40% 3s% t 3o# t 25% 20% . r 1 5% r I 0` ~7.4% 5%+oo% O.O' 0% i 1 46.7% 11 . ~_ _ I _ I 4.8% `__ 2re 13% 1.3% ·15 -5 5 15 25 35 Sh~ F~ - ·s 55 Dvnunic Drivino Posturc Anahsis. Shoulder laubjact 2, synttmais) 38.0% 4.~# 3 ~4.8% 5 (hl9b) 4 3 C~ 2 1 (b~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivinq Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shadea cells indicate results related to the comfort elOow movemert zone. 2.weighted posture comton score = 2, ~ nmJort · 'evci( Ci ) x percenta~ct Pi ) ,., A. Oval L:ap B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribudon elbow t exion ang (unit dog.) Frequency Perc_~" < 15.0 0 o.oo/. ~2 ^.::. ~: ' t,1.% ^^ t ~ ~o ~ l A . : . 1 1' :'; .^. ' ' j.~ ~.,2:, '. .S.^ "' .. ~ ~_ ~'~:~.~.~.:4S.O.';.6O.OJ | - 52.~, ~ :: ~ -: 277X''; . ' '~.~:~.~: ,=.o 1 ,, ~.. ~:; m.^,: . . ' '''^''{ '=~:'~ ~' 1 ' ' ' ' m-^' '' ' i ': "~% : 90.Q;105~11 - 2 ;~^ ~ ~;1.%~. [ 105.0, 130.0 10 o.o% > t30.00 o.o% Total 188 100.0% A.2 Postural Comfon Evaluation elbow tlexion angl. | Fr'!qUoncy (unit dea.) l w~abtod postural comton scoro B.1 Joint Movement Distribution (un~t. deg ~Frequency . ~ 0.0°/0 - : 3~0% 8.1% 1 242% ~- 30.3'C 1 33.3% ' -3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% B.2 Po~tural Comfort Evaluation weighed postural Comton scoro G-50 4.2 Sub~ct No.: 3 . . 43s% ~/ ~20% ~ ~% ~10%- ' 5.9% 11 5% '0.0% _~ ~ ~_ 0% 1 D'namic Drivina Posturo Analvsis - Elbow (sub~ct 3. oval lap) 40.4# 1.1% o,o% 0.0% _ , , , ~ , ~, s 60 7s 90 105 130 E~ F-xbn Ang~ r DYnamic DnYina Pos~" Analveis- Elbo~r | (6ubj~ 3' oval lap) 60% ~ so%- . -40~- ' 32. E 30~` ~ · ~ ` ' _ _ 14.4` 10% ~ ~ ~ s'~ 1 2s% I - 1 E 20% ~ 15% ` s% 1 1 1 s1.s% 35% . 30% . (subpct 3, oval lap) 33.3% 30.3%' < . 11 o% - 0.0%~ ~ ~_ ~ .~ 15 30 ·5 60 75 90 105 130 E_ P-xba-- Dvnamic Dnvina Posturo Analvais - Elbow (sub'~et 3, loch~o~lock) 60%- . 1, 50% ~ _ ,40% ~ ~ I C 30~. ~242% I ~ 20% ~ I ~e-2 S(hl9b) · 3 2 1 (ba) 1 c ~1 1

G-II.4: Postural Cornfon C. Synthesis - Oval LLap and Lock-to-Lock C. 1 Joint Movernont Distribution (un~t. deg.) Frequ~cy Percentage < 15.0 1 0 0.0% . [ 1~ 30.0.1; . 3 ::: I ~: ^ 1.~. -. ~: ~E~L~ ' ' 1:~' '~ ' ' ~, . .. ~ 5.9%j.:.. ~- ~ :,~5;~ 60.a~ . . .- ~.. 6o ~.~ ~ I ~ ^~27~%' ~' :~ ~, 7sOl' ~55 ::; 1 ~-:-; 24~C~- . I,=.O,;;~.~- . .~:.:.::. 1 ~ ''.=,4= :: ~ 80.O, fO5~] . 3. .^: 1 ~ ~.~#;^~ 105.0. 130.0 1 0 o.o% , 130.0 0 o.o% Total 2 ~S C.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comfort Rating elbow Hexion angio Frequenc,Y Peroentage (Pi) (Cl) (~t as9 ~ (low) . ~5 0 0 0.0% . z.;. . - 1 :15~ 2B81 : : . 2 _ 0^i.: 3;xr~< .:~ 1 2~-4251 1~ : 6 . ~ :,,~., ' ,I, ~} - ~ . : . 1at~ ;5 ~, -.~-. ~ ~ I s63 ns1 78 35~=C .,<; -~:n~. - .~1-' :- ~: 63 2~,Sff'' ,, .. ~8SA 92S1 ~. 24 . 1Q~ . ;. 1 1123~100~1 ~-. 3 1:.~%~: (low) . ~ · 0 0 O.OY. Total 221 100.0# 4.1 ~ghted posturd comfort ·core G-51 40% . 135%- ~ 1k, Dvnamic Drivino Po~ Analveis - Elbo~v (sub~ct 3, ovel lap) 39 4~ 25% ' 20% 5%- 10% 5% o% 1~ Z7.1% ~ - 9~ L. ' 5.9% 0.0%~ 1 . 11~ ~- , _ _ . s eo 7s 90 E~ o~on A~ - tos 130 . . . Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analvds - Elbo~v (sub~ct 3, synttia - ~) so~ T 46.^ 4s~ t t 3s.3% 3s~ . _ · 30` 2S% t ~ ·s~t _ o~t ~ s~t - ~, - , 5 (hl~b) 43 Co_e 2 1 (b-)

G-lI.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note: 1. Sha~ cells indicate results relater to the comfort shoulder movement zone. 2 weighted postural comfort score = ~ ~ <'mJon Ic`,el( G ) x percenrug~ P.' ) ,a, A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Mowment Distribution should r flexion ·ng (unit deg.) ~ P~ <-15.0 1 0 0.0% ' ~ . ' . ::' 0^ ..^'. ''' ' '~ ~ .' : .-: ' ttO+""~ . ~ ~ s:e ~. .. ~ 1 ^ ~., 241~^;- ;. 1 ~ 5~ ~s01 1~ : l ~ r.4~^~ _ . St. A ::. I F. . .27.1~.~: -~~[ 25.~ 35.0} 71 .- ~' I ~ . ~. 37.8'C^ . t 35.0. 45.01 21 11.2% [ 45.0, 5501 18 9.6°/e 55.0 9 4.8% Total 188 100.0% _ A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation shouldor tlexion angb Frequency (unit d6g.) ~ighted pomural comfon score B. Lock-to-Lock B.1 Joint Movement Distribution ~ . Percontago (Pi) , 0.0% : o.- - .: ,:: QQX" 0-§% ~- . . ;. - '..0%d :: .22~' ~..8~C:' '' ' 37;8'C' 25.5% . 100.0% , 2.S 40'L: 30~- . 25% , 20% + ~ 15%+ 1s`T :` ~ hould rflexion gb p~_~' (unit: deg.) Flequ~' _ <-15.0 O 0.0% -15¢ ~ 5 ~ I O 0.0% sn ~3.0%: t;.O,~15.0l 8 - 242% 1 ~, ,, . ,, 33.3%,: - ~3: 9.1% 35.0, 45.01 4 12.1% 45.0, 55.01 2 6.1% 55.0 4 12.1% Total 33 100.0% B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation 1 Co~nfon Rating shoulder tlexion angle frequency Percontage (Pi) (Ci) (unit.. dog.) _ 1 (IOw) ~ -15.0 0 0.0% l 3s% T 2 . . t-15.0. · 8.81 O . QO% :1 ~[ 8.8~25l 0. ~. 0~0% ; .S~P) ' [ 3^ 16.31 9 , . U~. 4, : - 1 16.3. 22.5] 8: ~242% 3 ~ 22.5, 2asl 3 9.1% 2 ~ ~ ~ 28.8. 35-0 l 3 9.1% 1 (IOw) > 35.0 10 30.3~/o Total 33 100.0% _ ~ighted postural comfort scoro ~3.1 G-52 Subject No.: 3 Dvnamic Drivino Poen~re Analveis - Shoulder (subject 3, oval lap) 40% T 35~; 1 ~t .. 2S% t t ", .s% + ~t s~ ,_ 0% 5 5 5 1S 25 35 45 Sho_ F1enbn ~ \1.2~.- 96% 0\4.~% Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis - Shoulder (sub~ct 3, oval lap} · 25.5% 2_9% _ 9.0% ~ , ~ , ~ . · , ~ , 5(~) 4 3 2 1 (b.' Com~ ~ Dvnamic Drivina Posturo Analveis - Shoulder (subioct 3, lock-to~ock) 3s%, 1 30 · 20% t E t 1 1 1 \ ,7 , ~.2.,% ~T°~-s ~ -15 -5 5 1S 2S 35 45 55 | S_ F - ~ A - ~le D~rnamic Drivino Posturo Analveh- Shoulder (sub~ct 3, loci~-to-locl~) 30~3% 30% t 27.3% 24.2% E 9 1% 9' S(hl - ) 4 3 2 1 (b~ W~ ~_

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Syn~esis - Oval LLap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distnbution . should tl xion ang FnCY Percentage (unit. deg.) | < -15.0 0.0% .( t5.tL -5,0~ ~o ,^-. ~ ~ ~Q~, ' .': [ ~ 5-Q. ' 5-0'1 ' ^ ~, ci.^. :^, . , ^2.3% - t 5~' 15.Ol. ~22;~- ~1~. ~ 1~25~0-1. ~(i2~^ ~ ~2L,t%: . 2510~ 0~1 ~74 ~ -^ ~- 33.5~.^ [ 35 0. 45.0 1 25 11 .3% [ 45.0. 55.0 1 20 9.0% > 55.0 13 5.9% Total | 221 100.0% C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation 35%, 30% ~ 2s-.t 20% + l DYnamic Drivina Posturo Anaheis - Shoulder (sub~ct 3, syn~is) 33.5% 26.14 S 1 5 + 1 0.0% 10%1 ~ 5- ~2.3%/ i 0'0% O'O 1 1 1 .3` ~9.0% · ~\5.9% -15 -5 5 15 25 35 Sh~ F~xbn ~- 45 55 Comfon Rating shouldor fhxion ·ngb Frequency Peroentage (Pi) ' pvnamic Drivino Posturo AnalYsis - Sl~oulder (Cl) (unit: deg.) I (subJect 3, synth~} 1 (10w) c -15.0 O 0.0% I ~s% . _ . 1 _ 2~ .~. ~ 15;o;-aal O^:: ~: 0~%<A':' ~26~ _ _ 3i..,-~. ~ .-: ~^ 0;0%,^; 25~- . 23.1# ~ .. ~[~2.S; 3.8~;: t':'~- 05% ' c20% ~· · - 5p - ) . [. :3.8, 1631 . 26~:~ : 1t.8$~: g 15%+ 11.8% ~- . - t 1= 22'i1 5~ ~ ~ZUS% ; ~ ~o%l _ ~54% ~ , , _ _ . 3; . [:2Z5. 28.81' t2: - ^ ~5.~%:. 5%- ~_ 2 ~t:28^ 35Ot ~ :;. . .- . :33~C^:A ~o'` ~, ~, _ , _ , _ 1 (low) > 35.0 58 26.2~/e ~s th - ' ~3 2 · (ba' Total 221 100.0% 1, c~ w~gh~d postural comton score · 2.6 G-53

G-II.4: Postural Con~fort Dvnamic Drivinq Posture AnalYsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comton elbow movement zone. 2 weighted postural comSo~t score = :; c`'mt~'n le`'ci( ci ) x percensaRc( P.') .., A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution _. elbow tlexion angle Frequency < 15.0 . . ^, ~ .15.~;:.:.~'=.'0 1 . .~ t =~. ds.0l ,.,....,,.,{.,..~.e, :.'60.01 :.^~.. .~60~.:. 75.01 ^75.0;. ~Q~1 ~;.; ~ ~ =.Q 105 [ 105.0, 130.0 > 130.0 A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comton Rating elbow Hexion angte (Ci) (unit: deg.) 1 (10~) < 15.0 2 1 1 5.0, 28.8 3 ..~ 5 ~ii).: W4'^.'::: '' 3 2 ~^ 1 (low) Frequency Percenage (Pi) 1 0.00/0 . 0.5% . -[:2B^'42.Sl ~ I ~1: 3~- ~Z~ ;56-31 tQ" ~ ~5.0'L-; .3; 7751 1 B 1: 32~C ~!~2 ~. 73" ' 1'' 3e'% - ~1~8S.0' ~13Q31 40 :- ~20.i% : I Q1~10O.01 1 j 3 ~1 15% > 100.0 2 1.0% Total 199 100.0# weig~d postural comtor' score · 4.0 B.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow tlex~on ~ng~e ~ Fre<'uency - <15.0 O _ 15.0. 30~1 O - 30.0, 45.ol 2 1 _ ~ _ ".0, 60.01 3 I. t "0, 75.01 14 . _ 7S.0, 90.01 2t I _ 90.0,105.01 3 - 105.0. 130.0 l 0 - > 130.0 0 _ Total 1 43 _ B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Percentage 0.0% O.Q% 4.7% :~ 7.0'C · 32.~% . 48.8%' 7.0% 0.0% O.OY. 100.0% Comtort Radng | elboev flexion ang~e Frequency ;~ 1 (low) < 15.0 O 0.0°/. 2 ~ 1S,0. 28.Bl O 0.0% 3. . ~ { 2s.a 4251 2 ~4.7% ~ . t 42~. S631 1 , 93% S (t~l) ~ S6.3. 775 1 16 ~372% 4, : ^ t 77-S. 85.01 11 25.6% 3 I 85.Q 9251 10 23~3% 2I 92.5, 100.0 1 ?.Q~ 1 (low) > 100.0 O 0.0~/ . Total 43 100.0% w~ghted poen~ral comfort scoro · 4.0 G-54 SUbjOCt No.: 4 - Percen~go l o.o% 160% T ,1 t3% : 40%' : ':': .~.0%^ 28.t% :'.'..' :'SS~' , j ~^ t;59~ ~ l 1.0% O.OY. 1 00.0# t . 40% ' 30% . 20% lo% ~ oY. 1 s% 1 40~l 3s% ~ ';, 30% + E 2s ~ 1S%t lo%t s% + o% ~ Dvnamic Drivino Postute Analvsis - Elbow (subioct 4, oval lao) sets% 26.~% 9.0~1 oo%~ ~ s so 7s 90 1 05 1 30 E~ P-xbn "g~ Dvnamic Drivina Postute Analveis - Elbo~r (subjoct 4, ovel lep) .~.7s . - · 322 · ~23. ~1,1 1 ~1.o% S`h9b) 4 3 2 1 (ba) c~ r Pvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis- Eibow (subject 4, ovaI lep) 48.8% so% 1 4s# t 4o% t i 3s% t 1 ~ 30% t E 2s% t s 20% t 5 0%] ] 4 37~% 70% 47~ _ o.o~ o.o%~: ~ 5 30 4s 60 ~s 90 105 130 E~ f - nbn Ang~ Dvnamic Dtivino Posture Analveh- Elbow j (subioct 4, lock-to-lock) ! 4 1 3 1 30% s E ~ ~ is%. lo% ~ 1 s% 1 o%. ~ 27 9% 27 9% I ~ ~ .0% ~ , · · · o.o% S(hk~h) 4 3 2 1 (b. co~ ~

G-Il.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthcsis ~ Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution ~bow tioxion 09h ic Dnvin Pos re Analve's - El (unit: deg.} ~Frequency ~ Percenuge | = (subpd4~ oval lap) · ,50 ~° o.o% 60% . ss.4` ~ 1=,<~:SO.O]. : ~3 .;~ ~ ~ :;.~;~; - s0%. :l . 30.0. 45.01. - . 10 I 1 4 .1%. ~, ",, ~ / : 45,0. . 60.0 ~. 21 . ::.- :. 1 ~. . ~ n` . ~' 30% . ~27. . 1;BO.0, 75-01 . . - ; ~:. 1 ::~ £73'C ~ 20%. ~/ , ~' ~ ~S.O,. BO.~] 134 ^.:~, 1 1 ;.:S6.d,% . e.r~/ t :8O.0,^.tO5.S)1 6 :: . 1 ~:- ^:<Z,5%~; 10%- 00~ 1 ~5% o.~% 00% 105.0 130.0 1 2 0.8Y. o% ~ 1 ~ _ , _ , ~, . 15 30 4s 60 7s 90 105 130 , 130.0 O O.OY. Elbo. F - xbn An9 - ~ Total 242 100.0# C.2 Postural Comton Evaluation Comtor' Rating ~Ibo. flexion angb Frequency Percentag;e (Pi) (Ci) (unit: de9.) (Iow) < 15.0 O O.OY 2-^~X; · { 15.0~: 23.81 . 1: . . .. jQ~ _ 3.:.-.~: - {.28;&^ 42.S] . 8 ~i ~: 3.3 *:~. ~ ~.~;~58~31 tl ~ ~4.5% 5(h - ~' 1''"~.'.~'1 . - ,A,~, ~ . ~1% 4'~2-/'". ' ' 1 "~' ~1- . ",A:- I {,. ,.,.M,`. a, ~'^ ^ ' ~ ' - ~' :~ 1 ~ . · . =,= : ~ ~tOO.O.] 6 ^ ~ 1 25% (tow) , 100.0 2 0.8Y. Total 242 100.0% wdghted postural comfort score 4.0 G-55 40~ 35% 30% s~ 20% 1s% 10% Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis ~ Elbow (subpct 4, s~t~) 393% 33.1% .L - . s ~ ~ 5-. ~ · · · 2.9% 0 8% `1 - , _, _ . _,, , 2 1 (b - ' 24.0% 5 ~gb} 4 3 C - r40n L~

G-II.4: Postural Co~nfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note 1 Shaded c~ls indicate results related to the comlon st~oulder movement zone 2 weightee postural comton score = ~ ~ omJorr le; clt C' ) x Pcrcentag~( Pi ) .., A. Oval Lap B. Locic-to~ock A.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution shoulder tlexion angb Freauency (unit: dea ) ~ -15 0 '' 1~15.0,.-5.0} ~ ~ I~ S ~ S;0 l ' :'.,''..'~: s.~ 15.01 ·~ t~15~0e ;t .;~ 1 2tS.Q~ 0 [ 35.0. 45.0 1 450. 55-0 A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movement Distribution ~ghted postural comfort ·core shouldor tl~xion angb ~ Freauency . 1 <-150 1 0 -150. ~501 0 1-50 501 1 - ~ 5 0, 15 0 1 S 15~0. 25~01 10:: 1 25.0. 35~01 10- [ 35.0. 45.01 10 [ 45.0. 55.01 3 >55.0 4 Total 43 I w.u-'e Percentage ~- 0.0% 1: °°$; ~:: i 12~5%~.~.: _ '::' 5Ji%:~.: 1 3Z!e,^.:,,. ~; 21~%^ 11.5% 75% 2~8 Pereontago . ~ . 0.0% 0.0% z= '11." 23.3% .23.:m' 23.3Yo 7.0% 9.3°/. ^^ ^_ B2 Postural Comtort Evaluation v~g~ed postural comfort scor G-56 Subject No.: 4 Dvnarnic Drivina Posturo Analv is - Shoulder (subject 4, oval lap) 3s% ~ 30% ; 2s% ~, ° 20% ~ 15% 1 0% s~. 0% . - T 2s% . 20% E 1 5# I ~ I s% I o% 32 0% 1 215% ~oo%ol. I I ~ s s 15 2s 3s 4s ss s~ f~x - ~ - DYnamic Drivino Poen~re Anaivais- Shoulder (subioct 4, oval lap) 28 s% s 0* ~21S% ~ S(b - ) 4 3 2 1 (bm Coadorl ~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis- Shoulder j (subioct 4, lock-to~ock) 2s~..T 20% 0 1 5% c 10% ' s% l _ 1 1 Pe~ntago (Pi) | 0.0% 1 QO% 0.~%:. 23% 1 1 . 1~6% ' 1 t~ Q% ~ I L 9~ I 1 .~. 1 1 1 39 5% 1 100.0% l 24 23 3% 23 3% 23 3% ~ioo%°~°%^ 1 1 1 1 ~ -s s 1S 2s 3s 4s ss Sh - _ F~ ~- DYnamic Drivino Posture Ansiveis- Shoulder (subject 4, lock-todoci`) 3e s~ s 30` + 2s% + 2 2~ t 16~% ~ ; 11.~% ~93 5 (high, v7. gh) ~3 2 1 (b. _t L~

G-I1.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lao and Locket - Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution ., shoulder flexion angle ' Frequency Percentage Dvnamic Dnv~no Posture Analysis - Shoulder <-15.0 0 0.0% 35% T 30-5% [~1S.Q ~S.~] ~ I O.Q% ~: ~ 30% + \ [ '5.~: :5~: ~ :' ~ tO.^ ~ 25 . + \~.e% 5.~ 15~- 16 -: ~B.6%:: ~· 20% + / .\ [.15 ~2~al 74 ~ ~ ~% , ~ ·5%+ 1071G 1~ 13.6% [23LO,.~36tJ.~. 53. .2t.8% I ~'°%+ - \6.60 / ~ .\7.4% 5% [35.0.45.0] I 33 13.6% ~5%+ ; ~· · 45.0, 55.0] I 18 7.4% ~ 0.0% 0.,, 55.0 1 23 9.5% ~-15 5 5 15 X 35 45 55 ~Sho~ Flesbn ~g- Total 1 243 1 100,0~. I C.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation ~a, | shoulder Hex~o ·ng~e ~Frequency ~ Percenoge ~Dvnamic Drivino Posture hnalveis - 5houlder 1 (10w) ~ -15.0 O 0.0% 1 3s% T 30.S~ 2.::;.:~. ~[-35.0,::-~: 0 .I 0.~: I ~) . 3~ ^~; - 1 -8~ 2~1 . ~ ~~. I I 0.0~c; tI 25% 235% 21.~% ~ . . . ~:~ :^ : [~.:.3~} 7 ~ - ~: l ~C 20%t 144% ~ 5~) :. - l -~ 1631 ~, 14.4% ' ~ '5% t _ ~9^ [ 1~.-~1 50 .;. 1 m." I1 °- lo% + ~ ~_ 3 ~[ ~:.'28.81 24 . j 9.8~:: ~s 2. . 1~8^ 3sn, 5s ~ ~2t ~' ~o~ 1 ~ , ~ , ~ , _ , _ , 1 tlow) ~ 35.0 74 30.5% I s ~9h) Toal 243 100.0% 1 co_t ~ghted postural comfort score ~2.7 G-57

G-II.4: Postura1 Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow · Note: 1. Sha~ calls indicate results related to the comfort ~DOw movement zone. 2.weignted posture comfon score = ~ ~ omJorr · Ict elt Ci ) x percentag~ Pi ,., A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to~Lock A-1 Joint Movement Distribution A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow tlexion angh ~ Frequenc~ . ~ 15.0 0 0.0°h : I 15.Q 30.01 ~ .- . .; ^.~i: ;- 0.~. .. ~t 3Q:~.~ 01 a . . t.8%^~ - 1 ^~. 80.01 25~` ~ 15.3~- . . I ~ ~ :7:~.Q l - .34 ~. . . -~20;Q% ~ ' 1: ~ .90.0 ~- .-!.i. ',: : . ~ ~^ . - . ~. ^ f m.~ tm.0 1 - t3~ . . :: &~. ~ . 105.0. 130.0 l 0 0.0% , 130.0 O O.O4Y. Total 163 100.0% . (Cl) elbow tlexion angh Fre~quenCy Percentago (Pi) i 1 (10W) < 15.0 O 0.0% I 2 ~ lS ~ Z11 111 O 0.0% 1 ~. 1 3, ~.. :~; ~ ~sl .s ;-. ! . 1~. . ~ 4 ~- ~1 "S. S63 l t?~^. ! 10~4%^ . . s ~, ,~,~.=sl. I 1 " ~. 1''''~"' . ,,.,.,~.,,, . .~. ' ~ "~.8S.01. 1 47:" ' 1:,~ 2sss;~ 3 g^ ~: t.~, =~l 1 ~t-;: I =~; 2 ~ ;;. ::: -: t =5.100.01 1 ! 13^ . 8o'`i 1 (low) ,100.0 O O.OY. Total 1 163 100.0% L ~igilted postural comfort scoro ~3.3 i 60%. . ~ so~c ~ I , 40% . E 3<n`, , 1~ . l ~- elbow flexion ·ngle ~F - ~ncy Pe~ntage , c 150 0 00% I lSQ 30.01 o | 0.0% i 30 0 4S O I 1 - t2~ 1 46 0 60 0 1 2 ~25 0% :t ~)-Q 75-01 3 i . 37~% 75O, 9001 2 250% 80 t), 10S 0 1 o 0 0% [ 105 0, 130 0 1 O o oot. , 1300 0 00% Total 8 100 0% B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation . elbow tlexion anglo (unit deg ) ~ 150 [ 1S0 288 . t 2sa. 42Sl 425. 5631 - . ~ 563~ .775 1 . ^ 1 n.~ m°1 ' 1 8s.~ 92~1 . 1 92.5,~CO.01 , ·oo.o . Fr~ nc~ Percentago (Pi) . o 0.0% 1 so%. . 0. . 0.0% ! 44s~ . - 1 : t25% - 1 35% . 1::' t~ . ! -~. . .: `. =. - ~ 220%: . 2: 25.0% 1 ~ 15#- . 0:. .~. 1 10%- . 0:: : . O.Q% 0% . O 0.0% _ 8 1 OQO% , v~igh~d postur~ comton scom · ~ ~ G-58 Subject No 5 Dvnamic Dnvino Posture Analveis - Elbow (sub~ct 5, ov~ 14~) 20.ns 153%/ . I o.o% 0,0% 15~ eo~ 0%- 1 , ' 1-1 ~ 1 n\0.0% 0.0% 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 E~ P - sbn An' - 40%- . _ 35%- ~ 30#- ~2s.e# ~27.0% . ~- I I . I S(hbil} 4 3 2 ~ (b.) ~ ~_ Dvnamic Dnvina Posture Analveis - Elbow (sub~ct S, oval bp) 37.5# ~ '°% T 35%t A 1 30% t 25.0% · 25#1 s%~°~°~e l.1 l 1 1 ' 1 - ~ ~ 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Ebl_ P-sior~ Angb pvnamic Dnvina Posture Analveis- Elbow (subioct 5, lock~o~lock) 37.5% 12.51` ~1 ~0 0% 0.0% S(b - ) 4 3 2 1 (b~ Co~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-t+Lock C.1 Joint Movement DTstribution C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation elbo He on ·nglo Dvnamic Dnvino Posturr Analveis - Ele | (uni~deg ~j Freouency ~ Perrena ~(subj~S,ov~ 14~} 15 0 0 0 0% 160% s26% ., ~ ~ .~1~0 ':'=-01' ' O. . ~i '" 0.~. ' ~ ~ . \ .- 1 30~; 45QJ ., 4 ^~. . 2.356: I ~ ~ . / \ . ~ _ 27^ ~ : 1S~8% I c 30,; / \ 37^:~;~:.: ^ 2J- ~^ 1 ~ 20~. 21.~% \ :-t:~^Q ~80~J. ~ - ~ - ., ~B~; ~l / ,' 7.6~ ' ;'i's9Q.~105~l ''' ' 13 ,: ' 7~6%~^2'^ 30%· 0.0 ~o,oy. Z3~/ ~\0.0% 0.0% 105.0 130.0 ~O 0.0% 0% . I ~ ~ _~ ~I _ , 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 :> 130.0 0 0.0% Elbo. F - sbn Ang. Total 171 100 0# I Comfort Rating (u~t deg ) Frequency Percontago (Pi) Dvnamic Drivino Post re Analveis - Elbsw 1 (IOW) < 15.0 0.0% 40% 392% ~ 2'^^''-.^ ' '( 15~0~: 28~{1lI Q ~'O~ '' 3s~t 3~ . t 28;8~ 42~6J I ~, ^ - aSS:. ~i 30 ~2~. ~ ;~ 1 42$ 5B31 1 ~18 ; - 10 5~} ~ s63 n~1 1 .8 ~2~.^ ~· 5` ~ ~ ~ ; ~ n~, :es.o~ ~I ~ ^ . 29.~` ~ ~ ~O~ . ~,^ 3A ~ 8~0 a2;.~] I 41 ~240%^ ~ s%. '' 2. ~,', '' ['~S~$,~O~' ~ , ~3 ~7 ~- _ ~_ ~_ ~_ 0,0% 1 (low) > 100.0 O 0.0% 5(h~h) 4 3 2 1~) Total 171 100 0% , Condor' weighted postural comfort score · 3 9 G-59

G-II.4: Postural Comfort DYnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder l~lote: 1. Shadeu ce ts indicate results related to the comfort snoulder movement zone. 2.weighted postural comfort score = ~ ~ omJort level( Ci ) x percentu~ct Pi ) ~st A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movemont Distribution shoulder Hexion u~gb ~ FrequOnCY ~ Percenta9. <-15.0 1 0 0.0°/. _ -15.0. - 5.0 1 ^ 0, 5 -.O.8X: . I - s.o~ S13 1' 33;.~ ~ . ;:: 2Q1%^ ' ''' : [~ 5.Q;. t5.01 85~. ~:5t=L - .:. 1~15~;25.01- 27 i ~,\6.5~; : ~ 1 25.~ 35Q1 fl:~.^;: 5~^ [ 35~0. 45.0 1 5 3.0% [ 45~0. 55-01 2 1.2% 55.0 3 1.8% Total 164 100.0# Co~n Rallrig should r f exion angh F uency _ (unit. deg.) | C 1 (low) < 15.0 O 0.0% 60` . :2 - ~,_ ~0;. 1 QO% ~so`. . 3 .; 1--a^-.231 ~ ~; 1 QO% ~. 44~ _: J. ~I ·2~5. 3B1 2~.~ ^ I ~i~xl~C E 30~. S (t-~. t^ ~ 3.8~11~11 ~ .:; ~I .~;59.~% ~ · ^ ~r l&3; 22.51 215~' 1 15Z,C ~ 20~` 3 1 225. ~] 2 1 tZ,C.' 10` 2 ^ 1 28.8 35.01 ~1 15;S~L o%- _ 1 (10~) ~ 35.0 10 6. 1% Total 164 100.0% we~ghted postural comfort acore · ' ~ shoulder 11exion angle ~Fre''u. ~cy Percontage (unit deg.) <-15.0 1 0 0.0% -15.0, - 5~0 1 O 0.0% 1.5.0, 5~01 t ^ ~ ~9.1% t 5.Q 15~01 t) .: ~QO'C: [ t5.0, 25.01 0 ~ I QO'C 25.~. :15~1 2 1 182'C 35.0, 45~01 2 18.2~o 45.0. 55.01 1 3 27.36/e ~ 55.0 3 27.3~o _ 100.0# B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation G 60 SUbjeCt No.: 5 Dvnamic Drivina Posturo AnalYsis - Shouldor (subj..ct 5, oval 1a,o) _ so.~. E_ | 20.11 1; V7. ' ~ ~ -15 -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 ~_ F - ~t Arq~ . . Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis- Shoulder (subj~ct 5, oval lao) 59.1% . i 1 28.0% _ _ 5,5~, 6.t% - , ~ . 1^ . _ I ~ I 30%T 2s%t ~ 2a% cls% ~ 10% 5% 0% . eo% . 70% · . 60% ~ D 50% · . E 40% ~ u ~ 30%- ~ 20% · ~ pvnamic Drivina Posturc Analveis- Shoulder (subioct 5, lock-to~ock) 27.3% 27.3% 1e2% 18.2% 1 i0.0%,0.~.0%,0.^n,l, .15 .5 5 15 25 35 45 55 Slto_ F-~ ~ Dvnamic Drivino Posturc Analveis - Shoulder (sub~ct 5, lock-todock) 72.7% 0% ' 0.0.% ~0 0% o% S(~h) 4 3 2 1 (be) Co~ "_

