National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$39.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Technology Commercialization: Russian Challenges, American Lessons (1998)
Office of International Affairs (OIA)

Citation Manager

. "View from a National Laboratory." Technology Commercialization: Russian Challenges, American Lessons. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1998.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
43
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


As Russia sorts through its near-term problems of the economy and overcapacity of manufacturing, it should also devote attention to the establishment of a system that rewards invention and the development of intellectual property. Such a system should be tailored to meet the requirements of the Russian social and economic structure. In the United States, the laws pertaining to intellectual property rights and inventions are intended to maximize "fairness of opportunity" and minimize "conflict of interest." Therefore, for example, a director of a laboratory cannot approve a CRADA for a company of which he or she is part owner. It is not possible to anticipate all the circumstances that might lead to such problems in the United States or in Russia; however, it is important to develop a Russian system that Russians trust. Failure to do so would lead to a very weak system.

Another key to the stimulation of technology transfer activities at DOE national laboratories has been increasing the number of contacts between scientists and engineers at the laboratories and their counterparts at industrial sites. One way such contacts have been increased is through the "User Facilities" operated at ONRL and other DOE national laboratories. These facilities were created for various purposes. For example, the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) was intended to produce various isotopes when it was built in 1966. It also was designed to permit experiments on neutron scattering and diffraction. Today, scientists and engineers from around the world use HFIR for neutron scattering experiments to study the structure of materials and the stresses in materials caused by welding or other processing methods. There is a two-year backlog of experiments that various academic and industrial organizations want to perform at DOE user facilities. To handle some of these experiments, a $1.3 billion Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) is planned at ORNL. The SNS accommodate more than 1000 users per year, and it will be operational in 2005.

DOE user facilities generally are made available to scientists and engineers without charge, unless the user wants to have proprietary rights to the data they produce at the facility. In these cases, the cost of using the facility is charged to the user. These user facilities bring many visitors into the laboratories, and as a result, new ideas are generated that may lead to inventions. Perhaps the most important benefit comes from the contacts that take place between visiting scientists and engineers and the host laboratory staff.

The structure and function of the system of laboratories in Russia are quite different from that in the United States. Even so, Russian laboratories might find ways in which facilities such as accelerators, reactors, and computers can be used by scientists and engineers from outside the host institution to develop new products or services.

Page
43
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Perspective From a University with an Industry-Funded Research Program (1-7)
Commercializing University Technology (8-15)
Legal Issues of Special Concern to Technology Commercialization (16-23)
An Industrial Perspective on Technology Commercialization in the 1990s and Beyond (24-32)
Research, Technology Development, and Commercialization (33-40)
View from a National Laboratory (41-43)
The Role of Industrial Institutes in Creating and Maintaining Russia's Industrial Potential (44-49)
Problems of Taxation and Technology Commercialization in Russia (50-54)
Commercialization of Scientific and Technical Developments at Higher Education Institutes (55-59)
Development of Legal Regulations for Technology Commercialization in Russia (60-66)
Commercializing for the Polymer Industry: The Experience of an Academy Institute (67-74)
The Main Problem in Commercialization of Scientific Research Results (75-84)
Areas of Further Consideration (85-88)
Appendix A: Workshop on Technology Commercialization Agenda (89-90)
Appendix B: Excerpts from the Bayh-Dole Act (91-98)
Appendix C: Excerpts from the National Competitiveness Technology Transfer Act of 1989 (99-104)
Appendix D: Commercializing Technology (105-106)
Appendix E: U.S. Patent Law Provisions that Promote University-Based Patenting and Technology Transfer (107-111)
Appendix F: Description of the Centennial Campus (112-113)
Appendix G: Innovation Research Fund (114-115)
Appendix H: First Flight Venture Center (116-116)
Appendix I: NIST Advanced Technology Program (117-119)
Appendix J: The Industrial Research Institute, Inc. (120-121)
Appendix K: NSF Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers Program (122-128)
Appendix L: U.S. Tax Policy Issues (129-132)
Appendix M: University Unrelated Business Income Policy (133-134)
Appendix N: Visits in Russia and the United States (135-138)