 |
Questions? Call 888-624-8373 |
|
|
|
|
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 25
CHAPTER 3
STUDY IMPLICATIONS
3.! Comparative United Kingdom/United States Experience
The study has indicated that the experience with precast segmental construction has been
significantly different between the U.K. and the U.S. The U.K. has experienced two corrosion-induced
failures of precast segmental bridges to date. In addition, there have been a number of durability
problems with bonded post-tensioned structures.
The problems with segmental bridges in the U.K. have been specifically with thin mortar joints
and poor design and construction practices. The problems with bonded post-tensioned structures have
also been related to mistakes made during the design and/or construction of the bridge. Therefore,
the U.K. experience with problems with bonded post-tensioned structures and specifically with precast
segmental bridges has been related to poor design and/or construction practices and not due to
significant intrinsic durability problems with precast segmental construction utilizing bonded post-
tensioning. Thus, the moratorium currently in effect in the U.K. on precast segmental construction
could be categorized as a very conservative response to past design and construction errors.
In contrast to the U.K. experience, there have been no known durability problems with precast
segmental bridges, related to the post-tensioning, in the U. S. to date. Although there have been some
problems with grouting in the U.S., there has been very little reported corrosion-induced damage to
bonded post-tensioning. It is important, though, to keep in perspective that there has not been
exhaustive field investigation of the corrosion performance of precast segmental bridges with internal
tendons. Most of the reported information is based on simple visual inspection.
Although the U.S. experience with durability of precast segmental construction has been much
better than in the U.K.: lessons can be learned from the U.K. experience. Certainly high quality design
details and proper construction practices must be continued, especially when using internal tendons.
It is important to adopt more stringent grouting requirements and inspection procedures, similar to
what has been done in the U.K., to insure that the tendons are completely encapsulated in a high
quality grout.
25
OCR for page 26
While lessons can, and should, be learned from the problems in the U.K. with precast
segmental construction, the current U.S. experience and laboratory research indicates that precast
segmental bridges, when properly designed and constructed, have good long-term durability.
3.2 Design and Construction Practice
The results of this study provided valuable information about the state of design and
construction practice in the U.S. Overall, durability design and construction has been good for precast
segmental bridges. However, some things can be done to improve the durability design and
construction and ensure good fixture perfo~ance.
Although the study survey indicated that designers are using, and owners are adopting, the
AASHTO Segmental Guide Specifications, AASHTO should formally adopt the guide specifications
as part of the Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges to insure that durable segmental design and
construction practices continue to be implemented. In addition, the AASHTO Specification should
specifically preclude the use ofthin mortar segment joints. Moreover, epoxy joints should be specified
for all corrosive environments, not just where de-icing salts are used.
Grouting provides the main line of defense against corrosion. Thus, proper grouting is
essential. Currently, there is a need for more comprehensive grouting guidance than what is provided
by AASHTO and PTI. The review of the current draft of the new PTI Specifications on grouting
indicates that it will provide more comprehensive guidance and should be used by designers and
contractors upon its publication. In the interim, the recent references (18-27) on grouts should be
reviewed for guidance.
Although current research indicates that even dry segment joints may provide adequate
corrosion protection when the tendon is well-grouted, epoxy joints performed significantly better; thus,
match-cast epoxy joints or cast-in-place concrete joints should be used exclusively with internal
tendons. Additionally, adequate end cover for the mild reinforcement at the segment joints should be
maintained. It is recommended that the amount of end cover be consistent with the clear cover
specified by AASHTO for the top deck slab.
Metal tendon ducts seem to be performing well, but they are susceptible to corrosion and will
most likely not provide a long-term barrier to the ingress of chlorides to the grouted tendons.
26
OCR for page 27
Corrosion resistant materials, such as polyethylene or polypropylene, should be used if a more
corrosion resistant detail is required. A continuous duct across segment joints is probably not needed
if proper construction and design procedures are followed. These include proper epoxying of the
segments, adequate Recompression across the joints' complete grouting with a high quality grout' and
high quality concrete in the precast segments.
3.3 Inspection and Evaluation Techniques
Currently, there is a need for better non-destructive evaluation and inspection techniques for
the condition of post-tensioning tendons insitu. At this time, some design or construction choices will
limit the available inspection options; thus, future inspection and maintenance should be considered
during the design of precast segmental bridges.
The use of plastic ducts, while affording better corrosion protection, will limit the non-
destructive testing ART) options for in-service inspection. Namely, traditional corrosion evaluation
electrical techniques, such as half-cell corrosion potentials and linear polarization corrosion rate
measurements (3LP), will be precluded. A1SO7 impact-echo testing will not be able to detect voids in
the grout nor will impulse radar be able to be used to locate the duct (although it may be able to locate
the tendon).
Utilizing metal ducts, while not an effective long-term corrosion barrier, will allow the use of
half-cell corrosion potentials and 3LP measurements to detect corrosion although the tests will likely
detect both duct and prestressing steel corrosion. Additionally, impulse radar will be able to locate
the duct for invasive probing; and impact-echo can be used to locate grouting voids.
The use of radiography, while the only technique that has been successful in evaluating the
condition of the prestressing steel, is limited by its high cost, safety issues, and the limited access to
the tendons in many structures.
3.4 Repair
Although the number of repairs related to durability of precast segmental bridges has been few
to date, those repairs that have been done have been highly successful.
27
OCR for page 28
The reinfection of cementitious grout where voids in the grouted tendons were discovered has
worked very well. Additionally, the installation of additional post-tensioning has been successful in
strengthening precast segmental bridges when required. Thus, designers should be encouraged to
provide additional ducts and good access to their structures so as to allow the installation of future
additional post-tensioning, if required.
28
Representative terms from entire chapter:
segmental bridges
Items in cart [0]