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. Synthesis ~ Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution shou~dorflexion angle I F,equ~n (unit deg.) ' Percontago 34 · A .,.: ~ . .. . . 85.~4' '^" 1 ' 1 <-15.0 1 l~lS~, 5.0 I SQ 5.01: [. 5~, 15.01'-: 15~ 25.01 . 1 2s:~.3~al .. ' [ 35.0, 45~0 1 45.0, 55.0 o _ 0.0% . 0: Q.Q%~: i . 18.~% :; 6X' 1~: :., 27.: . ~ . :: tS~%^ .6.S%i. ^ . 4.0°X. , . ~ , 55.0 6 3.4% Total i 175 1 OO.OY C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Dvnamic Dnvino Posture Analvais - Shoulder (subpct 5, synthesis) 48 6% so% ~_ 4s% t /~\ 40%; /~\ 35% + / ~ ' ~ 30% t / ~ E 25% t 19.4% ~ S 20% t ~ ~ o% t 1 ~% \ 55.4% 5 -s 5 1 5 25 35 SJ~ F - xbl. ~b ·5 55 . Comtort Rating shoulder flexion ang~ ~FreqUency Perc~ntJ9e (Pi) Dvnamic Drivina P'osture Ana v is - Shoulder 1 tlOW) <-15.0 O 0.0% j 60` 55.4% . 2 ~. t -1S.O,. - ae l ~. ° °* so% ~ ~ ~ _ 3 : ~1 8.8 2.5 ~ `~. A . . 0.0% ~ 40% ~ ~ . ~ . . - ~ -25. 3.81 2Z t!.~%. C 307 ~26.9% 5~-.~ ~ 38.1631 97,. .55.~.%; ~t ~_ ~ ,;,". ~sl ~- ,4 ~t ~ ~o~ 3 :~: t ~+ 2881 2 :: ~: 1~1* '°% t ~6.3% 2 . :: . . 1 2B^.315.01 11 : '; 6 ~0% 1 - ~_ ~-1% ~_ 1 (low) >35.0 18 10.3% '' 5(h~b) 4 3 2 t(b-) Total 175 100.0% , , com~ weigt~ted posmral comfon score · 4.1 G~1

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comfort elDow rnovernent zone. 2.weighted postural comfort score = 2; ~ omtor! · Ic~ cl( G ) x percenra~c( Pr ) ,., A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to~Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution ~2 Postural Comtort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movement Di~ribution elbow flexion angb Frequenc1 Percentage (un~t: deg.) c 15.0 0 0.0% t '5.{J.: 3ILOl ~; 1. : ~ : 0.7% ~' ::^t :~:.s.~^. a; :^ ~. 2;1%. i a .~.t . ~;;O~ 0 J . B.:k^~-: . . I -^ .5.&96~: ' ::. . .{ . t;0~,';:75.O 1 ~ . - 31 ~. ;~. ;: 1^ : .2t.8~. . }~t 75CC~-o ~ . -:. 85^,'.; ;- . :- 59.9% 1 ~' . t4'':: ,l ^ ~.~C'' 1, 105.0 130.0 1 0 O.OY. 1 > 130.0 0 0.0°/0 I 1 Totd 142 100.0% comilin R_ ~elbow flex~on angb r~ww Pe~ (l~i} 1 (low) ~ 15.0 O 0.0% j40% 1 15.0 28.8 1 0 0-0% !3s% 3~. .t 2aB~425J 1 - 4. 1 2~%^^ 13o~ ~ j ~^ ~I ~;.^ #iS J t - ~0. ~·. 2s% S¢lli ~: 1 ~-775J 1 38--i. ~:: . - K. - ~ 15~ - - ,,;.~; ~:- 1 n.~ . 85~.1 5t ~.:. . ~ i. 35.~. ·o% ~ ~:~251 ~ ! - 3` ~23.sx ~s% 2~ - t =5;: 100.Q1 1 t. ! ~99% ~°% 1 (low) ,100.0 O O.OY To ~142 100.0% ~ghted postural comfort score · 3.8 bo flexion angl F wac Pe nta (unit. deg.) ~| < 15.0 1 0 0 0% 1 3s% T 15.Q 30nl O O.Q% ~30%- [ 45.0. 60 0 1 3 7.7% ~c 20% . e . t ~QO. 75 01 4, . 30.8% | u 15% · 750, ^01 at 30.8% 1 10% 7.7%: I s% [ 105.0, 130.01 O O.t)Y. o , 130.0 O 0.0% Totd 13 100.0# I Subject No.: 6 Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis- Elbow (subject 6 ovel 1aD) 59.9% SO% . 50% . / 40Y. . / 30% . / 21.e% 10% . s.eJ 0%- 0.0% 0.7%_ ~ ~ 1 9.9 - ~o o% o.o% 15 30 45 *0 75 9.0 105 130 E~ Fl~bn Anole Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvais - Elbow (subj~ 6 oval lep) 38.~ - 26.B% 9 ~. - 1 1 1 9.~ ~ , ~ ~ ~0.0% S(hlgh) 4 3 2 1 tbe) Co_ - ~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Elbow (subject 6 oval lap) B.2 Postural Comfort Evatuation . , elbow th~ion u~gie | Froauoncy - 1 ~3 O.t~/e I 07.0% 1 1 7.7%: 1 1 ,.r~ . I ... ^2% 1 TT30.8% 1 1 1 1 0~- 1 1 1 77% 1 1 I O.t~. I 1 ~ 100.0# 1 w~ghted postur l comfort score · 4.2 G~2 =1.L~ 30.e~ 30.e% =~% I ~7~ 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 E~ F - bn - - Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Elbow j (sub~ct6 lock to~lock) 1 s°% T 46.2% 45% t 40% t 1 35% t 1 ~ 30%t ~ ~ Cu 25# t ~ 1 ~ 20.% 1 15%t 10%~ 0% 1 5(~. 1 ~.S% 7.777 4 32 1 (b.' Co_I L~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution | elbo~vilex~onangh ~oqu~ncy ~ Percentage I ~Qme ~icDrivinoPosh~mAn~veis-Elb r ~ 15.0 1 0 0.0% , ~ , s7.~` 1t5.~30-0t'' .. t:~.~' 1::O.B%.- so% ~/ ~ ~ 30.0.::~::45.0J ~ ~1 -226~. ~. ~o%· / ~ :~{ 45.0,: 600:} - ?t :: ::: ~ . - 7.1% ~ 2 30%- . / \ : t ~QC, 75.01 35A^ I --22,ll% ~.. ~ / ~\ ::: ~ t ;~.0. .80.01: - :89~ : I I .: :57;~%, 'l 7 J 9.7` - I S0.o,to6.01 - 1S: 1 97#:- '°% °~°% 0.6%~' ,. l\~0.0% o.oY. 105.0 130.0 1 0 O.OY. 1 o% , 1 15 30 4s 60 7s 90 105 130 , 1 30.0 O 0.0% 1 E~ f~ - ~ - Total 155 100.0# C.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comton Rating elbov~ tle~non angh Frea,uency Peroentage (Pi) tiow) ~ lS.O _ O.OD/O 2 ^ 1: :15~,:.::2B.8 ~: : QO% . . . 3 - . ~5 - :: S~ ·.- . ~ 2 ^ 1.3%. 5 p - } l 5liS, . .775 ~ ' . 2a4% ; . . t n~5; 85.01 S5 3 . . . .: { . 8S,0. 925 ~ 34 . . . . 21 , 2 . : ...... f .9Q~.t=.o ~t5 ~. . 9.~. 1 tlow) > 100.0 1 0 O.OY Total 155 100.0# wdghted postural comfort score · 3.8 G~3 Dvnamic Drivina Posture Andveis - Elbo~v (sub'~ct 6, synthesis) 1' 3s~ + 30~ + 2e 4 -35'+ 1 1 1 s% 36.8* ~- 2s.2% s~) 43 Comb~ 2 1 (b.)

G-II.~: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shaded ce Is indicate results related to the comton shoulder movement zone. 2 weighted postural comton score = ~ comJor, le`~( Ci ) x percenta~c( Pi ) ,., A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to~Locic Subject No.: 6 A.t Joint Movement Distribution hould r exionangh (unn. deg.) < - ~ 5.0 O 0.0 ~45% ~ r 40.^ .; {-15.Q -5~0t ^ ~0 ^.~^ | Q0%^ ~40~- ~_ 1 ~i 5.0~ S.{J } i . I - 20; ~ . ~:i~4.~% :^: . 3s% ~30 - :t:;~.Q:tS.Ol ~I . "~= I ::^.30~- -2s%+ /. -1SO.25~01 S8~ ~; ^~81lC s 20~t ,~L/ . . 1~:25.0i';35.01: . ~ ~ts .' ~ . ~ . t~ 3%~ 350 45 01 1 ~ 0.7% 45~0. 55-01 1 0.7% 55.0 3 2.1Y. Total 142 100.0% ~2 Postural Comfort Evaluation ~ shouldor tlex~on angb Freauency ~- weightod postural comfort scoro B.1 Joint Movement Distribution shoulder ticxion angh (unit: deg.) ~ -15.0 l 1 1-15.0. -s.ol ~ 50. t5~] 15.0 250t 1 25.0. 35.0 1 [ 35.0. 45.0 . 45 0 55 · 550 Total B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort Rating shouldor tlexion angh (Cl) (unit dog.) (low) <-15.0 2 1-1S.O ·B.B] 3 ~ ~ t].8, 25 1 ~ . : ~1-25, 3.81 - S(h~h) 1 3~8' 16.31 . ~, -,, 1 16,:l, 22~1 3 1 ~ 28~8 ~_ 2 j t 2~8, 35.0 t 1 (10w) ~ n Dvnamic Drivina Posturo Analveis - Shoulder (subioct 6 oval lap) 1 ",s`~ .... l 11~ -15 .55 15 25 35 45 55 Sh~ f~ A~ 1 | Percentago (Pl) | 1 1 I, . o.ex ~1 1 1 1 ^ ^ QO# ~I 1' .':'38. - ,. 1 1 1 1 :: . 35^ . 1 . 1 ,,,.~.~.... 1 r:~ I 3.5% 1 0QO% 4.0 Dvnamic Drivina Posture An~veis - Shoulder (sub~ct 6 oval lap) 423% 45% ~ - 1 1 t,'3% 5% 5 (h 9b) 4 3 2 1 (b. c~ weigh~d posturaI comfon score G~4 2s% T23.1% =.1% ~s%~m 1 o% 7.~% 1 0.0% 0.0% o.oYJ ~ 1 , ,, _ ·15 s s 15 2s 3s 4s ss ~ F - x~ ~ - 15 4~ 15 4# 15 4% m Dvnamic Dnvina Posturo Analveh - Shoulder tsubpct 6 lock-to~ock) 4e -

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Syn~esis - Oval Lap and Locic-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution should exion ang e FrequencY Dvnamic Dnvino Posture Analvus- Shoulder (un't de9 ) , Percentage ( u6, syn 39.4# < - ~ 5.0 i O 0,0% 40% - ~ I .1S.Q .. 5.01 0 - .: .^ .~: ~ ~ I lI.Q'S ~35% + /\ - 1 -!;.Q. 5.01 29 . 1 i2.8%. 30% + 211.4% \ ~ 5.0~ ~l5.O]- 4¢ 1 - -28.~% ·~ 25% + / ~\ . ~6f ~ :: 1 39.4~. ~20~ + 12.9% ~12.3% 1 2S.0.-.35~0.1 t~- 1 . 12.3% I . `, .. \ 35.0. 45-01 3 1.9% ' I s" + o%~/ ~\' 9% , 9,` 3.2% .0. 55.01 1 3 1.9% '. , o.o%, o. , ~, ., , ,-~, , 55.0 1 5 3.2% ~-'s -s 5 ~s 25 35 ·5 55 ~Sho~dder F-~-- Toml i 155 1 100.0Y. ! C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort Radng shouNler Hexion anglo j F~qu~nc' Pereentage (Pi) ~ Dvnarnic Drivina Posturo Ana/vds - Shoulder (Cl) ~! (~.~.yl.~i,, (NOW) <.150 0.0% I 40~l 35.5% 2~. ~1 ~Q: o.Q%` ~ 35% 3; ~1~8;8~ 51 0- ~00% ~ 30%t ~ ,. [·25. 3.8] g 5.896 o2% ~ 5 ~^ ~ 3.8, .t8~3 l; 55 . 36.511, : ~; _ _ 4 1 1~ 51 53 . 34^e ~110% + ~7 1% 3. ;.-. 1~ 81 8 ~; 5.2%~^.;:. s~ + ~_ · 2~: . ~ ~ ~1 28.~ ~.01 19: 1~. :^ !~ ~_ , _ , _ , _ 1 - 1 (10w) ,350 11 71% Is(~) · 3 2 1(ba' ~1, co~o-~ ~ighted postural comton score ~3,8 G~5

G-II.~: Postural Comfort Dynamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate msults re~ted to the comfort e/t~ow movement zone 2.we~ghted postural comfort score = ~ ~ om/ort ievel( Ci ) x percen~aRct P.' ) A. Oval L~p A.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation B. Lock-to-l~ock B.1 Joint Mov~nent Distribution (un~t: deg.) F__lu' ~__ - < 15.0 0 0.0°~0 : 't 1~ ^3Q0] ~-8~ ' v - {j.O~ : ~ ~ 3Q~ 45.~.: 5~ ~.' ^' ' : ':': S.~.'.'~^ . ; ':: ~ ' ^0. "-01' "~: . . .: 1~ ~;- ~ ~ 75 o] - 3B-- . ^ . -.: :2Z.~% .. ~' ' ~ ~'- ~: :- : . -,- :'''2^8%:. -.: t ~Q~105~: ,~;- :^^:7mC [ 105.0, 13.0.0 1 O 0-0% , 130.0 0 O. OY. Total 159 100.0% C=lo~ R-O!~ elbow flexion angb Fr=ww ~0 1 (low) < 15.0 O 0.0°~ 2 1 1 5.0, 28.81 3 1 .9Y. 3~ -~: ~ - ~{ - ~' 42.S1~ 13 ~1 B2% { ~:56:11 t. ~&8'L , sp-, ~ 5&3~.,775'1 '- ~^e' ^ 1 ' ~ ~^ 4. ~-s^ ~^ I ~.6, B5D J ~-i~ ~; 1 2t.0~L ^ 3 ~; 1 854; ~i1 25: ^ 1 ; t5.7X, ^ 2~- ~ ~,1CQ.0] tZ' I 7;!S 1 (low) , 100.0 1 0 0 0% To ~1 1 59 1 - . - , weightod postural comfort scoro ~3.9 elbow tlexion angb (unit deg.) Frequency -;~; ~ ts.Q. 30nl [ 30.0, dS.01 l ~75D t 7s.o.. 90.01 1 go~lo5. los ~ 1 ~:n o B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation =-~= 14~1 elbo-He~aon angh ~F~ncy l ~o~ (~) 1 (1ow) c 15.0 O 0.0# 2 t is~ 2s.al <' o.o% ~ 3 1 28^ 4251 0 - o.o%~ .. .~ . t ~, -56~1 1 8.1% 5 (hl~) t S&3. 77S 1 `' ~ 9.1% 4~, t 775. ~8S.°1 3 n~ ;] 1 8!~.tt 92 - 5] 4 ~-.~% 2: t ~ 100.0 1 2 ^ tB2% . ' 1 (low) > 100.0 O 0 0% Total 11 100.0# , wdgilted poanJral comton acore · 3.4 G~6 Subloct No.: 7 j 45# T 40% 35% ! . ~ i ~22 e% I ~ 20% 1e.4~ "'°% so%s.~ ~ 5%a ~0~0%~ · e DYnamic Drivino Posn~re Analveis - Elbo~v (subpct 7, oval lap) 42.S% i1 \.5% ~0.0% 0.0% 0%- <, _, _, _, _, ~ - I' I 15 30 45 eo 75 90 105 130 B~F~ ! DYnamic Drivino Posn~re Analvais- Elbo~ (sut~ 7, oval lap) 40% 35% 30% ~ 2S% Z 20% 15% 10% 1 5% 0% . 35J~ t 30.8% 5(10) 4 3 2 1 (b.) L C~ D~namic Drivino Posturo Analvais - Elbow | (sub~oct 7, oval lap) . s3.e% E L ~ = 1 o% 1 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 1 E~ F - sbn - 9- ~% 40% 35% ~ ~ ~ I I I °'°% ' 5 (hbb) 4 3 2 1 (h~ Co_~ ~ 3e.4% 36.4%

G-II.4: Postural Con~fort c. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution ·Ibo f ~ion ·ng F oueneY Pe nug Dvnamic Dnvino Postu Analvus - Elbow (unit deg ~| (subj - 7 evu 1ao} < 15.0 0 0% s ~ tS.~ 30D 1 8 1 ~ 7% 1 35% ~/~ - {- 30G,;--4SiOl 9 ~1 ~; 53~C. - ~ ! . 30% ~/\ ^~{ ~.0,:~ 0 1 . . 28 .' ~: ~1~ I e 25% · - 212% ~ { "t},::~] . 3B:: ~.^~:: 1:.::^.~ -:21~2% ~ 20%; , ~ , \ ~''~'-.75;:' I':~^''',' - 4t%'"''' 11 10%- ~53%/ 6.2% 0Q~ 1GC-O; ~ t~ ~1 ~ &2% i s% ~00% ~l\00% oo% [ 105 0 130 0 1 0 O OY. I o% ~ ~s 30 ~s 50 7s 90 ~os ,30 , 130 0 0 O OYO ! ~F - bnAn9- Total 170 100 0% I C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation | Co ntort fining | cIbo. Hex~on ~nglo | Fn~oueneY | Percentag. /Pi) | ~Dvnamie Dnvino Po~ ~ Analvds - Elbow (Ic~w) ~ 150 00°/. 1 40#- 3ss~ 2 ~1 ;150. 288] 3 ~:18% 1 35# , 29.4% ~ 3;~- ~^ t ~.;42S] t3 A<~%; ~· 2S%; ~24.7% 4; ^ ~ ~ t ~Si~5~31 ~tS; - ;a~- I 2 20%· ~ s~ - . .... t 5iL3. 477Sl 50 ;-- .:2E~.~C .i · 15%~ , ~ ~- -~ {; ns; ~.O1 - ·6 ~:~.;Z,1% ! ,0% . ~100% 3~-.~- -{1154 9251 ~29 - I ^ 17.~% 1 s% ~· oo~ .~:.~. :. ~ ;::~;.~100~J . ~. ~: i::,::82%,^ ~o%. 1 ~, ~, _, _ 1 (10w) >100.0 O O.OY 5(?119h) 4 3 2 1(ba) Otd 170 , Co~ ~ghtod posbJral comfort scoro · 3 G~7

G-lI.~: Postural Corr~fort Dynam~c Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to me axntort shoulder movement zone. 2.we~ea postural comfort score = ~ comton Ict ci( Cl ) X percentag~ Pi ) .., A. Oval Lsp B. Lock-to~ock Subject No.: 7 A.1 Joint Movement Distribution shoulder ft~x~on angb | FrequenCY A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation shoulder fhxion angb (unit deg.) < -15.0 . ~ {~16;0;.:.~8~8 l. l 1 , 1 - [^~a~:~-2Sl. l 1. ;~;1B.3 t-'.1~3. 22 . . . .. ~ go ~- ~ 1 . 1 2a~ "~] . 1 (low) , 35.0 1 6t Total | 159 weighted postur l comfon scoro B.1 Joint Movement Distribution 2~6 ~__ =~. ~_ Per~nOgo < -15.0 0 0.0% t -15.0. - 5-01 O 0.0% -S~. 5~01 0. 1 o.o% . I S.Q. t5.01 t ^.~ I Q.1% 15.G, 25.0 1 2 -: 1 182% . t 350, 35~0l 0 - ~ 0.9% [ 35~0. 45-0 l 1 9.1% [ 45.0. 55.01 2 18.2Y. > 55.0 5 45.5% Total 11 100.0% B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Dvnamic Drivino Posture Andveis - Shoulder (subioct 7, oval lap) 20% ~ le2'L '7 6% ''~ I'lIin%'l~ 15 -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 _r P-xbn-- Dvnamic Drivino, Posture Analveis - Shoulder (sub~ct 7, ovd lap) 3e.~% 40% 35% 30%- · 25.~% Es~. i, 1 , I . I , SthI9b) · 3 2 1 ~, Condo~t ~1 Dvnamic Drivino PoStu~ Analvsis- Shoulder (subject 7, lock-to~ock) s°% T ·s%t .~ + . 35~ ~ ° 30% ~/ 320% ~o~o% 0.~ 0.~.~, 15 5 5 15 25 35 45 55 ~_ F - xbn Anole Comfort Rating should~ t-xioll ~- Frequenct Pereontage (Pi) Dvnamic Drivino Posturc Analveh - Shouldor (Cl) (unit dag.) (subject 7, locl ~ock) 1 (low) <-15.0 0 0.0% 2. - ~ -1S.0, - 8.81 0 . : O.OX 3 : ~ -8.8, -2Sl O . 0.~% *, .~ . 1 -25 3.81 0 ~ -; ~: 0.0% . , 5(10) ~ 3~8. 163~. ~:~ ..1~, . 4 :^ ~ 1 16.3. 22.51 ~2 1~25: 3 : [ 225, 28~81 O. ~: O.Q%: . 2 . 1 28.B. 35.01 O - . :: Q0% 1 (10w) > 35.0 1 8 72.7Y. , Total 1 11 100.0% . ~ightod postural comton scoro · 1.9 ~8 L eo 70%+ 60%t ~ ~ so% t E 40% t =%l _ I le.2% ~ t 9.1% _ ~o% t _ ~0^ o ~ o~ 1 - , - , , 5 (h - ) 4 3 2 1 (10~) o o'L o.o~ ComloR 1~1 7Lr~

G-II.4 Postural Comfort C. Synthesi. - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint lUovement Distribution . _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~Perl-oge ,Dvnamic Driv~na Posture Ana v is - Shoulder , <-15.0 i O 0~0% 2 ~' [-1S.Q -5.Q1 0. . . | . ~Q'; . ,~% + , ~'e.s~ ~ 5,0, 5'.0l ' 1 17'-' 1 100% ~D '2- ~',0 ~1 1 ~_ :: . 1.15~0, 25~01. 31 :- . I 1 1i8~6~.: ~,°% t / : : 1'25.0. 3S.01 28: ;':' ' 1 .:16~' [ 35 0' 45-0 l 20 11.8% 4% + ~ 45.0, 55.0 1 19 11.2% I OY. t , , ~ , ~ , , , ~ , ~ , ~ > 55.0 1 30 17.6% ' 15 -5 5 15 2s 35 _ Total | 170 | 1 OO.OY , S _ fleabn- C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comfort Rating (Cl) shoulder tleX'on ~ng~e ~ FrequenCY Pereentage (Pi) 17.e% 45 55 j ,Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvds - Slloulder (subject 7, aynth~is) o~4 ~. .,~,~ - , ,. i . .2 .:~_, ,, . . . ,,,,..,. , ~ ,,,~ 1 (IOW) _ O.OYo 0.0%~:", - 1QQ%~^. 14.7'C; 15.3~ _ .~2.9~L :: _ ''.'.' :~1~ 69 40.6% ! 170 100.0% ~gh~d posmral comfort score · 2.6 G~9 45% ~ 40% + 3s% + , 30% ~ c 2s%~ ~_ ~ t 14.7% ~ ~ 15,Ve. ' _ _ 10%- ' ~ ~ 5%. ' _ _ 0% ~ - 1 - 1 25:~% 5 ~911) 4 3 C~ 40.e% lets% 2.9% 2 1 (b~

G-I! 4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note 1 Shaded ce Is ind cate results re~ted to B,e comfort elbow movement zone 2 we~gntea postural comfort score = ~ c`'mJnrt level( Ci ~ x pcmcurag~ Pi ) ..! A. Oval Lap Subject No.: 8 A.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution . elbow tlexion ulglo Frequency Percentago (unit deg ) c 15.0 3.6% 1 1 3s% ~30.~% ': t ~15;0~ 0] I t7.'.:~' : ' 10i3% ~30%~ . - s ~^ t 3Q0~e 45~01 10 ~ s ~6~1% ~j 2s% ~20~11 ~ ~ t~45o~ (~ )l 34 ~:i ' ~°;^ ~E 20 ~\ .. :~.'{ l;04:.;77;.01 ~ - . ti1.~^ . i ~30.48%:: 1, ~ ~s% 30.3% / \ ~ {.75.0; ~:.90.~71 ~- 48.~.;. ! :27.~; ~I ~ ~o% / \6 %/ \ ;^. I ~QtO6~1 I - t :.| --:~.B~! ~s%. .3e%/ ~o~ oo% o.o% 105.0, 1300 1 O0.0% 1 0% ~ ~ ~ ~ 35 30 5 75 0 105 130 > 130.0 Oo,oo/ I -_Rexbl~-11 Total 165100 0# A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comfort Rating (Cl) 1 (low) 2 .:~^,:~:~.~.. ' . . `.,:;,..,:. S 0ibt4' m.,,, .: 3¢' : 1 (low) B. Lock~to-Lock | Dvnamic Dri~na Posture Analveis - Elbov, | (subject 8, oval lap) 35% 1 . elbow tlexion angh (unit dog ) · '5/) 15~ 2B~ . . ' ~ ": 1 21~;':-4251 :. .. ::. ('-~.~. 56~ 1 , ,, , ~ . #~ , 7rS 1 ': ' ~ '77'~5, '85 4) 1 -: ~ ~;:. ~Z5 1 .: [~,':1'=.0 > 100.0 Total Frequency Peroontage (Pi) 36°J. 12 73Y . 12~: :'7~ i: l 24 ~.14~% I _ "d 2 '"'' ' '~C 1 28 ^~ 15 gX ;~- l 1 i 20 ~t2,U; 1':;'^':~::.' . '':'0. o 0.0% 1 165 100 0% ! ~ighted posturd comfort score ~3 9 B.1 Joint Movement Distribution 40% 38.B% 35-A 30% · 25% t 20% 1s% 0% s% o% . 8.2 Postural Comtort Evalustion i elbo. tlexion angh (unit dog ) . · 1 5 0 I 1" [ 28^ 425 . _ l "5 5631 56~ ns 1 77$ ssn , 1 85Q 9251 1 1 1 "S.100.01 1 1 , 100 0 1 1 Total ~ightod postural comfort scor ~3 2 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveh - Elbov, (~ 8, ov~ lep) 303% _ _ '9.4% |s ~ ~ 7.` t · · · · _ S(bJ9b) 4 3 2 1 tb-' C~ L~ Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvais - Elbo~v (sub~ct 8. ovel bp) 60% ?22% 222'L , . _ _ !.o%/1 .o%/~.o-..o.o%o.o% _ , . ,, _ , ~ , _ , ~, , 5 30 45 eo 7s 90 10s 130 E~ Flesbn - 9 - 35% . 3 t=L 33:~% 30% 2s% 20% 15% % 5% 0~. ~11.1% ~ ~ ~ ! I ~ I ~ I ~ 0.0% S(h~th} ~ 3 2 1 (b-) Cos_t ~1

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movoment Distribution . Ibo tle on ·ng I Fr uenc (unit deg ) eq ~Percen~ge < 150 6 34°/O .., ^ ^ :1: ::15.0, :. 30.0 ~: ~_ ~2.~: ..... . ^ [ 30, ~01 ^ 10. ~ :::.^ ~:.::- 1 . 2~- :~-^ ~ :45.~.~60.01 -: 3G,:;~:. t -: 2D.~,C^ E 15% -~. t .~:.?5.01 s, ^^^: . : ^: ~: 29.3~: ~ ~ 10%- -^t ;7~0 :90.01 4~^~. ~.~ ~ :. ~:~ n.~; ~, . . . :{.90~.105.01 t .-: :^: IJ.6% ::~ .. [ 105 0, 130 0 1 0 O. OYo , 130 0 0 0% Total 174 100 0# C.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comtor' Rating elbow Hexion - 9 ~Frequ.'nCY~ Percen - 9. (P') 1 (IOW) < 15 0 3 4% ;,- " ~. ~ - ~ J51t 288J - t5 ~1 ~" .^ .` . ; ^ .~. Nt :=;8.^~.`.25 ~t' ' ;: ~ :: 8.01~: s `~u ~t ..s. ;56 11 z - ~ j ~ t4~- s ~ ~3; 773 1 65~r ~i ~37il% ~r;- l n~ 6.01 2~,~ . j ~416~t% 3~ ; ~1 ;85~0; 925 l 2O ~I tt56% 2 ~ ~; I 612^ t OO l S ~A . ~I ~ 0~; 1 (IOW) , 100.0 O 0~0% Total 174 100 0# weigt~ted postural comfort acore · 3 9 G-71 30% r 25% 35# ~L ~ 25% E. 20% · 1 5% 10% Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Elbow (su~ ~ ov~ lap) 29.3% _27.5% ' 1 1 5 30 45 60 75 90 E~ F-abn Ang~ 20.7% 12.~% / , L]L t 0.6% o o% o.o% _ , 105 130 Dvnamic Drivina Posture Anaivais- Elbo~r (subioct 8~ aynthede) 37.4% 30~5% 1 9.5% o% -- l - ~ l. co~oa ~ 5 (h~h} 4 1 (ba)

G-11.4: Postural Comfort Dynamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note 1 Shaded ce Is indicate results related to the corntort shoulder movement zone 2 weighted postuml comfort score = ~ c`'m!or, Icvel( C' ) x percenra~c( Pi ) A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to~ock B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation .. Comton Radag shoulder tlexion anglo (Ci) (unit deg ) ow) <.15.0 2. f-1S.O. - B.8} 3 1 8^ 2S1 . 4. ,^ - ~ - 25. 3~ 1 S (high) ~ 38, t~31 `, . ~ -t6~3. 2~] 3 1 2o 5 28~8 ; 2 - ^ 1 2a8 3 1 (low) , 35 0 Total A.1 Joint Moverne~nt Distribution A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation ~houlder flexion angb Froquency Percontagc (unit deg ) < -15.0 ~0.0°/ 25% - 1~15~0~5~0] ~ -o ^ ~ ~O~o~t~> tO A . . ~ ~6. t~ . . 20% ~-1 24;;s ~I t4 - ° 15%· ~ =~ !~ I - -25 ^~- 1 15~ U o% r r 25¢ 3Sel -: ! ~3o ~s^ ;: I t8 !~- - ^ ~ [ 35-0' 45-0 1 1 4 8 5°/. s% [ 4s.0e 55-01 23 13 9% 0` > 5s.0 39 23.6% Total 165 100 0# 1 Comfort Rating shouldor tlexion angle Frequency Pereentago (Pi) (Cl) (unit deg ) - - 2 { -1&0. ~ 8 B 1 0 - 0 0% ~ so 3 -^ ~ 1~-a8,,_251' -^ 0 Q~X:; ~. 35# 4; ':~^ 1-25. 3-8t 4.^ .~;. ^ 2~* ' 25 s~.:,. ~ . ;~.::.~"~: ' - ^1~:^ 1 4~ ^ ~ ~23^- ~ 127!~L; 1 ~ ~s%- 3 ~1 22 S~ 28 8 ] ^ ~2~%,~ ~s% ; z:. ^: : r 28;8, 35~0] 30; 18X 1 o%- _ 1 (lov,) ~ 35 0 76 46 1% Total 165 100 0# 2.4 . Total 165 weigh~d postural comfort score B.1 Joint Movement Distribution wdgl~ted postural comfort score · 1 6 G-72 _ Subject No 8 Dvnamic Dnvino Posturo Anal~is - Shoulder (sub~ct 8' oval 14} ·~ . ~ 1. \ 13.9% ~ \5%~ ~ ~0.0%,O.~tltI' .1,1,1. -15 -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 1 ~_~- Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder (subioct 8, oval lep) 48.1% 18.2% 18.2% 1 _ 1S2% _ - ~2.4% ~ 5 (h - ) 4 3 2 1 tl~) CondoR L ~_ 50% ·5% 40% 35% ° 30% C 2S% ; 20% % 0% 5 .~ 0% Dvnamic Drivina Posturo Analvsis - Shoulder (subject 8, locl`-todocic) so.o% To.o% 007. °~°%~\,°°w,/ I ~ 1. ~ ·15 5 5 15 25 35 45 55 Sbo~dd. f~dce ~Ang~ Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvds- Shoulder (subioct 8, loc~o lock) 7o.o% 7o%- . _ 60%- . ·° ~o% ~ 1 ' _ 1 ~ =%- . _ 20.0% _ 20%. 10.0% ~0% I ~0.0% 0.0% · - 5 tN - ) 4 3 2 1 ( Comb~ L~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution shoulder ticxionan9~ ~F eq ~ncy ~ Percentage Dvnamic Drivino Posture Anal~is-Shoulder (unit: deg ) ~ u ~(subioct 8, s~n~h~is) <-15.0 ! ° o.o% ~30%T .- . t-15,0 5.~l - O . QQ96~: 25` { 5~0,.15.0]; .~0_ . .. 14.338. . ~14.3% 143% 13.7% .;.:.t::15.0. 25;0J 25.- A i . 14,3g5 ~. ~_ ~s t . ~: 1 :2~0~:3~1 32~.: ~. 18.3 ~I °% t s7: 0 1 15 86% s%t 450 550 ~1 24 ~13.rb ~, o.o% °~°~ ~L 55.0 44 25.1% -,s s s is 25 35 To~l j 175 100.0# Sho~ F~xbn - - C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation 25.~% 45 55 Comfort Rating shoulder flexion angle | F ogu~ncy Percentage (Pi) ' Dvnamic Drivino Posture Andvsis - Shoulder (Ci) (unit deg ) ~I (subject 8, s~h~} 1 (10W) ~ -15.0 O 0.0°/ 1 50% T 47.4% : . 2 ^.: ~ ~1 -15,0. - a8 1 0 - ~ . o 0'C ! 40% · 3 . . ~ ~. ~ .; .; `: S.8. 0 : Qo'` A 1 35% · ~^ ~1 -2~5. .3.81 ~4 ~2~356~~ 1 ~ 30,, . 501igb) ~1 38. 16~1 3t~.- 17.~.: I ~ 25%1 47 - 18.3% ~ ~- ~^ '-'::'-:.~ ~ t 16;3, ~ ~1 2t'- Y . 1~0'C; I " ls% t ~· ~ . ~.: ~ ~:: t:?~: 2831 ~ ~2= ~ ~s 1 ~2.3% . . 1 1 :32. - : t 8~, . % 1 ~ ~ _ _ , _ (low) , 35.0 83 47.4~ s (hbh) 4 3 2 1 (b.) T.W 175 100.0% , Condortl~l w~gh~d posmral comton score · 2 ~ G-73

