Items in cart [0] Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK list:$23.00 Web:$20.70 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free Resources Display this book on your site! Related Titles Gulf War and Health: Volume 5. Infectious Diseases Nutrition Standards for Foods in Schools: Leading the Way Toward Healthier Youth Other Related Titles NCHRP Web Doc 15 Durability of Precast Segmental Bridges: Final Report (1998) Transportation Research Board (TRB) Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Page 37   E-mail  Facebook  Digg  Stumble  Twitter More Page 37 Front Matter (R1-R2) Table of Contents (R3-R6) Acknowledgments (R7-R7) Abstract (R8-R8) Summary (1-2) Chapter 1 Introduction and Research Approach (3-5) Chapter 2 Findings (6-24) Chapter 3 Study Implications (25-28) Chapter 4 Conclusions and Suggested Research (29-30) References (31-36) Appendix (37-43)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 37
APPENDS Sample Questionnaire NIP Project 20-7, Task 92, FY '98 Durability of Precast Segmental Briciges Questionnaire Respondent's Name: Title: Affiliation: Mailing Address: Telephone: Facsimile: E-mai! Address: 1. Are there any precast segmental bridges in your inventory, or that you have been involved with professionally? If the answer is yes, please continue with the rest of the questionnaire, otherwise thank you for responding and return in the self-addressed stamped envelope. Please fill out the table of the following pagers) for each bridge in your inventory, or that you have been involved with professionally. Al

OCR for page 38
NCHRP Project 20-7, Task 92, FY'98 Durability of Precast Segmental Bridges Iu, cat .= em ~ em . . ~ . D A Ct ~ 3 ,, X ~ en O ce ~ C ~ ·o- LO C ~ O ·~ · _ Cal ~ .= A; _ - ' ~ O lo: ~ . _ ~ . BIG . _ A2

OCR for page 39
3. Please elaborate on the nature and severity of any durability problems and on any repairs made from the previous sheeters). We are especially interested in any known or suspected problems with corrosion of the internal tendons. What, to your knowledge, is the current state of design practice with precast segmental bridges in terms of internal tendons and segment joints? We are specifically interested in the frequency of use of match casting, and segment joint preparation (dry, epoxied, or mortared), amount of nominal pre-compression across segment joints, tendon grout charactenstics, or other procedures. 5. To your knowledge, have dry segment joints ever been used with internal tendons in the United States? Elsewhere? If so, please cite bridge name and location. . Thank you for your time. Please return in the self-addressed stamped envelope. AS

OCR for page 40
Summary of Survey Data on Precast Segmental Bridges Bridge Name and Location Internal Tendons? 1. Long Key Bndge, Florida Keys, FL No Match Casting Utilized? Yes Joints Dry, Epoxied, or Mortar? DO 2. Channel No. 5, Florida Keys, FL 3. Niles Channel, Flonda Keys, FL 4. Seven Mile Bndge, Florida Keys, FL 5. Ramp "I" over I-75, Dade Co., FL 6. Ramps/I-75 ~ SR826, Dade Co., FL (5 bndges) 7. Sunshine Skyway, Tampa, Fl 8. Airport over US-1, Ft. Lauderdale, FL (4 bndges) 9. I-75 Bridges C, D, E, H; Ft. Lauderdale, FL (4 bridges) 10. SW 14 St./SR 93, Br. N. Ft. Lauderdale, FL I-75/I-595 Bridges, Ft. Lauderdale, FL (9 bridges) 12. Ramps over I-595, Broward Co., FL (2 bridges) 13 . Port of Mimi Bndge, Dade Co., FL 14. Natchez Trace, Nashville, TN 15. Penn State Test Track, PA . 16. Pedestrian Bridge, PA 17. Winward Viaduct, 18. Kaneohe Viaduct, HI 19. Route 295 over James River, Richmond, VA Durability Problems? Nonei No Yes Dry None 1 1 1 1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No A4 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Dry Dry Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Epoch Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Epoch Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Epoch None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None yes2

OCR for page 41
Bridge Name and Location | Internal | Match | Joints ~ Durability Tendons? Casting Dry, Epoxied, Problems? ; ! ! Utilized? ! or Mortz r? ~ O. SR613 Across Escatawpa River, | Yes | Yes | Epoxy I None Jackson Co., MS 1. I-llO Causeway, Kilo= ~| None 2. Baldwin Bridge, Old Lyme, CT l Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None 23. ZilwaukeeBridge,MI l Yes | Yes | Epoxy | Yes3 4. KY 670 over Kentucky River, | Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None Franklin Co., KY l l l l | 5. Ramp B. Piked L ~| None 6. US 23 over Shelby Creek, Pike Co., | Yes | No | CIP | None l KY l l l l 7. I-88 over Grand St. Arterial, l Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None Oneonta, NY , ~Yes ~Epoxy ~None Greenwich, NY 9. Route 203 over Kinderhook Creek, | Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None4 Valatie7 NY O. Pedestrian bridge, Yonkers, NY l Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None | ~ ~ _ ~_ | None 2. Mexico Gravel Road Underpass, | Yes | No | CIP I None Em_ 33. Route D over Route50,Cole Co., | Yes | No | CIP | None MO R_~=~_~_~' t ~ ~| CIP | None ~ 35. Fremont Avenue Underpass, | Yes | No | CIP | None :_ ~ 36. Missouri River Bridge, Jefferson l Yes | Yes | Epoch | None CiW, MO 37. Wiscasset - Edgecomb, ME | No | Yes | Epoxy | None AS

OCR for page 42
1 Bridge Name and Location | Internal | Match | Joints | Durability Tendons? Casting Dry-, Epoxied, Problems? Utilized? or Mortar? l 8. San Antonio"Y"Bridges, San | Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None l Antonio, TX (3 projects) 39. Surtside Bridge, Freeport, TX | Yes | Yes | CIP I None l l O. French Creek Viaduct, Glen vood | Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None l l Canyon, CO l l l l l | 41. Islington Avenue Ext., Ontario, l Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None l I Canada l l l l l 42. Credit River Bridge, Ontario, | Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None l I Canada l l l l l 43. Mullet Creek Bridge, Ontario, l Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None l Canada l l l l l 44. EloraGorgeBridge, Ontario, l Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None l Canada l l l l l 45. Twelve Mile Bridge, Ontario, l Yes | Yes | Epoch | None l Canada 46. Vail Pass Bridges, Colorado l Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None l (4 bridges) l l l l l 47. Northumberland Strait Crossing, l Yes | Yes | Epoch | None l Canada l l l l l 48. I-70 Bridges, Colorado | Yes | Yes | Epox) | Nones l (5 bridges) l l l l l 49. I-70 Bridges, Colorado | No | Yes | Epoch | Nones | (5 bridges) l l l l l 0. I-70 bridges, Colorado | Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None6 | (5 bridges) l l l l l 51. Choctawhatchee Mid-Bay | Yes | Yes | Epo jr | None l Bridge, Destin, FL l l l l l 52. Roosevelt Bridge, Stuart, FL | Yes | Yes | Epoxy | None l 53. Delaware Canal Bridge, New Castle l Yes | Yes | Epo y | None l Co.,DE l l l l l A6

OCR for page 43
Notes on Questionnaire Data Durability problems with reinforced concrete substructure but not segmental superstructure. it. it. it. Problems with overlay wearing surface. Delaminations, cracks, etc. are patched as they appear. Minor cracking. Epoxy injection of cracks in pier struts. Some deck cracking reported. Some cracking reported. Additional post-tensioning required after 12 years of service, inadequate post-tensioning discovered. . A7

Representative terms from entire chapter:

none none none