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analysis- Elbow Note 1 Shaned cells indicate results related to the comfon elbow movement zone 2 weighted postur~ comfort score = ~ ~ omJort level( Ci ) x percentaRct Pi ) ,.' A. Oval Lap 8. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution Percentag. 0.0°/0 8 ~ 1 1 - 4 tZ~ ~ ~ 1 t~ ~ 9 56; ?~ ~ ~ 1; 3t~5%~ 63 ~ ^ ~-.31;A% 33 ' 18~% ' .~..,.,,.,.. ~:. O.^,... O 0.0% O 0.0% 178 1000% _ A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation _ Comtort Rating elbow flexion angh Frequency Percentage (Pi) (Ci) (unit deg ) (low) ~ 15 0 O 0 0°/O i 2 [ 150 2881 2 1 t% l ... . . 3 [ 28~8e 4251 tll ~I 1 ;^ 1~ t ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ZSi 56i,3 ~23 ~-- | t 2~8% 5(~P1-^ ~ #~-:77SJ tOO^+ 1 ^S~ - ~ -~< ~ "6 8501 28: .~, ~t5;7'C~ 3 ~i~ ~f 950; 92Ji1 ~ I 1 28%;; 2; ~l ~25.~1=ol 1- ^ I ~0~ 1 (low) , 100 0 0 O. OYO ~- Total 1 t78 100 0% I elbow tlexion angle Frequency (unit deg ) < 150 0 :1 ·sn:.=1 ~1~ · I ~4SO, "01 : : U :1.~.~0~: ~:,:.:'12'^75.~' 90~:' . . ~ =0. 106~i J ( 105.0. 130.0 > 130.0 Total . elbow flexion angh (unit deg ) . 15 n ~ghted postural comfort score B.1 Joint Movement Distribution B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Subject No.: 9 Dvnamic Driv~ino Posn~re Analveh" Elbow (subject 9, ov~ bp) ! 4 ~ elbow tlexion ~ng~e | FreouenC`, ~ Percent89. ! 1 weighted postural comfort ecore · 3 3 4~T 35% 30% · E 20% ~/ ~ 15% ~90% ~o~o% - 3S.4% 31.S.s. . . .. ~` L I ~ ~, . . _ s 60 7s 90 ~os ~30 ~ Reabn ~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Elbow (subpct 9, oval bp) 6~ ~ s6 2% so`. ~ - ` · 28 7% · ~ ` ~ ~,35% o%~ 17% o.o~ s~, 4 3 2 ~ ~be' Com~o~ ~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais- Elbow (subioct 9, oval bp) . ~ SqL o% 1 ' I - I ' I I ~1 ~s 30 4s so 7s 90 ~os 130 Elbo. F~s~ "o~ i 30 4` Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Elbow (subpet 9, lock-to-lock) 4o% T 3s% + _ 30` + ~273% 27 3` s%T ~ ~ · · o.^ 5 (h o co~

G-II.4: Postural Con~fort C. Synthesi~s - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution eIbow tlexion anglo (unit deg ) Frequency ;'::t' dS.0,...~.01' ' .,'' '! ., 30.0, :. 45.01 : t dSO., ~l : . .^-. t: - ;0, ' - 0 1 '1<i'~1' ~W, J= :, 1: ~ fUS~] >1300 o Total | 189 C.2 Postural Comtort Evalustion Comfort Rsting elbo. Hexion angb Frequency Perecntage (Pi) (Ci) Cunle d=.} 1 (10w) . ~ 5 0 O 0.0% 2;-; ~: I ~ ~=] I ~ 5. ~.~i~: - ~ -; z-:. ~ 3= o · . ~20I ~ ~ | ,A . ' . ~ 0~ _ ~ ^. t 42~. "~l ~ ~; . ~ :t~ 5~. ~ ~ "5 :~, ~ - .: 101 ~. ~% . .. ~! : 32 ~ ! :: t6 $~% 3.~:- . . ~ m:o ~ ~ ~ r .. ~ ~&~^ . ~; . . _j, . .: ~ . .: . I : os% :. . . (~) . 'wo 0 o.o% ~1 189 100 0% ~ghted postural comfort score · ~ 3 G-75 . . I Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Elbow Percentage j (sut~ject 9, ov~ lap) ' 33.9% · : . 63~i: ~3s~ ; 29.0%' \ 9034 ~' 25% ~/ ' 20.6% .. ~'.,31^ 1 C20% ~/ \ .:::':2O.4)% I ~'o% , 9.0% \ , 1" ^'~',20,5%'-'':"2 ~s% l0.0%,J, I, ~ \0.5-. o,o% o.o% 1 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 0.0% 1 Elb~-Renbn ~nole 100.0% l _ . ! Dvnamic Drivina Po~ure Analvais - Elbow I (subj~ 9, sy~) i I so% j E" 30` 32~. , 0` , ~ _ 53.4% . _ 29.1% 1 ~ 14.3% 5 (h - } ~3 C~oa o.o% 1 (b-)

G-II.~: Postural Comfon Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shaded ce Is indicate results relatea to tt~e corntort shoulder movemont zone. 2.weighted postural comfort score = ~ comJor, Ievei( C' ) x perecntage( P.' ) ,., A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Movement Distribution Shoulder flexion ~ngle | FreqUency (unit dog.) I A.2 Postural Comtort EYaluation should rfoxionangh enc (unit: dog.) Frequ 1 < -15.0 . ~ ' ~ ·1~ 8.B ]' . -. f -8~..~.25 1 :: t-23 ^3~1 '~. ' . '; ( ,1'" :.22 6'1 . ' ~ :~,::.~. . . [':~..::~-0 1 ' > 35 0 weightod poatural comfort score B. Lock-to-Lock B.1 Joint Movement Distributlon hould r flexion angle (unit. dog.) F~wil" ~9~, -15.0 O 0.0°/. -15.0. ~ 5.01 a o.o% 1-5~0' 5~01 0 0~0% S.Or. 15~01 2 .. 1~71L 1 15.0,:: 25.01 ~4 .. 33~3% 1 25.Q 35D1 t W'L _ O 0.0% [ 45.0. 55.01 O O.OY 55.0 5 41.7~o Total 12 100.0% B.2 PoSfEural Comtort Evaluation shoulder flexion angh (unit deg.) . -15.0 -8.~ -2~1 -25. 3~1 - ',3.8, 16.31 . . ( t&~ ".51 1 22~, 2sa1 . '2a8. 35.0 > 35.0 Total . . l Froquor~cy Peroentago O 0.0% O. ' :: 0.0% O ': . .0.0%. O .:: ::'0.0%~ 2' - ' ' 115.7% 4 ... ,~ - O QQ% 1 : ' a3% 5 41 7~. weighted poa~ural comfort acor ~2.. G-76 SubjeCt No.: 9 Pvnamic Drivino Posturo Anolvsia - Shoulder (subpct 9, oval lap) 30% . . ~% . ~`'~21- .~,1,1,~, -15 S 5 1S 2S 35 45 55 Sh~ flex~ ~- 1 2S.4% 1 8.2%/ . Percontage (Pi, 0.0% .,: :., 0~,... ,- -,1.1%,; :,.,.,^,: t.~.... ^ :; ::18^i .. ~' :i8. - C;,: ':.:':: 2=C.'.: .., s 2S.~'C 35.4% . 1 00.0# 1 Coador 2~6 '? '% ,Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveia ~ Shoulder (subject 9, ov~ Ia,o} 40% 35%4 ~_ 30% 1 26.0% ',2,,~, 1 1 33% 1 1 (hI9b) 4 3 2 1 (b.) Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder (subioct 9, lock-to~ock) 35.4% ·5% . 40%- , I .~-~ ~ -15 5 5 15 2S 3S 45 55 . Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subject 9, lock-to~lock) 41 7% ~! 333% Is-~e 1 00% .,~ 1 S(hI9h} 4 3 2 1 (b.)

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesi~ - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution shoulder tlexion ang~ j FrequenCYPercontago I pvnamic Drivino Posturo Analv~s - Shoulder (unit: deg.) I I (9ub~ct 9, s~) < -15.0 j O 0.0% 1 25% ~244% :- [-'S.Q-~] 3~- ~1.&%::. ~·92~/ \ ~ .5.Q: 5.01: 7 1: 3.6Y. . 11 20%t ~,5s~/ , ,e,% ~'' ~ 5.0, 15~] ~, j ~S.5%'' ~-15% ~12.4% 1 15.~;.25;03 37; · ~19~ . . | ~o'; ~/' ~ \~3 ./8 A :[ 2tiQ.35~. - 47^ ~: 24.~% ~11 / 135.0.4s.01 31 16.~% ~s%+ _% ~ ~ ~ ~ 45.0, 55.01 ,4 7.3% 11 o.o%~, - , - , , , - , - , - , ~ 55.0 1 24 12.4% ! ls s s ~s 25 35 ,5 55 , Sho~ Fl~xbn Angb Total ! 193 100.0# I C2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Cl=IO~ R~q should fl xiona ~ (unit deg.) ~~~ ( ~ (low) ' <-15.0 0.0% 2 ~ - ~`~:. 1.15,0,-~81 1. ~os% ~ :: : - 1 8~8. -2~51 ^ 2 ~-: t.o% :~ .:> .~::. I-2.S, .3~81 - 2. ~1.Q% 5~) . ~ :~8 163] 35 :. 18.t~ 4 :, : .. ~ .: .; - ~ 10.' ~1 ' =.- ' 1.7.'1~: . . ~ :., ~ -. .~ . . ,: .: 1 ~ ~ . "~'1 .4 ,,,- ., . . :~1% . :' 2 ' :;.: ~: ~ 2~^=Q1-: - . ~:- 2~% . . . ~.. 1 (low)> 35.0 69 35.8~o To~l 193 1 t)0.0% . wdghtod postur l comfort acore · 2~6 G-77 pYnamic Dnvino Posture Anaiveis- Shoulder (subloct 9, sy~is) 40%, 3s%t 24 9% 18.1-~ 18'% ~ 5~ 31% 5 thigh) 4 3 C~ 35.8% 2 1 tb.)

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note 1 Shaded ce Is indicate results related to the comfort e'now movement zone 2 weigt~ted postural comfort score = ~ ~ omJort le~ ci( Ci ) x percenta~d Pi ) 05' A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution elb tl xion angl Frequ ncy (unit deg ) ~ < 150 4 ~ - 15 0 30 0 ] n.:i 300 4501 t~ ^ -t 45;O 6001 65~^ ~60~ 75 t} 1 6t ^'~ . ^ ~ ~751L ;90~ 1 t2: ' : ~ =~21~1 ' ' ~.;~: ': 1 05 0, 1 30 0 1 0 , 1300 0 1 Total | 188 A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation weightod postural comton scoro ~41 B.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow tlexion angh (unit deg ) Frequency <15.0 1 15Q 300] 1 30.04 ~s.o 1 . [ 45Q 600 ~ 600, 750 I 7S.0, ~ 90.0 so.o,toenl t105.0.13OO1 , > 1300 l Total | 9 . B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation _ Percentage 2.1% j35` t4 4% ^~ : :^ ~Q.t ~25% 34-~% E 20% . :::~':.::32.~96. ^- ~ 15% .^ ·:64%: :. ~ 10% " ' '~ 0.09C,. ~; - - ~ 0.0% 0.0% _ 1000# , weighted postural comton score ~3 4 Subject No.: 10 30% s% o% Dvnamic Drivina Posturc Analvais - Elbow (subioct 10, oval lap] 34.6% ~= 5 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Elbo. F - xbn Anll~ Dvnamic Drivina Posturc Analveis- Elbow (subject 0, ovel Iap] so.o% so% , _ 4s# _ 40% . ~ 35# . _ i ~ 30% _ E 25% ~22.9% 5# ~ 0%- ' _ _ _ 6.9# s% ~ ~ ~ ~ 2.1% hbb) 4 3 2 1 (k - ) Co~o~ L~l 3s% ~L Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Elbow (subjoct 10, ovel Isp] . . . i 15 30 4s 60 75 90 105 130 E~ Flenk~n "g~ Qvnamic Drivina Posturo Analveis ~ Elbow (subject 10, lock-todock} ao% . so , 40# . i · 222% - 20% · 11.1% · 11 1# 0~- ' · ~· · oo% S - 9b) 4 3 2 1 (b.} Co_t ~1 ss.e%

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. SynU,esis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution , elbo tlexionan h DvnamicDnvin Po tu An Iveis-Elbow 9 Frequency Percentage 10, ovel I p (un~t deg) I 3~0% ~ ~ 5 ~2.0% 1 35% - ~31.0% ^ ~ 15Q 30~)] 1 -~ ~ 152X ~, 30% · . / ~ ;: 30 0, 45,0 1 22 ~ ~1 1; tl2'C 2s% , 1 \ --^:~.1 .45~.^.6O.O.l 67"~.:' . j:~':''>34.0'i''i I c 20%- 15.2% 1 \ -; t BQ Q ^~!; O l 61 -~< ~l ! ~3~. - ~ | ~ 5% ^/ \' ~ .2# \ ~- t3 ~1 669C^~ ~10~. '/ 6.6Y. ; - ~ ~ ~; 105 0 ] ~ 1 ~ ~0,~, ~^ I s% - :~ ° ~·\° °~. ° °% ° ° [ 105 0 130 °1 0 0.04/ 1 0% ~ ~ ~l ~, _, ~, ., . 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 , 130 0 O 0 0% s~ P - sbn an9 - T0ta1 197 100 0# 1 C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation (CI} | cibov~fhYion~ ~gh ~Fn~auency |P=eenug6 (Pi)| I DvnamicDrivina Posture Analveis-Elbo~v (TOW) ~ 15 0 2.0% ~50# ~48.7# 1 150 28~8l ~,4 ~; ~1% ~ 1, 40#; ~; : ~36 ^~; i t8~1C ~35% . .~ ~: . t es :~1 34.~5; - ~ 17.3% I ~ 30# · 223% t;~- 1 56= 7751 -~; 487'~C , ~ 20%- ~19.8# 4~ ^^.-;'. . ' .' 't''"~,. ~.01 ' .~O'.'.; : "'::.':,::,',~,1%,~,: I ~ 15%- . ~ a.~A<;. ~ ~ 1~51 3 ~<.~; ~ . : :t~X`: 1 5 - ~- 2.0# 2.;w ~t 9254100~] 0~ : ~:~^ O.Q~C 1 # _ _ _ _ , _ , (,Ow) , ,00.0 O o o% ! s ~h-) . 3 2 1 (lo~ Total 197 100 0# I co_n ~ghted postural comton score · 41 G-79

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shaded ce Is indw:ate results related to ~e comfort shoulder movement zone. 2.weighted postural comfort Score = ~ comJi~rt Ievelf Ci ) x percenta~c( P! ) ... A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution A.2 Postural Comton Evaluation Comton Rating ~ _ _ _ ~ _ ~ _ 3 1 (low) ~ - ~ 5.0 0.0% i { -15,0, ~ 8~1 O . :O.O'C 3. I-8~-2~1 t 1 1; Q5'C~ il': , l -2~, 3.8] ; 8 ^ ; ~1 32~: S^lh) :^ 1 31t 1~31 32v ~;17 ~, i- ~^ ~ t8~ 22~51 ~1 ~·;~^ ~ 1^- ^ 9 -- ].^ ; 1 22.S; "~1 ^; 3 ~ 1 ^1.6 ;Z ~ 28~8. =01 3S; 1 ;:18:~'C 1 (low) > 35.0 93 49.5% Total 1 B8 100.0% ~ght~d postural comton score ~2.3 shoulder tlexion angh | Freaue ~c~r Peroontage < -15.0 0 0.0% t-15.0. - 5-0 1 0 ~0.0~. t - 5~0. - 5~0 1 0 QO'C S.Q t5~0 1 O : O.O'C -15~0, 2S.01 1 ;- ~1 a3% - 25,0. 35~01 0 ~0.0% 35.0, 45 01 1 8.3Y. 45.0. 55.01 5 4t.7.h > 55.0 5 41.r/o Total 12 100.0% Comtort Rating should rtlexion 9 ~p ~- ~,j~ (Ci) ~ (unn. deg.) _ 1 (law) <-15.0 O O.OYO 2 { -1S.0. 8.8 1 O ~0.0% 3 1 ~ 88 - 25 1 0 Q0% - 2.5, 3.B 1 Q . 0.0% . 5'~) [~·~ 183} ,,:: O : ~, .:0.~% ,^. . [ 16~-2251 ~ 1 ~8.3% . 3 1 22~5. 2R81 0 O.Q%; 2 ~1 28~8. 35.01 Q ~0,0% 1 (law) > 35.0 11 91.r/. _! 12 100.0% ~igh~d postural comfort scom · 1.3 G-80 B.1 Joint Movement Distribution B.2 Postural Com~fort Evaluation SUbj6Ct No.: 10 Dvnamic Drivina f~osture Analveh - Should~r (subjoct 10, oval bp] 25% . Z 20% 18.- A lS% ~112% 112%/ \149 ~'o`. ; ~I. 1 ~ ~1 -15 5 5 15 25 35 45 55 ~ P-sbn 50# 45# 40# 35% ° 30# E X# 20# 5# 0% s% o# Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis- Shoulder (subioct 10, ovel l~lO1 49.5% 21 5 (high) 4 3 C~ L~ . 17.0% 18. 2 1 (b~ Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis- Shoulder (subioct 10, lock-to~ock 145% T j40% + 35% t · 30-~ ~ 25%+ I g20%t I ".s~.t 1 ,0~l I sw t °°% °°% °°% 00#)'00#~ ' 8.3% 8.^ ·1.7% 41.7% 5 55 15 25 35 45 55 Sho~d" flenbn Ang. | ,°°# T 1 ~+ 1 80% + 1 70%1 1 ·° ~l | E 50% + 40% t 30% + ~t t oo~ o% Dvnamic Drivino Poen~ Analvsis - Shoulder (sublect 10, 1ock~ock] 01.7% 1 5(~) · 3 2 1 ~ wn~ ~

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. Synthes~s - Oval Lap and Locic-to-Lock C.t Joint Movemont Distribution should rtl xion gte Dvnamic D vina Postu An v le-Shou d r (un8~: d~g.) Frequency Percentage (subioct 10, syneheus} <-15.0 O 0.0% 2s%. 24.0% ;: 1-15.4-5.01 t7 - ~ . 0.5%' x,%' 17.5 ., . ~/ \14.5 t 1~Q. 2~01 2t ^~ ~11.~C',', ~·r~ + 8.5# ~tiii ~' I'=OP''=~.~A ~,~,;, 17-~. 1350 4501 29 14.5°/. s~.i J~ · · · ~ _ 27 13.5% ~0.0% 0.5 ~I · I · I · > 55.0 48 24.0°/. ·1s -s s ~s 2s 3s 45 5s Sho~ P-~ An'- Total 200 100.0% C2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comfort Rating (Cl) shoulder tlexion ang~ (unit: deg.) , . F~_~ Pe~ . 0 0.0°h ~ . ,A ., ~ 0% I ~i .. : . ~ - 8.8. - z5 ~t :: 0~% 6 ~: 3 0% . 32: ~16.0% tg^:^: 95%~ 3 . 15% 35 r t75* 104 52.0Yo . 200 1 OQO# < -15.0 :: [-15.0.-8~1 weightod postural comfort score ~2~2 G-81 Dvnamic Drivina Poen~re Analv is - Shoulder (su~ ~o, "~) 60% , 40` 1 E 30% t 20~ t 16.0% ·2.s% _ 1 10%; ~ ~ z~ ~ 1 ~1 - , - , _, _, _, 17.s# s2.0% 5(h~h) 4 3 co~ "_ 2 1 rlom

G-II.~: Postural Comfon Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note 1 Shaded cells indicate results related to the comfort e'now movement zone 2 weightee postural comfort score = ~ ~ omJorr ie~ eit C' ) x percentaCc( Pi ) .., A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to-Lock - Missing Subject No.: 1 A.1 Joint Movement Distnbution A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation | e~boev t~e~cion ·ngh ~Frequen~Y Pen onlage 12~ tic Drivino Posturo An Iveis - Ell Q < 150 1 0 00% ~60# T s4e# . _ ^ [ 15 0. 30 0 } 7 ~^;- 5 ~I so% ~/ \ t 3QQ .45~01 ~23 . . ~19;3% ~ 40% · . / \ _ 65;.~ ^ 54 ~^ I ~ 30% . r / \ . t ^604. 75~, . =.,:: . ~. 18~6~i . ~19.3# 18.5# .75;~0e 90~1 ~2^ . 1~J%^ ~/ :~-. - ,~1~1: ~o~^ . 0.~:: ~1~- 5. ~_ \1.7# oOy. o.~ O.o# 105.0. 130-01 0 O.O~o ~1s 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 > 130.0 O O.OYo ~Elbo. F - xba Ang~ Total 119 100 0% I Comfort F'sting | elbr~r Hoxion ·n9l. Frequency ! Pen ontag. (Pi) | Dvnamic Dr~vino Postur ~ An Iveis - Elbow 1 (1avv) < 15.0 O O.OY tI45% T _ 2 l 15 0 28 8 ] 4 3.4# ~40% ~36.~% 3 - ~[ 28~i ;;4251 ~18s 160%;; I . 30% 4 ~: l ~ 425i .5B 3l: 41~: :. ~: 34S% ~I E 2s~ . ~ ~- ~- { "= 7~J 5: ~4~5% !~ 20~- _ _ ,6.0* 3 ~1 ~[-'0'~] 2''"." 1 OO%~:~ 1 ~'5S%lt ~11 3 1(10W) ,loo.o 0 o.oY. 1S(hI9b) 4 3 2 l~b. Total 1 119 100 0% ~ Condo~ wegh~d postural comton score · 4 2 G-82

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow flex~on angle (unit deq ) ~ 1S.Q~30.01 ..... '< : I GO.O. . dS.O.] , ~ 1 45 0; ~0Q l A t ~QQ 75 0 l ;:- 1 :?5 ~ 5~Q:l ...... 9QO, 106 0 [ 1050,1300 , > 1300 . Total C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation , Dvnamic Drivino Poan~re Ansivais - Ei bow Froquency Percentago ~(Subject 11, oval Iap} o ooo/O ~60%T s..6` 7. ~S.~% - : so~.- \ : 19.^ 40% ~/ \ ~I \ {iS-:^'~:'.:~: : ~.6% ' 2 30~ . / \ 22 ~' t~% · . ~- 19 ~16.5% . o ~1^ . ~: 00% 1 ~o# ~5 4 1 1 1 ~ ~ °% oo% o.o# 5 30 45 60 7s 90 105 130 o 0.0% 1 ~~sbnAng~ 119 100 0~. I | ~omtort Fl~ing | elbow tlexion lUle ~Frequency ~ Per~ge (Pi) | I Dvnamic Orivino Postun Aneiveis - Elbo~y (2''")''A''; ' " 1 15~0 28~l 4 00°/. 35% ~ ~36.1` 3 ^; - l 28;8, 4251 19 ~ ~ 160% , 30% 4:: : : 1 40. "31 41 :" 5% I E 25% s ~_ s3 ^ ~- 4~.5% ! ~ 20% ~16.0% ss.t1 sz. 7 1 2 1 oo% 1 s% ~1 1 _ oo# 2 ~^ :: ~ 7 s2s~tOo~ol a :: : .o.~% 1 0% t ~ ~ ~, I ooo ~'~g I o o% I s~' . 2 ~ (~} ~gt~tod postural comfort score · ~ 2 G-83

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dynam~c Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note 1 Shaded cells iodicate results related to the comfort snoulder movement zone ~ ~ omJ~'n Icvel' C, ) x percenra~c( Pi ) 2 weighted postural comfon score = A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to~ock- Missing A.t Joint Mov~nent Distribution shoulder tlex~on angh Frequency 13~ _~ - <-15.0 O.OY. :~ '1,'~.15;~. :~5.0 1 ^^ ~. . . :. ' ' . o^. 2 ;~ ' 1~ . ^. ^ t.~; . .:.; :4~.0, -~.01 - : s.:~- :~ ~ ~ .~;'. '~''2'~+'l'''~ t5iO ~' ~^18~A*~/$ ~ 1 ~' ~^13 -~ -^` t 15~4.~01 ~^~; ~ 1 ~^ { 25~;~350] - t8 ~; 1S0%^ 35 0 45 0 1 21 17 5YO 450 5501 9 75% ,550 9 75% Total 120 100 0% A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation C~to~ R - ~9 hou d r t exion ang (Ci) (un't deg ) F~_~' l~n_e lp 1 (low) ~ - 1 5.0 , . . 0.0% 2 ~[~15~ 8~81 - 2 ^ ~^^ t~' 3 - ~ ~ 8^ - 23 1 ~^ 0 ^ ~;^ Q~ J ~ ^1-~;. lB1 ~2^; ;^ ~~ 5~~h) ~1 38; l~31 ; ~ ~^~t5B~ 4. ' : ': .:~1'i'.1'&~:~5 1 "; ~ '4'2'' ' ~:':''^' 24^ 3 ~ I 22`s. 2a8] ~t ~ i 92% 2 1 ~ 8 35 0 1 18 ~- 1S ~Y . (Iow) , 35 0 39 32 5# Total 120 100 0% wdgt~ted postural comfort score ~2 8 G-84 Subject No.: 11 DYnamic Drivino Posturc Analveis - Shoulder (subioct 11 ovel 1ap) 3s% . 30# 2s% E 20% ~ ls% 0` s% . o% 333% lq~L \ 17.5% t 5.0# ~ ~ 1 rl\75%7.5% '0.0%~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 -s 5 15 25 35 Sho~r Flesbn Arq. 4s sS Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subia~ct 11 oval lap] 35% 30% 25% S 20% 5% 0# 5# 25.e% ~c~ . ~, -:; ~ o#' 5 (~) 32.5% 16.7% 9.2% ~ 2 1 (bm

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and LocJc-to-Lock C.1 *1oint Movement Distribution / 1 . l should tlexion ·ng Frequ cy PerrJntar (unit deg ) ~_ <-150 i 0 00% ; ~ ~ 1 5 Q ~ ~ O ~2 t 7~^ :: ~ -5 O. 5~ ~ ~ I . :5:. .;'.,: . , 4~5, ~~. ~ ~t, ~16 `^ I . 13:3~C. 1 ~15.Q 25~01 1 40^. 3333S,~: i 18. . . ~I 15.~: . I Ss ~501 21 17.5% i45~ 550 ~9 7.5% o./. 4 > 550 9 7.5% Total 1 120 1000% C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort Rating shoulder flexion ulg ~Frequency Pereentag. (Pi) (Ci) (unit deg ) 1 (low) <-150 O 00% . . 2.~ :~.: ~: I -1E~ " ] :Z : ~ - .: 1 `^ .- :3~. _ o~; ~o.ox . . 4:;. ~.; l 25. 3~l 2 ~1.~:. 5~- t 38, 163) 19 t5~- 4::2 ' - 1 1~. ~1 ".,., ~z4~. - 3 ~1 ~''~1 ^ 9=L 2^ ~t 28^ 3501 t8; 15~-^ 1 (low) ~ 35 0 39 32 5% Total 120 100 0% wdghted posmral comfort score · 2~3 G-85 35% 30% 25% 20Y. 1 5% 1 0~. 15.8% . .~ 5%+ ~ 0~ ~ _ Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subject 11, syn~is) 35% T 30%t 25% - ~ £~% ~I U 15%'13:1% 10% 4 5% 17.5% 15.0% _ ·00%~.~a I rl\7~% 15 5 5 15 25 35 Sho~ F~xbn Angle 45 55 Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Shouider (suM~ 1 1, s - ~sis} 25.B% 5 (hI9b, 4 3 Co~ 32.S% 16.7% L 2 1 (be'

G-II.4: Postural Comfon DYnamic Drivinu Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comfort e~v movement zone. 2.welghted postu~ comfort score = ~ comfon level( ci ) x perecnra~d Pi ) ..' A. Oval bap B. Lock-to-Lock A t Joint Movement Dlatribution A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movement Distribution dbo. ffexion ·ngb Frequency Percent~go (un~t: deg.) < 15.0 0.0% 50% ::~ I;~ ff ~ ~ri-5 °.~: ~s% ~ t ~w~ra ~ A v | | £i ~ r ; ~ ^ Y ~ ~0 ~3s% · . ~_ ~;~A~. ,~ ~:.,,^.^ 3~.~.~:.: ~ 2s% " i .~ L ~ 3~ :;,<-i.12;~,-: - 2 ~. ~' ^""~.~.£'~ ,~ ~:~<,:: . .::, I ~ 1t ~-. ~ ~^' "~2';.'49.~Se~ . '. ~ ~s% ~ . ;~ ~ ;~0 ~0 l | ~pi/~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ 13~;; [ 105.0, 130-01 o 0~0% 0% 130.0 O O.OY. Total 206 lOQO# Cor~ I lellng (unit: dog.) ~ ( - 1 (low) ~ 15.0 0 O.OY. 3s%. ~ 2 1 15.0, 28.81 O 0.0°h 30~ ~ . >~ ~.~.~ :^:. : ,.i l.~.~:`A: ~; I ;~:~ :. :;: ~j :: 2s : ~ 4 ~ : . A '' ~ ^ ~ ' 1 2 '~ ~ |~ ^~ ' ' ~ . ~ ~ ~ j ·~ i;5=i . | ;.JA5~.,7,, ^; ,A,*~ti=,~, ~ t | =< .. :~A;.15^^ ~ ~s% . ,~. ~' ~`,~ - ,^ :'.,~: 4~" ~ {^ =~6- 85~1.A ': " ~'""'' !^' '2; '2~ ^' I ~ 10% ~ 3^ ^~ ~I SIl~^ ~ I ^~ 2BB~; ~ ~s% 2 ~_~_~1 69 ~- ~ 333X, ^~; °~ 1 (1crw) , 100 0 O O O.b Total 206 100 0# ~hed posturd comfort score · 3 2 elb~ flexion ·ngh Freauency c 15.0 O - 1 t5~0. 300] -! 0~ :>' - 1~. ~.°'1 j . o.~; ~1 '.t'-Y,'"".~. t - ;0 -75 0 1 1 '- '- - -' 1' 75.0.''~90.0} I&~ ; l ~o.4t ~0Sol 1 ~3 1050, 13001 0 ,1300 0 Total 11 B2 PosturalComfort Evaluation el he Onangh (unit: deg ) Frcauency < 15.0 O ~dghtod postural comfort score ~;~1 l . o.oY. 1 . '' OQ%-~ :: 0.0%':: 1 : .~ .0.1*'` :^ 1 1 .,.'-: ~1%: 1 2 ^ ~.6X; I 27~. 1 O.OY. 0.0% . 100.0% 1 l 3 oo% 1 , . oo% I 1 . o.o ~1 .r ~- ~1~ ~ 1 I,A,':'.:~.,%..... I :- :.~.'Xi- I 1 ~ ' . 45~% - ; 1 . . 1 273% 1 1 00% 1 1 10Q0% G-86 31 Subject No 12 Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvds- Elbow (su~ct 12, oval lap] 49.0% 1' 12e% 3.~/. 0.0% o.o% 1.0%~ ~ , ~ 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Eb_ F~ ~ , _ . Dvnamic Drivina Posture Andvds - Elbov, (subject 12, oval bp] 33~% 29. 2.~ ~ 81 lS.S% I , I I I o.o~ S(h - ) 4 3 2 1 (ba) ^ we 6~T | Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Elbo~r (subJect 12, ovel Isp1 54 S% l E 30~` ~i 1 27 3% too%oo%oo%~/= ~ lo.o%o.o# s eo 7s 90 105 130 E~ F~xbn Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvsis - Elbo~ (s~ct 12, lock~ock] Is°% T I~s~ t _ 40~ t s%l _ I~ 30% ~27 3% ~E3£~l 1.2% 1 1 s (hbh) co_n

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthes. - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow th~on angb Frequency Porcontage | D~rnamic DrivinQ F~osture Andvsis - Elb~ (unit deg.) ~(subl~ 12. owd bp] <15.0 O.OYo , s°%T ~ :,-' ~ ~15~0;::530~0t ; .: . :~.~ ~ .! I ~.Q~CK .. ~ ~I ~s% · , \ ~ ~ .^ .[ .30;O: .~; O ~. . ;~ ; . ~., i . : , 35% . 1 332% ~ ~ ~. r.| i A~;~ ~Q ~ ~-~ ~^ v ~ | ~ ~e | l\ -j ~t-~.~1 ^~ . ;. :2~: l |~,^~2~= -: C ~e 20% - . I ~ \ ~: '.~.t~75;~^~0.01 ~: : -.1~: :~ ~^ ;. ~I ~ ·s% ~12.4% ~ \ ': .:.'"''.^ .t','~=n]' ' ' ,^ ' ;,' ' " "'=,/~'':i,'.^.~ ~.', /,.,~2 '?2~',. I '0% ~ 0 0% 0 0% 0.^ ''1~/ ~ 0.0% QO% 1 05.0, 1 30.01 O O.OY.1 o% . . , . , ~, _, , _ , . , > 130.0 O O.0°f.~ 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Total 217 100.0% I C2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comfon R ing eJ f on angh F P~nta Pi (Cl) (u dog.) | ~cyg. ( ) 1 (10W) ~ 15.0 0.0# ., . . · ~ z~s~, ~I ts4,'~28~:^ - . -- . ;~.. ~ ~ ~y-60% '~:; ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ >28=i~42~!;51 - - . A~s^~s~ ;~ is+~ ~Xi ^ j~;;~4c~x >~ t ~ 583 l ~ -~ ~-s 1;8= ' S ~".~: ' '~ ^ l~ \~'~ = S \ ^ ' =~ ~ ',',~,^; /'t5~'!~ . . ~.: : ^: ~ =~5, :85Q;~: -. "~^. :~:-s-;:t9.8~:^: . ~. ~ · ; { .8~ 8;LS1 ~s~i'",~ ~ '~ s?'.2lL5~C' ;' · . ~.~.. ~ ,: '::~:~^~ '~ 1 ~'~ ~1 ' " . . .~.~,, . .~, . 1 (TOW) ~ 100.0 O O.OYe Total 217 100~0%e ~htod postural comfort acoro · 3~2 G-87 DYnamic Dnvina Posturo Anal-e - Elbo~r (sub~ctl2,eyn~} 35% 30% 5% 0% 21.7% 332% 30.0% _ Es~ t15~m 5 ( - h) 4 3 2 1 (be) Col~lon ~1 0.0%

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dynamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder · Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comfort shoulder movement zone. 2.we~ghted postund comfort score = ~ comjon Icvel( G ) x perecnta~c( P.' ) A. Oval i ap B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 JoTnt Mov~nent Distribution A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movemcnt Distribution B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation (un't deg.) | ~ _ <-15.0 1 3 1.5YO . .W . .~..1~1 ' ' " 1 >. - '~.it'-~; '^ ' ~. . . . ~.. ~ ~ t.. _. ,~,A ~ ~ ,..... =~ ~- ~-,'~2~-%'4,-^""? ~,-'/~ ^~.~ . A ~ ?;~.t - ~.: ;., .. 3~:=~ ' '; ''' ~,~.~.' 2'~-~ ','.. ~A.~ ~~:,.,' 35.0, 45.0] 5 2.49` 45~0. 55-01 3 1.5% · 551) 4 1.94Y. T - 1 206 100.0% , Conil= R (unite deg.) - ~~ (11) 1 (10w) <-15.0 3 1.5% , 2~ 1 -~ ~:1-' '"^ W~# t¢i~ ~- , ~: . . :~ ~ ~= ~r: ~: .:, ~;; ~ : ~ - . .~5~-, .::: ^~?~ ~, j ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢r*r,;~ . '~~ ;~ 17~^i 5 ~;^ ~ ~ ' ^- ~B- ' ;'~ "~C,~- - ;~` ^ ' I~.~B~ ~ 1 - ~ . ~ ~s;.~ ~;~c ^i ·# ;- . ~ ~A ~}~ ~ . 8 ~;.::. .-, i^,-^^. 3~.:-: . ~ 2s~ ~.k~.~ ^ . :.20.~.~. ~.,~,S'~f.~9,~ 1 (10~) ~ 350 12 58# Total 206 100 0% , 38 | shoulder Hex~on angb ~ _ <-150 1 5 35r/. I ^ .~-lS;0~-5~01 !-r 0 ; Q 0% 5~o~ 58 ~1 2 - ~ ^ 14~3~C ~·~ #~Q.'A1S~O1 1 -; ^ 2; ^~Y~ ^; ^ ~ 14~ ;. . t A1 5~. 1 ~ ~ _ . O. . ~ ., , . ~- . . · ;-2{~-~ '35~01 ' ~" ;ff' ~O' '.^-':^' ,, ·. '.' ~ '''~0~-~ 35~0 45 0) ~7 1% 450 5501 2 143.h ,550 2 143Y Tnt*' 14 100.0# _ weighted postural comton acoro ~ Comton Rating shoulder Hexion ang~ (U) (unit deg ) 1(low) ~ 150 -15 0 ~ 8 8 ^ ; ~ - 8~^ ~ 25 1 t-25 3B1 , ! ~ ~ ~ 38; 1 ^'^;: ...::t"163i 22Ji . _ . -~; 1'22~5.'28.81 1 28~8, 35 0 >350 Total we~ghted postural comton acore · 2 0 G-88 Subject No 12 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvds ~ Shoulder (subpet t2, oval bp] 35% T 30% ~=~- 2 ~ ''S%~| 1 1 ~_; ~ 5# 1~9# 0% ·15 5 5 15 25 35 45 55 Sho~ F~ 45% 1 ~+ ~ 35~+ _ 15% + I I l~t ~ ~ 1 s%L__ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis ~ Shouldet (subj~ct 12, oval bp] T 41 7# 9.2% · 7.3% I · i · I · ~ 5(~) 4 3 2 1 (bev' Co~ ~ D'namic Drivine Posture Analvais. Shoulder (subject 12, lock-to~lock} 40% 35# 30% o 25% E 209` ~ 15% 1 lo% 1 5% 1 0% ~14 ~14.3# _5.7# 1 ~ 14.3% 14~ 14~ 14~ 1 !..M.o%o.o*im I ^1S ^5 5 15 25 35 45 55 ~_ Fb~ Arqle Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis ~ Shoulder (subject 12, lock~lock eo~ T 70# + _ ~+ 10 50% E 40 1 s~+ ~ I ,`! . . o~ o~ · 1 1 s (high) 4 3 2 1 (b. 1 1 ~1

G-II.4: Postural Comfon c. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution . . , shouldor Hexion "gb Frequency Percontago c -15.0 8 3.6% ; [~15.41i.-~;.Q] ~1 :: ;~ 2t; ~1 :~:~: 9.~ , : . .~.. 1 -5'~' '~1~ ^' . ..., .. w .~.: I .; . v..,~ =.=i,, .s, +~:{~..~:1,5~:: :- ~ I 1 . 61~ ;:~ j~ 7S:~: ~'i~?''S.';' ;-~-'-15;~.~'~1 ~ ' ~--"~' ' ',~.^ '-" ~- ^~ -^ 2~'/ IS~)S~< ~ > ~w ~,^,~'^~,~'~'~0 ~.::~."';.'.'9~1~ ^' [ 350. 45-01 6 2.7Yo [ 45.0. 55.0] 5 2.3% > 55.0 6 2.7Yo . Total 220 ~ 00.0# G2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comfon Rating houlder exion s b (Cl) (u-: deg~) Frequency Pe~go (Pi) 1 (10w) <-15.0 3.6Y. :; ~^ ' ' t-.150~^~.B~; `~ ~^ 10~. ~.~ ~ - ~ 43 ~ " ;: .: . .t . ~ 8~8. ~6 2~ 1 j ~ 1 1 / ~ ~. : 0.0~ . . ^~.~ ~- ~^i~i ; ~;. 1~25~- 3;81 ~^3 ~, t~C: _ l;{hip)^^ ^ t 3~&i^~1~31: 1 86;~: 40.0% .y<^ ~t 1"i;2251; -21- :~. ~9.5.'Ci,~ 3; ^ ~{A;~ ^'' ' · 1 22;l5~28~] ' ~ ~ ' ' · ~' , ~,3-,' ~ : 2-~- ~;4 1 .;~R A^~-35~ 1 :.; . : . ^2D4~: . .^^. ~= . . (IOw) ~ 35.0 17 7.7Y. Total 220 100.0% ~d pos~l comton score · 3~7 G-89 Dvnsmic Drivine Posturo Anal~s - Shoulder (sub~ct 12, s',n~is s% . 30% · . 2 . 20%. /e E ~ s'` · / ~ ~9.5% OL ~ 0~. · . _ _ L 3~lS%/8 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ 15 s \ 29.1% Z7 7% ~, ~ \3~2% ~ I r~^ 5 15 25 35 45 55 S_F-xbn Ano~ Dvnamie Drivino Posture Andvds - Shoulder (sub~ct 12, syn~is) 40.0% 28.4% s%t ~ 1 - I 40 35% 30% &25% ~ E 20% _ _ ~ 15% ~ ~a.6% ~ 3 2 1 ( 5 (hI9II) 4 Co_t L~l 11.~%

G-lI.4: Postural Comfon Dynamic Driving Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the cornton elf movement zone. 2.weighted postunu comfort score = 2, comfon · Icv~f ~ Ci ) x perecnta~c( Pi ) ..' A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to~Lock A.1 Joint Mov.#nent Distribution Pe~-go o.oYO I`;~;~s6. . .- . 2~-- ~1Ye~ ~ t4~,,~.~` . ,. .~;.,~. zzi% '. . '.t %? i; "~;' .';: ' ' 'c.~;~j'.~ ' 0.0% 0.0# 100.0% eIbow fie~aon angb ~ Frequ~ _ <15.0 0 : -.W'! .' 'l'= ' ~:1,"; ' ' ., ,:. ,., -~, ~.~;^^t^~::45~J:~^ :- ff: :~65:~w'6~ ' ' i~:- ' , . ~?~.~aa~7s;a~ ^-,.;; ~:: .,- ,;. .,,, - - , ~. , ·3~ t~ ~"''' .._.~.,_ ~t~.' - O;?l~S~3.. . ~.. - :.: :.';~&-i-~ 1 105.0. t30.0 1 o ,130.0 O Total 218 Co~ ~ - el n on angb F ~ ~(unit dog.) ~-~! - ~ (10w) c 15.0 O O.OY 2 [ 1 5.0, 28.81 1 0.5# 2. _ . ;5 ^ ': '~':' ' ' . ' '.'{ 2~. '' ~, . ' .'. ,. , - . ' ' .: ~ , i; ~,4~,-,?f,~; ^5. t ~ 56$T 8~4; 1~. 5 V~ 30~ `~' ..... s~ ~.A.' rA~ ~:. ,` ~ ., ~ :D$ r 7~ - ~ | `; ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ,~.~.--, ~'~k ~ 1 ~ ~ ~^ -~ ^.^.~ :^ 3: ^~>.~. i. ·~ .,: ~ ~.' :~Q;~l, ~^ 1 :~-~I'~C<s:. 2.'_~%'.S.'. ~'~t'~ '' I~°~5~1CQOl: :4~: 1 ~::~: : 1 (low) > 100.0 O O.OY. Tot ~213 100~0# l ~0 A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movement Distribution ~dghted postural comton acore . etbo. tI.x~on angb Freauency Pe~ntage (unit deg.) < 15.0 1 10.0% 3 ,-~;: ~30.=C, =,~1 0~'.^,2:': ~ :~: 00%^:'': .'''A"'"'t".~0.:60.e'1. 0'.,:~-., ~.':': 20~%::: .; .~.~ ~ ~0.: 75~0} . 2~> ;:' :: I ~;: 20.0%: : - 1::.:~.~.: So.~: 2 '. ^:;~: .: ~.^ :,:: 2~)~X ^. 90.4, tos.t~l: .. 0, ~`,~, ~ I . .~; ( 105.0, 130.0 1 0 O.OY 130.0 0 0.0% Tntal 10 100.0% B2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort R - na (Cl) 1 (1O - ) 2; 3 ~ ::: . . 4 ,... 5W0' ^^ ~ 4 . .^. q .^.~... . - 2~;;; 1 (10w) Subject l~lo.: 13 60% . so% ~ .. ~ 1 ~ ~ 20% I ·o~ o% Dvnamic Drivina Posture Anal~- Elbow (sub~ct 13, ovel Iap] se. 27.1% A~ ·o.o%0.9%~ 1~ I _ ~I 15 30 45 60 7S90 105 130 E_F~ Dvnamic Dnvina Posture Anal - s - Elbow (subpct 13, oval Iap} 39..% =~ ~| 50dgh) 4 3 2 Co~on ~ l i (unit deg.) Fr~ncy ~;;,| < 15.0 1 10.0~. 30%, . t 15.0, 28~3 1 10. - ! 25% . ^- I 28^ 425 l 2:: ao.oec i . 20,. . -~:- t "5. s631 _ , s- A 1Qo%' ! ~, { 5B~ 77S | ~30.~% I e - 1 775e 85.01 2 ~20.Q ~ 10 _ l 85.Q.925t 0;:~: :. O. - A. I s% : 1 =5,lOOQJ 0: . ~ .:. O.Q~ I o%^ _ ,1 00.0 O 0.0~. _ Totel 10 100.0% G-9O ~igh~d postur I comfort score · 3.6 . . i Dvnamic Drivino Poenlro Anaiveis- Elbo~v (subpct 13, oval 1ap] 30.0` .1 3o% T 25# t / 1 1 1 _ ~ i I ~ %. ~°°% °.°% °°% l 1 o`. on n~ ~n n~ 20 0.L ~. . . 5 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Ebo. F~ ~- . Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvois - Elbow (subpct 13, locit~o~} 30.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10,0% 10.0% ~. ~_ . 1 s (high} 4 3 2 1 (b~ 1_ c~

G-Il.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow flemon angle FrequenCl ~Peroenage j 12vnamic Drivino Posture Analvde - Elbow (unit: dog.) (su~ 13. oval lap] ~ 15.0 0.4% 60% T s4.s% ' ^s~ .~D. ~-t'''.^.^i; ' '''' | , -; '=~; ~1,. , Y^ ~,,. ,,,',, I ~ ~ . / r~s~l;~.~.~.~. ,~;,x,.,,.':,-3~ ~ !s~ '" ~. ma. . I ~ :~}}~C~ ~ ~ ~s^ ~::~ :'~or.?~, ~ ~C 30 ~2e. / ~ ''-~7sn~.^, it 1 ~. / ~ ~.?~s~ Yet / 250 SO | ~ ~ I; ', ~20% ~it/ ~ >. ~o~*~;~<' 14~ 1 ~I% '0.4~ ~1 - Do% o.o~ 105 0 130.0 ~ O O.O4Y o% ., 15 30 4s so 7s 90 105 130 130.0 O 0.0% En_ F - In bum Total 228 100.0% I C~ Postural Comtort Evaluation , Comfort R - ng elb~ flexion angb Fr~wacy Pe~nte9e (Pl) 1 (low) < 15.0 1 0.4% .. :. ..~ i ^~^ ~ ^ s .;~i .~? I ~ . 1 -~^,=~. ~ ~ . .~- . ,.; ~ 2 sj ^~ . ~, ;4 ~ , ~. .. ' ;~?.'~'.''l~.~42~; 1 '" ~' ' ' "'t0"'~'~: ^""' ;'~'' '"' ' . ~ _ - = .r~3es| ~ . :-~ ~A=~. s ?~ ~s 5 ~j>~. :: .. :: ~ `,~ 77 | . . .. .~.. ... 7~ .: .: :32 - i.:: ~5';' ~;i~;5~'~ ~. ~ .~{ . ,?~? ~15J~.l ~-. ~, ;~ , r~ / '80i=~ ~,, ;'~ 35^tX: .~; ·~ ,~^/ . '~;A^^'?S#>X {. _#~Z5;~? ~.. s~ ~5~i; 9~ ~ ~·^,~ ,~9~; ^~:~. .~ ~. ~- ;;~ j'~"! s`~ }^ · ~~ # , . ;, .~, . i ~'; ;';; ~.~;;;~ 1 (low) > 100.0 O 0.0# Toal 223 1 ~OQO% ~hted postural comton score · ~0 G-91 . as~L 30% 2SY. ~ lS% 10% o% Dvnamk Drivina Posture Andvus- Elbow (sub~ 13, "n~} 39.0% 32.5% 1 5 th~h) · 3 24.1% , I _ o.~` 1 ~ _ ~_ ~ 2 1 tb~ Co_'t 1~1

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analysis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shaded cells ~ndicate results related to the comton snou~er movement zone. 2.weighted postural comfort score = ~ comJon le; el/ Ci ) x percenmg~ Pi ) A. Oval Lap A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation B. Lock-to-Lock B.1 Joint Movement Distribution A.1 Joint Movement Distribution . shoulder tlex~on angb i 1 ·'50 0 _ . · '. t -15.0.: ~ 5;0 ~ :^ . ~: :x.-; . [~ - . ~ .-~.0,. 50.~. - 3¢.~.> L ~ i 5.~: ~ A . ~ . ~ ^4 ~ ;-'·['t~;~ll%~' ~SALP~ . L ~! ~2;~.~ ~ ! 35O, 4501 18 [ 450' 55-0 l 5 > 55.0 5 Total 218 Percontage | 0.0% 1 ~:'.. ^' ' 2~','i;: . I i ' ~ ~ 18.5~.:^ ~ 1 ' ~ ''344%:...~: : j.. ^....23~4% ' -' 10~.: 8.3% 2.3% 2.3% 100.0# =_~_ -~_ ~~_ Pl~y ~~lPi 1 (10w) <-15.0 O 0.0% 2. A,'',. .. ~.. 'l~-'150;~^ '; 1 ~;~.~)I I~ ;.,~%'',~. 3 ^ ^^ ~I-8~:-23~: 4-' !'; t~` 4 ^ ~; 1 -23~ 3.8~: 17~ ~ 11:. ,. 7.8%: '.s ~t ) - '1 3^';.tB31 ^: - ' ' 94~ " 1 . ' ~ .: - '.1% - . . ~ ~.~. . ': :2' 1 16~ 2~ 51 ' ' 38~.= ;. ~ | .:. lr. ~. 3 1 22.S,. .28.8 1: 13~. ~^~-^ ~ ~. . ~Q'C'^ 2.'. ~' ' -'~/' r 28~.3!iol^ 23~ ~ i 1 ~; tn ~: 1 (low) · 35 0 28 12.8Yo Totel 218 1 OQO# ~dghtod postural comfort scoro · 3.7 4s% ~43.~% 40% 3s% . 30% E 25# l s% 10% s% o% I 1 1 o d rtl xionangb | (unit. deg.) Frequency | Pereentage | < - 1 5.0 1 0 1 0 0°/O 1 30% -15.0.~5.0l 1 0 1 o.o% 1 2s%: 1 t '50, 501 1 2 ~ ~1 200% 1 . I ~ 5.0 t5.0 ~1 1 - - I lQO'L I ; , ~ ^ to.- ~ t 25~. BS.01 1 1; 1 10.0'C 1 ~ ~o 35.0. 45.0 ~1 1 1 1 o.<rK [ 45~0. 55~0l 1 1 1 lO.tr/o 1 o >55.0 ! 3 1 30.t)Y. 1 ~ 10 4~_ ~ B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation | Comtort Rating | shoulder Hexion ~nglo | Frequ~c' (Cl) I (u~t: deg.) ! 1 (low) 1 '-15.0 ~ 0 G-92 Subject No.: 13 Dvnamic Dtivino Postute Analveis - Shoulder (subject 13, oval bp] 35% 30% 25% t 16.5% t 10% t / 5% + 2.3%/ ~ 0% 1 00%-1 ~ ~ 34.~# 15 5 5 15 X 35 Sho~ F-xb--91 ~ 23.4% i10.6% .3Y 2.3f. 45 55 Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analvsis - Shoulder (subioct 13, oval IaP] 25.2% ~1 1. ~ ~ S(hl9b) 4 3 2 1 tb.' Codn L~ Dvnamic Dtivina Posture Analvsh - Shoulder (subioct 13, lock-to~ocl`] 30.0% 00%00% 1 4, 5 -55 1 5 X 35 45 55 _'F - ~ ~ - 50% 1 4s% 4o% 35 30% X% ~ 20% 5% lo% ~ s% o% Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analvais - Shoulder (sub~ct 13, lock-to~ock} so~o% 30.0# O.C# 10.0% · 0.0% · S(bk~b) 4 3 2 1 (b.) C~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. SynU,eeis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution shoulder flexion ~ng~ | FreaUency (unit deg ) ~ Percentage < -15 0 1 0 0 0% 1 1 [lSQ 501 1 s ~` 1 1 30%+ 2s% + ~ 1 - s-~ ~ 5-e 1 . ~ - - . ~1~ _~ . ' 115~ :iOI 1 25~0. ~ ~Q 1 [ 350, 4501 19 I ·SO 550 1 6 _ ~1 105% 83% 26Y. 35% Total I 228 1000% C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort Rating shoulder flexion ang~ i Fr~qu0ncy Percentage (Pl) (Ci) (unit ~eg ) ! 1 (10w) . \, ~0.0% ~S~A,~^ -~] ~L ~1 A ~0 4% 3'~. ~-~: I.8.a~-~5 1 4- ~1~% ~ ^~- t - 2~; 3 8 3 17 ~- 7 5'C 5 (10 ~1 3 8 t63 1 97~ - 42 5~f >: I ttIJ, = 51 38 ~17 t% 3 ~ A ~1 22 5428 8 1 13 ~; ~5 7% 2'2A''l ''.', ' ( ~$ ISI~] 24 105% . 1 (low) · 35 0 33 14 5% ~_ 100.0% wdghted postural comfort score · 3 7 G-93 Dvnamic Drivina Posturo Analvsis- Shoulder (subjoct13 synthesis} 35% ~ D ~ 20%' ~ 15%- . 10%- . 5%- . l 33.3% - 1 22 R% oo%~il 1 1 ~ 0% 1 ~ - .15 16.7% ·5 5 15 25 35 Shou~r F-~on Ang~ ·5 55 Dvnamic Drivina Posturo Analvsis- Shoulder (subject 13 synthesis] 45% 40% 3S% ~ 5% 1 42.5% . 30% ~ 25%. ' _ _ ·32 10%- ~7.5% 0%- _ , _ 24.e% 5 (hI911) 4 3 __ 14.5#

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note 1 Shaded c~ls indicate results related to the comfort elbow movement zone 2 we~ghtea postural comfort score = ~ ~ `'mton Ievel( Ci ) x percenr``,qet Pi ) .a, A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Movement Distribution ~2 Postural Comtort Evaluation B. Lock-to Lock B.1 Joint Movement Distribution B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation elbow tlexion angb (unit deg ) ·15~ ~ 150 ~] .2: '- 1 . 2UL;- 42S 1 . .;.i: :{ ::",§;,.'.:;56 . . ~ ~. . .7r~ J :~ NL~ ( ~` 8510 fl2s 1 - t 9Q5.tOO0 l , 100.0 l Total wdghtod postural com10rt scoro · 4 5 olbow tlexion ·n9\° ~freauenc1 Peroontage < 15 0 00% 15 0, 300 1 2 200% 300 4501 0 00% 45,Q 6001 O QO% t 6QQ '5 0 1 0 ' 0 0% 750, 9001 t 700% go t), 105 0 1 O 0 0% 105 0 130 0 1 1 1 o oo/. , 1300 0 00°/. Total 1 10 100 0% C~ ~rl~g elb tlexion anglo Frocuenc Pe P [Cl) (unit dea ) 1 (low) < 15 0 0 0 0°/. 2 t 150 2aBl 2 200% 3 1 28a 4251 O OO.f. ~ - 1 "6. 5631 O 00% 5 (t - ) ~ 563 7751 O O~C 4, 1 77li 8501 7 7009C 1 20% + ~ I ~iQ g25l O 00% 2 1 925 10001 0 00% 1 (low) , 100.0 1 10.0% TotaI 1 0 1 00.0% weightod pOStural comfort score G-94 Subject No 14 Dvnamic Drivina Posturo Analvais ~ Elbow (subioct 14, oval lep] SO% ~45.4% 0% / `' 1` t. 30% / E 25% / 15% . 11~% 5% ~ooy. 2.07 ogL . 0.0~/. o~o% o~o% U7- . . . _ .' , ~ '5 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Elbo. F - xbn - - pvnamic Dnvina Posturo Analveis - Elbow (subioct 14, owd lep] 52.0% 4t.8% 11 0.5% o~o% S(hlgh) 4 3 2 t (b - C~ Le~ Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analvais - Elbow (subject 14, ovel lso) lo o% 1 5 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Elbo. F~abn An' - 0.0% 0.0%/~0.0% .. .. _, ~ pvnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis- Elbow (subioct 14, lock-todock} ~o~o% '°~T ~ ~t _ so% t 'c40%+ ~ _ 30% + _ 20.0% 10~. + ~ 1 o.o ~_ O ~ _ 5 (b gh)

G-II.4: Postural Co~nfort C. Synthesis - Oval L6ap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution | eIbowfl-xionxngIe I Frer4uencY ~Perc nU ~Dvnan c Drivin Posture An Ivais-Elt <150 00% ~s% ~4, i22Y 1SQ 3001 6 2^! 35% i 1 l: . . .| 3ao , 45.0 12 : o : a~ . . ~ . | · =% · ~I ~ ~ ~""'I^~.o. ".~; · . 23~'~' ~1~^ ~ C 2S% ~1 ~ ~ ;:~{ 75~ yo]- ~ 87:'^ -<2.2#: : ~ 20% ~'1 ~1 ~ ... ~ . ~1 5%too% 29% o ~ otoY.o.s%o~o% 1050 1300J 1 05% 15 30 4s 60 7S 90 105 130 > 130 0 O 0 0% E~ F - ~bn - - Total ~206 100 0# C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation , elbr ·xio' ang' Frequency Dvnamic Drivinr Po tu' ~ An~veis-Elbow omton Fladng | (unie de ) l | Perr~g (Pi) | ~9 s% `. 1 x' r s) 2: ~- 1 ~ 15~ 2 83 i 0 1 00 ~1 1 i2%; ~.2 -- 3-.- ~;:: {:28.8. 42.~;~. : 3'.:: . ' ~,.: 35~+ : :4 .::- : ~ ~.'"~1; '0 : : . 4.~: ~C 25~+ · 5(tiptl).~: ~ ~ 56~ "~3 .~= . . " ~ ~+ 4: : t.775, ~.Q:] . ~ . ~::: lS`t _ _ .... .{ llS.~.9251: 8 38* 1 's%~ ~ s.3% ,s% 0.s~ ~- 2 t S125. t00Ql ~ ~0 0.0%-.~;. o'. ~ ~ I _ , ~. . 1 (low) ~ 100.0 _ 0.5% S(h~h} · 3 2 1 (b.) Total 206 100 0# ~ighted postural comfort score 44 G-9S

G-II.4: Postura1 Comfor' Dvnamic Drivinc' Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note 1 Shaded ce Is indicate results related to U,e comfort st oulder movement zone 2 weighted postural comtorS score = ~ c`>mJort le~ ci~ Ci ) x percenta~ct P.' ,., A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution shouldorfhxionan9h | F uency ~ (unit deg ) I ~q _ <-150 1 0 _ ~ [^15 0. ^ 50 ~ -^ ~ ~ ::~: ~ -SD. ~ SCl: ~. ~,,, . 1: , ~ ~ Q ~ t S ~ ~ - A ff 7 ~ ,4 ~ ~ _ , . .(i ~' l' 1~.; "~;l .^ ' : 2 ~. ^~: . . ~ ,~,s,'~ t"256~'~ ~I~"~' ' ~lt.,s^,~'"^;'~ 16~ [ 3s.0. 45.01 3 _ [ 45 0 55 01 2 _ >550 _ 4 _ Total 196 _ Comton Rating shouldor tlexion angb Frequency Percentago (Pi) (Cl) (unit deg ) 1 (10w) · 150 O 00% , 2 ~[~!50.~~B;8l^^ ~^ 3 ;~ ~i;S~C; ~ 3 i ~ a8, ;' 2~ 1: 9 - i ~ ~46% ~ ; ': ' ~ ~' ~ ' : ~.~.~;,~i~ .: .^^ <'tS.~%':-~. ' ~ ,~; ~ht ~;, . . ~ ,;~!~r, . -.^ , ,lA : ~' :~ 1'2:~.:'''~:'~12~J=": ' ~5: =7 1 5~ '^A; ~ ^^ 22~;i i 2, ~=,~L ~11<S,~;~ ~ ; ; ^5;~%A ,: ' ' 1 (low) ~ 35 0 9 4 6% Total 196 1 OQO% weighw postural comfort acoro · 41 A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movement Distribution P~ntago 0.0% '' ':" ~1X,:^::''~ . :~ 34~ :'.'' V^:t,'34;2~. 24: :,. ~ 'f~' · · AA,~, ^,t, ... A., , B. ,'^."'~'A' .~-'.A'~." ~; 1.5% 1 .OYo 2.0Yo 1000# s% 30% 2s% i c 20% ~ 15% 0% s% 0% ~ ! s% ` 1 3s% 1 ~ 30% E 2s% ~ 20% ' 1s% 0% s# o% shouldor flexion angh FrequencyPercenugo (unit deg ) <-15.0 0o.o% ~o# T 115.0, -s.a ~0o.o% 35% · . t ' 5.0. 5.0 1 ~ A . .., - . - 30% - . ~, ~2;20,0% .. 2s% =01 ~ .: . , x: 10.~- C 20%. 25~0. 35.01 o. 0.o% ~ 15%· [ 35.0, 45.01 0 0-0% s% ; [ 45.0, 55.01 1 1 0.0% 0% 55 {1 2 20.0Yo ~ Totd 10 100 0% ; B.2 Post~ural Comfort Evaluation . 1 Comtort R ngshouldort Pera~ t Pi (Cl)(unit dog ~g°( )| ; (2) c~] ~00% 1 .° t~a8. .251 ~ 0 ~QQ% I . 35%t 6 - h) ~t -2S. 3~1 .: 1 ~ ~ '' ~^ 1 E Z5 . ~_ ~tQ" I ~ ~s%t 3 --- t 22.S 2881 1 Q ~Q0% 2~_ [2~350] 1 0 0~0% 1 o 1 (low) ~ 35.0 1 3 30.0Yo 1 3 ~1000% 1 weightod pos~ural comfo t score · 3 3 G-96 SubjeCt No 14 DYnamic Drivina Posture Analvais- Shoulder (subject 14, oval lep} _~ ~ ~_ . ~ 15 .\5.3% ~ 6! 1 1 ~^ T°~,a,s,a,~, -15 5 5 15 X 35 45 55 ~ Fiedlm ~- Dvnamic Drivina Posture Andveis - Shoulder (subioct 14, owd lep] 43.4% 37.^ ~ ~ I ~ , · , · - ~ 5~) 4 3 2 ~ (bm 1 co~o~ ~ . 7 1` 7. 1` Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvus - Shoulder (subject 14, lock-to~lock} 40.0% 1 20.0% 20.0% ~1 ~ ~1 0.0% 1 0.~ oo%ol I I I 0.0% 0.0%1 1 15 5 5 15 25 35 45 55 ~dder Fle-0 Angle D'namic Dnvina Posture Analvais - Shoulder (sub~c,t 14, lock-to-lock) so.o% 30.0% t ~0O ~0` ~ , _ , _ . , , _ S(htlh} 4 3 2 1 (~ Co~oet ~1

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and LocJ`-to-Lock C.t Joint Movement Distribution houlder ftexion ang ~DYnamic Drivina Posture Ana vei - Shou der (unit deg ) I Frequency ~Percentage (subj~ct 14 syn~i~} < -15.0 1 o i 0-0% 135 ·- T 34.S# 33 5% -1S.Q: 5~1 t2: 5~ ;-^ I 130Yet In -~ I s~;~enl Tt - :34.~: ~ . 2s%l 1s =5% ~ ~ t | ~5 04 25111 31 - ~ t5~0~; ~ 154Y. +1 ~y. 12~Q.3~l lt ~- ~ ts~, ~10~+5.8%1 ~\5 37. 35.0, 4501 3 1.5% , ~5%t/* ~- \~.5` '.5% ,9% ·5 0 f5 0 ~3 1.5% 1 1 0.0%: ~ ~ '~~ · 55 0 6 2.9% 1 -1 S -5 5~, f - ~ ~'e Total 206 | 1OO OY. C.2 Postural Comfort Evatuation Comfon Rating shoulder ftexion angb Freauency (Cl) (unit deg ) 1 (low) c - 1 5.0 2 '~ . I-15.0.-&8t 3^~ ~3 A, ~ , ,, \~ ' ' ~ t .~ ~Pa ~s ~ l 4: : ~ .; : ~ 2;S 3~8 1 s (~): ~ . 1 38, t6.3 1 , .~: .:: . 1 1~3~:22~51 3: ^.~ 1 :22$ 28~81 2^ A t 284: :35Q1 [(low) >~50 ~z Total 206 ~ 1 o ·s ss , Percentage (Pi) ~Dvnamic Drivina IPosture Analvet; - Shoulder 1S% I ·57 ~ 4Z.Z~ 35% _ 9',:':: . .:'''4,4*.~^. · =%~ . ~ 53 ^ ~25~t E 25% 42~. - ! ~ 20%+ ~ 12.6%~ ~ ~s%+ _ _ . . S.3%~ ~ ~5 s% 6 ~% s.e% 5.8°/~ s ~h - ) 4 3 2 1 ~bm c 1 OO.O~e wo~ghtod postural comfort acoro · 4.0 G-97

G-II.~: Postural Con~fon DYnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comfort elbow movement zone. 2 we~tea oostu ra' comfort score = ~ ~ `'mJ`'r, le vel ( Ci ) x pe rcen rac ct Pi ) ,., A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Movement Distribution cibow tlexion ~ng. i FreqUoncy (unit deg.) l l ~2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comfort Rating (Cl) 1 (low) 2 3:^` 4' ~' S~^ . 3. 2 1 (low) B. Lock-to-Lock . Percentage 0.0% . QO%.; 3.7% 1 2.8% 61.6% 22. ' 0.0%; 0.0% o ooto . 100.0% l ~ ~1~_1~, ~I_~i' ~O 0.0°/0 - 1 15.0, 28.8 1 0 0-0% _ 1 2~8,: 425 ] 3 ~ ~_ 1~8% _ T: ,,,,,.,,,, as~L _ ~ u~:a D5 1 - . 111 67.7% _ ~!~:~ : 3B .- , :22.0% _ ~ 85.0, 925] Q O.Q% _ ~1~ .100.01 O ~ QO% _ , 1 oa.o _ 0 o.o% Total 164 100.0% wdghted postural comfort scoro · 4.7 B.1 Joint Movement Distribution L elb fte on anglo (unit. deg.) Frequency Percentago .150 0 0.0% j O O.O.h [ 30.0. 4S.01 1 16.7% I ~s _ 16~7% 1 c 20%- t ~ 75.0 9001 2 33.3% ~u ,s% ' 1 90.Q105.01 , O 0.~% 1 105.0. 130 0 1 O 0.0% I ,1 30.0 O 0.0% I Total 6 100.0% I _ B.2 Postural Comfon Evaluation elbow tlexion angle (unit deg.) 15.0 15.Q 28.8 28.8, 425 42.5, 563 [ S6.3. 775 t "5. 85.0 1 BSQ 925 - 92.6, 100 , 100.0 Total wdgl~tod posture. comton score ~4.3 G-98 Subject No.: 15 ! 60% t 1 ~. 1 ·~, . 30%. . 2.0% ' . 10% ~ . 0.0% 0% - DYnamic Drivino Posture Analvais- Elbow (subioct 15, oval Isp} 'l1 22.0~. 12.e% ~\ O.O h,~ ~ \0 0 . 0.0% 0.0% 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Elbo. F~ - n Ang~ Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvsis- Elbow (subject 15, oval bp) 67.7% 70% . . 50%. . · 40% ~ r ~ E _ 30.5% 3~. ~ ~_ 20% ~ r ~ 10%' ~ ~1.8% O.O4Y 0%- I · I - I 5 (h - ) 0.0% 1 4 3 2 1 (be) Co~ "v~ ~ _ 3OY. ~ 16.7% 16.7% D'namic Drivina Posture Analvsis - Elbow (subioct 15, ovel IsP} 33.3% 33.3% l 5%' I 0.0% o~o%l , ~ ~ \.OY. 0.0% o~o% 0% 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 ~ F - xion Ang~ Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Elbow (subject 15, lock-to-lock so.o~ so%. ' _ 45%- . ~ 40~- . _ 35% , ~33.3% -30%. . _ ~ E, 2S% · ~16.7% =15% ; ~ ~ ~ 5%. ' ~ ~ ~0.0% 0% . _ 0.0% _ , . , , I I S(hlgh) 4 3 2 1 (b.} ~,~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort c. Synthesis - Ov81 LLap and Lock-to-l ock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution i elbow He ion ·ngb ~ ic Drivino Posture An Iveis - Ell | (unit deg} FrequenCy ~ Percentage | (8ubjectlS.ov 11 p ~ 1 5 0 1 0 0 0°JO ~o~. - so e% ~ 15~: 30~01: O. .- ~ O.Q%:: - ~60% , \ 1 ~ :45.0. ^6003 ~1 7 ~1 4.1~ ~. t /1\ I t ~o.o. 7sal 1= ~60~3%. , , 30% 1 224% ,t:7s0, ;530.01 38- i , 22.4~:,, ~ 20%. 129% \ ;i{ 900,10501 Q - ~ ~QO% , o'`- oo% 0o% ~\oo~. oo% oo% 105 0 130 0 1 O 0 0% ~o~; ~s 30 4s 60 75 90 105 ~30 0 0% ! E~ F-xbn a ~1 ~1000% C.2 Posturial Comfort Evaluation :omtortFIsCingl elbo - ~e~d°n ~ngb ~Frequency |Percenuge(ff~| I DvnamicDrivinoPostur Anelve's-Elbow (1Ow) 1 ~ 150 0 00% j 70% , 67.~% . i ~. . [ 15= 28~8 1. o ~r . . 0~0% ' ~60% ~ 3': ~ 28-a 425 l `. .:,~. ~2~. 1 50~ ~_ . 4: td25 56~1 14 8.2'C. ! °°% ~ ~30s% s~) I #:~ nsl 11. ~.1% ! . ~_ .~, 1 77.S 85nl 38 - 224'; 11 ~ 20` ~ 3 ~ BS~ 9?~1 O OO'C I ~o% ~24% 00~` oo% 2 - t 1323.100~1 0 ; 00%~ ~I o%* _, _, , , 1 (low) > 1000 170 1WO# | S(hgh} 4 3 2 ~ (b.} 1 w~ghted postural comfort score · 4.6 G-99

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analysis - Shoulder Note 1 St~aded ce~ls indicate results related to the comfort shoulder movement zone 2 we~ted postural comfort score = ~ co mJbn Ie vel ( Ci ) x /'e rcenrage( Pi ) .., A. Oval Lap ~1 Joint Movenent Distribution .. shoulder flexion angh Froquency (unit deg ) -~5~, 5 ~ J ,.< ~^~^^ l 5Q t50l - . . :: ::~.l t~.: 25.01 -, . ~. t.2ti-~ Ol l 3s.0. 4501 13 [ 450 5501 10 55.0 1 Total | 164 A 2 Postural Comtort Evaluation C'omtort Rating (Cl) ~ (Iow) 2:,.,,, :.. 3 . . ,., ,.~ .... . . . ., 4,.. . ... . ~ ~ "S'~. ~ ................. ~ ~ : ^ ~ ; , (low) B. Lock-to~Lock h Idor flex~on ·nglo | Pel_n~ ll~il . 0.0% ...~,-..,.,.-, ,, 1~: : °^ . ::- . t~-251 O:~. i: ~ . :. 0.~- . ^: ~ [~-2$ ^3~t; ; . ? ~;,J: - 1 ; 4-^ . ^ 1 -3.~ 16.~] : .. ~;~. ~; j : ;.~ _ , A ' '; ' 1~ t ~: ~ | . ~ : | : : ~ 7.~ : ;^ [ 2~.S, .288] 7 ~! 4~ ~: t 288. 36.01 20v ,2= > 35 ~24 14.64Yo _ Dl~l 164 100.0% weig~d postural comfort scoro · B.1 Joint Movement Distribution hould rtlexion 9 n (unit deg ) Freq~ cy B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Percentago 0.0% 1 0.0% . 0.0%'' r28- 143% l . ~ 2a.6% . ~ o.o% . 28.64Y . 0 0°h . 100 0% shoulder tlexion angh (unit deg ) . . < -15.0 ~ 15Q - 8.81 t.88. 251 -25, 3B 1 38. 163 . .. . ( 16.3; 225 22~5, 28.8 28~8. 35.0 1 > 35.0 1 . Total - weigh~d postural comfort scoro · 2 7 G-100 Subject No.: 15 Dvnamic Dnvina Posture Analveis. Shoulder (subloct 15, OVJI lep] 40% T 35% + i30% ~ · 25% ~| ~ =.0% I 5%~o.o%,o.d,l,l,~, 1 -15 .5 5 15 25 35 45 55 | Sh~ F - xbn Angb l 1 1 50% 45# ` 35% 30% · 2 20% 1 15% lo% s% o~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis ~ Shoulder (subioct 15, oval lap) r 47.0% _ 22.0% t ~ ~ 122% t' ~ _ ~ ~ 5 (hl9~) 4 3 2 1 (b.) Comlon ~ 1 D.namic Drivino Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subjoct 15, tock-to-lock) 30% 25 ! . 20% E 1 5% ~ 1 0% ! s% 1 I 0% 2B.6% 28.B% 28.6% oo%'oo%oo%llllo 100% 15 -5 5 15 25 35 .5 55 Sho~ F-xion Angb DYnamic Drivino Posture Analv~is" Shoulder (subioct 15, lock-to-lock} . 28.e% 26.6 ~28.6 30% 0%:', 0'0% · · ~ S(hith) 4 3 2 1 (be) _~. ~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort c. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to^Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distrib~nion . $hould ~ flexion ang ~Fre uenc vnamic DnYino Posture Anaivels - Shoulder (un'2. deg.) I q .1 Percon2age I P ( u c2 5 syn2 s] , < -15.0 o o.oo/O I '°# T 3s7% ~ 1-1SiO -fi.Q] ~j 0~0%^ ~3s% t ~ . . l - 5.Q :~ 5.° 3 ~ . 14. - . ! ~ + / ~ \ .,.~'so ~, 1 :~6, 1 . 35. ~u20`t ·~.611 ~ ~o; =0 1 22 | ,zg ~, o% /' ~ W7.6% 7 0% ~350450] ~,3 · 76~i s%~JI ~ ~ ~ I~^ , 55.0 ~0.6°h ~-,s ·s s ~s x 3s 4s ss Sho~ F-xbn ang~ Total 1 171 100.0# I C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtor2 Rating shoulde fiexion angb Frequenc' Percentage (Pi) I l?vnamic Drivino Posture Anaheis - Shoulder (Ci) (umt dB9 ~(subject 15 sYnth~is) (10w) . 15 ~0.0% so# · 462# - 2 I -15.0. - 8~3 1 0 0.0% · 445# . f ^8.~ -2s l (' ~: o.o% j . 35# ~ ~ ~- t 2$ A3~ 1 .7A.,~' ' . ~4~1~-. . . I E 2s~ ~21.~% 5~) 1 &8 163) 71, 48.216 i ~ .e~l ~_ 1s.2~ . ~', : t 1~3~.225] 2g : : 17~0% 1 15% · r ~12.9% _ 3: .. [22Si 28.87 :-8~:. .. ~.~.-:. 1 s% ~ ~ '` 2;~..: . : t ~ 35nl :22: :; - 12 ~1 0% ~ 1 - ~ - 1 (low) > 35.0 26 15.2Yo S(h~h) 4 ~2 ~ (b.) Total 171 100.0# co_a we~ghted postural comfor2 scoro · 3.7 G-10 1

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivinq Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comton elbow movement zone. 2.w~ghted postural comfon score = ~ ~ `'n~tor, level( Ci ) x percenrapct Pi ) ,., A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Movement Distribution _ elbow tlexion angle (unit deg.) < 15.0 15.0..:34.0 3Q0. 450 1 ds.o. 60.0 60.0.~ -7SQ t 75.0; 90~0 t ~O.~tO5.01 1 05.0, 1 30.0 l > 130.0 A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B. Lock-to-Lock 60% T s°% t ~ I c 3o% t + SUbjeCt No.: 16 Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvsh- Elbow (subject 16, oval lap] 58.8% 35.3% % + 4.3` 1 0.0% 0-0~ 0'` - 1 ~ 1 5 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 E.~ F~xbn An9 - elbow flexion angle (unit deg.) < 15.0 . [ 1 5.0, 28.8 l . 2a8, 425 l "5, 56 t SB.3. 77.S 1 , . 1 ~.5, 85.01 8S.0. 925 . ~, ~ - ~,1~.0 . > 100.0 . Frequency Percentago (Pi) O 2 ~ S E = .: 70 : 37.~% ~ 2~- ~ 31 . 16. - ~,5 ~, 3 1.6% o 0.0% 1 s (h - ) ~3 2 , 1 Comlort Lev 187 1 100.0% wo~ghted postural comfort acore ~4.2 B.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow tlex~on angl (unit. deg.) ~Frequency | Percentage c 15.0 0 0.0% 15.Q 30.01 O 0.0% 30.0. dS.01 O o. ~ 45.Q 60.01 0 0.0% t 60.0, 75~01 6 75.0% ~ 75.0, 90.01 2 25.0% 1 gO.Ql05.0] O- 0.0%. l 1 t)S.O. 130.0 1 0 0.0% , 130.0 0 0.0°/. Total 8 100.0# B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation elbow tlexion angle < 15.0 15.0. 28.8 28.8. 425 . t 42~5. 5631 1 S6.~ "~1 77.5. 8S.0l 1 85.0. 9251 92.5.100~1 __ 1 (low) , 10~0.0 Total . weighted postural Comton score G-102 Percentage (Pi) . O.OY. . ~ 0.0% 0.0% . QO% 25.0% QO% . . 0.0% 0.0% ; 1 00.0# 4.8 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Elbow (subioct 16, ovel Isp] 44.~% 37.4% - 1 1 16.e% , ~ ~ ~_ 0.0% Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis- Elbow (subioct 16, ovaJ leP2 75.0% 30% r 70 60% t 1. .. so%t 18 C 40% + 1 ~ \ 20% T I 1 25.0'h t o v% o o ~ o o% o o% ~ ~ \o v~ o o~ , 5 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 E.lbo. Flesbtl - 9 - Dvnamic Drivina Posturo Analveis - Elbow | (subioct 16, lock-to~ock] 1 80% T I ~o~ 1 j 60% 1 o 50 30% 20% 0% O'. . 1 25.0` i T ~ ~o v% O.v~h o o% 1 ore (higb) 4 3 2 1 (b.) Co~ Lev~

G-II.4: Postural Contort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Loctc-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution | elbowfiex~on Sage ~Frequency ~ Percentage ~ icDrivinr Posture An Ivets- El' DO c 15 0 1 0 0 0% 1 60% 57.4% 1 ~S.0, 30.01.- o: ~O.Q% 1 50,` 3 / 30~0 dS O ~O ~ O Q' ~. ~as a% 41%; , 30% 1 =0 - 900] ~ -11Z ~ ~ 574% 1 ~ 20~ + /l ~ [ ~-105Q} 3 ~'5%~ j i°°~ °°% °°%~` - Ask ooY. 00% [ 1050 13001 0 00°/ 1 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 , 130 0 O 0 0% 1 Em Exxon Angle Total 195 100 0% i C.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comfort Rating | elbr~v~lex on angle ~ F~er~u~ncy |Fercenug~(Pi)| | ~IECt£~ ~Analve~s- Elbow 2 ~ 150 1 0 1 00% ~ ~ 1 - %l 390` 9 3 ~0 - - ()O~C . 30~- -d - ;; | ·25: =:1 ] ~ ^ 2 1% ~E zS ~ 4 ~ ~| 77 S =] 76 ~t;S% ~ 20% + 9 9 ~s 9% 2 ~185Q 5Qh~3 o~t+ ~1 1 s ~°°~ 1 r~v ~7 ,10O.O ~ 195 ~ 1000% 1 ~- ~2 (~} wdgh~d postural comton score · 4.2 G-103

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivinq Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note 1 Shaded cells indicate results related to the comton snou~er movement zone 2 weighted postural comfort score = >; ~ `>mtor, ievell Ci ) x percentapct Pi ) ,.. A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Movoment Distribution shoulder tlexion ang ~Frequency Percontago (unit: deg ) <-150 '.'2: 1.-15.0.' - s.o 1 ^^~^ t~5it1 5;t}~ ', :t fi Q - ;t5 ~ 1 15,0~25~^ ;; ~ ~ 1 25 Q. ~35; 350, 4501 45 0 55 0 1 >550 1 1 Total | 187 .. A.2 Positural Comfort Evaluation shouldor tlexion ·ngh Frequency (unit deg ) < -15 0 1 0 B. Lock-to~Lock B.1 Joint Movement Distribution Percontago (Pi] 0.0% - ' :: ' J,.3%:''' 21% ~ ~; :.' 1~...:' ., i:~ ;,- 3B~, t7JX, 7Q'C~ . .., ~.~... 43% 100.0# 39 shouldor tlex~on angh Frequency < -15 0 0 B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation _ Comtort R - ng shoulder tlexion angle Frequency (Cl) (unit dog ) 1 (low) < - 1 5 0 O 2 t 150, 8~81 O 3 [ ~ 25 1 Q .. ~1-25. 38 S (higil) ~ Y B. 16 31 ~ .. `,-. . t 16.3, 225 1 . ~ ~ .A . 3 122S 2881 0 2 1 "8, 3501 2 1 (low) > 35 0 5 Total 1 13 wdghted postural comfort acore G-104 Percenage (Pi) 0.0% I50% ~ - o% QOX 15% 462% '~ 30% 0.~% ~ 220% 0.0% ~ 1s% 00% !10~. 's% 1S.~% o% 385# 100.0% 25 Subject No.: 16 Pvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis- Shoulder I (subject 6, oval lap} 3s~ ~ , ^ 2s ! ~ ~ 20% E ~ 15% . I 5%' I o~. ~ ~/ 32 1% |\24 6% ~. s s 15 2s 3s 4s ss S~ Fb~bn-96e Dvnamic Dnvino Posture Analvais - Shoulder (subioct 16, oval bp] ~°% ~ 38 s% 1 3s% ~ . _ | | , . s~) 4 3 2 1 (b.) c~ l Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analv~is - Shoulder (subject 16, lock-to-lock) 50% T 46.2% 45%- ~ ~.Li. ~ 5 ·5 5 15 25 35 45 55 ~ Fle~on ~ - Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvds- Shoulder (sub~ct 16, lock-to~lock} 462% ~ 0.0% I 5 {h - ) 38.S~ 1 5.4% 0.0% ~, 4 3 2 1 (b - ) C~ "V~

G-I1.4: Postural Cornfon C. SynU,es~s - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation . . shoulder tlexion ang~ IF eq erncy Percontage Dvnamic Drivino Poen~re Analveis - Shoulder (unit: deg.) , r u , (subject 16, syntt~us} < 15.0 ' 0 O.O~o 30.~ { -15 0, . ~ 5.0 1 13 ~ : 6.59`> . 25% t 24.-'~,.o% t 59; 501 48 ; ~24.0% . 20% ~\ " < 1501 ~m.^ . t / ~\ t~so~so] 46 ~" I 230%; ~ 15% t / ~\~°= .. ~ 2~0~:3~01 20~. . I ;~1O.O%: A ~ 10%; 65% ~h [350~501 4 2.0% , s% ·/~ ~\2.0% 3.0Y ~s% 1 45~0e 55-01 6 3.0% ~0~/. . 0.0%/ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~I ~ ~ ~- , 5s.0 3 1.5% !-'s -s s ·s 2s 3s ~s sS To~l 1 200 100.0# ,s~ F - ~ - 9 - Comtort Rating shoulder tlexion angleFrequency Percentage (Pi) Dvnamic Drivino Posturo AnaiYsis - Shoulder (Cl) (unit deg.) ~(subject 16, syntl~is} 1 (10w) · 15 0 O 0.0% ~40~ T 36-0% 34,5% 3 ; ~ellt 9 .: ; ~4.0% 35%; `, ~- :38 >^ - ~ J8.0% ll c 220%% ~ 5~) I a~ 1~DI 72 i 36.0%. ~·4.0% 4. { 1~3. 22~51 33 16 ~10%- ~90% ~6.5# 3 0 .[ 2Z.~ 28~1 13, ~. 65~i ~s% . . ~· ~_ .2 ... 1 28~84~01 .2~:; .:: 1Q.0~: . . i, o%· _ , _ , _ , _ , _ (low) ,3s.0 13 6.5Y. ! s~)4 3 2 1(b.' Total 200 100.0% c~ ~voighted postural comfort score · 3.8 G-105

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dynamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Elbow Note 1 Shadea cells indicate results re~ated to Ine comton elbow movement zone 2 we~tea postural comfort score = ~ c`,n~trJrt Ie~el( ci ) X percentage( P.' ) .=, A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Movement Distribution el fl x~on angle (unit deg ) Frqq, ~Y~aY 150 0 00% . l tS;0. ' 30-0 ) ' '5 ':: ' ' 2.8% ' t 3 Q0, 45 0 l 18 - 10.t~ l 4s.~. 60-01 ss ~33-0% : ~ { 60.~ ·7sn ~8g' .~A . (g*-' . I ~ 1 75 0 90 0 1 8 ; 4 5't i ' ~ m.~lm.o1 o ,: O. - l 1050 13001 0 00% , 1300 0 0 0% Total I 179 100 0% Comfort Rating elbow flex~on ·ngh (Cl) (unit d ) ~Frequency Pereentage(Pi) ~ 1 (low) < ~ 5 0 O 0 0% 7°% T 67 °% 2 [ 150 2881 0 00% t 3; ~ 1 28~^ 42 5 1 12 67% so~ t < ~ ~ ~ 56~31 39 2t8% c~+ 5 ~h) ~ 56 ~ ~ 775 1 120 ~ - ~670% ~ 30% 77 5 85 0 1 8 ~ 5% ~ 2~% 3 [ 850 925] Q 00% 10% t 2 ~ 1 92 S tO00 1 0 00% ° 1 (low) , 100 0 O 0 0% Total 179 100 0# weighted postural comfort score B. Lock-to-Lock A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation B.1 Joint Movement Distribution Ibove flex~on angle Frequency B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort Rating ~ (Cl) 1 (low) 2 3 4t ^' . ' ~_ 4.'' 3 2 1 (low) __ 5o% T 4s% t 40% + 35% 30% C 2S~ + =%l 15% . 5-. -0'`~ 1 1 00.~0.0%0.0% 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 E~ f~xbn - 9 - Subject No.: 17 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow (subioct 1 7.4O9Y7a% IJP) 1 46 . Pereentago l 0.0% 6t5% l 23t% 15.~% QO% QO% QO% 0.0/. . 0.0% 100.0 , elbow tlexion ·ng~ |unit d_ < 150 t50 288 ~ ".a. `251 . 1 42S 563 1 1 "~ n.s~ 775 8501 85Q 925] 825 1000 .~R O Totel 7o~~- ~ ~ so% 1 so%. 40% 30% 20% 1 10% - wdghtod postural comton score ~3 0 G-106 I?vnamic DrivinQ Posture AnalYsis- Elbow (subioct 17 ovel Isp} 263% 6.7% S(hlob) 4 3 2 1 (k~ C~ "V~ Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvsis - Elbow (subject 17 ovel Isp] 1 I a.l% I ~ls.~% 1 ~ [o.` 0.0% o.~. o.` o.o% 15 30 ·5 60 75 90 105 130 EJbo. Fb~bn Ang" DYnamic Drivina Posture Analvsis - Elbo~ (subioct 17 lock-to lock) 53.8% ~ 308% O. 0% 1 1 0.0% 1 S(hgb) 4 3 2 1 (bw' ^ ~ We_e _~_ 1

G-II.~: Postural Comfon C. SynU,esis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution . elbo~flexion angle Dvnamic Drivin IPos r An Iv i - Elbo (unit 9 ) | Frequenc' ~Perc~n 96 | (aubiect 17, ovaI I p} ·150 ~00% i45% ; ".4% 13- ~ 6896; ~.o'` ~/ ~ :- I2".0',60':l 21 2~ ' '31°~'~-; , .3s% . ; ~\ ' I:~fiQ~ 7s.~:: ' 89 . 48.~% ~u ~ . .:. t- - ~.-.90.~1^^ ~. 8:-". : : 4~'' I ;5# ; 6-^ _ ~ -~ -1: .90 0 -~1: ~ :: o ~ ~0 ~1 5# ' 0.~- ~ 0.0% 0.0# 0.0# [ 1050,13001 O 00°/. ' o% ~s 30 45 60 75 90 305 '30 > 1 30 0 O 0 0% 1 E~ F-xbn ang~ To~l 192 100 0% C.2 Postural Comton Evaluation Comtort Rating elbo. tlexion angh Frequency Percentagc (Pi) (Cl) [unle ae9 ~ (10w) · ~ 5 0 O 0.0% 2' - -_~L~,~, , 4,.,,,,, . : ~1~:-'' , 3 . ^ ~...... ~ =^ ~~5'1 ~t. < ;: , ~ 9. - . ~, 4,~~, ~' t 425.' "~'1'' . ~ ., : ;.~=,. 5 ~) : . . . ~122. . :' 63 5% '" ' l ' ' 4' A:.' ~ ~' a :. .~.: 3 ;: ~ : { dis.~ ^9251: I: ~o.~* : . , z ^, ,, l~!=l~l . o . ;,, . O.Q% 1 (10w) , 1000 O 00~. Total 192 100 0% weigh~d postural comfort ·core · ~ 5 G-107 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvois- Elbow (su~ 17, s - ~us) 70% · 63.5% 5 0 ~ · . ~ D 4475~ , ~ ~ t - 20%. ' _ 10~- . 0~^ _ , 5 (h - ) 4 3 ~ . ~_ W_~ ~_ 24.5% 1 9.^ 2.1% 0.0% 2 1 {b - )

G-II.4: Postural Comfort DYnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shaded ce Is indicate results related to the comton shoulder movement zone. 2.weighted posture comtolt score = ~ cr~mJ~Jn le~ cl( C' ) x percenta~d Pi ) ,., A. Oval Lap B. Lock~to~Lock A.1 Joint Movement Dlstrlbution A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B.1 Jolat Movement Dlstribution shoulder tlexion ang ~Frequency | Pereen~ge (unit deg.) < -15.0 0 0.0~ .:~: . 1^.15;0.: ^5.~] ":^ ^ ' o: ;~ . ~: ~-. O.~Q. . .1:0: ~5 ~6~^r:~: : - 1 ~4#; ^ J='~ ~. ' ' . ' 3t ~ ~ -: 1 : 207~ . '~'^''~'-2"1 ~ . ~27 4%; ' .43'.~, :.:' ~ 224.0~C,'::': ~' 1 35~0. 45.0 1 251 4.0.J'. 1 45.0, 55.0 ] 105.6Y 55.0 5.0% Total 179 1 100.0# cO-_Flann~/ _~=~- ~__ Pe~nlegll(~) _ 1 (1au) .. ~s O O 0.0% . ~ ; 2. .:. -, : {~15;Q._- 8.8.1.~: .: ~ : : ~ :; .0~ .: ; 3, ~ ~^l;-a^~1 : o~,, I ~o~ ~ . -.:~:: ~-~:: :f:^~;.:.38:~::.:::: . 3.~.^ . ~ .1.7'L:.: . :~(high) - '~;'';-:'1 :=''1~31';: ... ~,.,, 1 .~22.3,c,. - ~:-~: }~: r~r~l 3~ 1 =.t!~L, ~ ^ ~ ;3 ~ ·: ~ p~ _1 `1 1 ~ - 13~. ~ 1 .. ^ . ~7 ^. 2 _ ~"~.i ~: 2~0'C :~ 1 (10w) ~ 35.0 44 24.6°/e Total 179 100.0# , _ wdghted postunl comton scoro · 2~9 shouldorticxion ·ng~ | FreqUen ·350 O 0.0% L~ ~ ~0 0.0# [.S.0. snl 0 ~ 0.0% I . :.1 5.0, .tS.0t I . 0.; : ! 0.0'C :~ I 0. 1 . QQ%.: _~2~ I t . 6=L. l 35 0' 45-0 1 1 6.3°X 1 6.3% 55.0 13 81.3% Total 16 1 OQO# i Frequency Percentage (Pi) O _ O.OY 0.0% o,. 0.0% o: : : QO ~ . 0., ' 0.0% ' i O ~. :. '. . 0.0%;: . . o 0.0# 1 ~. ~b . 15 - 93.8°J ~1 _ _ 16 100.0# _ w~ghtod postural eomtort ·eore · 1 1 B.2 Postural Comfo~t Evaluation shoulder flexion angh (unit deg.) -15 0 -1 S O, - 8.B J ~a8. -25] t - 2~ 8 ~ _ I 3^ 163 - t 1634225 2~S, 28~8 28.B, 35 0 l >350 1 Tota G-108 SubjeCt No 17 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder (subioet 17, oval lep) 25%T 20.7: ~o%l°°` I °°%/~ I ~ ~ - I - ~ - I - I - I 1 -15 .5 5 15 25 35 45 55 L ~ F - sbn A~ 91 1\24.0' 1\..~ 1 1 ~. Dvnamie Drivino Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subject 17, oval lap] 7~35%%1l 1 73 1 1 S(t~lob) 4 3 2 1 tbe) Co_t ~ !90% I70% 1 s 60% E 50% 40# 1~ 30% j20% 11` 10~. Dvnamie Drivina Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subject 17, lock-to-lock) jo.o% oo% o.o%, o.o% o.o% _ a_ .o% o.o% o.o%~_~_ 15 5 5 15 25 35 45 55 Sho~ F - - on Ang~ 1 Dvnamie Drivina Posture Analveis- Shoulder (subioet 17, loek-to~oek2 100% T ~t ~t 70~.l S 60% + E 50% t 40% t 30% + 20% t .0% ~ 0,^ 0.^ o ~ 0 s3.e% 1 5 (h9h) 4 3 2 1 (b~ w~ ~

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution shouiderflex~onangb | Dvnamic Dn~nn Po Analve's-Shou iunit d ~Froquency ~PercenUge | (subjee' 7, synumus) i 15.0 1 ° 0.0% ! 30%. · |-'S.Q: -~-01 ~25 ~ 25-~% 22.B% {-~.Q:~.~.0} B ~:, ~ ~9.1,%^.^^^ . 20%+ 19.0Y~/ ~ ~ ~ : : ~ 5~, . ~ t S. 1 =. ~ : I . : :: . ~ 9~- ~ 1 3 . 3 % 1 1~0, 25.~1 "~, :.^ : 25~. , ~ 15~. / ~ , - ~113% : t25~0.3S.01: ~; ^. ::~ ~ ^ ~o% ~/ ~ 8\s6%/8 1 35~0. 4s.0 l 26 13.39~. ~s% . . 3.1# ~ ~ ~ ~ 145.0. 55.0 l ~ 11 5.69` ! o%. oo% oo%~. ~ , ~ ~, ~, , s5.0 1 22 11.3% 1 ~s s s ~s 25 35 45 55 ~' Sho~dc~ F-xbn- Total I 195 1000% C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comfort Rating (CI1 . . 1 (low) 5~) 1 tlow) shoulder Hexion angh Frequency (unit dog ) o 40'^;^ :. 36i : . : 13 . ~:; ~ ;~% ~ ~% - ,. 59 : .. 22.~% . . 30.3Y. _ tiS 1000# weighted postural comton score · 2~8 G-lO' Percontage (Pi) 0.0~. :: .. 0.~%:-: ;~; 0.0~7L':' '._'"' 1.~% _ 20.5X (subpct 17, synth~is} 35% . . 30% · ~ 25% · . ~+ ~ · .~8S%~ 10% 1, ~ _ , _ , 10% ~ . 5% . . 0% ~ _ 30.3% 22.~% 20.5% 20.01 ~ 5(~) 4 3 2 1 (b., Co~o~ ~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results relatea to the comfort elbow movement zone. 2.we~gntea postural comfort score = ~ ~ `'mforr level( Ci ) x percenta'C( P.' ) . - , A. Oval ~p B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow tlexion ~ngl. | Frequency ! < 15.0 - ' . 1 .:'15.~..:.'3Q.0 1 ' '': 1'3Q.~. ~.o1 ' .:-. i ~ dS.~.: 60.0 ] .~, 1 . 60~, . .75.0 1 ., { .7s,Q.:sQa : t-: ~Q 105.0 1 [105.0.130.01 O , 130.0 0 . . Pe~ .oo/o .- ~: 0.5%. Q8'C,' . ~ . 33.6~C'. . ~ '46 ~ `' ' : ., 4~:~ O.OYO 0.0% A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation elbow tle~ion angle (unit: deg.) . < 15.0 [ 1 5.0, 28.8 : : 1 :2a8, 42'i . 1 ~ 5631 L~ I n~ as~ [~ : ~ ~t ~. lao.o I . , 100.0 . weighted postural comfort acore · 4.1 8.1 -1oint Movement Oistribution B.2 Postural Comfont Evaluation . elbow ttexion ang~ (unit deg.) < 15.0 l l 15.Q 28.8 ) l t mn, 42~51 l .. t 424 56.3 . .,. . ~ "~ . U5 1 A . 1 775, 85.0 85.Q 92~5 =5.100.0 ,100.0 weigh~d poen~ral comfort acore · 3.5 G-110 Subject No.: 18 r t)vnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Elbow ; (subject 18, oval lap} so% T ·s~ . 1 _ c.~ ~L 0% o% 4.3~- _ ~0.0~ 0.0% 5 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 E~ Flenbn ~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Eibow (subject 18, ovel bp) 44.6% 45% T _ 40~- . 35~ . a: =~ L~ o~. 5 (hk~b) 4 t ~t I ~ 20% + 60% . so% · . DvnJmic DrivinQ Posture Analveis- Elbow (subioct 18, oval Isp} 54.5% 62% 0~+ zys ~ 1 ·% U15 - , - 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Elbo. F - xbn - - Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Elbo~r (subject 18, lock-todock] 7o% T w%t ' s°% t ~ · 40% + 30% + ~ 1 1 B.2% 1 8.^ _ 20% t _ _ _ o% 1 - , _ , _ 00% o.o% 5 (higb) 4 3 2 1 (ba) C~ 63.e%

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. SynU,es~s - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution ~ Frequency | Perc~nt~g. | elbow flexion angle (unit deg.) ~ 15.0 1-:1S.Q. 30-01 _ [':'30.e, ".o1 ~ , ~ [ 45;~. 60.Q - t - ;0, 7S~l . ~ t ~.~. 5~0.0 l . ,.: ~ - ~. l~.e 1 [ 105.0, 130.0 1 0.0% t~. ~ 1 O.59` . 21 1 o% o o.oo/o >130.0 0 O.OYO Total 1 195 . 1 00.0% C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation DYnamic Dnvino Posture Analvais - EIbow (sub~ct 18, OVaI lep} ·72% 1 50% . 45% ~ . 40% ~ . . 35% . 30% . C 25% . 20% . 15% , 1 01% 5%2 20.0%0.5%1.0%~ ~ ~ ,1 4.1-'. - ` O.OY. 0.0% . ._ , , 15 30 45 60 75 90 E~ F - xbn - 9 - 105 130 Comfon RaNng | elba~v tlexion mg. Frequency | Pereen~g ~I ( Analvais - Elbo~v 1 (10w) ~ 15.0 O0-0% 45% I 43-~% 2 . . - { -15~. 28.8 1 I O. ^ 0 016 40% ~ 3i ^^::: . ~t~ 28~. 425 l I 2 ~ - ~ :: :: 1.0'C~; ~ ~28.7% 4 .;. [ ~. ~] I . 9 . .~ . :~:- 25~+ ~24.1% ~ s ~! 84 43.~% ~ 20%+ . 4.-:- . ~1 ~19,=: I -15%+ 3 A ~- [.85.~ 9Q51 ~54 .;. 27.7% 1 s + ~~ ~4'1% 2: . ~ °~ '0001 . B ~ ~. 4.1% ~ l - , _ , _ o~ _ 1 (Iow) ~ 100.0 O 0.0% 5~' 4 3 2 ~ (~} Total 195 100.0% we~ghted poanlral comfort acore ~4.1 G-111

G-Il.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analysis - Shoulder Note 1 Shaded ce Is indicate results related to the comfort shoulder movement zone 2 weighted postural comton score = ~ cc~mtort Icvel( Ci ) x percentaR~ P.' ) A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to-Lock Comton Rating | shoulder flexion angh (~ A.1 Joint Movement Distribution A.2 Posturai Comfon Evaluation B.1 Joint Movement Distribution should r t exion ang _ (unit deg ) ~=~' ='n - ~_ < 150 0 00% ~160 -~)1 I ~ i ~ - 00$ - ~ S;o s~; I I 33; t7 ~f~! J7 ~; ^ 25S~L ~01 1 ~^ 2S~^ 25Q 9~;~] I I t8: ~L ^' l 35 0. 45 0 1 23 12.5Yo l 45~0, 55-01 10 54Y > 55.0 7 3.8% , Total 1 184 100 0# Comton Rating should rtl xion 91 ~, ~Pi (Cl) ~ (un~t deg ) ~_ 1~12 ) ~ t-1SQ. 881 0 00°/O ~. 3.:~.::.:. ~ :. ^~:.~ -2Sl:: o ~ . :~:^ : ~ ~ <~: . ~ ~: ~ ~: :. i. . ". . 3 1 =, ~1 ~ - A A 5~ ) ~ ~ t; 3& 1631 58 h^--- ~ .~31^ :. . 4~:.^ ;: :: ~E 16~ ~1^: ".Y~: 1S~ i :: 3- ~ . I ~ Zlklll 17~: ~Z,C 2; - 1 2UI :15111 ~ 18 98%~ 1 (low) > 35.0 40 21.7tYo Total 184 100 0% "dghted postural comton acore hould rtlexionangl (umt deg ) Frequency c -15 0 0 150 -501 . -50 SO] . S.O. 15.01 1 tS.O. 25.01.' 1 25.0, 35.01 . 35.0. 45.0 l [ 45.0. 55.0 l > 55.0 . Total B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation . P~ ~ .o% 0.0% . 333'C 83% , 1 a3% 167% 0.0% . 0.0°/ . 33.3% _ 100 0% . _ _ 1 Frequency Pereentage (Pi) 1(10w) 1-~5CSO8' O~ 00# 3 1 88-2~51 OQO% ~[-25 31~1 ~333% 5~) 1 38~ 1631 ~ 1' ~ - 83% 3 1 ~S 2a81 ~O QO% 2 1 2~8 3501 - 2 t67% 1 (low) ~ 35.0 4 33.3Yo Total 12 100 0% wdghted poatural eomtort score · 2 8 G-1 12 Subject No 18 Dvnamic DrivinQ Posture Analvais - Shoulder (subpet 18 oval lap] 30% T __ -20%- . 17.9%1 ~,s~ iGo'%lO'0%, 1,1,1,~-, -15 -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 5 _ Flesbn Ang~ _ . . . Pvnamie Drivina Posture Analv~is- Shoulder (subpet 18 ovel lep] 15%- ' 31.5% 30~. · ~27.7% 25#. ~21.7% E ~1 1 9.2% 9.B# 1 S(hd~h) 4 3 2 ~ (b.) Coado~ ~ pvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis- Shoulder (subieet 18 loek-to-ioek} 35% ~333# 33.3% ~25%+ 15%1 1 '°%1 I 5% ~ 1 o%] | | 8.3Y B.J~\ 0.0% 0,0% ~ ~ ~ 0.~1% 1 5 5 5 ~ 5 25 35 45 55 S _ Flesbn Ang~ Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvais - Shoulder (subject 18 loek-to~loek) 45% T 41-~% 40% + c25 5 ~1 16 1 V7e S(hlgh) 4 3 2 1 (be} Co~ L~

G-11.4: Postural Comfort C. Syntt,,esis - Oval La,p and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution shoulder Hex~on-9- ~Fre qu~ncy ~ Perc-U ~Dvnanic Drivino Postur~ Ansive~s - Shouldor <-15.0 i 0 1 0.0% 1 ' 25-~ T 24.5# 24.0% {.'5.0, -5-01 O. .i'-. I - - -. o - ~;- 2 ~18. ' t -5eQ ri~Ol =, ,r i, ~ 1' ' .tB;8~;~- . ~· · \ I ''~t'0~'.'15~137'. . . ~38 i; ~l ~24~S~. ~' ~ ~s%- /8i ~i ~i \ ~1.7~ 2 t' 15~0~.'25601' . 47 ~'' 1 ' ^~ 24~ ' ~ ~°%- ~ I · ~ ~1 ~\ 1 2S~ 3f iO 1 20A~. V . 1 ·,' tO ~l ~I · · · · \s. 1 % s. 6% [35.0.45.01 23 11.7Y , 5% · I ~ ~ ~ [ 45.0, 55.0', 10 5.~% 1 0% 0.0% 0.0% ~ ~, ·, ·, - , > 55.0 1'i 5.6% ~-15 -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 Tot~i 196 100.0% ~Sho~r flenbn 016 C2 Postura,l Comtort Evaluation Com,tort Rating shou~.r thxion angb Frequency Peroonago (Pi) (Cl) (unit: deg.) 1 (iOW) < -'i 5.0 0.0% ~2 ^:~: ~ ~ -: ~-1S0, .-aB1 ~- O :::~ : : . o.o%: 3 :: . - 1 - 8~. ~ 2~ 1 ~ O ~ .; ^.^ ~ O.O~ -. ~ ; 1 2^ 3.8 J - 1 2B: ~ . : - :13.3%.: 5 ~) 1 I ~ 3 0, 163 J 59 ~. 33.t1L 4 . . I^t~3.: 22S1 30:.: ,. ~;tS~: 3 .; .~ : . 1 2~:28~1 ~. tT: :~. . : ^.: &7~: .2. : : ~t 2~84.35Q1- I .. 2Q^ ^ to2%: (10w) . a5 ~44 22.4# _ 196 100.0% wdghtod poen~ral comton scoro · 3.3 G-1 13 35% 30% 25Y. ° 20~ 5% 0% 5~ 0% Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvus - Sl~oulder (su~ect 18, syn~s.~] 30.1% 2e e ~ 5 (Id9h) 4 3 _ Co~ ~1 22.4% _ _ _ , _, _ _, 8 71L 102% 2 ~ (b.)

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note ~ Shaded cells ir~icate results related to the comton elbow movement zone 2 weighted postural comfort score = ~ ~ `>m/`'ri level( C' ) x percenta~c( Pi ) .., A. Oval l~p A.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow tlexion angi. (unit doa ) < 15 0 t 1510~30,0} t 3010 ~ ;45 0 ^ :1 45.0. 60.~] , ., . . [ 60.~ '~75.o 1 ' . 1 7s,~ 90.01' ^; t ~O;to5~0] [105.0,130.0 , 130.0 Total A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B. Lock-to-Lock B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation elbow tlexion angle (unit deg ) < 150 [ 150, 28B1 ^ ' ~' ~ ~ A, ~5 . ~ ~ ~i:~J l . =~ l ~ ns, a5~0l l ~ . ~ - .Q =5 1 l t 92;5, 1000 1 >100.0 Total . ~ghtod postural comfort score · 4 3 B.1 Joint Movement Distribution weigh~d postural comton score ~4 6 G-114 Subject No.: 19 Dvnamic Dnvino Posture Analveis ~ Elbovr (subject 19, ovel Isp} 37.4% 33.S%' ~ 4o% T 3s%l 30% + / D =% + / E 2` ~ ~.o- o.o% o.o% 5 30 45 60 75 9.0 105 130 Elbo. Flexbn Ang~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Elbow (subject 19, oval bp) 44.7% 4s%T_ 413` 40~. ' ~_ 3s%. · . 30%4 · E 2S% + ~ t ~l3.4% 0% ~ ~o 6% °- - o% 5 (hth) 4 3 2 1 (b-) Co~ L~ Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - EIbo~v tsubiect 19, ovel lap) s7 1% so~... ~ 1 ~ .40% ~{t `14.3% To,o%o.o%o,o% i 1 ~0.o~.o,0% oef. 5 30 45 60 7s 90 105 130 Elbo. Fbabn Ang. Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Elbo~v (subpct 19, lock-to-lock) 60~` T 57 1% 50%+ ~ 42.9% E 30 1 o%- - , ~o.o~ 5 (h - ) 4 3 _ Coledo~ L~ o o% o.o% I 2 1 (b.)

G-11.4: Postural Comfort C. Syn~esis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution olbo t.e onan9e Fn uenc Pe n e DvnanioDnvinoPoen~An Iveis-Elbo~v (un't deg ~| ~q y ~9 | (sub 19, ov I p) < 150 0 00% ; 40%T34. %m ~ ~ ~ lS O. -30 Q~l ~ 2 2% 35% ' -/ \ - ^ 1 30~ :45.01 - =: - . : ~ t7~,- ' ~ 25% ~/ \ : ~t 45;~. BD.03 64.~. 344% C 20%- t172% - t-0. 75~01 6 ~37~%: . · ·s% ~/ ~ 1~75.D`~90.0J . 17 9.196: ~ 10%- ~/ ~. ~. I ~.01 . . 0: .. ~Q~^:::. 5 · · 2.2%/ \ . . . # 0.0% ~\0.0% 0.0 ~0.0% [1050 13001 O 00% o%- =~, ~, , , . . , .15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 > 1 30.0 O 0.0% I Ea~ P-xbn Acn9- Total 186 100.0% C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation ._.. _ onafonF! ng e! Ne on ng Fn u DvornieDrivinoPoMun' Aneiveis-Elbow L tCj | un~edeg ~!q y ~Pen~ge(Pi)| (su 19.sy. ·} (Iow) < t5 0 0 0 0% 1 so% - 452% ! 45%- _ 4~.4% 2-; .: ~ t540,- 28.~] .. . ~oi5~s; , 40~· ~_ _ _ 3';' '- :'::9''I 28^ 42si ., .= . :'tQ~' - ' 35%g ' ~ ' · 3 _ _ ., t ~ 5~31 -, - 34~% 2 2S% ~ 5~) . ~ =& "5] ": ~. ~ 20%- ~ ~ ~ ns. s5~01 13 . 7.0% - ~15%- , ~12.9% _ _ _ 3.: t ~S~ sZ!SJ . `, : : 2.2% ~.0%. _ _ _ ~.-- ~: t~ 92S~-100~1 () 0;0%: ~o% ~o.s% o.o% ~ (~) ~ '00.0 0 0.0% '' 5~) 4 3 2 ~ ( - Total | 186 1000% ii cO~_ wegh~d poenJral comton score · 4 3 G-1 15

G-II.4: Postural Cornfon DYnamic Drivinq Posture Analysis - Shoulder · Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comfort shoulaer movement zone. 2.welghted postural comfort score = ~ cc~mton · le~ cl ~ ci ) x percentage( Pi ) ,u, A. Oval Lap A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B. Lock-to~ock B.1 Joint Movement Distribution A.1 Joint Movement Distribution shoulder tlex~on ·ng ~ = <-15.0 0 1 0.0% ..^~..;.;l..15.~.:-s:0.r^.:.. ~:. t>':~.: . I : ~.~C):^ ' ''.t',+-i,2.1,!,'-.'5.0,;' ~.~"-,:';.'' ' I: tS:;:;. :: ~ : 1Q.t%: ; ·= ~ - S.0; . t5~-)^: ~- 30.~.~. ~ ~:^~:: : t~:; ·~ ~t 15.~: 2S~.1 ~: ; I - 19 ;: ~ ~ : ^ t0.696 4:: .,i. 1:250; 35.~. ~ I . .. 174~^: ~::.: .95%+ ::.::: [ 35.0, 45.0] 25 14.0Y. .0, 55.01 36 20.1°/ 55.0 33 18.4% Total 179 100.0# Comt~ ~, ~g~ (~,~ ~ (low) . · 5 ~0 O.OYO 1 60` T ,. ~ ~ \~ ' . ' - '^*'2 -' '','1'-l6Q~ 8~'1 ;.A.-. ' ' '~0~ ' ~^' ' '. . ^ 0-'~;^'-%' ' ~ ~ ~ . ~. ~ 3 ;^^~^ : .::; :~:-a.8,^~:2JiJ;~: : - -t: ^:: : I: · 0~;: 1 . 40~ ::~.::: ;4. ~:: ::::: ;~: ~:~;;;: 3~:l'^: : 12.^:: 1 1 ~?~:-~:^ . ~' 3~0~ .' ~ ,.'~SP - ' ' ' :~ ~__ " ' 3B;~^ , ~: '."20~%"' : 1 · 20.~% ;~ ^4~; +. ::~< [~!~7 ~t4 ;~.: 1 ~ ^; ?.8~C;~<o I ~ 20~. . .,^.- :.3 -^ . ~1 ~5 . . I :-- : 2.^> . . : :^: z:: : ~ :: -r^2ss. 3501': t7: 1: :~;5~. I o~. _ , 1 (low) ~ 3s.0 94 52.5% ~1 To ~179 100.0% , L weighted posmraI comton scoro · 2.4 B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comtort Radng shoulder tlexion angh (Cl) (unit d - .) 1 (low) ~ 15.0 : 2 I-1S.0. - 8~8 : :: 3 : : l-B.8.:~2.5 . - ;l,: : 1 -25. :~.8 _, 5( - h) ~ 3~, 163] . .: : -4- : . I 16.3,: 22.S1 3 . 1 22 5. 28 8 1 ::.- : 2 1 28.8. 3~q.0 1 (low) , .~q n Frequency Porcentage (Pi) O O.OY o o~ O ~QO%, 2: :: . 222~. ;:: 0.0%.^: : 0.0%: 0.0%. .' - 0.0% 77.84Y. 100.0# v~dghted postural comfort ·core G-1 16 1.7 Subject No.: 19 2s% T 1 20% T 1 S% ~E 1 j ~ 10%~ I ~1 1 ~1 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Shouldet (subpet 19, oval lap} 2~.1% --~.oA 1'n1~, 1 -15 5 5 15 25 35 45 55 Dvnamic Drivina Posturo Analvsis - Shoulder (subpct 19, oval lap} 52.S% _, _, · . _, 5~9b) 4 3 2 t ( - Com~ ~ [)vnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis - Shoulder ! (subject 19, lock-todock} 35% T 30% . 2s% ~ ~ t_ O^~W 222% ~1 '5 5 1 5 2S 35 45 55 St~ fl.~ "gl. Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subject 19, lock-to-lock} - 33_i 77.8% 1. S(hlth) 4 3 2 ~ (b.) Con~ L~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthes~s - Oval L:ap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution i shoulder Hexion angb Frequency Percentage (unit deg.) b' ~0.0°/0 ,, I,15,~.~:;.,~., .A-'.~..::~:: ~i ~,2'~ ^,10S~C i, _ 30 .: ~ ~ ~ . ~ .~ 16{-i. 1; 1 5.~)e 25 1 . ~ ~ 9: . ~:: . . ~: ~ ... ~ t . 21;.Q: 3&0 1 ~- i7~;: ..~ ;:. . ~ . . .~;~ [ 15.0, 4s.0l 1 26 13.8~e 1 450. 5s.01 1 39 20.7'Yo 33 ~19.14Yo Total 188 100.0# C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Con~ton Rating silouldor Hexion ang~ | Freauency Percon~ (Pi) (Cl) (unit: d69~) ! iow) c - ~ 5.0 O o.o.~o ^-: :I~L ~o^.iY.~: . ;; . 3 . ~I~IL~Z5~ ~ ~. ^^ 05% . 4, ; ~ ,` <. 7~%^i. 5 ~> ~. [ :3.~. :163 ] 36 i^~- : -: :19.1% . . ~t4:;.~;. ; 7;~% 3~. ~1~ ^6 ~;. . ^ 2.7X' 2 ~.: ~I ~01 : t?::~:. . ~ '!' ^~.O'C''. (NOW) > 35.0 '01 s3.~/o Total 188 100.0% weightod postural comton scoro · 2.4 G-117 Dvnamic Dnvino Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subioct 19, synU - sis} i . . 1 ll so% . 40% - E 30% u ~ 20# 2s#T 20.7% '9'% 20%- ~i- ,6.0% / _ Es,5. ~- 1 16.0% .,s .5 s 15 25 35 S~ F - ~ - - 45 55 PYnamic Drivina Posture Analvais- Shoulder (subject 19, synthosis} 1941% ·o% o% 53.7% .. 1 ~ - _ ,49% _ .~ ~ , ~ , _ , ~ , ~ , S(hl9b) 4 3 2 C~

G-lI.4: Postural Con~fon DYnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note 1 Shaaed cells indicate resu~ts related to tne comfort elOow movement zone 2 we~gntea pOStUrat comfort score = 2, ~ rJm!on leve`( C~ ) x percentacct Pi ) .., A. Oval l~p B. Lock-t+Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow Hex~on angh (unit deg ) < 150 . ~ 15Q 3001 . ~ 1 30 0 45 0 1 ~1 ! 450, "-0 1 ..'~'I' m~.'~75.01 · 1 '75-~:~ m~ 1 'f 90~105-01 . [ 1050,13001 ,1300 0 Total 148 Pereentage . 0.0% 1 ~ 20% ~ ~l 5.~-..; l n.7~ , I 32 i4% I ~ - 31~; ]~ :'. t).7%'' . 0.0% 0.0% 100.0~. A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation elbow tI6xion angh ~ Freque ~cy j Percontage (Pi; _ < 15.0 O 0.0% 1 150, 2881 0 00% - 1 2~: 4251 ~ : &1%-: . :: ~ "S. s6~1 24 . 16~ 1 563. 7~751 ~. . 453% 1 n~, 85-01 3t. . 2a. - . ~ 85~0.- 9251 16 10.8'C :- .[ ~,1~.01 1 0.^ > 1000 0 00% _ Total 148 1OO OY. w~ghted poen~ral comfort score · 4 3 B.1 Joint Movement Distribution 1 elbow Hexion angle frequencyPercentage | 35% T i 30% T ~ 25%+ , .2o%t 11 1 "'s%t s4~/ i s too%~,E, i ~- SUbj8Ct No 20 Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvais - Elbovr (subioct 20, oval lap} 32.4# 3~.e% 1 1N 1 ~ o-~. O.~. o.^ 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 Elbo. Flexbn ~ - Dvnamic Dnvino Posture Analveis - Eibow (subioct 20, oval Iap} °# T 45Y. t 4o% t 35# 3C# ~ I E 25% t 1 ~ =% + 1 ~ is%+ t t 1 0% - . 1 < 15 0 ~40 15 0, 30 01 1 1 1 12S% 1 1 35% 1 , , 34% 30.0.: 45.0] 1 2 1 25.0% 1 , ' 25% 45.0. - .01 1 1 1 12.5% 1 1 2 =% -Q 75-01 1 1 1 125% 1 ' - . , ' o. 75.0, 80.01 1 3 1 37.S% 1 ! ,~ so.a.tos.ol 1 0 1 °~°% I 1 1 . 1 [105.0.130.01 1 o 1 °°% 1 1 ,1300 ~O Total | 8 | 100 0Y B.2 Postural Comtort Evalustion 1 . 1 elbo-tl~xion ~ngle | Fmqu~nc~r | Percentage (Pi) weight d postural comfort scor · 3 8 G-1 18 - _ 372% 6.9% ~o. ~o~o% SthI9h) 4 3 2 1 (b.) C~ s% o% 70% 1 ~; ~so% + E t 1 ~ 30% t 1 ~ 1 11 20% t 10% t ~ o%1 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Elbow (subject 20, oval lep) 17 5% T _ _._ ~i% Il Sn I - 5 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 E~ F - xlon ~ - Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvais - Elbow (subioct 20, lock-to-lock) L.: S{hoh} 4 3 2 1 (b.) C~

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Locic C.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbo~fhxion·ngle Dvn ic ivin Po r An Iv i -Elbow (ur.'t dog.) Frequency Percen~ge (subject20,ovall p] < 15.0 0.0% ,3S% T 31.4% 32-~% ' ~ : i - 2.~: I ~t _ ~ ·~4.0~.6Q.Q3 1 10~ 1 6~4X ~=~22So%: 1 1 1\ l ~O.Q 75~01 49 >. 1 31.4%` ! e ~sY. ~/ ;~175~0~80.01 50 ~$~% ! ,°%' ~6.4% -! ~1~-0l 1 - i: ! Q" ! s% 1 o.~, ', , 0.6% 00% 0.^ [ 105.0, 130.0 1 O 0.0% ~°` '5 30 45 60 75 90 ~OS 130 > 130.0 O 0.0% I Elbo-F-xbl~Angle Total ~ 56 100.0% ! C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation :omton R~ng | elbow Hexion ~gh ~Frequency ~ Perr~en~g. (Pi) | I Dvnamic DrivinQ Postur Analveis - Elbo~v 1 (low) < 15.0 O 0.0% 1 4s% 43.e% 2~" ~^" 1 15.0. 28.81 1 ~i 0.~% 1 3s% 3-,~- ~1~28~42s] 10 ;6.~%: ! ·30%; 4~.~; ~1 ~26 16.^i 1 E. 25% + ~ 51h - ): ~ S~ 77~' - 68 43.6% - ~ 20%+ ~,6.7% J,~. _~ - 34 2t.8'C I ~'s~t ~ ~ ~ i I 16 i Q.6%~^ 1 1 o% t ~ ~ ~a~ I _ , 007. , E r~v\ | lOQ.O | 156 | ·00.0# 1 _ 2 ~ {b-1 w~gh~d postural comton score · 4.2 G-1 19

G-lI.4: Postural Comfort Dynam~c Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shaded c~ls indicate results related to the comfon snou~er movement zone. 2.weighted postural comfort score = :, omJort le`'ci( ci ) X percenta~ct P.' ) ,*' A. Oval Lap B. Lock-t+Lock A.1 Joint Movernont Distribution hould rtexion ~ngh I F uenc (unit. deg.) I "q Y Pereontago < -15.0 I o 0.0% I 50% T .. : {~15.0. ':5~^ `:- ~ ^- ;'-- 1 - ~^ ~s% ~ : 1^-5~, ..5.~.~::. ~".-;~: ~: ~^~::: 1 3s%: 4- . ~ 5.Q,:.i15.O] -.:.:, : . ~ ~.~ : ~ . ~ :~:.: . :.~.: . l: 15.~. =. ~1: .~^ ~: . . .tt. . .,: . . 1: ~ ~::.7;~.:.: ; ;1:25;.0.3s; ~;.~ . . . '4 -. - ~.~-~ l 35.0. 45.01 10 6.8% [ 45.0. 55-01 5 3.4% · 55 ~7 4.7% l Total I 148 100.0# I A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort Rating (Cl) 1 (la~) ..~ .,. ,t,,.,.,,~, ... . 3 . A~ . ' . ,-. ,:. , ' ._ ; '4. ', ,~. ~ . , . '" .65 ~ '' . . ,. ..4 ,' . ' . ·' ' '"- '. .S.' ' .'. .. ' "< ~^`~' .''. '.. .~ . Z '.... .. .... .... 1 (1oW) ~ shouldor fl~xion ·ngh | F - uency ~ighted postural comton scoro B.1 Joint Movement Distribution shoulder tlexion ~ng~ | Frequency 1 < -15.0 . 1-15.0, -5.~' . 1 -5.0, .5.OJ 5.Q 15.0t . 1S.Q 2S.Ol ~. 25.0. 35.0 [ 35.0. 45.0 45.0. 55.01 , 55.0 5 Total ~12 B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Coml~ R - i~l shouldor tlexion angio | F - u~ Pe~= (l~i} 1 (Iow) < · ~ 5.0 O 0.0°h 2 1 15.0, -8.81 O 0.O'C 3 ~ ~-a.8, -2~51 o QO% . ~1-25. 3.81 ~3 25.~,C S (high) 1 3.8. 16.31 - 0 . - 0.0% `, 1 163. 22~51 O QQ% 3 1 ns, 28~8 1 0 0.0% _ 2 1 28.8, 35-Ol 1 8.3% 1 (10w) ~ 35.0 1 8 66.7Y. Total 1 12 100.0# weigh~d postural comtor'scoro · 1.8 G-120 Subject No.: 20 -30%t 1~25.~% 5% oo% o~l l 1 ~% _15 -5 . 1 ·o% 3s% . i=% E 25% 1 ~ =% 15% 106% 5% ~L _ i l l 1 ~s% T 4o~ . . 35% · . 1 ~ 300%. . c 25% - . ' 20% . , ~ 1s%. . 0%- . 5% · ' 0.0% 1 o% ~ · 33.8% ~ I 1 2.7% 2.~% S(bJ9h) 4 3 2 1 (b-) Co_t ~ 12vnamic Drivino Posture Analvais- Shoulder (subject 20. Iock-to-hck) ~. ~ . . . . -1 5 ·5 5 1 5 25 35 45 55 Sho_ Fle~on ~ - = 60% ~so% ~ ° 40# I C 1U 30% 1~ 1 _ ~t ~ 110%+ ~ 11 0.0% _ 0.0% 1 s (high) 4 3 2 1 (~) 1 ~ Dvnamic Drivina Posture AnalYsis - Shoulder (sub~ct 20, lock~o-hck} 6e.7` 25.0# _ ,

G-Il.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution . shoulder fl xion angh Fre uenc Percente e (unit deg ) I q 9 <-15.0 1 0 0.0% , . A ~ _] s.Q ~ ~ 5~ 1 ~ . .: : ~. . . 0. - s.~ . ]i.(l } ,-, · . ~,.!~.~,,., ~ .' '.- ~'i46.9X,' ~ ~ ~; ~ . 5.0 :: 15.0~1.: 98- ~ ;< ~ .:~. ~.~C;~; ~ ~1 -: t t5.0;:25101 ~ If ~.~. I : .6.~. . 2~.35.tJ1` S; - :. ~ ~3~1%: ~ 35.0, 45.0 1 1 10 6.:1Y. [ 450. 55.01 1 8 5.0°h > 55.0 1 12 7.5% . Totai I ~ 60 100 0% C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation 50% 45% ·OY 3s% 30% E 2s% 20% '5% Dvnanic Drivina Posture Analvais - Shoulder (subject 20, synthesis) 46.9% 1 1 · I ~. ! s%· 0.0% 0.6% 1 OY' : ~ 1 .'s .s 23.8% · s 1 s 25 3s Sho~ P-xbn - - 45 55 Comfon Rating shoulder flexion angb | F eaUency Percontago (Pi) ~Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Shoulder (Ci) (unit deg) I r l (subpct20,synt~i~ 1 1 (low) <-15.0 0 0.0°/ sO% 463% .' '2".~''A'.'' -~~ [~-.15.0~-a8~. A=,~.2:,,^.,.,: ' '0~;^' 40% 3 . . ~ 8 8~ 2.5 ~t: ~O.~L ~3s% 29. 4 4, t -21S, ~.3~8} 86~ . ~. 41~;: ~, ~ 30% · 501)~ 1 ~47^-~:; ^ ; '29.~% I ~i 20% ~le. ~ :^ 1~=5L 8 ;: :.~5,0~^ ! ~ ls%- . ~ 3.: . 1 22~5, 28~8~, - .3 .^ ~1.8X ~1 10% ~2.s% 3. 2 t 28.8i 3tiBl . 5 ^' . l.1.#~ - 1 O% _ I _ I _ I _ ~_ 1 (low) > 35.0 30 18.8 ~1 5(h`9h' 4 3 2 1 (b~ Total 1 160 1000# 1 co_~ w~ghted postural comfort acoro · 3 6 G-121

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note 1 Shadea c~ls indicate results related to the comfort elbow movement zone 2 weq3hted postural comfort score = £~omton Ievel' Ci )x percentapc( P.' ) A. Oval Lap B. Lock~to~ock SubjeCt No 21 A.1 Joint Movement Distribution A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation . elb flexion angh (un.t deg ) Frequency Percentago < 150 0 00% - 1 150; 3001 11 ~- 88%~ :C.0. 450 ~31 , t9 t~ ~:1 4S.0,-~60-0l 60. ':. '''37.0% ~ - ,t~; :75 Q 1 _ 39 ~- 24 t% t 71; Gi; 9Qt, l 19 1t ~C^ - ,Q;tO6,0l 2 ~t=6; [ 1050,13001 0 00% > 1300 0 00% Total 162 100 0% _~ 0.0% 06% . · t7~ . · ~ 2g.0% . dO.t~ . ~- 9.~%' . ~1.9%~: t2Y . O.0% . 100.0# 42 . elbow tlex~on angle Frequency . weghted postural eomfon score B.1 Joint Movement Distribution Dvnamic Driv~na Posture Analvsis - Elbow (subioet 21, oval lap} ! 4°% . 3 ~ 3s s% E 20% 1 9 1% o%l 6J' 5% to.o%,,/' , ~ , , ,s 30 4s 60 75 90 105 130 ~Elbo. F - xbn An9 - | Dvnamic Dnvina Posture Analvsis - Elbow I (subject 21, oval lap] !4s`T t 3s%- . 30` IE 2s% '; 20% ls% 10% 5% 0% `0 1% 3e 9% 1 1 191% I , I ~_ o.o% 5 ~h 9h' Coadon i elbow tlexion angh Freauenc Qvnamic Dnvina Posture An Iveis - Elbow (umt deg ) | ~Percentage ~( ubiect21 oval l p <150 0 00% °% T 3~4# [ tSO, 3001 3 n.^ 1 30% 273% 273Y./ 3 273 ~, · 2s% ~_ 75 0 l o 00% 2- 12Os#% ~ 1 1 ~ 75 0 90 0 1 1 91% j o% ~I ~9 1` _ O o.o% ! s% 001 ~ `~ 1 o~ oO% 00% 105 0, 130 0 1 0 0 0°/ I ~s 30 45 60 75 90 ·05 '30 , 130 0 O O O.JO 1 Elbo. F - xba ange Total 11 100 0# B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation weighted postural comfort score Pe~n-~ 0.0% 9.1% 36.~% 46 5% .: ~ - 9.1% O.O'C 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% G-122 60%T l so%- ~ 40% 30%. Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Elbow (subioct 21 lock~o~lock] 54.S% 36.47e 1 ~ 9.~% 0% I 0.0% · · 0.0% 5(~) 4 3 2 ~ (~) C~ L~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution . eIbow flex~on angb ~Freqwocy Percentago . < 15 0 0 o oo/o l ~15.Q 3o~ol t4 .. 8.1% . . . :1 30.0. 45.01 . 3. . . 1 t8.7'C ~ .45.0. ~60.01- 64 1 37:Q%. 1~60Q, 75.01 - - < ~ 225 t 761O, 90.0 I - 20 : . ~tt.~% {. eQo,.10C.~] 2 ; ~. ~ ~12% 1 ~ os.o. 130.0 1 ° 0 0% , 130.0 0 o.o./O Total 173 100 0% . C.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation elbo H xion ang e Conl~ R~g (unit deg ~-I- ~l'anenl~ = {l~i) ~ (1~) < 15.0 O 0.0% 2~ . ' ' [' 15~ 28~81 '' 2 t2!S. 3 ~1-i 1 28^ 425 J ~18~: `,.: ~ 4~S 58~1 52 . 30.~% 5 ~) - ~ "~ -~5 1 ~ . ~. - .; 1 n~, 85.01 17 9~; 3 ^ . 1 85¢ 92S1 . 3 : 1.7%: 2.~;:.:- . ~SI2.5.100.01 2 ... t:^i ::. (~) , 'w.0 O 0.~. Total 173 100 0# l wdghted postural comfort score · 41 G-123 40% T 37.6% 35% + 30% - ta 25% E 20% 15%- 10% 5% 0% Dvnamic Drivino Posture AnaiYds - Elbow (subject 21, ovel isp) 40% r 35%- t' 30%- ~ 2- 25%- . C 20% . C`. 15%- . 10% . 5% 0% 37.0% \22.5% ~_h 0.0% 0.0% 15 30 45 80 75 90 105 130 ~ Flesbn Anob Dvnamic DdvinQ Posture Analvsis - Elbow (subpct 21, ·yn~ede} 39.9% 2.02% I , _ 0.0% S(~b) 4 3 2 1 (ba) C~o~ ~ . . .

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shadeo ce~ts indicate results re~atee to ~e comton shoulder movement zone. 2.weighted posture comfort score = ~ comtorr 1evel( C' ) X percen~age( P.' ) .., A. Oval Lap B. Lock~to-Locic A.1 Joint Movenent Di~ribution . shoulder fioxion angle tunit: deg.) < -15.0 . .:: . [ -.1 S-O.. :- S.Ol~'~' ' : : · .. 1..:~. S~.1.: .:. :t :~;Q, :tS.Ol: ..~, r .15~... Z!lA)1 . 2-'..~;~.0. 3540'l [ 35.0. 45.0 1 . ~ ~e ~ ee ~l . Frequency Percentage , O 0.0% . . : : o.o~e ~ . ~ , . 1 . -::' :. :.: ' 0.~:.:~ , . - - 8 ; :.:: :40' ^ I 26 . - : :16.0YL T~: .. 16.~%~^ 24 14.8% 1 4a.u, ~7.u 1 47 29.0% > 55.0 29 1 7.9YO Total 162 100.0% A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comtort RaUng shouldor thxion angh (Cl) (unit: deg.) 1 (low) <-1a5.0 .^.'~ :::.' :~.~ :: : .' ~::.1-.1~0,. ~ ~1'; 3 ~. ~ , 1 , 8^ ~ 2;5 ~ ' ': ~:y,;, ~- ,, il.~' ".T'~' . .5~h)' ; I.'163;'22.5I''' '' 3:: 1 ~. 28~814 ., .:Z. 4~ . ^ ' ": ^ ~ ' 28,8 ' 35;01 1 (10~) ~ 35.0 Total ~gh~d postural comton acore · 1.5 . . B.1 Joint Movement Distribution shoulder tlexion ·ngb F~_ = ~~~nlege < - 1 5.0 O 0.0% ! ao% t-15.0, - 5-0 1 ~O 0.0% ' 70% + -5~0. 5~01 O ~QO%; ' 60~- 5.Q. 16.01 1 ° ~ QO% i ° 50# 15.0. 25.0] O ~ ~QO~ ^ ~_ 40% . [ 25.0. 3S.0] . O . I 12 00%' I c. 30% 45 0 55 0 1 1 18.2Yo | ~O. 55.0 ~ 72.rK0 ~ Total 1 1 100.0# I B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation l Comtort Radng shoulder ticxion u~gb (Ci) (unit: deg.) 1 (low) · ~ 5 0 To~l Frequency Pcrcentage (Pi) O 0.0% O O.Q% O QO% . O.OX^ '~ . 0.0%~: . O.Q% . QO% . QQ% 1 00.0% . 1 00.0# ~ightod postural comfort scoro G-124 Subject No.: 21 o. - o.o% ~ 1 1 -15 5 5 15 25 35 45 Sl_d" F~sbl'~ - Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis- Shoulder (subioct 21, ovel lap} 29.0% Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis- Shoulder (subject 21, OVJI bp] 7`T ~+ _ 1 . ~ + 1 · + 13.0't, 18.7` 0% + s.e% ~3.1% 1 ^1 - , _, _, _, _, (h~h) 4 3 2 1 (b.) 1 c~ "_ i Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvais- Shoulder I (subj~t 21, lock-to-lock) '1 1 S2% ~o.o~ o.o% o.o% o.o% o.o~ o.o%= 15 -55 15 25 35 45 55 Sho~ Flenbl~ An91e I 1 00.0% ! '°°%T i 90% t ~t 70% t i ~t ~ ~t 40% t 30% t i ~t 1 10% t 00% 0^ ~ 1 pvnamic Drivina Posturo Analvde - Shoulder (subbct 21. Iock-to-lockl o.o% , °°% , 1 , V7. 5 (hk~l) · 3 2 1 (b.) CO_t 1~

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution houldor tlexion angi Fr uenC (un~t dog ) ~ Pereentage 1 <-15.0 ! ° 1 °°% 1 .. :-. O.~.:.^.. {-1~Q .5.~] ,. _ : l-5.0,~ 5~1 5.0, tS~}' = 150, =~1 : _ : 1~:2~0. =01:' ' _ ~- · O.6% ~ ^ ~r 4 B'lL: ~ ,' ....'1!i.1~'4;. I ~ t6;~%.; [ 350, 4501 25 _ [ 450' 55-01 49 ~ 55.0 37 l _ T 28.3Y. 21.4% 14.5% Total ! 173 100.0# C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Qvnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis- Shouldgr (subject 21, syn-sis} 30%T 25% t ~ 20% e 1 OY. 5% 0 211.3% 150` 15.6% 1.5 1 c, ~ ,m 1 , '0.0%0.0%~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 45 55 1 j 15 55 15 25 35 i Sho~ F - sbn h~ Comfort Rating sh,ouldor tlexion angb Frequ~cy Percenteoo (Pi) pvnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis - Shoulder (Cl) (unit deg ) ! (subpct 21, synthedel 1 (low) <-15.0 O O.OY ~70% 6427. 2 l~l5.0,-88l; 0'%"~` O.Q% 1 60% . ~ - 3^ ~10818~5r^ o~ ~: o.ox;- i so~. . ~ 4-;: - 1 'Z.5.~ 3.8} 0: ~':0.0% ~° 40% . ~ ,c _ 5 ~); 1 3 8 16 8 1 ~ ~- 528 ~! ~_ ,. ~_ - 4. - 1 1~3e "~;1 21.' 12;~'C 20%- 12.1% 15. 3 1 ~ 28~1 5 :::: : - 2.0%i' ~10% 5.2% _ 2.91 ~_ 2 .. . 1.28.8~ 3S.Q1. 27 ^ ~ 15.~.^ . _ , _ , _ , _ _ 1 (low) > 35.0 111 64.24Y. ! S(b9h) 4 3 2 1 (b~ Total 173 100 0% j Condort "va weightod postural comfort scoro · 1 3 G-125

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dynamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shadeu ce Is inciicate results related to the comton e~oow movement 20ne. 2.weightea oostural comfort score = ~ ~ omjon 1e; el ( ci ) x percenra,'e( Pi ) ,., A. Oval Lap B. Lock~to~Lock Subject No.: 22 A.1 Joint Movement Distnbution 1 elbow tlex~on anglo ! FreqU.nCy Perconage ~ ~) ~0.0% ~35% . t 'S.0. 30.D ~ - `- . - .-~1%:. . .; , ~`,~,,. . t 30.0.^ 45.0 1 15 . 8.~%: - i 1 ~ 1 4&0~:.60.Q 1 6t 32;~1.%:: . 1 60~,.;.75.01 53:. .282%.: .. 1 :75.Q. '90 0 1 s4 .^ . 28,7#P ' ' ; t t~t`:105~11 t: . .: .: ~5%:. . 1 105.0, 130.01 O 0.0% l 130.0 0 0.0% 1 Totai 1 188 100.0% , _ A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation , elbow tlexion ~l91° | FreqUoncy l~en:lin-= (l~i} , < 15.0 . 15.0, 28.8 . I' 2EL8. .42~1 t 42;S, 56~3l ' ~ 1 563'.77~1' . ~> '' ".5 : 85.0 1 . : '': . 1. 86.s, =5: ~100.0 , 100.0 pvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Eibo~v (subpct 22, ove. Iap} 32.~% S ~ ~ 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 EIbo. Flexbn Ang. l - 0 5~. o.ar. o.o'` Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis - Elbow j (subject 22, oval Is O 0-0% 45% T 42.0% 0 0.0% 35%t i 1g: I Q8* ~. 30% 36-^ I :1g.t ~I c 25%+ . : ~. 1 1 :42.ll%:: I ~ 2°~+ 33,.^ I t7.~: I ~ ls%t ~ 21 ~11;~ti : ~ 10% t ~ 1 , ~ OS%' '-' ! 0% ~-~ O o.o ~1 1 IU, ~ weightod posmral comfort scoro · 4.2 B.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow tlex~on angb Frequeney Percentage l . . < 15.0 1 0 ! oo% 15.Q 30.0 30.0. 4S.O 45.Q.60.0 - t BO.O. 75~01 1 7s.0. 9°°1 1 90~0,.105.0 105.0, 130.0 > 13.0.0 B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation 60 ~ . elbow tlexion ang ~Freqlloney i Pereontage (Pi) t < 15.0 1 0 1 0.0°t 1 ! ~, , i 1 t5.0. 28.a1 1 0 1 0.0Y 1 1 t 28^ 4251 1 o: 1 0.0~f~- 1 ! t 42S. 56.31 1 1 1 ~1t.t% 1 1 [ 56~3, 7751 1 6 1 667% 1 1 ~ "~. m01 1 1 1 "'% 1 I . ~1 t 85.Q- 9251 1 0 I 0.0%: 92~5 100.0] 1 1 1 1t.~% ~1 1 . ~, 1 , 100.0 1 0 1 0-0% _ Total I 9 ~100.0~. 1 _ weightod posm,al eomtort score ~4.4 G-126 o s% o.o% 1 1 S(high\ 4 3 2 1 (~) Condo~ ~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Elbow (subioet 22, oval bp] 55.6% so% + 10~/ t 0% 1 I ~ ~ .1~. 1 1. t% .o~ 0.0% o.oY. I ~ ~0.0% o.oY. 15 30 ·5 60 75 90 105 130 EU~ Flesbn Ang. Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Elbow j (subioet 22, lock-to-lock) '°%T 60% so% a 40% 30% 20% 0% OY 1 _ 22.2% + _ _ i - 1 - I 1 1.1% 0.0% · 0.0% 3 2 1 (be\ n ~

G-II.4: Postural Comfon C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Locic-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution citefh on angI6 (unit. deg.)Frequency ~ Percentage < 15.0 1 0 1 0.0% ; 1 1 S-Or 30.01 - 4. 2~% 3040e -45-0 1 15 ~ 7.6% ~1 45.Q {so.ol . 63 32.~%.:~ .: t eQ 0. 75.0 1 ~:. - . ss ^ 2 ~,~,6 ~^.; t =0. 90.0 l 55 :.; .:.2~.~; ~- ~ Go.O, 105.01 2 . . .: .1.0~: 1 10~.0. 130.0 1 0 o.o.~ , 130.0 0 0.0% Total 197 1 100.0# C.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comfon Rabng elbow flexion angle Frequency Perocntago (Pi) (Cl) {unb er', (Iow) . 15 0 0.0°/. Z:^^:~. .: : { ;15.4, 28.81 ~00%; 31~; ~: ~: ^1 2a8,'4251 18 . 8.1% 4,~ ~: t 42Ji.:.563} 37 ^ ~ta8%: 5(hig~:~; 1 56.3,::77.S1 : 85^ 431~. `,,: :: ~: t 775; 850} 34 17.3#: 3.;~ . . ;: ::;l 85.~ 925} 2t ^. . 10.7%~ .2 ;,.i~ . ~92.5; :100.0 1 2 ^ . :1. - i :. 1 (low) , 100.0 O O.OYO Total 197 1 100.0% weighted postural comfort scoro ~4.2 G-127 35Y. 30% . ~ pvnamic Drivino Posture Andvsis- Elbow (subject 22, oval lap] 32.0% I ~ ~ ~7.9% _ . 25%- . ° 20% . 15%. . 0% ~7.6% 5%. ~2.C%/8 0% 0.0%,=_/ ~ ~ _ 1.0- o,o% 0.0% 1 5 30 45 50 75 90 Elh" P - sbn "g~ 105 130 D`rnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Elbow (sub~ct 22, synthesis} 4s% . 43.1% 40~T 35% t S 30% t c 2s% t ~ I ~ I 36.0% . 19.e~ 5 (1i - ) 4 3 Comh~ ~1 0.0% 1 (b~

G-II.~: Postural Cornfo~t Dynamic Drivinq Posture Analysis - Shoulder Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comton shoulder movement zone. 2.weightea postural comtor~ score = ~ ~ omJor, · Ievel( C' ) x percentapc( Pi ) ,., A. Oval Lap B. Lock-t+Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation , shouldor Hoxion angb Frequency (unit deg.) "dghtod postural comfon score B.1 Joint Movement Distribution B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation shouldor tlexion angle (unit dog.) < -15.0 16.~ 8.B] .. ~-a~-2S1 _1 - 2 ~. 3~8 1 [- 3a 16~3~: .. I 16^ ^St ; [ ~.. 28~st 1 2~8. 3501: ~ 35.0 I Pe~ 0.0°/e :'.:::~:.'O.~^.i.. 2 1~ : 384~.^ . . 14~%~-.,.: 7~% ,~. .: . 5.3% 8.5% 4.8% 100.0% Peroentago (Pi) . o.oe/. . QO~:: . . ;:: : ' 'QD~.'. ::.: l , :.,,~,:.. ' . . S3 ~C'' '. : t22~-- ~ : ::2~1.X d . .? `,% :~.: ~ . 18.6~ 100.0% 3.8 wdgh~d postur l comton score ~2~3 G-128 Subject No.: 22 ` s`- . 30~- . 25~. j ~ 207~- . - ~ 1 lo%- . ! 5%- . 0.0# n 0~: 1 , ! ·15 l Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subioct 22, oval Isp} 3e 21 3# /. ~ 14.4% .o%/ | | I ~% I -5 5 1 5 2s 3s 4s ss S~ld~ flexbl~ ~- . . DYnamic Drivino Posturo Analveis - Shoulder (subioct 22, ovel lepl ! ~ 53.7% so`. E 30~` ~'8. ~e.e~ "20~. r ~7.4% ~ s~r~gh, 4 3 2 ~ `~' c~ Le~ Qvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis- Shoulder (subioct 22, lock-to-lock 3s%T 30~ ~ 2s% E. 20% s% % S% oY. 33.3% 2o.o.% o.JrD 1 11.~% ·1 5 -s s ~s 2s 3s 4S 55 pvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Shouldor (subioct 22, lock-to-lock) 44.~% 222% ·s% . . · ~ 35% . . . 30%- ~ E 25% 20%. . ·5% ~ 10~- S% ' · · 0.0% Oh S(high, 4 3 2 ~ (b~ Co_t 1.

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval L:ap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution . . should r x~on 9 Fr u ncy Per n g ' Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvs's-Shoulder (unit. deg.) l l ( ubj ct , yn 1 1 < -15.0 1 ° 0.0% ~40% T ~ '` t-1S.Q-5~1: 0~ :~` 0, - ;. ' 35% t ieg [~ 5.Q .SQl; ~t :i-.~ ~ ~ ~ 20.8~ - t / 8\ ^-~-:.~0, 15~. . . =;~, I : ~t%:.: ~-25%t =.B.% ~ \ 1~1. 25~t . 23~ : ~1 't4~ ~ ~ ~ 20Y.- ~ 14.2% ]~] ~t~ ^. I 8.t%- o% - ; / ~ ~\e.~% 9 6% ' ~10 5.1% I 's% ~/ 8 5.0, 55.0 1 19 9.6% o% . o.o% o.o 55.0 10 5.1% .15 ·5 5 15 25 35 45 55 Should. P-xbn Ang~ Total 197 100.0% C.2 Postural Comton Evaluation should ex~o. ·ng Freouen r ne Posture KneIveis- Shoulder :omtort F'ating | (unie deg ~j ; q | Pereenuge (Pi) | Dvnamie D Ivl 1 tlow) < - 1 5.0 0 0.0% 1 60% ~51.B~ -2 - - . 3 ~ -15.0. - 811t: a ~: Q~' 1 so 3 :. I~-8.8. -~!51: 0:: ::. . o.a%:: ~. 40%· `, t - 25, 3~8 ~- 12 .^. ' 6.1% . 5~) 1 3.8. 1~:~1 11)2^; ~51.8% ~, ~18.3% 19.B~ . ~. ~ 1B,3, 22.S] . 2*.; - ~12;!X ~- ~ 20#. ~8' 3 ~-s, ooR] `, ~2.0%, ~lo~. · · 2. ~ i,2~8~=Q] t8:^i, ~;:at%: I o`· _ I _ ~ _ ~ _ I _ 1 (low) ~ 35.0 39 19.8Y 1 s~) 4 3 2 1 (b.' Total 197 100.0% I co~ _` ~ghtod poen~ral comfort scoro · 3.7 G-129

G-~.4: Postural Comfort Dynamic Drivinq Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comto~ el~ move~t z~e. 2.weighted postural comfort score = I; ~ r~mIon le; el( ci ) X percentapc( P~ ) ,., A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Movement Distribution elb tlexion ng Frequ cy Perc nta (unit deg.) j ~ < 15.0 1 0 0.0% 15.0. 30-0 l 4 1;~%; t 3Q0. 45.0 1 20.; ^ B.696~ ' -l ~s:o, 80.01 54 2B.OX : ~ 60,0i ::.;75.0 1 96:: ls 7% ::t 7s.~;.sonl 3s ;-; 16~C i .'': 1. 80Q 105.01 O ,., : o.o% [ 105.0, 130.0 l 0 0.0°/0 , 130.0 0 O.O./O TOtJI j 208 100.0% A.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation . Comtort Rating (c') 1 (low) 2 3 ~`, ... 4 ~ `~ ~ 5 ~h): . 4,........... .. 3 ^; 2~ .... 1 (low) ~elbow HeXton ~ng. I FreqUOnCy Permnuge (Pi) . _ < 15.0 I 0 0.0% _ [ 15.0, 28.8 1 2 1.0% _ [ 2818i 425 1 15 ; 1 72~C; _ [ ~. 56.31 43 : I . ' 20;~C'': - 1 56.3. 77Sl 113: ~I S4;356 _ 1 U~,~85.01 33 ~1 1S. - 1 85.Q 82~ 1 2 ~| 1,0%; _ 1 ~S :tW.01 0 '' " 1- °°%': , 100.0 0 0.0% Total 1 208 100.0% wdgt~ted postural comfort score · ' ' B. Lock~to-Lock B.1 Jolnt Movement Distribution elbow tlexion angh (unit: deg.) < 1 5.0 tS.O, 30.0 . [ 30,0. 45.0 1 - ^ t 45,0. 60.0 J . 60.0. 75~0 75.Q 90~0 . [ 90.Q105.01 . [ 105.0. 130.0 1 . ~ 1 ~n n B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation weighted posture' comfort score · `.,o G-130 50% T ·5% + ~t 35% t ~- j ~ 30% . 25%. . I ~ 20% . 15% . 10% . ~ I 5%- . 1 o'; l ~- Subject No.: 23 Dvnamic Dnvino Posture AnolYsis - Elbow (subioc~t 23, ovel Iap) l 26.0% \ / . !6.8% .~` L I | =~ 0~. 00% 1$ 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 E~ Fb~bn A - q. pvnamic Drivinu Posture Analveis - Elbow (subject 23, ovel bp) ! 60% ! i 40% 1 ·. I ~ 30% I ~ 20% 10% 0% r S43% . ~ ~ 36.5% . ,~ ~ . ~ ~ 8.2% . ~ ~1.0% 0.0% · _ I _ I _ I · S(hlgh) 4 3 2 1 {b-' 1 ~ Dvnamic Dnvina Posturo Anaivsis - Elbow (subioct 23, ovel Isp} dses% so~ T ·s% ~ . 40~- ~i 35Y. 30% ~ 27.3% / c32s% to~oo%|1! ~. 1 , I, - , _ ,d, L~ 5 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 E~ f~xbl, ~1e DYnamic Drivina Posture Analvsis - Elbow (subject 23, lock-to~hek] 70% T 63.e% _ 60% ~_ so%~ , _ ED40% ~ ~ 30%~ . _ 1o~ 1~ ~ ~ o.~ i, ~ 1 - I - 1 - 1 1 oo% 5 (h~h} 4 3 2 ~ {b.) Comh~ ~ .

G-II.4: Postural Cornfon C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Locic-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow Hex~on ang ~| F - U4N1CY Peroontage ~Dvnamic Drivino Posturo Analvais - Elbow (unit deg.) (subioct 23, oval lep] 15.0 ~0 0.0% I ~s% T ~ ^ t 15~0;~ 30-01 ~ ~t.8YG I ~s% ' / \ 30~.:;45.0.1 ... ::22:.:~ . :10.0% ! . 30%1 ~26.0% \ :' ~:~.~,^.;~60~1 .- . S7-^ :| 26; ~1 c 2s% / , ~e.3% :1~1 ~ : .-- . ~ ^; 43.8%, 1 ~ 20%- . / \ .;:t: 7~0: 9.0.~' :i: 44:: ~ .t8.3% ~o%· - l0.0% \ . .^~.{ ~on,.to5.01. . o. . ~ ~ .-.: .Q^^,; . ~s%. -00% .8%/' \o.o-. o.o% o.o% [ 105.0 130.0 l 0 o.0% o% . ~ ~ ~, ~, ~ . , , 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 > t30.0 O O.OYO E~F-sbn ang~ Total 219 ! '°Q°% C.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Comfort Rating elbo. tlexion angh Frequency Per~ntago (P') Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Elbow (Ci) (unit deg.) (subioct23,eyn~us] (10w) c 15.0 O 0.0°/. ~ ~52.S% ..... .. , 2.~:,. . .:: - l 15 0.^. 28.8 1 .. . 2 . Q^: ~t ~ 3,<~^ . . . ~ ~ ~17 ~: . 7~ ~· 4~ t ~37 9% + ~:: t ~ se.31 .. ~. ~5 - 20~: c I · 5~.~. {. 5~5 ~ns] . 115- ti2.5%. ~ 30% ..~ ~:,s t7.4% t ~e. :3^~.::: : l ;85.Q: 82S] ;: 2: . 0.8% 1°% t _ ~_ 9~` .2 :. ~ . ~ =,G,.~0o~1 . : Q :: ~: 0.0%: o%] ~, _, _, ° o.o% t (1Ow) ~ 100.0 O _ 0.0°/. s(bgb) 4 3 2 1 (b~ Total 2t 9 100.0# Co~ ~ghted postural comfort score ~4.4 G-13 1

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analysis - Shoulder · Note: 1. Shaded cells indicate results related to the comfor' shoulder movement zone. 2.weighted postur~ cornton score = ~ comJort Icvel( Ci ) x percentage( Pi ) ,.' A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to-Lock A.1 Joint Movement DistribuUon shoulder fl~xion ~ngh | FreauencY Percontago (unit: deg.) < -15.0 O 0.0% l 1 7. ~3.~~ ·~- ~ :~(~] ~ ~28` ~ ~13.9~ .; 1 ~!~ t~ ~o ~^~; 1. .~,.19~,;.: :~^~ . 1 15~. ;~] - ~ ~38~; ~1 -t83% :: 1-25= 3501 ~ 1 "; ~; ~22~. . 28 13.5# 45~ 5501 13 6.3% >550 9 4.3% Total 208 100.0% A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comfon Radag shouldor Hexion angb (Ci) (unit: deg.) 1 (low) _ <.15.0 ^; ~ .1~04 ~ 8.8 1 : ~ '8.8. -231 , ,-,: , (:,,-~.5' .:, 3 8 1 ^' - ~ ; [; ~ 3.8;; t~31 . :-.:::: I :lB='.22~1 '.'. ' ' 2;"^'-1 22~ e1' . ; ~ ~ 2as, 35.01 . ~ 35.0 Tot~l . . _ Frequency Perconage (Pi) O 0.0% l _ l,,~.~ A i~''~''0~5~^2~''# I , ..~.%,:::.. . ~,, ~,, . : ~ ~ 1 50 ,. 24.~4~.; I ' ''.. 19 ::. ~.. ~ . .. 9..l,%: _ te,., .,. ' '"' B.~.:: ~212~C~ - I . _ 50 24.0Y _ 208 100.0% _ weighted postural comfort acora · 3.0 B.1 Joint Movement Dlstribution shoulder flexion angh _ (unit: deg.) _ _ < -15.0 _ 5.0.-5.01 _ -~.°. 5.0 3 _ _ l 6.O. :.t6.0 1 l , _ ' 1 1~0 2so). _ . . 1. 2G,0. :35-0 1 _ 35.0. 45.0 1 - 45.0. 55.0 1 - , 55.0 _ ~_ B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation shouldor flexion angle (unit: deg.) < -15.0 [~1tn. - 8.B - {-8~.25 -- 25. 3 3.~. 16~3 t 16.:t 225 ~ 22.5, 28~8 1 t 28~, 35.0] > 35.0 weighted postur l comfort score · 32 G-132 SUbj9Ct No.: 23 pvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subioet 23, oval lap} 25% T 21.2% | | 1.'s -s s 15 2s 3s 4s 1 Sl~ P-~ Ang~ 1 pvnamie Drivino Post;uro Analveis- Shoulder (subject 23, oval IJP) 240% 2s~ T _ 21.6% _ E I j 12.0% 1 1 5~9h) 4 3 2 ~ - ' Com~ L~ Dvnamie Drivina Posture Analveis- Shoulder (subject 23, lock-to-loek T "4` DYnamie Drivino Posture Analveis- Shoulder (subioet 23, loek-to-loek} ` 1 ~ 3S`t ~ 30% ~ _ 273% . .= . I 1 5 ~9h) 4 3 2 1 (b~ L c~-

G-II.4: Postural Comfort C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution | should~r tl~x~on angl. ~ F equ4tncy ~ Perc~ntag. | 0.0% : ' ~'' .: 14.6% ~,: - ~g.~%: ~ . j.: i7~4%-~: :: ^:~: 2t;InL~ . 1 2.8% 6.8% 4.6% 00.0% 50 j O ._ ^ l l5.Q 5~01 ~ . . t . 5.O. ~,o l _ '.:::'t. 6.O,. tS.O.l':::.'' _ : t :15.o. 25~l~ . _ 2~0. 35~01 _ [ 350 450] ".~: . . 28 [ 450 550] 15 _ >550 1 10 Total ! 219 C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comton Rating st~ouldor tlexion ar~gh ~ Fre~aUency (Cl) (unit deg ) 1 (10W) ~ -15 0 O 2 - ~ -15 0. - aa 1 ;1 ^. omc . ... . . 3:: : ~ ~ ·8.8. ^~5t^;^ ~ .:. .. . . 1 2~. 3.8 1 :~ . 21 : . s~) 1 38, '631 54 ^ 4 I 1~3. 2251 .3 .: ~ 22S. 28.81^ 2 - { 288. 3501 _ 1 (10w) > 35 0 1 53 Total | 219 Pereentage (Pi) 0.0% "~.:: ;!,~C' '' : ~. ... 1000% wdghtod postural comfort scoro · 3 0 G-133 DYnamic Drivina Posture Analvais - Shoulder (sub~ct 23, syntheus} 25% ~ . 20~ 21t s%t 19.8% · 14. ~ ~s% t l l l ^10.o#~ , ~ , ~ , ~ , 12.8% t\6.8% ~ ~4.^ -15 55 15 25 35 Sh~_ P - sbn Ang~ 45 55 - I Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvais - Shoulder | (sub~ct 23 synthesis| 24.7% 25%~ 20% ! . 15%~ u , 0% o% 1 183% ~ 1.4% 1 5 (hdllb) 4 3 Comlort ~1 21.S~ 242% 2 1 (ba,

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dynamic Drivino Posture Analvsis- Elbow Note 1 Shaded cel~s ~r~dicate results related to tne comfort etoow movement zone 2 we~gnted postural comfort score = ~ ~ omfon · Ie~ el( Ci ) x percentapc( P.' ) ,., A. Oval Lap B. Lock-to~Lock A.1 Joint Movement Distribution elbow tl xion ang (un~t deg ) Freauency ~ 15 0 :': 1 .15.0,'..30Q}~.''' . t 30i0 . '45.0 1 ' ·" l 45.0, 60.0 ~1~ 1 -75;~;^ 90 0 J . . . -~ [.. :=o;~ 1 [ 105 0,1300J 0 > 1300 0 Total 190 Pcrcentage 0.0% _ ~^, :, z1*~,,-~ _ '':"~::''' d..7~C:.;':~: _ ~,, ,',';.,:,7.9~C'''.+' _ r '~'45~8%^ _ ~ - 38 4% _ ~: : 1;1~co - ~ _ 0.0° ~i _ 0.0% _ 100.0% A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation elbow tbxion angh (unit deg ) c 15.0 [ 150, 2881 { 2848,; 425 _ ;~,5631 , I,"~:~.5I' ( 77. 5, 85 0 J I Ap esl t - R,10001 . ·lWO _ ~L weighted postural comton score B.1 Joint Movement Distribution Ibo tlexion ang (unit deg ) Frequency .150 0 I t~ =~ ] 1 30-0.' 45 0 1 t 450. 6QO] 1 750 900 . . [ 90.0.1 Q5.01 . [ 105 0, 130 0 1 . _ ~qnn B.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Subject No.: 24 DYnamic Drivina Posture Analveis- Elbow (subject 24, oval Isp] I - 1 2 .t so% ~ , 45% ~ 40% · . 35% 30% · 25% · . 20% 15% ~I 57. -0.0%~ - 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 Elh" F - xbn Ang~ 45.S~ 1 \33.4% l pvnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Elbow (subioct 24, oval lap} 50# · , 45% . 40% . 35% , ~ 30% , E 25% . ~ ~ , 1 ~ 15% , 1 10%' ~ 5% . 0~. ~ 37. - I , I , 8 5~high) 4 3 2 1 (b.} Co~ndort Lev~ 35% T 30% 25% 1' 20% 15% 10% s% 1oY. ! i Dvnamic Drivina Posture Analvsis - Elbow (subject 24, oval lap] 33.3% 333% 33.1.~. No.~. 0.0%1 ~ N.0% 0.0% .. . _ . _ . , . . . 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 130 ~ Fbsbn Ang- Comtort Rating| elb`~VH8Xi°n~n9l ~Frequel~cy ~Pereont~g.(Pi)| Dvnamir Drivir,u Posture Analveis.Elbotr (10W) 1 < 150 ~I sO% 2 1 ~ 150 28~1 1 01 00% 1 1 o% 3 ~35% 30% s~) 1 1 ~3 "51 1 0 1 Q" 1 ' ~ 20% ~-~] 1 1 1 ~ 15% 2 . 1 1 92.5.100-01 1 2 1 33.3% 1 ~. · ('ow) 1 , ~oo.o ! ° ! °~°% 1 1 Total 1 6 1 1000# 1 1 - weigilted postural comton score ~2 8 G-134 33.3% 0.0% 3 2 1 tb-) Comb~ ~

G-II.~: Postural Comfort C. Synthes~s - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Dlstrlbution C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation ·lbo~v Hex~on ~n9 - ~Frerluenc\' | Porcen~ge | Dvnamic Gnvino Posture An Iveis - Elbo~v ~ 15.0 1 0 0.0°/. 1 45% ~.3% .~ I::16.0,'::30~0l . .~:. 2Q%.; 35%+ - ~: ~ 30 ~: 45.01 1t^:: ,^ i : 5,65` . ~o% t 1 ~ .. I 45.0~^ 60.0:1 ; ~ 1S: ^~.: . :. :. .~ r.7s. c 25% ~1 \ ^~ ~ t sQ Q~ 15 ~ 1 sr~.^ . ~^~ ".~'c: . . . t ; . 1 - 78 A2 ~ ~3a3~i. ' ' ~ 0% 5.6% 105.0, 130.01 .-. :4 ; ~: 0.0°t °% l °°%~ b~O 75 2__ oo% 0.0% . ~ =0 O O.OYo ~ F~x~ - . Total 196 100.0% Comton Rating elbow tlexion angle FrequencY Peroentago (Pi) 12vnamic Drivina PoStu~ AnalYsis - Elbow (Cl) (unit deg.) (subpct 24, synth~is 1 (TOW) . 15~ 0 0.0°t 50% ~46.9% .~ ~. ~ 1~=} ~:Z.~. : ^:. 1,0%;: 40 ~37 ;3¢,;:~.~;^ :: ~ ~ .;.: - 4.1% 35% t ~ i~;2. :. , .~-t :~.::.~1 15:: :: . .7^ ~ 3~ + ~ 5~): ~1~ 92:::; 46.g*, .: ~ ~- · - - 4~ · ~ ~l ~. . :~.~:. ~ 15% ; ~12.^ :3~ .^Z : 6 ~tl=~;~51 ~1T:: -: fL7~-: .o% ~ 3.1% 2~^~ . :: ~ii25 1001)1 `,: 2.~C s~ Tl _ _ _ _ o.o% 1 (low) , 100.0 0 0.0°h S~h) 4 3 2 · (b-) ToSal 196 100.0% Condoa weighted postural comton score · 4.3 G-135

G-II.4: Postural Comfort Dvnam~c Drivina Posture Analysis - Shoulder Note 1 Shaded cells indicate results related to the comfort snoulder movement zone 2 weighted postural comfort score = ~ comJnrt · Ie`'cll C' ) x perecntaget. Pi ) A. Oval Lap A.1 Joint Movement Distribution shoulder floxion anglo (unit deg ) Frequency Percentago < -15 0 6 3 2% ;15 0; ~ Sa l; 19 ^~ ~ ~2 '^I0;= ' t~s=~.~snr -~v ~:A~.~ ~-~ ~^. `~^ l;.O, tS01s - ~ 39:^~;~ ~:i5~2tES%~: - ~^^.l;:rt5 0e ~ nl ~ ~ _ 37. .s: ; . . .: t9.59C. . '`: ^ ~:~= =~] ., , ~ im'~;^": ': :.' ,'.;2 1~%: : .' 350, 4501 11 58°J 450, 5501 8 42% ,550 5 26% . Total 190 100 0# A.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation B. Lock~to~ock . . shoulder ttexion angb (unit deg ) . · 150 . ( ~1SO -016 . ~ - ~ r.~:.~.2s.l. ,:,~ .- w",. :3 8 1, ' . ' :1'~ 161} 1~ _:1: . ., 1. ~, .,35.0 ]':':' ' >350 ~ighted postural comfort score B.t Joint Movement Distribution shoulder tlexion angle | F - uency i . B.2 Postural Comtort Evaluation Subject No 24 25% 20% E U lo% 5% 0% . Frequency Percentage (Pi) l ~ 6 3 2°/. . , .. . 4^~.,...: 1'^ :-;~1%~:;. ,.. . t5^, ~ ^ 7 . 1 3t''- ; ~ t6=C ~ i '' ' SQ: 2 ' . :'2~.~.:. 2 ~ ' t2~% l t~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~C 23,; ~ ~t2;t~C; 24 12 6% . 190 34 PYnamic DrivinQ Posture Analveis - Shoulder (subject 24, ovel IJP] =.l% _~% l9.s% o`/1 n\ ~ -1 s -s . . Ovnamic Drivina Posture Analveis - Shouider (subject 24, oval lap 2B.4% 26.3% _ _ _ 1,1 1 1,1, 30% . 25% . 10%. ~5% ! ! Peroontage i 0.0°/. 35%, 0.0% 30~. 33 ~' 25% 33-35 ~E 20# · : QO%: ~u .5% ao'L ~ ·0% o.oY 1S% o.o./. 1 n~L 33.36/. 100 0# ! should" tlexion ·ngb (unit dog ) 1 1 < -15 0 1 ~g~ l I -~.as, 251 1 1 [-25, 3~81 1 1 ^ [ 3~ t~ 3] 1 I t 16~. 2251 1 22S, 2881 288, 350J >350 ~ighted postural comfort score · 3 3 G-136 5~9h} ~ 3 2 1 ( - Co_n ~ Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analveis - Shoulder (sub~ct 24, lock-to-lock} 33.3% - 1 o~o% . , -15 -5 5 15 25 35 45 55 S~ f~ ~- Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvais - Shoulder (subpct 24, lock-todock} 35% T 33-3% 333% 33.3% ~t 25% + ° 20% ~ '1 t '°%t s%! o% ~1. I 408 00% I.l S(hI9h) · 3 2 1 (b.' C~don ~

G-II.~: Postural Con~fon C. Synthesis - Oval Lap and Lock-to-Lock C.1 Joint Movement Distribution shouicler tl¢xion ang ~Frequency Percentage (unit d~' ) -15 0 ~3 1% -150,-!i))1 1 19 ~I 91~:^ 7; ^ ~ - 5Q, ~ 5,Q]4 4~4 ;`r I 22 4% .[:: 5~0, 15Ql : . 41 : ~: =^ :: . 1.16.0~.2~01. : 37: ^:~:. ~: 1 a9~- · '. 1i2sQ.=Q3 . ! m. ~I '':''l.~ [ 35 0 45 0] 11 5 6% 450 5501 8 41% , 55 0 7 3 6% Tots,l ~ 196 100 0# I C.2 Postural Comfort Evaluation Comfort Ratingshoulder flexion a~gb | Frqu - 'Cy Perconta,ge (Pi) (Ci)(unit deg ) l 1 (low)<-150 1 6 31% :^ 2- ~t ~-ao% :3 . i -8.8, -35 I. 1S : 7~7%: . . . 4 ~ . =~: i ~ ~ " 1~='~' ' 5~) I a~l 52 . 26^ - 1 1~,~ 5] 23^ 1t;~C , ~ ~ ~14 ~71%~; 1 2 ~ ( 28~S:~' 23 - 11 7`i 1 (low) . : ~26 13 3Y. 1~1 196 100 0% wei,ghted posturef comfort scoro 34 G-137 Dvnamic Drivino Posture Analvsis - Shoulder (subject 24, synthesis} 25~. T 22.4% 20.9% ~_ -__ ·e O-L 20% . . 15%4 ~ u S 9.7%/ 10%+ _ s%t3~:l 1 0-y 1 - i - , ~ 1~1 1 8\117% 1 1 B\5.6% 1 ~ ~ `_ 4-~% 3.6% ~.~ 15 5 5 15 2S 35 S_ F - sbr. ~le 45 55 Dvnamic Drivinc Posture Analvsis - Shou,lder (subioct 24, syntt~,~) 3o%- 2e.0% 26.S% 25% . 20%. c . u 15% 10% 5% 0~. 4 5 (h~i) 43 Co~ 1 4.Fi% , 3.mL 16.3% I , I , I ~ 2 1 (b~

G-11.4: Postural Comfort T ~ :17171 ~ ~ ~N ~: ~ T~1 ~ 1l N |~ |N |= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ :: ~ ~ 1 :~ ~ ~ ~ T: ~ l me ;~A | ~ N |= |- |` 1 ~ ~ ]~ ~ ~] 10 1 j~ ~ ;~: j;~ 101 1~1 ~m L ~m 1: ~ W:~W ~W ~ 1~] E ~ ~ ~ 55~L ]~] th ~] L51 13 1~: ~ ~ ~ ~( ~ l4~: :~4 m I 1~ ~1 ~ 1= ~ 1~1= 1 1~1 1= 1~' |~ 1'' 1~1~'1~1 L~LU~LL1R :~] 1 1 1: TT: ~17171~ T: lit l:T: ATTIC INTO Tilt ~1~ 1: 1 L1 L: ~ 1~ ~ 1~ 1- 1 1= L I L ~L W1E ~ W] T: i. ~ . I I 111 ~ I ~ ~ I {) I ~ I ~ I N I I N I C I I ~ I ~ JIN I 1 ° I I ~ I ~ i I 1 1-c iT: ~ ~P ELt2~q ~31 >= l lo iT: ~] F]~1R F:1 ° 1 L j 1~ 1 141~121;121 d Lddd1A RJ1 -> r ~T:T ~T ~:T ~ T:T T:~:T 1:T :;T 1 - ° 1 's 1 ~ I ~ 1 = I l ~ l u, 1 ' 1 ~ 1 1 = | r 1 = I l u~ l 1 ~ 1 ' ~ ~ f L I = I U 11~1 1 ° L L:L ] L, 1 Ic3 7~1~ t:_ 1 1~ TT:~AL~1d jE ~ JEQL]EEU ELL~]? LE: ,=~ ~ ~? ~1; F~ N b? | N | ~ | ~ | U' | E[: 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | | N | N | ~ ~ ~L1 1 I LT G-138

G-II.4: Postural Comfort 3. ANOVA Results on Comfort Scores of Driving Postures in Prototype Workstation 3.1 ANOVA on Comfort Scores of Dynamic Driving Postures = j~=MS F P Stature 0.18 2 0.09 0.22 0.801 Joint 29.83 1 29.83 73.81 0.000 Test Session* 6.96 1 6.96 17.23 0.000 Stature x Joint 0.79 2 0.39 0.98 0.381 Stature x Test Session 0.53 2 0.27 0.66 0.520 Joint x Test Session 2.10 1 2.10 5.20 0.025 Stature x Joint x Test Session 0.75 2 0.38 0.93 0.398 Error 33.14 82 0.40 Total 74.28 93 * The levels of Test Session are oval lap and lock-to-lock maneuvers. 3.2 ANOVA on Comfort Scores of Static and Dynamic Driving Postures Source Adjusted SS 0.91 24.38 1.01 0.02 1.10 0.52 0.11 26.44 54.49 Adjusted MS F Stature Joint Test Condition** Stature x Joint Stature x Test Condition Joint x Test Condition Stature x Joint x Test Condition Error Total 54.49 95 ** The levels of Test Condition are static and dynamic driving conditions. 2 0.45 1.44 0.242 1 24.38 77.46 0.000 1 1.01 3.21 0.077 2 0.01 0.03 0.969 2 0.55 1.75 0.180 1 0.52 1.64 0.204 2 0.05 0.17 0.844 84 0.31 G-139

G-II 4: Postural Comfort Il.4.3 Body Part Comfort Evaluation G-14O

G-II.4: Postural Comfo~t tn _ m 1 o o ~n ._ ~ Z CL o m o tn - ~n tY tn a' ~ a, 8 ' O _ cn C o ~ ~ O _ a, O 8 '' O _ ~ (D'C E ' ~ 8 ~ m c ,o 8 5 c: o C C~ i~ O a, O CO - o al ~ c _ o-:~ ~ 43 o ~ 0- C~ c '' C! fi m n _ ~ (D C fD ~ ~S e O ~ ~ c 0 _ c~ ° 8E ~ o _ cn > c 0 2 r== $ E ~ m 8 c (D ~ cL. C - 8= ~ - o _ o CL Y - - ~ o o - o o - :> ~ - o~ ~ O C~ , ~ ~ m

G-II.4: Postural Comfort ._ - o - tn m - o Q - - o ~n ._ o o - v' ~_ v, . -995~13 _0 0 _= O ~ fi 6 o __ o . o {n ~ ~TT: fis2 _o o ~ ,_=~t 2 8- ~ _ O N ~ {n _ o ~14~ 2 -0 Ln ~Ln ~ co ~ 71] . ~ O-O Ln O-lA ~el S _ o N <0 ~ ~-~TE - [8s=° - - ~ ~ - -= ~ fi ' o _ o ° _ o ' n 0 ~ 5 . c _ _--~ ~ ~ ° ° ° ~1~1~ ~ G 8 ~ 5~~ ~ n ~ ~ O = , 6 o - _ n-'" `° '~--° = ~ 6 ~ 6, _ _ ~ o 7 ~ _ _ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 _,) 0 ~ ~ ~i~ r, 0 ~ e cr m Y ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z __m ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ a, _ ~ o Ln ~o Ln CD Ln cc L~ 0 . _ 0 o Ln ~D Ln co Ln cc' . Ln ~o G-142 . c

G-Il.~: Pos~ral Comfort §, - - o _ _ ~n _ m Q o - 1 o C' ,U} 3 ~ ~- ~ ir o - o ~n - - ~n - ~n ~ =-C , C 8~==o ~ C=C-, Q ~ ~ ~e ~ ° ~ 6 ° _ o, O.' o ~ 3 c, 2 ~ O a a~ O _ L.) _O O ~ Y ~ ~ ~ c ~ 2 ~ ~ o (D O - o o _ :s q, o ~ ° , C~ . C _ 2 CD n . a ~, O.c=~, ~D 3 2 =° 8 ~ O _ ~ , ~ o ., ~ C) -E ~ b ° c m .C a, => 8 ~ ~S a, o _tD o ~ Yo __ C ~ =, O (D O - S - o 0=, ~ _ ~ ~ O S ° - C~ .> O m G-143

G-II.~: Postural Comfort _ ~ ~ ~ _ 8g°8 ,'8 'Leo ~85=' . ~ o G 8 ~ 8 . o ~ ~ C Cat _, ~ S . o . _ _ ~ C O .c ',_ O _ ,2 8 m _ ~0- 2 858 E ~ ' ~ i. .0 ~ ~ CL ~ 43, C ~ ~ o m ~ ~ -c c O go, s 8 ~ -O o ~ ° 0 ~ -.

G-II.4: Postural Comfort e J - 3 - o _ _ tn 3 m o - 1 o o · - ~ Cl m ~ 3 o - o - 3 V) tn t Om ~s ~C -° o 85o (D C 0- a, ~ ~ 2 ~ oo ~ .~) ~ _ c7~ .c O ,_ E (D °b 8 .~ m 0 _ ~ 5 8= ~D o _'° 0 _ o ~ O - o c~ 0 ~ :> c:) - ~ 1D O co c . c _ 2 m n _ _ ~ ~ ·C C) 2 ~ ~ 8 ~ o ~ .= c\, ,, ~ 0 8 `'c,~ O _ ~n c O E am, =°m 85 .2 ~ ~ o, 8 ' ~ a, - o 0 m ,= ~ g .= O s ° ~ - o y ~o ~ c ~ (-D O' ~ O- .c c c) ~ m O _ n G-145

G-II.4: Postural Comfon a, ·_ o _ _ ~ _ m - o CL 1 - o V, .O ._ t o m o ~n - In Ct ~n . a: ~ 8 c° > c N 2 ~ ° 8.,c,o l _ ~ , c 0 2 ~ O 8 ~ m _ c ~ - o 0 o-~ ^ O - > C1 lD O - - o o ~ 5 c) ~ o ~ w ':n c5 '= C] ~0 Q _ _ ~ C > ·C 'C ~ O 8~ ~ C O ~ ~ O S~o _ 0' ~D C~= o - ~ c~ ~ ~ m 8~ .2 a, o' =, c 0= r. -o u, ~ co c c~ c~ ~ =, O =e O _ - o c ~ 4, 0 ~ °- c~ 5 ~C ~ 2 m G-146

G-II.4: Postural Comer fort T ~ ~ T T~:TTTTTTI~ ~ ~ ~ IT tT:~TTT:T: i~] 1~: ? TO F~T To :~N Ll~1 P coo ~P :~ ~ : en I ~ ~ W: PPLLFrFLLd: m ~ i ~1 ~ 1171 ~15OZ11 f1 1; 71 I ~ ~ ~ fTr?~tT!T E l ~ ' ~ ' ,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ]ttl: ~ ~ If m Ttt: :~:L ?] my 1 T~ I T ~ l~l~;l~l~m ~ JO 1 ~ - I T TV lit 1~i~ t17~ lElIT ~ 3 ~ 1 ~ 4: 115l~liTl~l ::LLL~ |= |= |~ | X | X |~ |: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G A _ N _ _ E :~ ~ N _ _ _-_ _ _ O _ _ ~ I I I I I . G-147

G-Il.4: Postural Comfon - ._ a - m o Q 1 o a In ._ C] a m a - tn to to ,1_ O Car E ~ 8~oo _ TO a, C) 'C ~ O 8 -a, G _ ~ ~ .' o , _ 8 ' ~ .2 a, ~ E _ C:) 8= s o - o o~ ~ ~ atom o W o W W C O o- 5 ~ a, 0 ° en C] a' ~ _ _ G-148

G-II.4: Postural Comfort 2. Cumulative Body Comfort Level Change - Prototype Bus Neck after 10 lass of after 20 laps of ~ after lock-t~lock oval track driving oval track dnv~ng ~driving N 23 ~3.0 _ Average 0.0 0.1 0.0 S.D. 1.2 1.4 1 .5 Left Shoulder after 10 laps of after 20 laps of after lock-t>Iock oval track dnving oval track coving dnving N ~23 ~ ~ 23 23 Average ~ -0.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -0.1 ~-0.2 S.D. 1.5 1.8 2.0 Right Shoulder after 10 laps of after 20 laps of after lock-t~loci oval track driving oval track dnving dnving N 23 ~ 23 23 Average -0.3 -0.2 -0.3 S.D. 1 4 1.9 2.1 Condor Docomtol, G-149 Condor Discomton -2.0 -3.0 ~ 1 40 D~comtort Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Neck Comfon 2.0 1.0 - 4.0 _ - > 0 _ aRer Burlaps of E oval track dnving a 0.0, ~ aRer Uncaps of aRer lock-to-lock oval track dnving coving Test Session Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Left Shoulder 4.0 3.0 ' 2.0 1.0 0.0, ~ 1 0 _ aRer 1 Chaps of -2.0 - oval back -3.0 4.0 · - aRer Recaps of after 1~cic-to oval Sac c lock Coning driving _ I dnving Test Session 1 Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Right Shoulder 4 0 - 3.0 - 2.0 . 1.0 41, 0-0 ~ ~ 1 0 _ after 1 Saps of 2 ~ n oval track a -2.0 - -3.0 - 4.0 dnving aRer 2a.1aPs of oval tract' dnving Test Session . after lock-to locJt dnving

Left Elbow after 10 laps of oval track dnving o _ ma N 23 Average 0.0 0.2 ~ ~ S.D. ~ .5 1.8 1 .9 Right Elbow after 10 laps of after 20 laps of after lock-to-lock oval track dnving wal == ending dnving N 23 23 23 Average -0. 1 01 0.0 S.D. 1.7 1.9 1.9 Left WnsVHand after 10 laps of after 20 laps or after lock-to-lock oval track dnving oval track dnving Uniting N 23 23 23 Average O.0 0.2 0.1 S.D. 1 3 1 ~ 1.8 Comfon Comfort G-lI.~: Postural Comfort 2. Cumulative Body Comfort Level Change - Prototype Bus (Continued) Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Left Elbow 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 - ~ 0.0 · · - 1 o aRer 1 maps of after Wraps of aRer lod'-to-lock ovaltrack oval track driving -2.0 - dnving dnving -3.0 - 4.0- D~scomfon Test Session Comfort Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Right Elbow 4.0 3.0 _ ~1.0 J 2 o 2.0 - 0.0 ~ - 1 0 aRer 1Qlaps of aRer 20 laps of aRer lock-to-lock oval track driving oval track driving dnving -2.0 -3.0 - -4.0 - Discomfort Test Session Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Left WrisVHand 4 0 3.0 o' 2.0 c {~) 1.0 - > J 0 -2.0 0.0 ~ 1.0 aRer 1 Slaps of aRer 20 laps of aRer lod'-to-lock oval track driving oval track driving driving -3.0 4.0 Discomtort l Test Session G-150

Right WrisVHand after 10 lads of after 20 laps of after tOCK-to-loCk oval track anv~ng oval track dnving driving N 23 23 23 Average 0.0 0.0 0.0 S.D. 1 4 1.5 ~ 7 Upper Back after 10 lass of after 20 laps of after loCK-to-lock oval track Onving oval track driving dnving 23 23 23 Average -0. 3 -0.5 -0.4 S.D. 1.5 1.7 ~ .8 Low Back after 10 laps of after 20 laps of after lOCK-tO-IOCk oval track dnving oval track driving dnving N- 23 23 23 Average -0.7 -1.6 -1.3 S.D. 2.3 3.0 3.7 Comfott 4.0 3.0 a1 2.0 - Comton 2.0 1.0 Comhn G-II.~: Postural Comfort 2. Cumulative Body Comfort Level Change - Prototype Bus (Continued) Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Right WrisVHand 4.0 3.0 2.0 - 1.0 - 0.0 1 o aRer 1 Slaps of after Recaps of aRer lo~to-lock oval track dnving oval track driving dnving -2.0 - -3.0 - 4.0 Discomtort Test Session 1 Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Unger Back 4.0 3.0 - ~D 01 - ~ 00 J 8 -2.0 10 aRer 10 laps of aRer 291aps of after loct-to-lock oval track dnving oval track dnving dnving -3.0 4.0 Dlscomfon Test Session Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Low Back 1 to o.o 1.0 aRer recaps of oval trade dnving -2.0 -3.0 4.0 Discomtort after 20 laps of after lock-to-lock oval trap dnving dnong Test Session G-151

Left Hip/Thigh aRer 10 lass Of after 20 laps of after lOCk-tO-IOCk oval track dOving oval track. dnvint driving N 23 23 23 Average -0.7 -1 .1 -0.9 S.D. 2.2 ~2.8 3.7 Comfort Right HiplThigh after 10 laps Of oval track driving 23 -0.8 2.3 . after 20 laps of oval track driving · 23 Comfort after lock-to-lock 4.0 dnving 3.0 N Average S.D. Len Knee after 10 laps of after 20 laps of after lock-to-lock oval track Driving oval track driving Ending N 23 23 23 Average 0.0 0.1 0.0 S.D. 1 7 2.2 2.3 Comfort 4 0 3.0 G-II.4: Postural Comfort 2. Cumulative Body Comfort Level Change - Prototype Bus (Continued) Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Left Hip/Thigh 4 0 3 0 2.0 1.0 - 0.0 1 o aRer 1 Haps of aRer 20 laps of after loc3-to-lock oval track driving oval trap driving driving -2.0 - -3.0 - 4.0 Discomton Test Session Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Right Hip/Thigh 1 .o - o.o 1.0 aner 1 flaps of after 20 laps of aRer lock-to-lock oval track dnv~ng oval trap driving driving -2.0 - ~ -3.0 - ^.0 DiscomtoQ Test Session Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Left Knee 1.o o.o 1 o aRer 1 Haps of after 2~,1aps of after lock-to-lock oval Pack dnving oval track driving driving -2 0 -3.0 - 4.0 - DiscomtoQ Test Session G-152

Right Knee after 10 laps of after 20 laps of after lock-to-lock oval track driving oval track driving driving N 23 23 23 Average -0.8 -0.9 -0.9 S. D. 2.4 2.7 2.8 Left Ankle/Foot after ~ O laps of after 20 laps of after lock-to-lock _ oval track driving ovi'! tack dr v ng driving 23 2 3 23 S D 0 2 0.2 1 4 Right AnklelFoot after 10 laps of after 20 laps of after lock-to-lock oval track driving oval track doping Unv~ng Ave age 23 -0 8 22 S.D. _~ 2.4 2.4 Comton Discomfort Comfon G-II.4: Postural Con~fo~t 2. Cumulative Body Comfort Level Change - Prototype Bus (Continued) Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Right Knee 4.0 _ 3.0 _ ~ 2.0 - c (~) 1.0 > 0.0 -1 o aRer 1161aps of aRer 29~1aps of aRer loql-to-lock ° oval trade driving oval track driving doming E -2.0 - ~ _ -3.0 4.0- Discomfort Test Session Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Left Ankle/Foot 4.0 3.0 ~ 2.0 1.0 0.0 -2.0 -3.0 - 4.0 . 1.0 aRer 10 laps of after 20 laps of aRer lock-to-lock oval track diving oval track driving ding Test Session Comfon Cumulative Body Comfort Change - Right Ankle/Foot 4.0 3.0 2.0 - J -1 .0 o 1.0 0.0 -2.0 -3.0 4.0 Discomlon - - - aRer 1.1aps of after 2~1aps of aRer loc'l-to-lock oval tram ding oval track driving among Test Session G-153 -

G-II.4: Postural Condor 3. ANOVA Results on Bow Part Comfort I,eve! Changes in Prototype Workstation SourceAdjusted SS DF Adjusted MS F P a_ . Stature 39.8 219.9 9.72 0.000 Body Part 19.4 141.4 0.68 0.800 Test Session 23.2 211.6 5.67 0.004 Stature x Body Part 14.3 28 0.5 0.25 1.000 Stature x Test Session 45.3 4 11.3 5.54 0.000 Joint x Test Session 34.5 28 1.2 0.60 0.949 Stature x Body Part x Test Session 48.6 56 0.9 0.42 1.000 Error 1842.2 900 2.0 Total 2067.4 1034 G-154

G-II.~: Postural Comfort ~ jR =' 2 E e ~ ~ 0 5 E E ° O · 0 e ~o ~ ~ v ~ C ~ c5 o ~ ~ Y o V ~ , ~ ~o o ° - o . . ~ .g o ·C _ ° Yv C" ~ 5 - 'C ~ io 2 c O ~o E._ _ a, O ~n L) tn - tn ~i Q - cn CL ~0 S - J - o C~ ~i L i' , ~ C~ o aBusu ~ laAa1 yo~o ~ _ _ _ en cO In ~ 0 _ . ~n 'n ~ ~ =, r, o, 0 ~o _ 0 Z a, _ ~ E E ~ ~. - o ~ _ cn ~ , 2 E ° - ~ 4' U) ~ ~ _ !o 0 ~5 _ ~o - a~ G-l55 - l ll 96U - 3 l8Aa~ yo~o ~ ~o

G-I1.4: Postural Co~nfort ._ ._ y 1_ o o ~n Q - - o o - ._ ._ - o m Q ,0 _. cn ., ~n - o o m . _ O .= a) o L a, _ - c y c C~ Ct ~D c y _ .= CD .C~ ~ t ._ m -Y: m CL "C _ ~ ~ T. .= ~ ~ .m "C I J,u, - 3 .~) D Ct U.! D LLl a, ~ :D ._ o cn a 0 ~ J o cn U~ o _ ~ ~ o _ N _ O N . ~ O U~. ~ <D C~, _ O O _ O _ ~ _ N _ O 0 . ~) O ~ ~) _ (D O. C~. _ O O . u~ 0 a) C`) a~ ~) -.- O ~ m.' r~. . ir~ 0 a~ ~ {D . =.' O _ O (D. . ~n 0 0 ~ c~ a c~ a, _ N ~ _ O _ . ~ 0 ~ bo ~ . _ O O _ N _ ~ io bm 0- . ~ ~o -m, _ ~n 0 mm m- 0 =, _ in O _ c~ ~ a {D ~r _ _ (D _ c~ 0 0 ~ o . ~ o ! o I~ m-__ = Z =! _ _ _ _ E E E _ o _ _ . _ ~ O N _ O O ~) O _ O O _ _ _ O ~ O C _ _ _ ~ m0 C _ . _ _ _ _ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ _ O ~ in O ~ _ O ~ U, O ~ c~ =1 _ O ~ 1O N ~ _ O O ~ O U' I _ O O 1~ O ~) _ O O Ir) O O _ _ i~ O O _ . _ UD N U~ O O _ _ _ :z ~ O C~ l ~ ¢ fL rr~ t - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ~ 1 t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~I l _____~_________ _ L' ~ . It t_ , ~ , ~ ~ ~C} , ~ , 1 1 1 .0 ~ ~Y · · · ~,] . , T _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I ~1 ~ ' IJ ' ~ - - -T- ~ . .~ ~ _ OI Y ~ ~g ~ _ ~o ~ 0 ~ - ~o g _ ~' . ~. ~ . - - - - . i. - - - - - - - - - - ~ T I ~I ____ ___________ · . . , · j t _____~__________ . ~ j ~ I , , _____~__________ . I ~ j ! _ _ _ ~, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ·d I ~I E 8~D 19~1 yo~oD L) G-156 , In ~ ~ o 8 .~

II.5 Grip Force G-157

2. ANOVA Results on Grip Force Data 2.1 Analysis of Variance on Max. Grip Force Source SS DF MS F P Gender439.71 1439.71 10.24 0.006 Stature Group8.86 24.43 0.10 0.903 Transit Bus Driving Expenence97.55 248.77 1.14 0.347 Error644.16 1542.94 Total1190.28 20 2.2 Analysis of Variance on Grip Force Exerted Using RMS Data OF MS FP Gend~6.38 1 6.38 0.80 0.385 Stature Group4.86 2 2.43 0.31 0.742 Transit Bus Driving Experience4.17 2 2.09 0.26 0.773 Error119.46 1 5 7.96 Total134.87 20 2.3 Analysis of Variance on Grip Force Exerted Using "Impulse" Data SourceSS DF MS F P .. 1 12.03 4.04 0.063 Stature Group13.64 2 6.82 2.29 0.135 Transit Bus Driving Experience1.58 2 0.79 0.26 0.771 Error44.60 15 2.97 Total71.85 20 G-158

3. Correlation Analysis Results on Grip Force Data _ Grip Force Exerted Grip Force Exerted . ~Using RMS data ~Using "Impulse" Data Max. Grip Force 0.285 0.375 (p = 0.210) ~(p = 0.094) G-159

II.6 Ride Quality G-160

Il.7 Comments and Recommendations G-161

1. Test Results of Comments & Recommendations on Prototype Bus Mo: Initials | Comments and Recommendations l 1 RXE hanging pedal and small steering wheel 2 JXB 1. needs more spacing between LIP and RIP for more knee clearance; 2. Iikes small steering wheel hanging pedal and RIP layout; 3. comfortable workstation 1. needs steering hub tilt since the subject was used to flatter steering wheel angle; 2. Iikes treadle pedal better than hanging 3 PKM pedal; 3. Iikes size of steering wheel; 4. safety factor with door open control - some kid could reach and open it 4 JXO 1. Iikes RIP layout; 2. treadle pedal needs foot travels between brake and accelerator pedals instead of pivoting around right heel; 3. Iikes size and padding of steering wheel; 4. no stretch in the workstation _ 1. Iikes RIP layout (hazard and door control locations) - fast and easy control; 2. the subject would like a 'cushioned' seat with 5 ~XB all air out in a lowest position; 3. rel 6 PEC problem for downward view 7 controls; 3. Iikes the stop announcement of the talking bus 8 JTB 1. beautiful workstation _ 9 BEM 1. farebox height and/or location obstructs too much. it needs to move farebox toward the driver so it doesn't block the filed of vision; 2. Iikes adjustability of the workstation; 3. Iikes the steering wheel; 4. the hanging pedal angle is a lot better than that of conventional bus 10 KJM 11 RAS = = the steering wheel; 3. the farebox creates a blind spot 12 SCR way. we have to push them with a whole leg 1. the plate area of accelerator pedal is too small; 2. needs too much force to press the pedals; 3. pedal separation is too 13 DC8 close together; 4. Iikes a bigger steering wheel; S. Iikes the seat; 6. the angle of steering column obstructs visibility of PIP at certain angles; 7. the subject would rather make an announcement by himself than using the play message of the talking bus 14 ALD 1. the operation of the play message button of talking bus requires taking eyes off from road. it could be moved closer in. RLH 1. high force is required on accelerator and brake pedals; 2. the subject didn't like the angle of the pedals because of high 15 sitting position. his posture is more suited to flatter pedals; 3. Iikes four-way flasher on LIP but locating it on RIP was not a bad idea; 4. the subject didn't like air seat unless it is stiff- didn't like bouncing of seat; 5. a bigger steering wheel might be better- 20 inch maybe 16 WAM likes having J-handle type of control for doors like the old way; 3. the subject didn't like separate switches for the two doors; 4. Iikes the seat 17 PEW 1. Iikes turn signals on floor; 2. the accelerator pedal was a little hard to press; 3. Iikes hanging brake pedal since he can get more foot pressure 18 MOW 1. pedal size is not big enough to find easily; 2. accelerator pedal requires too much force; 3. LIP is too close - make it thinne and longer to allow more clearance; 4. RIP is too close in towards the driver laterally; S. Iikes the seat; 6. Iikes the steering wheel tilt; 7. put the door open switch next to four way flasher; 8. Iikes two-piece mirror with a convex mirror below flat mirror 19 MAC 1. the brake pedal needs to move away from the steering wheel column; 2. prefers ODA controls to farebox controls _ 20 KAK 1. farebox obstructs visibility - moves it back towards rear of bus; 2. Iikes RIP layout; 3. Iikes steering wheel; 4. suggested convex mirrors under plane mirrors l | RA |1. LIP needs o move away laterally for more clearance of leR leg; 2. Iikes RIP layout with frequently user] controls together 22 CAM 1. accelerator pedal is difficult to press - high force requirement 1. instrument layout is excellent - made it easier to concentrate on the job; 2. Iikes hanging pedals - places more strain on hip 23 NRK instead of ankles and more strength capability of hip I A; ~ |1. the spoke. If the steering wheel were obstructing the gauges; 2. Iikes the no-bounce (stability) of seat; 3. Iikes the steering wheel adjustment: 4. more leg clearance is needed to LIP G-162

Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines: Final Report Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!